MD wrote:Government is about to step in. It will get ugly.
What, more that it did in the last century you mean? That's not possible.
Without oil, these pictures will start to rest where they belong - in the history books.
JPL
Moderator: Pops
MD wrote:Government is about to step in. It will get ugly.


Twilight wrote:I don't know. With that level of getting their act together, maybe we're better off with governments not addressing the problem?


Ludi wrote:For my own part, I would rather "the government" please not get involved!
...
But that's because I expect them to crap it up for everyone, not help.



Thus, the real dilemma of coping peak oil, for a while at least, is really quite simple. If the government should lay out the full ramifications of peaking in hopes of rallying the people to make preparations, the most immediate consequence is likely to be serious economic setback triggered by an unambiguous announcement itself.
.
.
.
So there you have it. The GAO did their job by warning the Congress that peak oil might just be a very serious problem very soon, and the DOW is still going up. Sometimes government agencies are not that dumb after all!


Twilight wrote:If people are not aware, it matters little whether the government is aware. There really is very little any government can do about a structural problem on this scale without public participation. Maybe the only intelligent thing they're doing is prolonging the party if they know it is too late to act in any manner at all.

Jack wrote:Now, KillJOY - you know we can't upset the proles or outer party members. That would be double-plus ungood.

MonteQuest wrote:
Or maybe they plan to smother peak oil under a shroud of war.
Or shift the blame and cause to terrorism. More war.
Bottom line.
More war.

JPL wrote:MonteQuest wrote:
Or maybe they plan to smother peak oil under a shroud of war.
Or shift the blame and cause to terrorism. More war.
Bottom line.
More war.
Without fossil fuels, that's not possible -
Anyhow, what would be the point?



Battle_Scarred_Galactico wrote:Anyhow, what would be the point?
The point would be to kill another group to take their resources, the way the world has always worked.

MonteQuest wrote:
700 million barrels of SPR will fuel a lot of war.
We produce 5 mbpd in the US.

JPL wrote:
But I still say, what for? If you take our 5, and put it with your 5, that's still not enough oil (pleuugh). So what do we all do?

MonteQuest wrote:JPL wrote:
But I still say, what for? If you take our 5, and put it with your 5, that's still not enough oil (pleuugh). So what do we all do?
Fight until it is all gone.
This is not my plan or my notion.
This is how it has always been.


JPL wrote:Post-medieval Europe after the first Black Death, for example. When 50% of the population died and a lot of the farmland went back to scrub-land. Roads were left un-made and whole villages & towns were abandoned.
It was 100+ years before the European economy recovered to the point where people 'needed' resources. Wars weren't possible, during the post-medieval 'transition stage', there just wasn't the manpower to do it...JPL

Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests