
KingM wrote:You see this sort of thing all the time. Not saying that it won't work, but most alternatives never amount to anything. Once again, I'll believe it when they start selling this thing in large quantities. Until then, it's a scientific curiosity.


HydroLuver wrote:I am sure some clever engineer can design it to swivel to catch the most wind possible based on direction of the wind.gnm wrote:I think the orientation of the band might be a real problem. Getting the flow to hit it correctly that is. Could be useful along roof peaks and such where large mechanical interference already orients the flow however.



mos6507 wrote:It does look like the ribbon won't work well if gets wet or loses elasticity.


JRP3 wrote:I'd like to see a demo in actual wind. I wonder if a fan might cause larger vibration since it puts out pulses of air and not a steady breeze?


BobWallace wrote:They does? And here I am, thinking that the blades go 'round and 'round. Who knew they jerked?

JRP3 wrote:BobWallace wrote:JRP3 wrote:I'd like to see a demo in actual wind. I wonder if a fan might cause larger vibration since it puts out pulses of air and not a steady breeze?
They does?
And here I am, thinking that the blades go 'round and 'round.
Who knew they jerked?
Well hold your finger against fan blades, you feel vibrations right? Because it's not a continuous surface, therefore pulses. I don't know if it would make a difference, but it might.

BobWallace wrote:That said, don't you think this guy has done some 'real world' tests and not relied on just fans? Wasn't he most likely just making a quick demo and it was easier to turn on a fan than to turn on the wind....


HydroLuver wrote:One of the key negatives for getting wind energy for homes owners is the problem of large wind turbines in a dense residential area. NIMBYism will block that.


Working in Haiti, Shawn Frayne, a 28-year-old inventor based in Mountain View, Calif., saw the need for small-scale wind power to juice LED lamps and radios in the homes of the poor. Conventional wind turbines don’t scale down well—there’s too much friction in the gearbox and other components. “With rotary power, there’s nothing out there that generates under 50 watts,” Frayne says. So he took a new tack, studying the way vibrations caused by the wind led to the collapse in 1940 of Washington’s Tacoma Narrows Bridge (aka Galloping Gertie).
Frayne’s device, which he calls a Windbelt, is a taut membrane fitted with a pair of magnets that oscillate between metal coils. Prototypes have generated 40 milliwatts in 10-mph slivers of wind, making his device 10 to 30 times as efficient as the best microturbines. Frayne envisions the Windbelt costing a few dollars and replacing kerosene lamps in Haitian homes. “Kerosene is smoky and it’s a fire hazard,” says Peter Haas, founder of the Appropriate Infrastructure Development Group, which helps people in developing countries to get environmentally sound access to clean water, sanitation and energy. “If Shawn’s innovation breaks, locals can fix it. If a solar panel breaks, the family is out a panel.”

BobWallace wrote:Did you notice that word "prototype"?
Did you notice that no one suggested powering New York City with these?


BobWallace wrote:If you were to actually read the text ... Did you notice that word "prototype"? Did you notice that no one suggested powering New York City with these?

jbeckton wrote:Can solar, or wind, or geothermal, or biomass, or tidal, or wave energy completely power the nation-NO.But there is a good chance that solar/wind/geothermal/biomass/tidal/wave ect... can. I still think that we will need to rely on nuclear power to provide a base load for quite some time.

BobWallace wrote:Do you mean can they power the nation right now? If so, of course not. We haven't installed enough. Can they in the future? I think so.jbeckton wrote:Can solar, or wind, or geothermal, or biomass, or tidal, or wave energy completely power the nation-NO. But there is a good chance that solar/wind/geothermal/biomass/tidal/wave ect... can. I still think that we will need to rely on nuclear power to provide a base load for quite some time.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests