NEW! Members Only Forums!

Access more articles, news & discussion by becoming a PeakOil.com Member.
Register Today...
It's FREE!


Login



Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins :-)


THE Exxon Mobil Thread pt 2 (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Moderator: Pops

Re: All Exxon Valdez Cleanup Workers Now Dead

Unread postby Tami » Wed 30 Jun 2010, 23:47:29

My brother in law worked cleaning up that mess. He is still alive.
Tami
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed 09 Jun 2010, 23:37:59

Re: All Exxon Valdez Cleanup Workers Now Dead

Unread postby americandream » Thu 01 Jul 2010, 01:39:08

ALMOST, not All.
Dismayed participant in the global pyramid scheme.
americandream
Master
Master
 
Posts: 5445
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 02:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: All Exxon Valdez Cleanup Workers Now Dead

Unread postby Novus » Thu 01 Jul 2010, 02:27:54

I have heard the life expectancy of Valdez cleanup workers was 51.
User avatar
Novus
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 2451
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 02:00:00

Re: All Exxon Valdez Cleanup Workers Now Dead

Unread postby dolanbaker » Thu 01 Jul 2010, 04:55:08

One of the responses to the story, Who do you believe?

0 0 Flag as Offensive Prince William Sound Resident on Jul 1, 4:05 AM said: @The Truthmaster:
This is complete Bull crap... Almost all Valdez Clean up crew Dead? Give me a break! Do you have any idea how many there were of us? Thousand upon Thousands... no were not all dead, though sometimes we might wish we were deaf after listening to some of this sensationalism on T.V.
All of this reeks of pigs at the trough the BP $$ trough... Yeah I don't trust any Oil companies after experiencing what we went thru with Exxon, for that matter I don't trust The Supreme court either-so much for looking out for the "little guy". And now I really don't trust CNN after allowing that woman to state such BS. I would bet my fishing boat that she has never even been in Alaska much less Prince William Sound. CNN you better check out your guests credibility a bit better.


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/warning- ... z0sQHgtgyn
Ronald Coase, Nobel Economic Sciences, said in 1991 “If we torture the data long enough, it will confess.”
User avatar
dolanbaker
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1562
Joined: Wed 14 Apr 2010, 09:38:47
Location: Éire

Re: All Exxon Valdez Cleanup Workers Now Dead

Unread postby mattduke » Thu 01 Jul 2010, 20:59:14

americandream wrote:ALMOST, not All.



My apologies. I renamed the title.
User avatar
mattduke
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 3593
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 02:00:00

Re: Not All Exxon Valdez Cleanup Workers Now Dead

Unread postby jboogy » Sat 17 Jul 2010, 21:52:44

This has been discredited. it appears the source for this claim is extremely difficult to pin down, rumor floating through the intertubes. http://7ax.de/1isc
Perhaps the population would be less swayed to socialism if we had fewer examples of socialism from our "Free Market Capitalists". -----fiddler dave
User avatar
jboogy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Mon 06 Jun 2005, 02:00:00
Location: the place where smartasses dwell

Re: Not All Exxon Valdez Cleanup Workers Now Dead

Unread postby dissident » Sun 18 Jul 2010, 06:05:07

Even if most of them are still alive, prolonged exposure to even diesel fuel (skin contact) can shorten your life. Oil has a bigger spectrum of toxic compounds than just a distillate. I am sure some BP apologist nitwit politician will come and claim you can drink it is so safe. I've seen one 'tard make this claim for PCBs.
User avatar
dissident
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1873
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 02:00:00

Re: Not All Exxon Valdez Cleanup Workers Now Dead

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Sun 18 Jul 2010, 07:11:11

I noticed 'glycol' in the Corexit Formulation of Proylene Glycol. And from
my dog being poisoned by antifreeze (for some reason they love the taste/smell, I know that antifreeze is Ethylene Glycol.

From:

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ethyl ... d_904.html


Comparing Ethylene Glycol and Propylene Glycol
Comparing the properties of ethylene glycol and propylene glycol-Warning Label Ethylene glycol should never be used in any drinking water or food processing system

This chemical dispersant is like anti-freeze. BP is systematically poisoning the sea and everything in it.

Two ounces of ethylene glycol antifreeze can kill a dog, one teaspoon can be lethal to a cat, and two tablespoons can be hazardous to children.

Dispersant Application in Alaska: A Technical Update Anchorage, Alaska, March 18 and 19, 1998. Presentations and transcripts of panel discussions from a 1998 conference on the use of dispersants in Prince William Sound and Cook Inlet, Alaska. The report is 341 pages. Copies available by download or on CD (see contacts page).
mcgowanjm
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 02:00:00

Re: Not All Exxon Valdez Cleanup Workers Now Dead

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Sun 18 Jul 2010, 07:14:15

And two of my different sites are posting this.

From the vid accompanying the title:

Testing Gulf Water: One Sample Exploded in Lab
July 18th, 2010

I think this originates with the Press Register of Mobile.
mcgowanjm
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 02:00:00

Re: Not All Exxon Valdez Cleanup Workers Now Dead

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Sun 18 Jul 2010, 07:50:21

dissident wrote:Even if most of them are still alive, prolonged exposure to even diesel fuel (skin contact) can shorten your life. Oil has a bigger spectrum of toxic compounds than just a distillate. I am sure some BP apologist nitwit politician will come and claim you can drink it is so safe. I've seen one 'tard make this claim for PCBs.


As a cotton farmer, I remember, way back when(carter/reagan
maybe) the California Sec of Ag drinking
a bottle of Methyl Parathion (major cotton insecticide), to claim it's benign.

Always wondered what happened to him. :twisted:

And I see in a web search that Ethylene Glycol is used to isolate/screen DDT polymers. Nice stuff.

AAMOF, it looks like I've got lots of propylene glycol in me as well. It's a surfactant, designed to get the chemical in question to 'stick to'/'penetrate' the plant. A surfactant,
say propylene glycol is in your anti persperant:

Skin care manufacturers are not supposed to claim that their products penetrate the skin. If they did, the products would then be labelled as “drugs” and would be governed by much stricter regulations. However, it is now recognised that the skin does absorb many of the toxic ingredients in skin care preparations.
mcgowanjm
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 02:00:00

Re: Not All Exxon Valdez Cleanup Workers Now Dead

Unread postby SFDukie » Sun 18 Jul 2010, 23:58:52

I'm extremely skeptical of the claim that most cleanup workers from the Prince William sound spill are dead. Personal injury lawyers would be having a field day were that true. That claim seems to come from an author, Merle Savage, who worked on cleanup. And she's clearly not much for evidence based medicine...

http://www.lvrj.com/news/exxon-valdez-oil-risks-spur-warning-for-gulf-cleanup-crews-93258964.html

While pain pills and other medications didn't work for her problems, Savage researched some natural remedies.

"I found out about toxic chemicals and detoxed myself with a lemon juice concoction," she said. "And I sleep on a blanket with magnets in it. It gets your system back in shape.

SFDukie
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed 10 Jun 2009, 17:19:58

Re: Not All Exxon Valdez Cleanup Workers Now Dead

Unread postby americandream » Mon 19 Jul 2010, 05:38:29

So presumably you are willing to go do your patriotic bit in clearing up this gunk, the risk of being immersed repeatedly in it notwithstanding, whilst the top nobs in a certain unnamed company are whooping it up at yachting regattas for the fabulously well fed.

As they say, there's one born every minute.

SFDukie wrote:I'm extremely skeptical of the claim that most cleanup workers from the Prince William sound spill are dead. Personal injury lawyers would be having a field day were that true. That claim seems to come from an author, Merle Savage, who worked on cleanup. And she's clearly not much for evidence based medicine...

http://www.lvrj.com/news/exxon-valdez-oil-risks-spur-warning-for-gulf-cleanup-crews-93258964.html

While pain pills and other medications didn't work for her problems, Savage researched some natural remedies.

"I found out about toxic chemicals and detoxed myself with a lemon juice concoction," she said. "And I sleep on a blanket with magnets in it. It gets your system back in shape.

Dismayed participant in the global pyramid scheme.
americandream
Master
Master
 
Posts: 5445
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 02:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Exxon ups oil target for Iraq's West Qurna Phase 1

Unread postby Graeme » Sun 28 Nov 2010, 20:48:15

Exxon ups oil target for Iraq's West Qurna Phase 1

U.S. major ExxonMobil (XOM.N) and its partners raised their production plateau target from Iraq's West Qurna oilfield to 2.825 million barrels per day after adding new reserves to the area covered by their original development contract, an Iraqi oil official said on Sunday.

The original plateau target when the contract was signed in January was 2.325 million bpd in six to seven years time, but the Exxon-led consortium agreed with Iraq to add four undeveloped reservoirs, Madhi Swadi, a member of the joint management committee that runs the field, told Reuters.

"There was a discussion to develop the discovered undeveloped reservoirs and it was agreed as an addition to the original contract at production rates of 500,000 bpd," he said in an interview at West Qurna oilfield, near the southern oil hub of Basra.

Under a rehabilitation plan for the field, the consortium plans to boost output from the giant field to around 750,000 bpd in three years from between 230,000 to 240,000 bpd now, by drilling new wells, overhauling existing wells and a series of water injection projects, Swadi said.


reuters
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
http://www.repoweramerica.org/
User avatar
Graeme
Master
Master
 
Posts: 7236
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Exxon ups oil target for Iraq's West Qurna Phase 1

Unread postby Tanada » Mon 29 Nov 2010, 05:48:53

Sounds to me like the super straw effect is coming to Iraq with a vengeance. I wonder if the goal is to drain the reserves ASAP in case the government stops being friendly to the USA a decade down the road?
Always appeal to a man's enlightened self interest, you can trust him to look out for himself honestly, It's when you appeal to his Honor or the Common Good that he stops paying attention.
User avatar
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6615
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 02:00:00
Location: West shore Lake Eire, MI, USA

Re: Exxon ups oil target for Iraq's West Qurna Phase 1

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Mon 29 Nov 2010, 08:40:31

I wonder how many bribes had to be paid to seal that deal? :twisted:
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 2894
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Exxon says it can't find more oil

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 15 Feb 2011, 18:23:22

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Exxon can't find more oil. The "Good old days are over" says an Exxon oil man.

Exxon can't find more oil

Obviously there are still wells to be drilled in offshore areas, small fields in the Bakken and similar onshore plays, as well as Brazil, Iraq, the Arctic, etc. But a giant company like Exxon needs giant oil plays to stay alive. Exxon is saying that it can't find any giant oil projects worth spending its money on anywhere in the world.

The time of the big private oil company is over. 8)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 12583
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 02:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Exxon says it can't find more oil

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Tue 15 Feb 2011, 18:30:22

8) Sooner or later this had to happen. Apparently it is sooner.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 2894
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Re: Exxon says it can't find more oil

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 15 Feb 2011, 18:41:28

vtsnowedin wrote:8) Sooner or later this had to happen. Apparently it is sooner.


Yup. I'm just amazed at how soon it is all happening. Looks like that 2005 global oil production peak (i.e. peak oil) is hard and real.

The WSJ says Exxon is shifting into natural gas plays.

This has BIG implications for US energy policy, since Exxon is the largest American oil company.

It also has BIG implications for people who have stock portfolios with energy stocks. Exxon stock was down big today---probably due to the WSJ story about them I've linked to here. There has been a lot of debate as to whether the big oil companies will do great or will get wiped out as peak oil starts to bite. Personally, I don't own Exxon or other big energy companies----I think their growth potential is limited as oil supplies start to drop----I think the energy service companies will do better. 8)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 12583
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 02:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Exxon says it can't find more oil

Unread postby Daniel_Plainview » Tue 15 Feb 2011, 18:45:28

"The good old days are gone and not to be repeated," says Fadel Gheit, an analyst with Oppenheimer and Co. Bringing additional reserves from gas "is not going to give you the same punch" that oil would, he said.


Peak oil has arrived ... Image

Plantagenet wrote:
vtsnowedin wrote:8) Sooner or later this had to happen. Apparently it is sooner.


Yup. I'm just amazed at how soon it is all happening. Looks like that 2005 global oil production peak (i.e. peak oil) is hard and real.


Peak oil is upon us ... Image
User avatar
Daniel_Plainview
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 3915
Joined: Tue 06 May 2008, 02:00:00
Location: 7035 Hollis ... Near the Observatory ... Just down the way, tucked back in the small woods

Re: Exxon says it can't find more oil

Unread postby highlander » Tue 15 Feb 2011, 18:47:06

That is because it is all locked up in ANWR. (well, 42 days worth or whatever)
There will be a loud cry to reduce taxes on oil companies, have gov'ts subsidize exploration and allow corporate profits to be massive, or else the world will come to an end.
govt's will submit, no oil will be found
there will be blood.
This is where everybody puts profound words written by another...or not so profound words written by themselves
Highlander 2007
User avatar
highlander
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun 03 Oct 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Washington State

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Oily Stuff and 20 guests