Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Telecommuting Thread

How to save energy through both societal and individual actions.

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby radon1 » Fri 27 Nov 2015, 22:22:14

There is so much waste in the office work, in addition to the commuting time. Office politics and accompanying stress, dress codes, inability to relax properly, noise, slackers, idiotic "socialising" practices, "educational courses" and so on. Good if the productive time adds to the half of the total, and this is a good part of your life.
radon1
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Thu 27 Jun 2013, 06:09:44

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby ennui2 » Sat 28 Nov 2015, 04:36:44

pstarr wrote:The hierarchy is intentional, layers of waste and dissembly so as to insulate the wealthy owners from labor, real production on the factory floor. Without intimidation and confusion the workers would rise up and take over the business.


Wrong again.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby ennui2 » Sat 28 Nov 2015, 04:46:00

pstarr wrote:urbanization (as you dismissively refer to it) is the solution not the problem.


Wrong, for one very important reason. People don't all want city life. Just because Kunstler and you don't like the suburbs doesn't mean others don't. People will exercise their free will to live where they choose. They won't conform to some central planner's idea of how to be collectively thermodynamically efficient. The town I live in, for instance, I think was ranked #6 out of the top safest towns in Massachusetts. It's also ranked at the top for public education (bashed in another thread). In theory it might save some BTUs to cram people into a tighter space, but beyond a certain point produces filthy Blade Runner or Soylent Green style conditions. No conspiracy on the part of government planners necessary to make cities into shit-holes.

Also, as I explained, as you depopulate the hinterlands, what kind of lifestyle is remaining in the boonies around major cities? Nothing. No agriculture to speak of, since all this is moved to flyover states. The idea that the boonies would in some way revert to some sort of rustic utopia without suburbs is false. As long as we have mechanized green-revolution agriculture we've destroyed the ability for there to be thriving rural economies. Instead you'd just have more of what we have now, meth labs and the like.

I'd rather look at the world as it is rather than envisioning some sort of brownstone walkable utopia that simple can't exist, and how we can make it at least incrementally better.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sat 28 Nov 2015, 05:38:37

In Australia the tertiary education system is leading the way, with course content & teacher workloads shifting fast. This year I have been a 'full time' student, attending university one or two days a week.. My head lecturer runs two full time groups, working 2-4 days a week on campus with 1-2 ratio of homework she can do at any time or place suits her. The pay deal is based on class time hours only, with a very attractive hourly rate, but when online hours divide this rate by 3, I make similar amounts to her while driving a truck along the freeway, listening to the radio on cruise control- very easy job.
Next year the same course will only contain 14 days on campus, spread over the year, with a 1-5 ratio of classtime to home- teletime. Teachers will be paid a casual rate of close to $100 an hour, but will be assumed to be working online 4 hours to support this- so the bottom line is still about $20 an hour- less than truck driving. Of course if you are quick online, you can cut hours down very significantly. I am fully up to date & no assignments to redo & have had to spend a tiny amount of time in the online study portion, probably a tenth of what is assumed in the course design- primarily because I have years of experience in the sector & it is second nature.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby Pops » Sat 28 Nov 2015, 11:23:47

Here is another article that ties together location independence with other trends...

The forces behind this sea-change are many: the rapid adoption of mobile technology, ubiquitous internet access, and a general sense of malaise powered by the vague yet nagging notion that we’re just not meant to work all day sitting in a cubicle. Add to that the waste of time, energy and brainpower that commuting engenders, and it becomes apparent that our definition of “workplace” will never be the same. It may seem like a tug of war between companies and workers, but in fact they share common goals: using technology and mobility to maximize productivity, innovation, and well-being.

http://qz.com/65279/40-of-americas-work ... s-by-2020/

Granted this person is selling a product (a "location" for "location independent" workers) but the point is made.

Obviously, MacDonalds will install self-serve kiosks and auto-burger-flippers if it is more profitable than paying a wage. And the argument that building burger-flippers will replace being a burger flipper is obviously wrong: if it were true installing auto-burger-flippers would not be profitable.

Workers have no recourse, save a Ned Ludd tantrum. Simply put, there are only so many positions available for auto-burger-flipper programmers and oilers.

I just can't see a way forward that doesn't entail the percentage of the population in the workforce continuing to fall and increasingly split between very high skill level and the very low. Which is OK. The ultimate efficiency improvement is simply less consumption and that is where we're headed. It seems to me we are prodded in that direction by environment (increasing "pollution" per Limits To Growth), the economics of profit (increased "efficiency" i.e. lower labor cost), and of course resource constraints.

In 2000, labor force participation peaked after growing for 30 years on increasing participation by women.
Turns out the 2 income household was never all it was cracked up to be for a majority. My wife only worked a little while and it was likely a net loss financially — as many families I'm sure find. In the broader sense she was much more valuable to our family at home. I've decided at this late stage that even I, never really a doting father, would have been more valuable to my family working at home than trying for the last dollar out on the road. Too bad telecommuting wasn't available to me when my kids were young.

Image


Working for the man is a new phenomenon these last couple of centuries. I'm pretty sure paying you just irks the crap out of him. After all, He built It, not you. As such you are merely a cost reducing his bottom line and he will be more than happy to fire your ass at the first opportunity. And unions are as dated as corporations in an increasingly self-oriented, wired world.

I think location-independent freelancing and co-ops (like the company in the article) will be a central feature in the future.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby AgentR11 » Sat 28 Nov 2015, 12:22:14

pstarr wrote:Ennui, urbanization (as you dismissively refer to it) is the solution not the problem. The problem is we set up our cities to deteriorate specifically we chose a semi-rural parasitic lifestyle . . . called suburbia. Our cities used to be great. Try Paris. Or London. Or Moscow.


And urbanization need not even be thought of as strictly large cities. Any city over, say, 25,000 or so, has sufficient commercial impact to justify a cargo rail yard. Any location with a cargo rail yard can get product shipped from just about anywhere, and ship product to just about anywhere. My small city is a bit larger, and it is fairly walkable, even if folks don't believe in walking presently. We have rail and trucking, a post office and ups. I can walk, bike, or drive my truck to the grocer or hardware store. There's even a substantial sidewalk and core public bus thing coming online.

A lot of folks focus on the big city concept, because it provides an opportunity to ramp up real estate prices in the core areas; but the concept of urbanization does not require large at all.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6357
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby ennui2 » Sat 28 Nov 2015, 13:39:25

I think you'll find adaptation occurs via the least disruptive pathways. Telecommuting is a negawatt style adaptation. All it requires is an attitude adjustment on the part of employers (prodded via where employees choose to work). This is part of the invisible hand of the market, if you will, that being labor arbitrage.

All of these new-urbanism projects require a degree of central planning that simply won't happen due to government dysfunction and lack of buy-in from the voting public.

There is an inverse relationship between peak energy and labor. If we really have so much surplus energy and surplus food, we really should be living in some sort of socialist utopia where nobody should have to flip burgers for minimum wage anymore. And there are lots of articles talking about how when robots take over, that it should go in that kind of direction rather than creating an increasing pool of darwinian "losers" who are unemployable by virtue of not being able to do any sort of tasks that can't be automated.

What would happen in a descent scenario is a reversal. Things that used to be Jetson push-button would need to be done by hand. Energy slaves would be replaced by people slaves. People who had very little value before, because they can do little more than use their hands or their brawn, will then be worth more, but JUST to be beasts of burden once more. So sure, they'd be in demand, but is that a good thing, really?

There are pros and cons to both worlds. In a world with a need for more manual labor, there will be more jobs, but will they be the sorts of jobs that provide any sort of meaning in the work, or will it just be a job for the sake of mere subsistence?

Meanwhile, a world of increasing automation shifts us towards Wall-E or idiocracy laziness and sloth.

No matter where this goes, human vice will manifest itself.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby Pops » Sun 29 Nov 2015, 12:08:58

I think increased telecommuting will be part and parcel of part-timing and other strategies to lower labor cost to business.
Here is as pretty good article in Atlantic about increasing geographic income inequality resulting from the war against regulation and the resurgence of monopolies.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/arc ... picks=true
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby ennui2 » Sun 29 Nov 2015, 12:58:11

But Pops, you are forgetting that we're living in an explosion of startup companies. It's true, 99% of them are in some way tech related, and are not boutique organic farmers, but if you put that aside, there are opportunities even for the unwashed masses to leverage technology. It's not simply a way for big companies like Microsoft to cut costs.

We're also living in an era of democratization of funding, via crowdfunding. If you have a good idea, get a few people together, and your pitch resonates, you'll get funded, regardless of what VC thinks about it.

I think it's really really important that people shake off the idea that in order for the American dream to exist that jobs need to trickle down from corporate america. If you have talent, then become an entrepreneur. Have it grow out of a hobby. Do it while you work a crappy dayjob. But break away from the employer/employee paradigm.

BTW, I started a company. I'm not going to go into detail on it because it's really not relevant for doom, other than to say that while I don't have full-time employees, I am paying remote contractors. I don't need an office and I don't need to limit myself to the local talent pool. These savings work equally well when you are cash-strapped as when you're a megacorp bean-counter. Geography doesn't play into it, mine or theirs.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby Pops » Sun 29 Nov 2015, 14:00:49

I think it's really really important that people shake off the idea that in order for the American dream to exist that jobs need to trickle down from corporate america.


Oh I agree completely, but let's not fool ourselves, this isn't about entrepreneurialism. The owner/labor relationship is at heart conflict based and zero sum. At the moment the owners are winning and the "boom" in "entrepreneurs" is the result of "increasing productivity" and downsizing resulting from offshoring and automation.

Way back (1990's) I believed the internet would lead away from mass-production to mass-customization. I'm sure I've talked about the guy who really wants to make cedar clogs but had no market channel large enough locally to survive but with a larger potentially global distribution he does. This may have happened on Etsy and to some extent on Amazon and ebay but not to the extent that the internet has made lots of workers extraneous. [should have been "independent"]

I'm really not sure just how well today's tech unicorns will age. Lots are just another version of socialized cost and privatized profit. Not Candy Crush or Snap Chat, I'm thinking Uber, airbnb, etc whose entire model is avoiding the regulations, taxes and overhead of traditional model. Really the next level of being supranational... with the cool caché of branding themselves "sharing economy." What a crock.

The current wireless bubble sure seems a lot like the previous wired bubble, crazy P/Es, no real product, all powered by low interest rates and speculative capital fleeing the commodities crash.


But really I'm kinda trying to think beyond that to the greater arc of corporatization and it's battle against labor — and of course peak energy. The bigger but related trend to telecommuting is the increase in temp/unattached workers predicted to be 40-50% of "employment" by 2020.

Perhaps that should be 40-50% of Unemployment. This has to do with lower demand for labor.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sun 29 Nov 2015, 14:33:25

Counting all the peeps sitting home on parenting payments, disability or living under a benevolent other, employment has been in the 40's % in most developed countries for years. That's why we only ever get told about the 'active' unemployed.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Sun 29 Nov 2015, 15:42:23

I commuted to work for 3/4th's of my career, first in suburban Chicago, then in suburban Washington DC, finally in Silicon Valley. 29 years as a commuter, mostly in smaller cars - MGs, Fiats, and an Alfa Romeo (hey, might as well enjoy driving when possible).

For 4 years I rode the train/light-rail/shuttle bus to work, with an employer-provided laptop and WiFi on the train, and worked during travel. For another 4 years I worked from home, with virtual meeting software. I managed some remote employees I had never met. This was possible because I was no longer an engineer designing new products, I was sustaining older products, and managing other sustaining engineers.

Telecommuting is probably both possible and desirable for about half the people in white collar jobs. But there are limitations, and these are the same whether the employee telecommutes or not, but some such work habits are not compatible with telecommuting.

The Work Ethic of a particular employee is key. If somebody is productive under the direct supervision of the boss, it does not mean that they are equally productive from home. Some people like me found relief from commuter stress, and became more productive.

Substance abusers are another issue - there are functioning alcoholics and stoners who simply cannot function with no restraints upon their substance consumption. As a telecommuter manager you soon note that there are those who schedule only morning meetings and are probably too wasted to work in the afternoon. Their telecommuter status makes it difficult to get them treatment or counseling as well.

Finally there are those jobs where flexible hours work better, and those such as customer service where shift work is the norm. I took advantage of flex hours myself for grocery shopping, personal appointments, and meal preparation - even if it meant a couple of hours of work at night.

Honesty compels me to admit, there is a local steelhead run on the San Lorenzo river above Santa Cruz, and during the November-February season, this county allowed fishing on weekends and Wednesday mornings before noon. I was obsessed with catching steelhead for two consecutive years, and Wednesday mornings often found me standing in waders in the cold river and rain, asking myself if I was crazy for doing so. Other employees played golf on one morning of each week. Indeed, flex hours are great as long as you can handle them.

The point is, there are both jobs and people where telecommuting is simply not possible.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby ennui2 » Mon 30 Nov 2015, 19:59:17

Pops wrote:At the moment the owners are winning and the "boom" in "entrepreneurs" is the result of "increasing productivity" and downsizing resulting from offshoring and automation.


I agree that the direction we're going is not sustainable without profound societal change. I also agree that the lack of regulation is creating a legal robber-baron like society of hedge-fund types and a few lucky eggheads.

It's remarkable how much, for instance, Bill Gates, has sought to redeem himself after cashing in on the decades-long monopoly of WinTel.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/worl ... /76557200/

The problem with capitalism in the US is that it is inherently selfish. People are taught that being rich is a virtue for its own sake and that there's no larger social obligation. Conservatism in the US, despite its roots in religion, which supposedly preaches charity, reinforces this narrative of dog-eat-dog capitalism.

I guess what I'm rebelling against here is this fatalism that the elites (i.e. the existential "them") will own it all and everyone else will be serfs. I don't think it's that hopeless and I think there will remain pathways to success, but people are going to have to be agile and know how to promote their own brand.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby Pops » Mon 30 Nov 2015, 20:59:35

Yeah, who had the sig:
We've tried nothin and we're all out of ideas!
was it Barbara?

--
There is a level of inequality above which the owners always lose their heads. Can't remember it at the moment.

--
I see "location independence" as a big deal. It has really been a liberating lifestyle for me, not to mention lowering my overhead and likely my impact as well.

The thing I was saying about how it crosses with "unattached" workers, how it meshes with falling workforce participation and declining home ownership/ ownership in general makes it hard to get a handle. Then there is the whole financial deregulation/automation and outright monopoly power bit... not to mention huge debts.

Saw a story about Walmart's flat growth rates and their decision to increase wages – of course there is a correlation. Back when Henry Ford said every one of his workers should be able to afford what they build it was a good thing, nowadays when Walmart says every employee should be paid so little they can only shop at the cut rate store—with food stamps— not so much.

The condition and direction of the economy seems really hard for me to discern at the moment, if it ever was, LOL. One little stat, people are saving money on fuel at the moment, and yeah they are driving a little more but they are saving more of the "savings." Up 25^ from 4.5 to 5.5 percent since 2013.

I'm kinda rambling but a final thought, the post war average expansion is a tad over 5 years, we're going on 7. Hard to see the forest for the flames... I mean trees.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby Newfie » Mon 30 Nov 2015, 23:00:46

Location independence, I like that!
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18458
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby Pops » Tue 01 Dec 2015, 10:52:54

As someone who has been telecommuting full time for over a dozen years (freelance graphics), here are some tips.

1) Connection
If your tool is the internet you must pay utmost attention to your connection! Most folks nowadays live in town and have access to DSL or cable. For me it is imperative to have a good connection PLUS a backup.
Living in the sticks is a lot harder but doable, I did it in the Ozarks in 2004 and have used just about every connection you can name. Nowadays it is easy, but don't take it for granted.

2) Space
My first home office was a small bedroom I outfitted just like an office, Mac work machine, MS Office machine, high end scanner, proofing printer, fax, files, phones, CD storage, printed work order board, blah, blah.

Now I'm very casual. I just have a small desk in the bedroom, laptop, digitizing tablet and big monitor. Everything is digital, no files, no faxes, no scanner and the printer is in a closet. I don't even backup to CDs or DVDs any more, just a couple little pocket drives and a cloud account. In fact I've purposely set myself up to be completely mobile.

3) Style
When I first set up at home fulltime I would get up in the morning and get ready just like I was heading into town, except I walked into the bedroom/office and closed the door. I did it that way consciously because I was afraid I would be distracted. When I was at work everyone pretended I was out of the house and I did too. In the early days I was making good - and needed all I could make.

Turns out that even I, possibly adult ADD, have little trouble getting my work done simply because I am on my own. I had the same 1960s outlook as most managers whose job it is to crack the whip and squeeze every little drop of labor possible from the serfs. Partly it is due to the fact that I'd been exempt for a long while, salaried then owner/partner. It really isn't such a big deal, I'm pretty sure if a person is not motivated enough to get the work done they probably know it and will cling to the cubical and the coattails of the producers with their final ounce of strength.

I also lowered my overhead, or as has been pontificated, I "crashed early to avoid the rush." But early on if my inbox was not packed I was worried and felt as if I should be keeping my seat warm even if I was not doing anything billable... old habits die hard. This time of year especially is always slow in my biz because retailers have everything set and are busy doing their thing and "institutions" are partying.

Over time I've become confident enough to simply walk away from the screen when my work is finished and go do something else. For a while I did some little farming and cattle, now I'm fixing up an old house.

By the same token I've become much less rigid about the door to my office; wife, kids, grandkids wander through, no biggie. Turns out one of the great benefits of working at home is working at home.

[ETA one more]
4) Turn It Off!
If you allow customers to contact you 24/7 they will. The only way to not become a drone is simply not respond outside whatever regular hours you set. Mine are M-Th, 9-3 & friday some. I can and do work late and weekends but I charge double. I respond tout de suite during my hours and can and will drop everything for an "emergency." But the thing to understand is your clients know immediately how much you value your time, if you act like it is worthless, they will too.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby Pops » Tue 01 Dec 2015, 14:11:18

And one more tip, don't get involved in a message board.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby Newfie » Tue 01 Dec 2015, 17:25:06

Pops said..
"I just can't see a way forward that doesn't entail the percentage of the population in the workforce continuing to fall and increasingly split between very high skill level and the very low. Which is OK. The ultimate efficiency improvement is simply less consumption and that is where we're headed. "

I agree with most of your thinking on this thread and the first half here. I think you are wrong on ultimate efficiency.

My observation is that humans have a strong desire to work, to contribute. When we can't do something useful we find something else to make ourselves think we are useful. This wasted work is expressed as consumerism and through it we create great gobs of pollution. Oh that we could just sit at home and read, paint or sing. Our drive to do useful work to do good, is killing us.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18458
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: The Telecommuting Thread

Unread postby Newfie » Tue 01 Dec 2015, 18:30:51

Pops,

Reflecting on your comments about connectivity living in a major city deepen town you would think I'd have great connections. Not so. Fios is not available for us. We have DSL but the damn thing barely works, esprpecially when it rains. Our cell connection routinely provides a much better connection than our DSL.

Our marina has wireless and I have a high performance wireless router rig that gives me 5 bars in the saloon. But the connection to the real world is just terrible. Now that may be because half the town is on that connection, I have no way of knowing. It's not the wireless side that's slow, it's the wired side.

IIRC the USA has the poorest Internet infrastructure of all first world countries.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18458
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

PreviousNext

Return to Conservation & Efficiency

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests