Why is it ironic? Why shouldn't they want to get on with things? What were we there for but to stop Communism? Maybe they see why now after all these years. The irony is that Peak Oil may cause the US to turn Communist!TheSupplyGuy wrote:Wow, that's really ironic they want closer ties.
NiKfUrY69 wrote:Historically we only pay for reconstruction when we win, as such Viet Nam should pay us for the costs and deaths caused in their counrty.
Tyler_JC wrote:We could have won that easily. Hell, if you had let me to do it, I could have "won" the war. Bomb every major settlement and throw those people back into the stone age.
HANOI, Oct. 19 (Xinhua) -- Vietnam is likely to pour 3.4 billion US dollars into constructing its first nuclear power plant in central Ninh Thuan province, which is scheduled to become operational in the 2017-2020 period, a local official said here Wednesday.
"We've submitted to the government a pre-feasibility study on building a 2,000-MW nuclear power plant either in Ninh Phuoc or Ninh Hai (two districts of Ninh Thuan). Total investment for it is 3.4 billion dollars," chief of the International Cooperation Department under the Vietnam Institute of Energy, Tran Thanh Lien, said at a press conference held after a Vietnam-France seminar on selecting technology and location for the plant.
Starvid wrote:Yet another country prepares for the energy source of the future.
Starvid wrote:There is no sensible alternative to nuclear power if we are to sustain civilization.
- James Lovelock
Hmm sounds like a bad skin rash that takes a long time to heal.Peakoil_Tarzan wrote:Hmmmmm. Yeah, the problem with "the energy source of the future" is that, even if we stopped using it tomorrow, it would be with us for a very long time.Starvid wrote:Yet another country prepares for the energy source of the future.
and maybe about other new or potential nuclear powers (like Nigeria, Brazil, Venezuela, Indonesia, Iran, Poland, New Zealand, Australia and South Africa, to name a few).
pedalling_faster wrote:i was a youngster during the Vietnam War.
i had always accepted the notion that that war was part of the "Cold War" (a true misnomer, it was a pretty hot war for the 3 million SE Asian civilians that the US killed).
http://www.petrovietnam.com.vn/Images/C ... _lease.gif
i found this link on the PetroVietnam website.
now i'm wondering to what extent "grabbing the oil" (or at least, controlling it) was a motivation for the US attack on Vietnam.
P.S. How many barrels in a ton of oil ? PetroVietnam sometimes states oil exports in tons.
"Vietnam’s Petroleum production is ranged thirty first in the world and the third in the ASEAN, at an output 340,000 barrels per day of crude oil, ...."
NeoPeasant wrote:I doubt it. The US was the Saudi Arabia of the sixties, production-wise, and an imminent US peak was just a little-known theory from some kooky old Shell geologist.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest