Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!

yesplease wrote:Course, the DOE estimated we could hit ~300GW (~20% of generation) w/ modest improvements to transmission I don't think we'll need them to expand wind power until we get a few decades down the road.


That certainly doesn't look like a 20% increase in the rate of growth 2008-2009 for the US???yesplease wrote:Not only did wind power grow during the worst recession in over a half century, but it increased it's rate of growth by almost 20%. Pretty impressive IMO.



Reuters wrote:Denise Bode, chief executive of AWEA, said jobs stalled because of tight financing and uncertainty about wind power incentives, including long-term tax credits and a national mandate for renewable energy.
She said President Barack Obama's recovery act that set aside billions of dollars for renewable energy helped prevent job losses. Some 1,500 to 2,000 jobs were lost in wind power manufacturing, but those jobs were made up for with gains in construction and maintenance at wind power farms, she said.




“The U.S. wind energy industry shattered all installation records in 2009, chalking up the Recovery Act as a historic success in creating jobs, avoiding carbon, and protecting consumers,” said AWEA CEO Denise Bode. “But U.S. wind turbine manufacturing – the canary in the mine -- is down compared to last year’s levels, and needs long-term policy certainty and market pull in order to grow. We need to set hard targets, in the form of a national Renewable Electricity Standard (RES), in order to provide the necessary stability for manufacturers to expand their U.S. operations and to seize the historic opportunity we have today to build up a thriving renewable energy industry.”
Early last year, before the Recovery Act (ARRA), the industry anticipated that in 2009 wind power development might drop by as much as 50% from 2008 levels, with equivalent job losses. The clear commitment by the President to create clean energy jobs and the swift implementation of ARRA incentives by the Administration in mid-summer reversed the situation. Recovery Act incentives spurred the growth of construction, operations and maintenance, and management jobs, helping the industry to save and create jobs in those sectors and shine as a bright spot in the economy.
January 26, 2010 5:00pm
by Sheila McNulty
Wind power surged ahead in 2009, breaking all previous records by installing over 9,900 megawatts of new generating capacity in 2009. That is enough to serve over 2.4m homes and expanded the nation’s wind plant fleet by 39 per cent, bringing total wind power generating capacity in the US to over 35,000 megawatts. But do not read too much into those headline-grabbing facts.
Total manufacturing investment dropped compared to 2008, with one-third fewer online, announced and expanded wind power manufacturing facilities in 2009. That resulted in job losses in the sector.


The graph is using old data (circa Dec 2009, maybe earlier). As of Jan 2010, installed capacity was ~9,900MW last year.sjn wrote:That certainly doesn't look like a 20% increase in the rate of growth 2008-2009 for the US???yesplease wrote:Not only did wind power grow during the worst recession in over a half century, but it increased it's rate of growth by almost 20%. Pretty impressive IMO.
Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!

It's suspicious that more wind turbines require more people to maintain them, do you think that more wind turbines should require fewer people to maintain them? Manufacturing/sales are worldwide, so I'm not sure if a drop in local manufacturing will impact expansion much. Even if we "stall" at ~10GW/year, we'll hit 20% wind power, enough to power 200 million PHEV/EV cars all year, by ~2025-2030.sjn wrote:There's actually something very suspicious with the opening link, it reports jobs lost in wind manufacturing, but compensated for by more jobs in maintainance, whilst financing was "tight":
Who said wind power was capable of unbounded exponential growth? Anyhoo, nothing is, it's a total red herring. Whether or not wind continues to grow past ~10GW/year really depends on renewable mandates and the PTC. Credit's big, but not as big as those two AFAIK.sjn wrote:Does this sound like a recipe for an increased rate of growth? I'm very much in favour of wind power generation, although I'm of the opinion maximum final capacity is limited by availability of suitable sites, rather than being capable of unbounded exponential growth as some others on this site have claimed.
Fer sure there's some significance. One included all of 2009, the other didn't include all of 2009. No one counts anything until it's up AFAIK, it's just that the earlier report missed the usual push in installed capacity at the end of the year.sjn wrote:I do however think there may be some significance to these two differing reports on the rate of capacity expansion, perhaps there's more on paper (planned/approved expansion) than actually took place due to the reported contraction in the manufacturing of turbines?
Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!

I drive through this one periodically on the way to visit friends/family. They put up a bunch of new turbines at the *end (Nov/Dec) of last year. A few years ago, I went through there and half the farm was lit up w/ spotlights. I think they were filming the helicopter chase scene for MI-III. The IRL version looked much better.shortonsense wrote:Have you seen some of these windfarms Yes?
I was tooling along south of Amarillo a few weeks back and ran into a huge windfarm down that'a way. Huge. Turbines off to the horizon. I remember years and years ago when I first saw the Mohave farms and thought they were pretty neat, nowadays, these projects are just huge. The people building them nowadays sure ain't thinkin small.
Viva La Transition!

Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!

I never understood the "all debt is bad"" mentality. Somehow spending an extra $62 billion/year on cheap coal due to it's impact on health is fine, but if we offer an up front credit instead of the PTC (distributed over 10 years), both with similar costs, that's reckless...TheDude wrote:From the AWEA, who ought to know: AWEA Q4 and Year-End Report Release“The U.S. wind energy industry shattered all installation records in 2009, chalking up the Recovery Act as a historic success in creating jobs, avoiding carbon, and protecting consumers,” said AWEA CEO Denise Bode. “But U.S. wind turbine manufacturing – the canary in the mine -- is down compared to last year’s levels, and needs long-term policy certainty and market pull in order to grow. We need to set hard targets, in the form of a national Renewable Electricity Standard (RES), in order to provide the necessary stability for manufacturers to expand their U.S. operations and to seize the historic opportunity we have today to build up a thriving renewable energy industry.”
Early last year, before the Recovery Act (ARRA), the industry anticipated that in 2009 wind power development might drop by as much as 50% from 2008 levels, with equivalent job losses. The clear commitment by the President to create clean energy jobs and the swift implementation of ARRA incentives by the Administration in mid-summer reversed the situation. Recovery Act incentives spurred the growth of construction, operations and maintenance, and management jobs, helping the industry to save and create jobs in those sectors and shine as a bright spot in the economy.
So we have reckless piling on of debt to thank for wind making it to this stage.

Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!

My suspicion is that less manufacturing of turbines is going to produce less growth in the installed capacity, which as you imply requires a constant growth in maintenance workers without which the installed capacity would be eroded. The outlook isn't a rosy as implied by the OP even despite the robust growth that has occurred in the last year.yesplease wrote:It's suspicious that more wind turbines require more people to maintain them, do you think that more wind turbines should require fewer people to maintain them? Manufacturing/sales are worldwide, so I'm not sure if a drop in local manufacturing will impact expansion much. Even if we "stall" at ~10GW/year, we'll hit 20% wind power, enough to power 200 million PHEV/EV cars all year, by ~2025-2030.sjn wrote:There's actually something very suspicious with the opening link, it reports jobs lost in wind manufacturing, but compensated for by more jobs in maintainance, whilst financing was "tight":
It may be a red herring, but it isn't mine, those who have argued the growth is (effectively) unbounded and used it as a proof for the insignificance of PO know who they are. The outlook going forward depends on multiple factors including those you've noted and the ability to continue fund ongoing maintenance and grid upgrades.Who said wind power was capable of unbounded exponential growth? Anyhoo, nothing is, it's a total red herring. Whether or not wind continues to grow past ~10GW/year really depends on renewable mandates and the PTC. Credit's big, but not as big as those two AFAIK.sjn wrote:Does this sound like a recipe for an increased rate of growth? I'm very much in favour of wind power generation, although I'm of the opinion maximum final capacity is limited by availability of suitable sites, rather than being capable of unbounded exponential growth as some others on this site have claimed.
Fair enough. Let's see what happens going forward.Fer sure there's some significance. One included all of 2009, the other didn't include all of 2009. No one counts anything until it's up AFAIK, it's just that the earlier report missed the usual push in installed capacity at the end of the year.sjn wrote:I do however think there may be some significance to these two differing reports on the rate of capacity expansion, perhaps there's more on paper (planned/approved expansion) than actually took place due to the reported contraction in the manufacturing of turbines?

yesplease wrote:I drive through this one periodically on the way to visit friends/family. They put up a bunch of new turbines at the *end (Nov/Dec) of last year. A few years ago, I went through there and half the farm was lit up w/ spotlights. I think they were filming the helicopter chase scene for MI-III. The IRL version looked much better.shortonsense wrote:Have you seen some of these windfarms Yes?
I was tooling along south of Amarillo a few weeks back and ran into a huge windfarm down that'a way. Huge. Turbines off to the horizon. I remember years and years ago when I first saw the Mohave farms and thought they were pretty neat, nowadays, these projects are just huge. The people building them nowadays sure ain't thinkin small.
Viva La Transition!
shortonsense wrote:yesplease wrote:I drive through this one periodically on the way to visit friends/family. They put up a bunch of new turbines at the *end (Nov/Dec) of last year. A few years ago, I went through there and half the farm was lit up w/ spotlights. I think they were filming the helicopter chase scene for MI-III. The IRL version looked much better.shortonsense wrote:Have you seen some of these windfarms Yes?
I was tooling along south of Amarillo a few weeks back and ran into a huge windfarm down that'a way. Huge. Turbines off to the horizon. I remember years and years ago when I first saw the Mohave farms and thought they were pretty neat, nowadays, these projects are just huge. The people building them nowadays sure ain't thinkin small.
Viva La Transition!
This is the one I bumped into.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roscoe_Wind_Farm
Anyone claiming that these things can't pump out enough power to matter really need to spend an hour or two driving one from end to end.

pstarr wrote:shortonsense wrote:Anyone claiming that these things can't pump out enough power to matter really need to spend an hour or two driving one from end to end.
It depends on what you mean by "matters." It would take 1,000 to equal a 1 coal-fired plant. Guess which cost more?
pstarr wrote:But then you'd still need the coal-fired plant when the wind isn't blowing.
shortonsense wrote:pstarr wrote:shortonsense wrote:Anyone claiming that these things can't pump out enough power to matter really need to spend an hour or two driving one from end to end.
It depends on what you mean by "matters." It would take 1,000 to equal a 1 coal-fired plant. Guess which cost more?
What do I care? Whether its 5 cents/kwh or 20 cents/kwh, the range is within reason for what people in America are willing, and do, pay for their electricity every day of the week.pstarr wrote:But then you'd still need the coal-fired plant when the wind isn't blowing.
Have you ever spent ANY time in that part of Texas? They build them where they do for a reason.
The Great Plains...Saudi Arabia of Wind!

pstarr wrote:shortonsense wrote:pstarr wrote:But then you'd still need the coal-fired plant when the wind isn't blowing.
Have you ever spent ANY time in that part of Texas? They build them where they do for a reason.
The Great Plains...Saudi Arabia of Wind!
And once again . . . and again. . . how does more electricity mitigate the current peaking and plateau?
And before you repeat your tiresome canard. . . . can you name an acquaintance who actually owns and drives an electric car? No?
pstarr wrote:That is because they are not products. They are concepts. (I do not consider a Prius an electric car. It is a sales promotion.)
pstarr wrote:Wait! Do you actually know anyone who even owns a Prius?
pstarr wrote: I'll bet not How about you Camaro-driving wife?
pstarr wrote: Is she about to drive an electric car? Doubt it. You expect everyone else to carry the load, Short.
pstarr wrote:I HAVE SOLAR PANELS ON MY ROOF AND YOU ARE A PHONY.


pstarr wrote:dozens of people? I am calling you out short. Name one car, one brand, one product. I dare you.
pstarr wrote:I DO NOT BELIEVE YOU
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests