built-in heating elements that could prevent roads from freezing
Yes, we are going to solve our energy problems by using more energy to wait for it........ F%&King warm roads. lol
built-in heating elements that could prevent roads from freezing

Goddamit, pstarr. You and your stupid doom views always putting a torpedo in the cornucopian boat.pstarr wrote:Would these work in a traffic jam? Wouldn't the sun be blocked?



Fer sure! Cuz midday, when solar output would be maximal, the freeways are just one big parking lot. It's not like we've ever seen traffic jams in the morning or evening, when people tend to go and come back from work.VMarcHart wrote:Goddamit, pstarr. You and your stupid doom views always putting a torpedo in the cornucopian boat.pstarr wrote:Would these work in a traffic jam? Wouldn't the sun be blocked?



Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!

At $60/bbl, four lane roads are about $4 million per mile, last seven years, and cost about $570,000 per year. At $12.3 million per mile, the solar road thingy would need to last about 12 years to equal the cost of an asphalt version.fletch_961 wrote:How does 1760*7000=1.23 B?
Even using normal math (12.3 M) it would be a little pricey.
Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!

VMarcHart wrote:The cornucopian at work.
And then let's install wind generators along the 46,876 miles of interstate roads. Fifteen generators per mile using both shoulders and the medium of the interstate, 703,140 generators, each at 3 megawatts, that's 2.1 gigawatts. Enough to power every fat food restaurant and every 60-inch plasma TV in America.
And then let's curral sheep and goats to mow the grass along the interstates, collect the manure and power distributed biomass power plants every 50 miles. Again, enough to power every HVAC unit in America to ensure no home gets colder than 69F or hotter than 72F.
And then...

At $60/bbl, four lane roads are about $4 million per mile, last seven years, and cost about $570,000 per year. At $12.3 million per mile, the solar road thingy would need to last about 12 years to equal the cost of an asphalt version.

Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!

I'm pretty sure that most road paving costs in 2006 don't have land acquisition costs, or grading and surveying costs comparable to new road construction.
The interchange recently underwent a significant rebuild dubbed the Marquette Interchange Project, and was officially opened on August 19, 2008, several weeks ahead of schedule. At a cost of less than $810 million, which was well below the projected $1 billion price tag, the project involved 46 cranes and more than 4,000 workers in the largest construction project in state history, which took a little more than four years to complete.
[edit] The new interchange
The new Marquette Interchange was designed to ensure the safe and efficient flow of traffic. Though the new interchange occupies the same amount of land as the old one, it feels much more spacious. Design features include:
* Two lane ramps in both directions between I-94 and I-43
* More gradual curves on ramps, with longer sight distances
* More distance between ramps, to eliminate traffic conflicts from lane changes
* Elimination of all left-hand entrances and exits
* Design features allow for future expansion to an eight lane expressway
Some states, cities and counties say their road-repair budgets didn't anticipate asphalt prices that are up 25.9% from a year ago, so they're being forced to delay projects.
"We will do what patching we can, but this will truly, truly be a devastating blow to the infrastructure," says Shirlee Leighton, a county commissioner in Lake County, S.D., where a 5-mile repaving project was postponed after bids came in $79,000-$162,000 higher than the $442,000 budget.

VMarcHart wrote:The cornucopian at work.
And then let's install wind generators along the 46,876 miles of interstate roads. Fifteen generators per mile using both shoulders and the medium of the interstate, 703,140 generators, each at 3 megawatts, that's 2.1 gigawatts. Enough to power every fat food restaurant and every 60-inch plasma TV in America.
And then let's curral sheep and goats to mow the grass along the interstates, collect the manure and power distributed biomass power plants every 50 miles. Again, enough to power every HVAC unit in America to ensure no home gets colder than 69F or hotter than 72F.
And then...
To dream ... the impossible dream ...
To fight ... the unbeatable Exxon ...
To bear ... with unbearable burro ...
To run ... where the brave dare not mow (the grass) ...
To right ... the unrightable stanchion ...
To love ... pure and chaste from afar ...
To try ... when your blades are too weary ...
To reach ... the unreachable wind current ...
This is my quest, to follow that solar arc ...
No matter how hopeless, no matter how far ...
To fight for the right, without question or pause ...
To be willing to march into Hell, for a cornucopian dream ...

pstarr wrote:Would these work in a traffic jam? Wouldn't the sun be blocked?

It's from the site (link is in the popsci link on the first page). I'm not sure if it's accurate. Like you mentioned, it sounds like it's for new roads. For instance a new four lane road in Afghanistan costs about $3 million per mile, so $16/ft^2 sounds like new road costs in America. Still, if the construction tech turns out to be viable, which is pretty much what the entire thing hinges on, then the panels have to last long enough to amortize their initial cost less whatever they can tack on (data/power transmission, load leveling due to integrating capacitive storage) given what appears to be lower maintenance costs.fletch_961 wrote:I'm pretty sure that most road paving costs in 2006 don't have land acquisition costs, or grading and surveying costs comparable to new road construction.
Where did your $4 M figure come from? Was it the cost to re-pave a mile of road or the average cost to maintain the I-system. It certainly doesn't cost $4 M to re-coat 253,440 sq. feet of existing road w/ asphalt.
But when projects like the aforementioned "Big Dig" and this one (see below) get averaged in $4 M sounds about right.
The interchange recently underwent a significant rebuild dubbed the Marquette Interchange Project, and was officially opened on August 19, 2008, several weeks ahead of schedule. At a cost of less than $810 million, which was well below the projected $1 billion price tag, the project involved 46 cranes and more than 4,000 workers in the largest construction project in state history, which took a little more than four years to complete.
[edit] The new interchange
The new Marquette Interchange was designed to ensure the safe and efficient flow of traffic. Though the new interchange occupies the same amount of land as the old one, it feels much more spacious. Design features include:
* Two lane ramps in both directions between I-94 and I-43
* More gradual curves on ramps, with longer sight distances
* More distance between ramps, to eliminate traffic conflicts from lane changes
* Elimination of all left-hand entrances and exits
* Design features allow for future expansion to an eight lane expressway
$810M for a couple miles.Some states, cities and counties say their road-repair budgets didn't anticipate asphalt prices that are up 25.9% from a year ago, so they're being forced to delay projects.
"We will do what patching we can, but this will truly, truly be a devastating blow to the infrastructure," says Shirlee Leighton, a county commissioner in Lake County, S.D., where a 5-mile repaving project was postponed after bids came in $79,000-$162,000 higher than the $442,000 budget.
About $500k for 5 miles of just repaving, not $4m. Granted that was probably a two lane road.
Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!


Is reading the FAQ really that horrible?vtsnowedin wrote:Glass pavement??? freezing rain/ winter ought to be fun.
What are you going to do about traction? Cars slip and slide on wet asphalt, let alone wet glass. What’s going to happen to the surface of the Solar Roadways™when it rains?
Everyone naturally pictures sliding out of control on a smooth piece of wet glass! Actually, one of the many technical specs for the top layer it that it be textured to the point that it provides at least the traction that current asphalt roads offer – even in the rain. I hesitate to even call it glass, as it is far from a traditional window pane, but glass is what it is, so glass is what we must call it.
Last year, I attended a three day workshop called the International Workshop on Scientific Challenges for New Functionalities in Glass in Arlington, Virginia. I received quite an education in the properties and abilities of glass! I presented the Solar Roadways™ to an international audience of glass scientists. Afterward, I was invited to travel north and present our project to Penn State University’s Materials Research Institute. I had lunch with several of their research scientists after my presentation. By the end of this trip, I had been thoroughly convinced that the glass specs that I had presented would not pose any problems – and traction was the easy part.
Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!





Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!

I dare you to make less sense!VMarcHart wrote:My doom mood notwithstanding, I'm in awe with the concept of infinite betterment.
It doesn't matter that we clear, pave, re-pave, un-pave, pave again every single last square inch of land, somebody will always come up with a solution for the improvement of all 9+ billion projected lives, forever and ever, that is.
Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!

But then, look who's talking.yesplease wrote:I dare you to make less sense!

About infinite betterment? Looks like that one was you!VMarcHart wrote:But then, look who's talking.yesplease wrote:I dare you to make less sense!
Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests