Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Vietnam Thread

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

THE Vietnam Thread

Unread postby Aaron » Wed 04 May 2005, 13:03:44

Ford Urges All Americans to Salute Our Vietcong Rulers
Link
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Unread postby Chuckmak » Wed 04 May 2005, 22:23:52

...did i read that right...? "Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld"????

WTF!?!?!?!?!? lol
"if god doesn't exist, it is necessary that we invent him" - Voltaire

"they say prescott bush funded hitler" - Nas

Image
Chuckmak
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bridge City

Unread postby Chuckmak » Wed 04 May 2005, 22:30:03

Cabinet Members Under Ford

Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger (Cont.)
Secretary of the Treasury William E. Simon (Cont.)
Secretary of Defense James R. Schlesinger (Cont.)
Donald H. Rumsfeld, 1975
Attorney General William B. Saxbe (Cont.)
Edward H. Levi, 1975
Secretary of the Interior Rogers C. B. Morton (Cont.)
Stanley K. Hathaway, 1975
Thomas S. Kleppe, 1975
Secretary of Agriculture Earl L. Butz (Cont.)
John Knebel, 1976
Secretary of Commerce Frederick B. Dent (Cont.)
Rogers C. B. Morton, 1975
Elliot L. Richardson, 1976
Secretary of Labor Peter J. Brennan (Cont.)
John T. Dunlop, 1975
William J. Usery, Jr., 1976
Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare Caspar W. Weinberger (Cont.)
F. David Mathews, 1975
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development James T. Lynn (Cont.)
Carla A. Hills, 1975
Secretary of Transportation Claude S. Brinegar (Cont.)
William T. Coleman, Jr., 1975



...LMAO!!!
"if god doesn't exist, it is necessary that we invent him" - Voltaire

"they say prescott bush funded hitler" - Nas

Image
Chuckmak
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bridge City

Unread postby AdzP » Thu 05 May 2005, 04:10:43

Just to set you straight over the casualties...its not 1.5m.
In 1984 the US state dept released their assesment of the number of dead which was Vietnamese: 3.8m, Laotians: 800,000, Cambodians; 800,000 which is a total of 5.4m...

The Vietnamese govt say they lost around 5.5m though...
User avatar
AdzP
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu 26 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby nocar » Fri 06 May 2005, 07:51:19

Some of you peakoilers might be too young to know how the Vietnamese transported their supplies from the North to the South.

So, FYI, they loaded bicycles with almost a 100 kg load (200 pounds), attached a bar over the steering handles, and pushed the bicycles on narrow jungle trails, often in steep terrain. It is a long way, I think I remember from the reports that it could take a month, but still...

I have always found it fascinating that the strongest military power in the world in the 20th century was defeated by bicycles. Well, of course combined with the spirit and dedication of the Vietnamese.

With bicycles people can transport lots of stuff even after PO. Even when the surface has crumbled on our superhighways, they will be a lot easier to use than trails in mountain jungles.

nocar
nocar
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Fri 05 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Fri 06 May 2005, 15:14:33

We could have won that easily. Hell, if you had let me to do it, I could have "won" the war. Bomb every major settlement and throw those people back into the stone age. We did not do everything necessary to win that war. We lost 58,000 soldiers because we refused to take the gloves off and win. It would have been much easier to bomb a 10 mile strip across the country and create a de-facto DMZ between North and South. Napalm and other chemical weapons could have been used to deforest that strip of land. Anything that crosses that line could have been destroyed nearly instantly. Rome didn't go easy on Carthage. Rome didn't avoid civilian casualties in Gaul. If the United States military wishes to win wars, it must use its full potential.

But you must ask yourself, “Do we want to win?” Winning is relative because the cost is hundreds of thousands of innocent lives. But if your goal is to win a war, force must be used. I personally would not want to win that way and would not support anyone suggesting it. However, that person (a genocidal maniac he might be) would at least be telling it like it is. The world is a brutal place. Sometimes brute force is necessary to secure victory.

So to conclude, don’t tell me that we couldn’t have won the Viet Nam war. We could have, we just chose not to. We don’t like committing mass murder (thankfully) and avoid it at all costs. This makes us look better to the rest of the world, but it costs us boys between the ages of 18-25.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Unread postby RIPSmithianEconomics » Fri 06 May 2005, 17:55:12

You've got to love revisionism. If America had "blown the piss out of them", to copy the classic phrase from Day Of The Dead, would that be winning? The original objective was to protect South Vietnam from North Vietnam, but America would have lost more than it gained. It's easy to forget how close America was to civil war back then, but you can be pretty sure that genocide would have combined in far more unrest, and the economic slump of the 1970's could have merged with this to change everyone's lives forever. Fortunately, America "chose" to lose that war.

Of course, if you're a strict objectivist (in the war sense rather than the philosophical sense) you'd have to say that we lost the war in Europe, as Poland still ended up under the iron hand of dictatorship. The same thing happened with Czechoslovakia, but at least Austria stayed free.
There'll be war, there'll be peace
But one day all things shall cease
All the iron turned to rust
All the proud men turned to dust
So all things time will mend
So this song will end
RIPSmithianEconomics
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 260
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Scotland

How much should the USA pay Vietnam in war damages?

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 08 May 2005, 10:20:18

As we celebrate the 30th anniversary of the defeat of the Americans by rice farmers and coconut girls in Vietnam, we must begin to ask ourselves the question about war damages.

With the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was forced to pay war damages to the nations it had attacked during WWI. This sum amounted to 132 billion Reichsmarks, which would mean a sum of some US$ 1100 billion today.
Germany has also paid the survivors of the extermination of the jews huge sums of money.

We must now ask the same logic of reparations for the Vietnamese, Laotian and Cambodian victims of the brutal and illegal war of the Americans in South East Asia.

If we know that, on average, holocaust survivors received around US$ 10,000 per capita, and at today's value, Versailles reparations amounted to approximately US$ 1000 per capita (we calculate this as a sum per victim), how much should the US pay the Vietnamese, Laotians and Cambodians who survived their aggression?

Knowing that the Americans killed around 3 million Vietnamese, 200,000 Laotians, and 500,000 Cambodians (grand total: 3.7 million women, children, babies, old men, rice farming boys and girls), we offer the following poll options:
Last edited by lorenzo on Sun 08 May 2005, 10:26:23, edited 1 time in total.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 08 May 2005, 10:23:05

Again, mysteriously, a third poll option disappeared (Aaron, there's something wrong with the machine).

The third option was: "US$ 10,000 per capita - a fraction of what the US spends on tanks, cannons, aid to Israel, bombs, WMD and other slaughter machines each year"
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby DomusAlbion » Sun 08 May 2005, 10:40:34

Aaron, there's something wrong with Lorenzo and his posts. Every third brain cell in his addled pate seems to be misfiring and I can no longer see his posts.
"Modern Agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food."
-- Albert Bartlett

"It will be a dark time. But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting."
-- James Lovelock
User avatar
DomusAlbion
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Beyond the Pale

Unread postby julianj » Sun 08 May 2005, 11:13:00

Actually, Domus Albion, if we accept that wrongdoers should pay compensation, then what's wrong with putting a figure on it.

It was my -perhaps addled -recollection - that a figure for US compensation to Vietnam had already been proposed, I think in the UN, and the US had dismissed the idea of paying a penny. Nor about Bhopal either.
julianj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu 30 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: On one of the blades of the fan

Unread postby Jack » Sun 08 May 2005, 11:16:20

I prefer the option of letting them lend us money, followed by a planned reduction in the value of the currency. The net result is that they pay us. 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sun 08 May 2005, 13:06:09

http://resourceinsights.blogspot.com/ Americans are evidently well liked in Vietnam. Seems they see the situation as being similar to the US - UK friendship that has developed since the US won independence in The Revolutionary War. Far from wanting reparations, they want closer ties. In the potential conflict between the US and China, Vietnam may well prove to be on the American side.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Unread postby heyhoser » Sun 08 May 2005, 13:25:34

I don't believe handfuls of cash would do anyone justice. The moral thing to do would be to accept that our WMD's continue to devastate large portions of the population and to head a humanitarian effort to assist the Vietnamese in combating these effects.
What's that saying, 'Give a man a fish...."
heyhoser
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Czech Republic

Unread postby NevadaGhosts » Sun 08 May 2005, 16:28:06

Don't feed the brainless anti-American trolls.
NevadaGhosts
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 703
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby eastbay » Sun 08 May 2005, 16:40:00

Pay Vietnam reparations? Man, that is one truly nutty idea. It's so nutty it must be some kind of joke.

EB
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sun 08 May 2005, 17:07:37

NiKfUrY69 wrote:Lock on and launch nukes!
The spooky thing is that when the shit does hit the fan and we are looking at real end times, I do think that the nukes will fly - primarily at China. Its not a pretty thought but if DIE-OFF is staring us in the face then it will be a case of 'whatever it takes.'
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: How much should the USA pay Vietnam in war damages?

Unread postby Jdelagado » Sun 08 May 2005, 17:25:28

I wouldn't pay viet-nam a dime but I wouldn't mind buying lorenzo and jane fonda BOTH one-way tickets to hanoi.

jdelagado
User avatar
Jdelagado
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri 29 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Phoenix

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sun 08 May 2005, 17:32:38

I guess my earlier post just didn't get across to anybody. Oh well, I'm not proud. Vietnam DOESN'T WANT REPARATIONS THEY WANT TO BE OUR FRIENDS. Get it? Those days are gone. And the times they are a-changin'.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Next

Return to Asia Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests