Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Roads Post Peak

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: I just had the hope knocked out of me

Unread postby Lore » Thu 15 Dec 2011, 11:59:33

dorlomin wrote:Smooth roads are easy to maintain when there is little heavy goods traffic. Tar is cheap.


I'm sure dorlomin is just joking.

Tight times put gravel on the road

Gravel roads, once a symbol of quaint times, are emerging as a sign of financial struggle in a growing number of rural towns.

High costs and tight budgets have prompted communities in Maine, Michigan, Indiana, Pennsylvania and Vermont to convert or consider converting their cracked asphalt roads back to gravel to cut maintenance costs, officials in those states say

In Montcalm County, Mich., 10 miles were converted to cut patching costs in 2009, said Randy Stearns, managing director of the county's road commission. He cited one road that cost a combined $39,244 in 2008 and early 2009 for patching, but only $7,300 to crush into gravel. More roads may be converted this summer, he said

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/201 ... oads_N.htm


I would venture to say, here in the North, it would be a decade or less without maintenance before paved roads would deteriorate to the point of being impassable, even without traffic. Figure not much longer beyond that for gravel roads to disappear into a cow paths.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Roads Post Peak

Unread postby dorlomin » Thu 15 Dec 2011, 15:02:11

Lore wrote:
dorlomin wrote:Smooth roads are easy to maintain when there is little heavy goods traffic. Tar is cheap.


I'm sure dorlomin is just joking.

Tight times put gravel on the road s.
Why? Even gravel roads can be cycled with 700*23 tyres. Some roads be need to be changed but while dropping road surfacing may be a short term expediant, as things become more permenant road surfacing is likely to return to prominance.

Without the heavy pounding of constant heavy good vehicles there will be less need for maintainance and as I said, asphalt is cheap, labour will be cheaper.

If Zimbabwe can have a usable road system why not a post peak America?

And that said a good broad tyre and you can go places that are inaccessible by most motor vehicles.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: I just had the hope knocked out of me

Unread postby anador » Thu 15 Dec 2011, 15:11:39

The ironic thing about this is that roads are both worn out and maintained by traffic.

Just look at any road which has had no traffic for a couple years. The asphalt cracks, crumbles, and eventually plants take root.
Asphalt remains somewhat pliable which is why it can be melted and re-used.

The constant pressure of traffic helps to mold asphalt down and keep it from buckling, especially where there is a freeze thaw cycle.

Roads that havent been re-surfaced in awhile also start to take on a distinctive wavy profile, with troughs where the tire ruts press and a raised crest where the chassis doesnt touch the pavement.

When shit falls apart, dont expect roads to last just because theres no cars on them. (though concrete highways dont behave like this and will last a great deal longer than asphalt)
@#$% highways
User avatar
anador
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Thu 26 Feb 2009, 17:31:18

Re: I just had the hope knocked out of me

Unread postby Lore » Thu 15 Dec 2011, 15:30:58

dorlomin wrote:
If Zimbabwe can have a usable road system why not a post peak America?

And that said a good broad tyre and you can go places that are inaccessible by most motor vehicles.



The public road network in Zimbabwe comprises about 88,300 kilometers.  Of this about 15,000km is paved. Only 24 percent of the network is currently estimated to be in “good” condition, 40% is estimated to be in “poor” condition and the remaining 36% in fair condition. The condition of the network has deteriorated significantly since 1995. Most of this deterioration has occurred on urban roads, and on the unpaved rural road network.
http://www.ifrtd.org/en/regions/country ... mbabwe.php


Here in the US we have over 4 million miles of public roads. It only takes a few years of hot weather, freeze thaw cycle, no patching, resurfacing, or grading to allow vegitation to take hold. You can grow a substantial tree in 10 years in the middle of the highway.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: I just had the hope knocked out of me

Unread postby The Practician » Thu 15 Dec 2011, 15:38:47

What about when shit doesn't fall apart to the point that some sort of workable road infrastructure, maintained to a level adequate for bicycles and heavily reduced motor vehicle traffic, is an impossiblity? I don't totally discount the possibility of an armageddon scenario in my lifetime, as the the fact of nuclear weapons in the hands of desperate and resource hungry societies is not something any sane person can just shrug off. However, that's not exactly the future I'm pushing for. If energy waste can be given up with a semblance of decorum we can probably still have roads of sorts for quite some time, even if it's not 4 million miles worth.
The Practician
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2011, 22:08:02

Re: I just had the hope knocked out of me

Unread postby Pops » Thu 15 Dec 2011, 15:55:55

The pothole singularity is coming! :lol:

The potholes will join together to become one and it will happen way before ICE vehicles are abandoned.

Infrastructure is crumbling as we speak and we've still not reached the absolute liquid fuels peak, why would roads improve after they begin to decline?

Sorry, we're way off topic.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: I just had the hope knocked out of me

Unread postby anador » Thu 15 Dec 2011, 15:58:33

If people can make fire and organize themselves its not impossible to break up the road-surface, re melt it and re-apply it.

It is ALOT of work and will probably be seen as a luxury when there are no huge machines to do it.

But, brick streets, concrete streets, and smoothed cobblestone or paver streets do not have the problems of asphalt and can be maintained easily by human hands.

Bricks are easy to produce locally almost everywhere and provide a very smooth surface for bikes and cars.

Commonly bricks and other pavers can be repaired and replaced in small sections, as opposed to asphalt or concrete which suffer from terrible surface inconsistency unless long sections are re-done all at once.
@#$% highways
User avatar
anador
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Thu 26 Feb 2009, 17:31:18

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby Lore » Thu 15 Dec 2011, 16:33:03

It really all depends on your view of whether we will have a hard or a soft landing. In a tribal future world, one group may not want to pave its way to another and have them enjoy the sweat of their brow, or create a breech in security. Barter Town's streets may ultimately look like those of the old West cow towns.

Just something to chaw on.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby anador » Thu 15 Dec 2011, 16:43:53

Way back when the towns would be paved, but the roads in the country were dirt paths. Even in the United States until the 1920s inter-city roads were basically unpaved paths.

The romans were the one ancient society that actually exerted themselves to create inter city roads, for reasons of their own military survival. (okay incas and a couple others, but it is a rarity)

More than likely we will return to such a state, where the town maintains the roads within the town and maybe a couple bridges outside, but beyond that, infrastructure is just too costly to maintain without slaves and an imperial government.
@#$% highways
User avatar
anador
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Thu 26 Feb 2009, 17:31:18

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby Beery » Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:28:30

Lore wrote:Bicycles in a post apocalyptic world are highly impractical for any distances. They require flat, smooth and well maintained surfaces on which to operate efficiently. Expect high maintenance in trying to cut paths through ruff terrain.


Flat, smooth roads are optimal for bicycle transport, but they are by no means essential. Bicycles were used in the 1890s on the same dirt roads that horses used. Modern mountain bikes are built specifically for off-road use. The idea that bikes require tarmac or concrete is nonsense. If I can ride 60 miles on the C&O Canal Trail, which (because of constant flooding) is worse than an unmaintained dirt trail (and I have done so carrying 40lbs of gear and towing a trailer with my daughter in it), I can ride a bike perfectly well in a post-apocalyptic wasteland. Not that I think for a moment that our future is that bleak.

The bicycle became popular in the 1890s specifically because it could equal or outperform a horse over ANY ground and needed much less feeding and maintenance. In WW1, scouting horses were superceded by bicycles by 1918 because bicycles travel as quickly as horses, but they can move silently and can easily be hidden from sight - and they don't succumb to bullets as easily. What horse can carry 600lbs of equipment up mountains like bicycles did in the Vietnam war? Horses can, at most, carry half of that weight.

On June 14, 1897 20 men of the bicycle corps left Fort Missoula in Montana. Their goal was to ride to St. Louis some 1,900 miles away. The trip took 40 days in all and the group averaged 50 miles a day. They rode into Northern Montana on muddy trails and toured Yellowstone on their 60-pound iron bicycles. If they could do that on bikes that weighed 60lbs, I know it's possible on a modern bike weighing 30lbs.
Beery
 

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby Lore » Thu 15 Dec 2011, 19:36:24

Beery wrote:
Lore wrote:Bicycles in a post apocalyptic world are highly impractical for any distances. They require flat, smooth and well maintained surfaces on which to operate efficiently. Expect high maintenance in trying to cut paths through ruff terrain.


Flat, smooth roads are optimal for bicycle transport, but they are by no means essential. Bicycles were used in the 1890s on the same dirt roads that horses used. Modern mountain bikes are built specifically for off-road use. The idea that bikes require tarmac or concrete is nonsense. If I can ride 60 miles on the C&O Canal Trail, which (because of constant flooding) is worse than an unmaintained dirt trail (and I have done so carrying 40lbs of gear and towing a trailer with my daughter in it), I can ride a bike perfectly well in a post-apocalyptic wasteland. Not that I think for a moment that our future is that bleak.

The bicycle became popular in the 1890s specifically because it could equal or outperform a horse over ANY ground and needed much less feeding and maintenance. In WW1, scouting horses were superceded by bicycles by 1918 because bicycles travel as quickly as horses, but they can move silently and can easily be hidden from sight - and they don't succumb to bullets as easily. What horse can carry 600lbs of equipment up mountains like bicycles did in the Vietnam war? Horses can, at most, carry half of that weight.

On June 14, 1897 20 men of the bicycle corps left Fort Missoula in Montana. Their goal was to ride to St. Louis some 1,900 miles away. The trip took 40 days in all and the group averaged 50 miles a day. They rode into Northern Montana on muddy trails and toured Yellowstone on their 60-pound iron bicycles. If they could do that on bikes that weighed 60lbs, I know it's possible on a modern bike weighing 30lbs.


I'm not saying bicycles in a post dematerialized world will not have a place, at least for the short term in more urban areas. However, for the majority of people, especially the very young, the old and infirmed making long trips cross country of a few dozen miles or more on unimproved surfaces would be a challenge if not impossible. Remember too that in the future being 50 will be the new 80.

A horse on the other hand can double the 1897 bicycle corps average miles a day and carry more or pull many times more in a team. They can take on those physically unable to traverse such a trip under their own power without handicapping those more able. On top of that, you can hook em up to plow once you get to your destination and plant your crops. Digging around for parts to replace those broken on your Trek won't be an issue either.

While ducking bullets may be in your future, for the most part, life will exist only to those that have the versatility and ability to conduct the most mundane and laborious necessities of living.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby PhebaAndThePilgrim » Fri 16 Dec 2011, 11:07:24

Good day all:
Gravel roads are expensive to maintain. Gravel roads need almost constant grading. The gravel is constantly being displaced and worn down.
The pilgrim and I noticed in 2008 that the county road department was using a cheaper grade of rock. Cheaper rock grinds down faster. Faster grinding down means more dust.
We used to pay for dust maintenance. We no longer have the money to waste on such luxury.
My husband and father-in-law actually take their tractors and grade the road themselves, especially in the winter. My husband also helps to clear the road of snow, and clears neighbors driveways. The road must be maintained to move rain from the center of the road. Water can not stand on a gravel road. It should flow off the sides, ditto for blacktop.
Our state road department recently closed down several maintenance stations because of lack of funds.
One of our neighbors was a real nutball. He was in his mid 30s, yet spent most of his time doing goofy stunts on a four wheeler, and on motorcycles.
He would spin wheelies on the gravel road in front of his house. He did this all of the time, even late at night. As I said, he was a nutball.
He always had potholes in the gravel road in front of his house. He moved away a few years ago, and no matter how many times new gravel is laid, there are still potholes in front of his house. Gravel is hard to maintain properly, and does not handle abuse.
Also, as more people move from the city to the country, the gravel road has more use. The city people drive very fast on the gravel roads. Seems they are always in a hurry, and since they have not had experience on gravel roads, they do not understand the damage they are doing by driving fast, or they just don't care. Gravel roads are not built to withstand high speed traffic. The momentum of a car going at a high rate of speed on gravel spews the rock off the road, especially on curves. Cars going at a high rate of speed on gravel roads also creates a washboard effect, and causes potholes. I do not know why this happens, but it does.
From what I have witnessed I do not think gravel roads are the answer. They are very high maintenance, and take a lot of petroleum to maintain.
Pheba.
PhebaAndThePilgrim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Show-Me State

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby anador » Fri 16 Dec 2011, 12:15:48

Okay, I live on a gravel road.

The problem you are describing Phebas, happens when you have loose gravel on a road.

there is no prepared roadbed, no binding or containment... and yeah the shit falls apart.

In the 1820s a scotsman named MacAdam developed a new way to create inexpensive gravel roads that did not have these problems..... the Macadam process or simply macadam.

The process relied on setting gravel of uniform size into a prepared coped roadbed, and dusting the top with stone dust mixed with water as a cementing binder to fill the gaps.

The road relys on traffic weight for compaction and formed a hard, mud free and longlasting barrier.

The macadam technique was used in the country, but fell out of favor with the introduction of asphalt.

Gravel roads we have now are just plain sh**ty in comparison. They shed water to the sides, freeze totally solid in winter, so plows dont damage them, and are easy to maintain.

All gravel roads are not created equal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macadam
@#$% highways
User avatar
anador
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Thu 26 Feb 2009, 17:31:18

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby Hoops_Mckann » Sat 17 Dec 2011, 16:53:06

Not sure how much worse the roads here in Kansas City could get. I have incurred over $400 in allignments and new tires (damaged by potholes, deteriorated roads) as my job involves exntensive driving (claims adjuster). The cars of the future will need thicker sidewalls and more forgiving suspension to negotiate the ever increasing rough roads. Since the 80s more and more cars are being equiped with low profile tires, that will likely phase out as the roads detriorate over time.

One thing I have noticed is a correlation of lack of semi traffic and better road conditions (on the highways).
User avatar
Hoops_Mckann
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Great Plains

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby smiley » Sun 18 Dec 2011, 12:20:01

I think potholes are the least of your worries. What about the bridges.

Usually built to last 50 years, the average bridge in this country today is 43 years old. While safe to travel, almost one in four bridges is either structurally deficient and in need of repair, or functionally obsolete and too narrow for today’s traffic volumes

http://www.transportation1.org/bridgere ... theGap.pdf

While traffic volume might become irrelevant in the face of declining traffic, the age of bridges and reduced funding for maintencance and repairs is concerning (unless you're driving a Duck :) ).
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby sparky » Sun 18 Dec 2011, 20:27:06

.
A side to the discution not covered yet
before roads were bad and ill maintained because the heavy traffic used iron bound wheels
those cart carried a couple of tons on a very small contact area ,
the static pressure was huge
it would destroy any surface quickly , good road became possible when people switched to inflatable tyres ,the ground pressure is much lower ,
it made maintaining the roads a financially viable proposition ,
before , they would become a sea of mud in the wet

pneumatic tyres and low friction ball bearings are used in every poor country
usually it's an old car axle with the cart mounted on top ,
the whole thing pulled by some animal
it is very efficient and long lasting
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby PhebaAndThePilgrim » Wed 21 Dec 2011, 21:00:50

Good evening: We are in mid-Missouri. We are north of the Ozarks, some of the oldest hills on the North American continent. We took a drive down to the Ozarks today to buy some summer sausage at a great processing place. The gravel road we went down was in great condition compared to our road. And, our road uses a higher grade of gravel.
The pilgrim said that was because the Ozarks are basically rock with a minimum of topsoil. Water runs off quickly, and the gravel road was basically sitting on rock.
Our soil base is clay, hard-pan clay. The water has nowhere to go on the gravel road so either sits on it, or must have a place to run off.
The pilgrim said as far as maintenance of gravel roads is concerned: "It all depends".
I have learned over the years that "it all depends" is a farmer's answer. There are many variables, soil, weather, etc. I should have known.
Pheba.
PhebaAndThePilgrim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Show-Me State

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby Beery » Thu 22 Dec 2011, 17:03:46

Lore wrote:A horse on the other hand can double the 1897 bicycle corps average miles a day and carry more or pull many times more in a team.


I can double the 1897 Bicycle Corps average miles per day on my mountain bike. Horses are fine for some jobs, and while they can pull more weight over a short distance, they can't carry the weight that a bicycle can carry over the distance that a bicycle can carry it, nor can they negotiate the same terrain that a bicycle can manage. They need constant feeding, they need shelter in cold weather, they get sick and die - things that don't happen to a bicycle.
Beery
 

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby Lore » Thu 22 Dec 2011, 17:29:28

I'll bet on the horse everytime over a trail covered in two feet in snow.

Ask the Park Rangers if you can take your montain bike on the mule trail down to the bottom of the Grand Canyon.

True, horses need feed and get old, sick and die, but guess what? So do you! Grandma and grandpa are going to have to conserve their limited calories without breaking their legs or kneck.

In an imaginary post apocalyptic world bicycles will have a place, but I doubt very much if you're going to be able to find parts to fix a Shimano derailleur. On the other hand, find two horses of the opposite sex of breeding age and you can always make another.

In such a fantasy world it's back to the basics.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Roads Post Peak

Unread postby MD » Thu 22 Dec 2011, 17:33:51

PhebaAndThePilgrim wrote:..."It all depends".


yup.

It's too bad too many of us are dependent. We need more independent problem solvers. More farmers. Where did they all go?
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests