Us Cassandras are always lambasted or worse, since people just don't want to hear it. That's one heckuva graph, Geko. Can you extend it out a few more years and a few tens of dollars up?
Moderator: Pops


manu wrote:Good call Geko.
Gampy, maybe you should get into the morturary buisness. They should be really busy in the years to come. Better, the crematorium buisness.

Geko45 wrote:Back in 2006, I posted the following price projection and was lambasted for my 'hockey sticks' graph.
spartacus wrote:Geko45....I have been looking at price forecast charts for the last 25 years. Invariably they are 'hockey sticks' like yours. Try using a longer period (ie: pre 2000 and see what happens). According to pre-86 forecasts, oil price now should be a lot higher than it is.
Your curve-fit to the production data doesn't even have any science, and does not reflect new refinery capacity coming on stream.
Whilst I would agree that oil is a finite resource, I have difficulties with pseudo-science, particularly from MBA's. I got an MBA 15 years ago.....and most of the case studies I did then (ie: how great was Enron etc) show what a limited outlook those schools have in relation to free thought. It's all herd mentality.....like a lot of sheep. Individual thought (that doesn't agree with the lecturer) is likely to see you fail.
I never met a McKinsey person with an original thought.
Geko45 wrote:Then why do I have a 4.0 GPA when I am the only person in my cohort that thinks that we have a problem? During my presentation, I had to field all the usual red herring type questions. I was even asked about the 'giant' discovery off the coast of Louisiana which is now defunct. It sounds to me like you had a bad experience in your MBA program and are now projecting it onto me. I'm not here to deal with your emotional baggage. If you spent half your life living as a 'sheeple' then I'm sorry, but it's not my problem. I might have had some respect for your arguments if they had not turned into an ad hominem attack on MBAs.

No way. $3.00 diesel didn't stop any trucks... $5.00 diesel isn't slowing down very many trucks... and neither will $8.00 diesel. They'll just keep on a truckin' no matter what the price is... until there ain't no more diesel at any price. THAT will be what finally stops the trucks.
gampy wrote:It's funny, I don't own a car, I walk and bike everywhere. I live in a relatively small city, but I know for a fact that I will probably lose my job once gasoline becomes so expensive that people will forgo fast food for gas.
I am exploring some way to find a job that will survive gas shortages, and high food prices.
Question is, what kind of job is safe in a depression?
People need to eat, but where will they eat in a depression? I am in a kind of transitional phase (career wise) and am trying to figure out what kind of trade, or skills might be indispensible in a serious economic clusterfuck.
I work in the "hospitality" industry at the moment. (I am a short order cook)
I wonder if people will be eating out much in the near future.

Reuters
OPEC president sees $200 oil possible: report
Monday April 28, 5:22 am ET
ALGIERS (Reuters) - OPEC President Chakib Khelil does not rule out oil prices reaching $200 a barrel, even though supply is adequate, because the market is driven by the dollar's slide, Algerian government newspaper El Moudjahid reported on Monday.
"Questioned about a possible rise which would go to $200, the minister did not rule out this eventuality, explaining that this rise is from now on indexed to the fall in the dollar or to the rise in the dollar," El Moudhajid reported.
"In terms of fundamentals, stocks are high, demand is easing, supply is satisfactory. Therefore normally, without geo-political problems and the fall of the dollar, the prices of oil would not be at this level," he was quoted as saying.
Khelil, a former World Bank official, is also Algeria's Minister of Energy and Mines.
He added: "The prices are high due to the fact of the recession in the United Sattes and the economic crisis which has touched several countries, a situation which has an effect on the devaluation of the dollar, and therefore each time the dollar falls one percent, the price of the barrel rises by $4, and of course vice versa," he was quoted as saying in brief remarks to journalists on Sunday.

Micki wrote:No way. $3.00 diesel didn't stop any trucks... $5.00 diesel isn't slowing down very many trucks... and neither will $8.00 diesel. They'll just keep on a truckin' no matter what the price is... until there ain't no more diesel at any price. THAT will be what finally stops the trucks.
So yes, whilst the trucks will keep driving, there will be less and less of them.

gampy wrote:It's funny, I don't own a car, I walk and bike everywhere. I live in a relatively small city, but I know for a fact that I will probably lose my job once gasoline becomes so expensive that people will forgo fast food for gas.
I am exploring some way to find a job that will survive gas shortages, and high food prices.
Question is, what kind of job is safe in a depression?
People need to eat, but where will they eat in a depression? I am in a kind of transitional phase (career wise) and am trying to figure out what kind of trade, or skills might be indispensible in a serious economic clusterfuck.
I work in the "hospitality" industry at the moment. (I am a short order cook)
I wonder if people will be eating out much in the near future.

eastbay wrote:Oh man, great graph Geko. Wow. I'm guessing that in two years we're going to see some serious demand destruction if the middle line remains on course. Any chance you could update it to reflect 2009 and 2010 projections?

Geko45 wrote:eastbay wrote:Oh man, great graph Geko. Wow. I'm guessing that in two years we're going to see some serious demand destruction if the middle line remains on course. Any chance you could update it to reflect 2009 and 2010 projections?
I updated it with the most recent price data and pushed the scale out a couple of more years (and the dollar scale up a $100) and either my model is breaking down or we are in for one serious spike. I want to play with it more before posting an update, but the worst case scenario was crossing $200 in Jan of 2009 (pretty much like this article suggests). Gosh, I hope I'm wrong.


elrod wrote:If this is true, why have we not seen it yet? This article was written in 2000:
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39ded01f0f37.htm






Plantagenet wrote:The Congress is going to enact a new $9 per barrel tax on domestic oil, so even if it did fall to $5 per barrel you'd have to add in the tax and would wind up at $14 per barrel.
---------
WASHINGTON - House Democrats next week will push to impose a new conservation fee on oil and natural gas taken from the Gulf of Mexico....
The bill calls for a $9 a barrel "resource conservation" fee on domestic oil, and a $1.25 per million Btu fee on natural gas .....

![bduh [smilie=bduh.gif]](http://peakoil.com/forums/images/smilies/bduh.gif)
Users browsing this forum: pstarr and 25 guests