Not unless it will make you feel better.dohboi wrote:So let me get this straight, dor. Are you suggesting that chemistry may operate on fundamentally different principles above the Arctic than above the Antarctic?
. Researching would be a very very good idea. One day people might pick up the habit.And is there something wrong about researching topics before discussing them?
None other than the link it was from memory Im afraid.so presumably you did some googling around before posting?
I think I would pay money to keep watching you post. Busted for posting the first abstract your google search revealed, never even noticed it was about the Antarctic and now bluffing it out. You amuse me like meemoe does.Such a detailed understanding of the mechanisms of this, does not come from a few moments of googling. It takes understanding of the diverse elements and how they relate.
dor needs to set here ego aside. This isn't about her
Lovely stuff. So self important. Hope to see your flock jump in with some keyboard chewing as well.Assigning causality between the polar vortex and cold stratospheric temperatures is simplistic and incorrect.
Puchica wrote:My problem about the MSM is that in the one subject I do know somewhat about (paleolithic & neolithic art and culture) university and research findings are so mangled and misinterpreted that sometimes the MSM headline is the opposite of the conclusion of the research. If that carries over to climate research, MSM isn't very reliable, I'm afraid
Cid turned up here tripping out on an anti American hate fest on the Geopolitics forum. Then he discovered Global Warming and now its his little means of punishing the US for not adopting the politics he likes. He doesnt leap to conslusions, he already has his conclusions and makes the 'facts' fit them. Mankind is to die because they are not liberal enough for our little munchkin.mos6507 wrote:Does Cid come across a little extreme and leaping to premature conclusions?
The current level of methane in the atmosphere is below that used for the climate sensitivity calculations in IPCC TAR in 2001. The Arctic is still believed to be about 1.5C cooler than it was only 120 000 years ago. It takes staggering amounts of energy to heat up water, and there is a lot of water up in the Arctic.mos6507 wrote:Yes. Does it mean the status of the environment is A OK? Hardly. We're kind of quibbling over whether our goose will be slow-roasted, toasted, or stir-fried.
dorlomin wrote:He doesnt leap to conslusions, he already has his conclusions and makes the 'facts' fit them.
mos6507 wrote:dorlomin wrote:He doesnt leap to conslusions, he already has his conclusions and makes the 'facts' fit them.
Which makes him the same as just about everybody else on this forum.
dorlomin wrote:Too many people round here are basically yellow cowards. No spine, no hope, no balls. Even if we were doomed, we will go down fighting and trying to save what we can.
Gutless jessies like Cid and the keyboard chewers are as bad as the deniers.
lol. wrong matey but he ho......Shar_Lamagne wrote:Dor, What you hate is that Cid was right and you were proven wrong, again.
Again the religious babble. You cant even understand my critiques so its religious babble about certainties.Shar_Lamagne wrote:To dismiss it as extremism is just you doing what
Shar_Lamagne wrote:You hate him because you can't out debate him. He's got the facts on his side, you present none.
Shar_Lamagne wrote:Your Tantrum style of posting just embarrasses yourself and lowers others estimation of you.
Return to Environment, Weather & Climate
Users browsing this forum: theluckycountry and 232 guests