NEW! Members Only Forums!

Access more articles, news & discussion by becoming a PeakOil.com Member.
Register Today...
It's FREE!


Login



Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins :-)


THE Methane Thread (merged)

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

THE Methane Thread (merged)

Unread postby Doctor Doom_gst1 » Sat 12 Jun 2004, 19:24:56

And now, for something completely different:
link 1 and link 2 and link 3 and link 4.
Doctor Doom_gst1
 

Unread postby Andy » Sat 12 Jun 2004, 20:09:01

When they find a way to extract the methane at a net positive EROEI and avoid releasing some to the atmosphere, I will become interested. Remember, methane is 10 times more effective as a greenhouse gas and would certainly accelerate planetary climatic cooking.
User avatar
Andy
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun 16 May 2004, 02:00:00

Unread postby Licho » Sun 13 Jun 2004, 05:09:02

Burning methane would not help climate either :-)
User avatar
Licho
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon 31 May 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Brno, Czech rep., EU

Unread postby smiley » Thu 17 Jun 2004, 15:02:38

It think that the exploitation of these recourses will prove to be too much of a challenge.

Imagine what it takes to start strip mining at >300 m below the surface. And these sediments will probably migrate to depressions in the ocean floor, so you'll be lucky to find them at 300 m. The find in near South Carlina lies at about 2000m depth according to my world map.

As soon as you start taking these sediments to the surface the methane starts to release so you probably have to process them in situ.

And thirdly just think of the enormous volumes of soil that you have to move and the environmental impact it will have.
User avatar
smiley
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Europe

[Methane 5] Poop power!

Unread postby Leanan » Fri 16 Jul 2004, 09:48:27

Forget Hubbert's Peak! A new source of energy is here, one we will never, ever run out of:

http://money.cnn.com/2004/07/15/news/funny/fecal_power.reut/index.htm


;-)

{The link died. Can you find it back? EE}
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 02:00:00

Peak poop

Unread postby sheilach » Fri 16 Jul 2004, 16:15:58

There may be a lot of s**t around, but getting it deposited in the right place could be a problem.

Look at Washington for example, they fly their poop all over the place and in general make a big mess, the hot air they generate while contributing to global warming, does little else.

Properly collected poop can be fermented to make methane, the left over sludge makes a fine fertilizer.

If you have a composting toilet, the poop can be put right to work in the garden making the raw material to produce more poop.

As they say, what goes around, comes around. :lol:

Poop is our greatest untapped resource!

Make more poop today and make it work. :lol:
Live like there's no tomorrow
User avatar
sheilach
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 02:00:00

Unread postby Madpaddy » Fri 16 Jul 2004, 16:22:48

S..T HAPPENS
User avatar
Madpaddy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2044
Joined: Fri 25 Jun 2004, 02:00:00

Unread postby Itch » Fri 16 Jul 2004, 16:24:41

I don't know, guys, I think there would be a lot of times when the EROEI would be at a negative, especially after heavy Mexican food dinners. Besides, how many of you would love to walk outside and smell the glory of shit fumes when you're done eating breakfast?
User avatar
Itch
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 02:00:00

Unread postby sheilach » Fri 16 Jul 2004, 16:39:13

In some asian countries, the odor of poop is overwhelming and it's bound to become more common eleswhere as we run out of chemical fertilizers.

We won't be able to afford to toss our lunch into the ocean, we must re-cycle it back into the ecosystem. :roll:

The human overpopulation could be put to use by recycling our poop, but when the population crashes, it's back to old horse and bull poop.

how many of you would love to walk outside and smell the glory of doo doo fumes when you're done eating breakfast?


Get use to it, we will need strong stomachs in the years ahead of us, we may well be gratefull that we have enough to eat to produce poop. :cry:
Live like there's no tomorrow
User avatar
sheilach
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 02:00:00

Unread postby born2respawn » Fri 16 Jul 2004, 16:50:24

I suppose you'd move the waste out away from any settlement and nearer to farm land: If you're rotting it down you'd be generating methane, and for safey you'd want that away from large numbers of people as well.
User avatar
born2respawn
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Britain

Unread postby sheilach » Fri 16 Jul 2004, 17:01:48

Definitely keep it away from people! 8O
and for safey you'd want that away from large numbers of people as well.


Small boys are the worse, they love lighting farts, imagine the 'fun' they would have with a methane generator using poop!! :roll:

I suppose you'd move the waste out away from any settlement and nearer to farm land


Of course, with transportation being a BIG problem in the future, you would definitley want the poop near the farm, of course with farm machinery now sitting idle for lack of fuel, those same people will also need to live near the farm to help the farmer work it.
Live like there's no tomorrow
User avatar
sheilach
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 02:00:00

Unread postby born2respawn » Fri 16 Jul 2004, 18:13:22

Transportation only has to be a matter of moving a couple of buckets a few hundred yards to a tank (down wind, preferably). After a while it'd become routine and the effort smell would be just another part of the day.

It's worth it seeing as having the stuff lying around nearby would be asking for trouble: Dysentry/diarrhea would be a massive problem, especially if there's a hint of water shortages.
User avatar
born2respawn
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Britain

Unread postby sheilach » Fri 16 Jul 2004, 20:39:24

It's worth it seeing as having the stuff lying around nearby would be asking for trouble: Dysentry/diarrhea would be a massive problem, especially if there's a hint of water shortages.


That will be another BIG problem post oil peak.Most areas have to pump their water and they use gasoline powered pumps, as the price of fuel rises, many people in the poor countries will not be able to buy the necessary fuel.
There's allready a big problem with water pollution in poor countries, some people just won't learn that human waste shouldn't just be dumped where ever the need arises.

Even when educated about the dangers of pollution from wayward poop, they still refuse even to use latrines.

I guess if their that dumb, they deserve what they get. :roll:

It's natures way of culling the unfit. :twisted:
Live like there's no tomorrow
User avatar
sheilach
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 02:00:00

Unread postby born2respawn » Sat 17 Jul 2004, 11:18:07

sheilach wrote:There's allready a big problem with water pollution in poor countries, some people just won't learn that human waste shouldn't just be dumped where ever the need arises.

The problems in these places is... if not caused then certainly exagerated... by trying to impliment a "western style" sewer system: Dumping it in a pit and chucking ash in on top would be far safer than streets fulls of the stuff.
User avatar
born2respawn
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Britain

Unread postby sheilach » Sat 17 Jul 2004, 17:37:55

The problems in these places is... if not caused then certainly exagerated... by trying to impliment a "western style" sewer system: Dumping it in a pit and chucking ash in on top would be far safer than streets fulls of the stuff.


The problem is that people DID try to instruct those people to dig latrines in which to put their body wastes and they refused to use them, choosing instead to take a "dump" where ever the need arose. :roll:

They weren't trying to impose a "western style" sewer systems because that would be too expencive and impractical in areas that didn't even have piped in water.
They were used to just leaving it were ever they happend to be and it was too "inconvienent" for them to walk to the smelly latrine/outhouse so they continue to suffer from water born diseases and skin rashes, especially their children. :cry:

I learned of this problem while reading "Foundations of Parasitology" by Gerald D.Schmidt & Larry S.Roberts'.

"Tradition" is very difficult to change. :cry:
Live like there's no tomorrow
User avatar
sheilach
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 02:00:00

Unread postby Leanan » Sun 18 Jul 2004, 09:11:46

While sanitation no doubt saves lives, it's now starting to look like it causes other problems. A lot of immune system problems - allergies, asthma, lupus, IBS, arthritis, multiple sclerosis, etc. - seem to be caused by growing up with too much hygiene. Your immune system doesn't learn what a real germ is, and mistakenly attacks the body or overreacts to substances that are harmless.

I was reading an article about this recently. An doctor had moved to the U.S. from India and raised his children here. He remembered getting water from the same river where neighbors upstream were dumping sewage, and the cholera, etc., that sometimes resulted. He's very glad his children don't suffer that. But his children all have allergies, and no one in his family ever had allergies before. He considers it a worthy trade, but still...it's something to think about.

One interesting study found that people rarely suffer allergies if they grow up with both a dog and a cat in the house. Having one or the other was better than none. Having pets may be a good way to get the benefits of early germ exposure, without the drawbacks.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 02:00:00

Unread postby Ender » Sun 18 Jul 2004, 09:31:49

sheilach wrote:Most areas have to pump their water and they use gasoline powered pumps


Where are you getting this from?

I don't know about other places, but Melbourne's water is mostly gravity fed (you know, lots of water high up, rather than fossil fuels, is how we transport our water).

And are pumps really gasoline powered? I thought most of them were diesel, and a lot of them are electric as well. In any case, assuming you're correct that most places use oil-fired pumps to get their water, how difficult would it be to change that over to electric?
User avatar
Ender
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri 21 May 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Unread postby Leanan » Sun 18 Jul 2004, 10:10:41

I don't know about other places, but Melbourne's water is mostly gravity fed (you know, lots of water high up, rather than fossil fuels, is how we transport our water).


We do that here, too, but we have to pump the water up into the water tower first.

And are pumps really gasoline powered? I thought most of them were diesel, and a lot of them are electric as well.


I lived in Manila for a couple of years, and the water pumps were electric there. Whenever the power went out (which was frequently), so did the water. We got in the habit of keeping one of the bathtubs filled, just in case. The people who get their water from wells around here have electric pumps, too.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 02:00:00

Unread postby Hydro » Sat 24 Jul 2004, 22:26:25

The majority of sewage pumps are electric. Why the hell would they use diesel? Electric pumps are more than sufficient.
Ender wrote:
sheilach wrote:Most areas have to pump their water and they use gasoline powered pumps
Where are you getting this from? I don't know about other places, but Melbourne's water is mostly gravity fed (you know, lots of water high up, rather than fossil fuels, is how we transport our water).
And are pumps really gasoline powered? I thought most of them were diesel, and a lot of them are electric as well. In any case, assuming you're correct that most places use oil-fired pumps to get their water, how difficult would it be to change that over to electric?
User avatar
Hydro
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun 04 Jul 2004, 02:00:00

Unread postby sheilach » Sat 24 Jul 2004, 22:50:46

The majority of sewage pumps are electric. Why the hell would they use diesel? Electric pumps are more than sufficient.

Even electric pumps mostly use electricity generated by fossil fuels like coal, natural gas, oil, kerosene or gasoline. :(

As fossil fuels become more expensive, they will need to switch to hydro power, wind powered pumps or solar powered pumps. :D

Fossil fuels are in EVERYTHING! 8O
Live like there's no tomorrow
User avatar
sheilach
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 02:00:00

Next

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests