Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Re: The Search for Prometheus III

Unread postby John_A » Sun 22 Dec 2013, 11:54:45

MonteQuest wrote:So, to make the transition to renewable energies, we must “powerdown” our civilization and learn to live in a world of modest, bio-regionally organized communities living on received solar energy.


Eco-pipe dreams. Nukes can easily allow no power down, there are liquid fuels for the rest of the century without even finding any more, and as the planet is just discovering, the CH4 molecule is a great and wonderful thing, and we have so much of it around there is no need to even built solar panels if we choose not to. Not that we SHOULDN'T mind you, but until solar panels can deliver a contracted 120 MW at 10PM on a Thursday night under contract to the grid, they are going to stay as more of an intermittent power generator rather than anything looking like the base load generation that has made America the country it is today.




MonteQuest wrote:For the next half-century there will be just enough energy resources left to enable either a horrific and futile contest for the remaining spoils, or a heroic cooperative effort toward radical conservation and transition to a post-fossil-fuel energy regime. Technological change is shaped in part by the physical attributes of the energies available from the environment, so a world based upon renewable solar technologies is going to be different than the one we now live in.


Doomer porn pipe dream. We live in this reality, not the one some might dream about.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby dohboi » Sun 22 Dec 2013, 12:00:03

Wow, where/when did you get those montequest quotes from? He hasn't posted around here in years, afaik.
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Search for Prometheus III

Unread postby Strummer » Sun 22 Dec 2013, 12:20:47

John_A wrote:We live in this reality, not the one some might dream about.


Yes, we do. But "this reality" is something completely different than you think for the ~7 billion people on Earth who are not members of the american imperial middle-class citizenry. Judging by your posts, you have no clue about the world outside the privileged little bubble that you live in.
Strummer
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2013, 04:42:14

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby dohboi » Mon 23 Dec 2013, 12:47:52

Here's one measure of how unsustainable US consumption is:

The U.S. Is A Gas-Guzzling Horror Show, In 1 Chart

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/1 ... 54472.html

Image
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby clif » Mon 23 Dec 2013, 15:14:34

there are liquid fuels for the rest of the century without even finding any more,


Far from it ........


Former BP geologist: Peak oil is here and it will ‘break economies’

Dr. Miller critiqued the official industry line that global reserves will last 53 years at current rates of consumption, pointing out that “peaking is the result of declining production rates, not declining reserves.” Despite new discoveries and increasing reliance on unconventional oil and gas, 37 countries are already post-peak, and global oil production is declining at about 4.1% per year, or 3.5 million barrels a day (b/d) per year:

“We need new production equal to a new Saudi Arabia every 3 to 4 years to maintain and grow supply… New discoveries have not matched consumption since 1986. We are drawing down on our reserves, even though reserves are apparently climbing every year. Reserves are growing due to better technology in old fields, raising the amount we can recover – but production is still falling at 4.1% p.a. [per annum].”

Dr. Miller, who prepared annual in-house projections of future oil supply for BP from 2000 to 2007, refers to this as the “ATM problem” – “more money, but still limited daily withdrawals.” As a consequence: “Production of conventional liquid oil has been flat since 2008. Growth in liquid supply since then has been largely of natural gas liquids [NGL]- ethane, propane, butane, pentane – and oil-sand bitumen.”


(snip)

Although he is dismissive of shale oil and gas’ capacity to prevent a peak and subsequent long decline in global oil production, Miller recognises that there is still some leeway that could bring significant, if temporary dividends for US economic growth – though only as “a relatively short-lived phenomenon”:

“We’re like a cage of lab rats that have eaten all the cornflakes and discovered that you can eat the cardboard packets too. Yes, we can, but… Tight oil may reach 5 or even 6 million b/d in the US, which will hugely help the US economy, along with shale gas. Shale resources, though, are inappropriate for more densely populated countries like the UK, because the industrialisation of the countryside affects far more people (with far less access to alternative natural space), and the economic benefits are spread more thinly across more people. Tight oil production in the US is likely to peak before 2020. There absolutely will not be enough tight oil production to replace the US’ current 9 million b/d of imports.”


(snip)

According to another study in the Royal Society journal special edition by professor David J. Murphy of Northern Illinois University, an expert in the role of energy in economic growth, the energy return on investment (EROI) for global oil and gas production – the amount of energy produced compared to the amount of energy invested to get, deliver and use that energy – is roughly 15 and declining. For the US, EROI of oil and gas production is 11 and declining; and for unconventional oil and biofuels is largely less than 10. The problem is that as EROI decreases, energy prices increase. Thus, Murphy concludes:

“… the minimum oil price needed to increase the oil supply in the near term is at levels consistent with levels that have induced past economic recessions. From these points, I conclude that, as the EROI of the average barrel of oil declines, long-term economic growth will become harder to achieve and come at an increasingly higher financial, energetic and environmental cost.”

Current EROI in the US, Miller said, is simply “not enough to support the US infrastructure, even if America was self-sufficient, without raising production even further than current consumption.”


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/12/23/f ... economies/

Simply put the party's over, but the over inebriated guests refuse to accept that reality

So they grasp at any and all excuses to party on, till they cannot.

Then reality will slam them and the rest of us into that cruel wall
How cathartic it is to give voice to your fury, to wallow in self-righteousness, in helplessness, in self-serving self-pity.
User avatar
clif
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 13:04:10

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby dohboi » Tue 24 Dec 2013, 01:02:42

economic growth will become harder to achieve and come at an increasingly higher financial, energetic and environmental cost


Unfortunately those are costs that the we seem to be willing to pay indefinitely.
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby clif » Tue 24 Dec 2013, 11:17:15

Until the day we cannot.

Remember, even one too many straws results in the breaking of the camels back.

We are much sooner than most think going to find out,

what costs breaks infinite unfettered global capitalism,

and what chaos will result from that breaking of the system.
How cathartic it is to give voice to your fury, to wallow in self-righteousness, in helplessness, in self-serving self-pity.
User avatar
clif
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 13:04:10

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 21 Jan 2014, 17:31:21

3 questions to gauge global progress on sustainability in 2014

In my previous post, I argued that the sustainability agenda for 2014 is actually all about progress toward global agreements on climate change and sustainable development to be completed at the end of 2015. And while international agreements are necessary, they are not, in and of themselves, sufficient to achieve the goals they establish. As we have learned from Kyoto, treaties alone do not bring results.

With this in mind, three questions will tell the tale about how much progress is made in the coming year, and will be key to how well any agreements in 2015 actually can be advanced.

1. Will markets finally embrace long-term value creation? Ideally, investors will help deliver a virtuous circle that rewards companies that take a long-term view and reject externalized costs, rather than focus on churning for quick profits. One important signal will be how fast integrated reporting and natural capital accounting accelerate in the year ahead. More companies are embracing this model and also inserting sustainability information in their regulatory disclosures. These developments should continue to grow, and one hopes that they will convince investors that sustainability and long-term value are their business, too.

2. Will consumers put their money where their mouth is? The mature economies continue to waste massive amounts of water, energy and food. While more people are speaking about the importance of sustainable consumption, the consumption-based economy steams ahead. Market pressure to demonstrate growth above all remains overwhelming. There are, however, some signs of change. The sharing economy is gaining traction, but it is still in its early days. Car sharing and urban farming in Brooklyn or Berkeley won’t get the job done, but these are positive signs that a generational change in consumer attitudes may be coming. For companies, the challenge will be how to translate these signals into new business models that generate both profitability and brand value.


One important signal will be how fast integrated reporting and natural capital accounting accelerate in the year ahead. More companies are embracing this model and also inserting sustainability information in their regulatory disclosures

3. Will the tragic lessons from Bangladesh lead to more decisive action to reform global supply chains?


eco-business
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby Graeme » Wed 22 Jan 2014, 18:28:14

Sustainability and Corporate Consciousness: The Facts Are In

The term "sustainability" carries a great number of definitions in several industries. However, no matter the field, the core idea of the word means the same thing to everyone: to continue, to carry on, to keep going, etc. In this post, I'm focusing on the concept of sustainable business practices. Believe it or not, such a process does exist, as I've learned from the pages of Gregory Balestrero and Nathalie Udo's Organizational Survival: Profitable Strategies for a Sustainable Future.

To the environmentalists, and many others, the idea of organizational survival through sustainable practices seems like an A+ method of going about business, leading to a prolonged existence in your field as well as an added bonus of staying alive on the planet a bit longer. However, many on the financial side have spoken against the practice, stating reasons such as the cost and their question of its importance (due to it not being a requirement). But where there's a mass, there's at least one willing to go against the grain. Therefore, I decided to ask financial advisor Rebecca True about her take on the idea of sustainability, after reading her thoughts in Chapter 8 of Organizational Survival, "Does Corporate Sustainability Create Measurable Value?"

Kyle Dowling: How would you define "sustainability"?


huffingtonpost

The World's Most Sustainable Companies Of 2014

Australian corporation Westpac Banking is the most sustainable company on earth this year, according to a new ranking from Corporate Knights. But what does sustainability mean, exactly? Doug Morrow, vice president of research at Corporate Knights, a Toronto-based media company, says it’s a multifaceted concept.

“On the one hand, it means doing more with less; squeezing more output out of every capital input, including financial, human and natural capital,” he explains. “But the hallmark of a sustainable enterprise is not just efficiency, but also mechanisms to encourage meritocracy, diversity, innovation and long-term planning. Management teams at sustainable corporations are afforded room to think and plan beyond the next financial quarter.”

Sustainability in a corporate context is essentially recognizing that a corporation’s long-term interests are intellectually and financially consistent with resource efficiency, proactive health and safety practices, and responsible leadership, he says.


forbes
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 28 Jan 2014, 17:54:25

US Firms Dominate Sustainability Yearbook

Ten US-based companies including Abbott, Alcoa, Baker Hughes and Molson Coors have been awarded gold medals for sustainability practices in the RobecoSAM Sustainability Yearbook 2014. This places the US higher than any other country in the rankings.

The gold medal-winning US companies also include Ball Corp, Citigroup, Humana, Life Technologies, Owens Corning and Spectra Energy. Each of these firms were named industry leaders as well.

Last year, the US topped other countries with nine gold-awarded companies that included repeat winners Alcoa and Molson Coors as well as Baxter International, PepsiCo and Waste Management.

Every year RobecoSAM assesses the sustainability performance of companies across 59 sectors. Each company is scored on up to 120 financially material economic, environmental, social and governance criteria specific to its own industry, with a focus on long-term value creation. Companies that make it into the yearbook are ranked as gold, silver or bronze and the top-performing firm from each of the 59 industries is awarded RobecoSAM Industry Leader.

RobecoSAM made it more challenging this year to qualify as a yearbook member. Companies now need to be in the top 15 percent of their industry and achieve a score within 30 percent of their industry leader’s score to make the cut.

Also this year, out of the largest 3,000 companies that were invited, 818 companies from 39 different countries participated with a 31 percent increase in participation from businesses in emerging markets, according to RobecoSAM.

Germany and South Korea followed the US each with eight gold medal-winning companies. German gold medalists are Adidas, Allianz, BMW, Henkel, SAP, Siemens, TUI and Volkswagen.

South Korea’s award winners include personal products firm Amorepacific, Hyundai Engineering and Construction, KEPCO Plant Service & Engineering, KT Corp, Lotte Shopping, S-Oil, Samsung Electro-Mechanics and SK C&C.

Australia, Japan and France each have five gold-medal winning countries, followed by Switzerland and UK, each with four.


environmentalleader
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby Newfie » Tue 28 Jan 2014, 18:29:36

Sorry, I just don't buy into what they call "sustainable." My definition is quite different. I call this green washing.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18460
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby dohboi » Wed 29 Jan 2014, 01:26:38

If you have the time, here's a nice lecture by Tainter himself. Sustainability is specifically addressed starting at about minute 38.

http://climatestate.com/2013/05/14/coll ... h-tainter/

...just two quibbles for now--when he says that conservation does not lead to sustainability (or something like that), he is referring to sustainability of what are clearly unsustainable (over the long term) structures--empires.

When he says that sustainability is not inherent to humans, his main (counter) example is from when humans probably had not yet developed fully modern language. It is obviously much harder to innovate (and to pass on those innovations) without than with language!!!
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby Graeme » Thu 20 Feb 2014, 18:32:00

4 top sustainability reporting trends for 2014

At most companies, work on 2013 sustainability reports is well underway. But it's not too late to take stock and assess whether you're giving enough consideration to four major issues recently cited by Ernst & Young: materiality, conflict minerals, social compliance in supply chains and reporting requirements in emerging market stock markets. Its publication "Let's talk" is an easy read and does a nice job of laying out the issues at a strategic level.

As I read, I thought, "So how does this affect my clients and other reporters right now?" Here's a recap of each trend, with some tips and tools you can use to take action.


greenbiz
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby dohboi » Fri 21 Feb 2014, 06:53:28

I guess every move in this direction is good, but at some level, isn't 'greenbiz' a bit of an oxymoron?
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby Newfie » Fri 21 Feb 2014, 19:52:11

The little bit of the LEED program I've seen leads me to believe it is probably doing more harm than good.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18460
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 25 Feb 2014, 17:24:26

Guidelines Released to Help Financial Sector Report on Sustainability to SEC

A nonprofit standards-setting organization today released voluntary guidelines to help commercial banks, insurance companies and others in the financial sector report on relevant sustainability issues in annual filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The financial sector standards are part of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board's effort to improve the quality and rate of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure in mandatory SEC filings, including annual 10-K reports, among publicly listed companies in 10 sectors.

The SEC has been criticized for failing to enforce its rules for corporate reporting on climate risk in particular. A recent report from Ceres said the majority of financial reporting on climate change from S&P 500 companies is too brief and largely superficial.

SASB's standards give the financial sector guidance on how to disclose a number of climate-related risks, including commercial bank lending to carbon-intensive industries and carbon embedded in the asset management industry.


bloomberg
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby Graeme » Wed 02 Apr 2014, 21:25:03

New model shows moderate resource use, reduced economic inequality keys to sustainability

A new analytical tool adds human factors to a widely-used biological model of how animal populations interact, suggesting that human societies can reach a steady state that is sustainable when they do not over-deplete natural resources and avoid extreme economic inequality.

The paper, titled "Human and nature dynamics (HANDY): modeling inequality and use of resources in the collapse or sustainability of societies," was published in the May 2014 issue of the journal Ecological Economics. Its authors are Safa Motesharrei, a Ph.D. candidate in applied mathematics at UMD; Jorge Rivas of the Institute of Global Environment and Society; and Eugenia Kalnay, Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science and the Institute for Physical Science and Technology at UMD.

Kalnay, an internationally recognized weather and climate scientist, worked in leadership positions at NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for two decades and currently serves on the UN Secretary General's Scientific Advisory Board on Sustainability. She is renowned, in part, for leading the National Weather Service's advances in weather modeling in the 1990s. Her recent work has focused on advancing understanding of climate change and environmental sustainability through improved modeling of the coupled interaction of earth and human systems.

HANDY's starting point is a well-known model in biology and population ecology, commonly known as the "predator-prey model," which is used to understand the dynamics of animal populations. The researchers applied that model's concepts to human societies, and incorporated two new variables that are not included in existing models: accumulation of wealth and economic stratification between rich and poor. These changes are necessary, the researchers say, to reflect that some segments of human society use more resources than others, and accumulated wealth can delay, but not prevent, the decline that occurs when a population exceeds the carrying capacity of its environment. With HANDY, the researchers say, they have developed a practical method for using the relevant natural, social and economic conditions to estimate a human society's carrying capacity.



The goal is not to find precise solutions for the variables of the real system, but instead to address questions such as:

In the long run, will the system settle at a steady state?
What are these possible steady states?
What factors determine which long-term behavior is followed?

"The results of our model are optimistic, because they show that by making certain decisions, we can bring about a sustainable future," said Rivas. Unlike physical and natural systems, such as the solar system or an ecosystem, "we can, as humans, make critical choices that can change the long-term path that our social system will take, and we can optimize such choices using scientific models. This is a key takeaway lesson of this paper."


phys.org
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby Graeme » Mon 07 Apr 2014, 20:25:07

Generalists to the Rescue: The Emergence of the Sustainability Professional

As humanity has developed and expanded its footprint on our Earth, the complexity and interrelatedness of our systems has increased exponentially. The trend for individuals to specialize has also accelerated, and life as we know it today would be impossible without the brain surgeons, fire fighters and information technology engineers performing their highly specialized tasks. Nevertheless, this trend has also unavoidably led to ever narrowing and isolated perspectives, an unexpected and ironic byproduct in the age of ever expanding information and nearly instantaneous dissemination. In parallel to this trend, the challenges that face our Earth and humanity's success on it have also increased in magnitude, complexity and interrelatedness. Unfortunately, we have not yet found a field of specialization adept to navigate humanity's turbulent and uncertain future. However, there is an emerging field of sustainability professionals -- generalists by training -- who are committed to finding a balanced path forward by approaching our complex system as a whole in order to attain its optimal state.

While the connotation of the word generalist does not provide us comfort by bringing to mind a perspective too wide to describe anything specifically, but in stark contrast, science defines it one applicable to every case and therefore universally relevant. The aim of these generalists is to positively affect the direction of human activity in every situation. Their pragmatism and optimistic resolve characterize the sustainability professional.

Paradoxically, the human activity that has the highest potential to improve global standards of living is negatively affecting the balance of life on Earth and threatening its carrying capacity. Increases in global average temperatures and loss of biodiversity are just some of the consequences directly related to modern civilization's frenetic consumption of energy, food and natural resources. This spiraling race to the bottom is pitting people against people, condemning billions to undernourishment, and poverty. Unfortunately, the aforementioned conditions are exacerbated by disease, war and poor access to health. However, there is a reason to be hopeful, because for every seemingly intractable problem on Earth, there are countless highly motivated specialists attempting to resolve them. Accelerating the implementation of innovative solution-sets and identifying their optimal deployment to achieve system-wide positive feedback is our biggest challenge. This is where the generalists play a pivotal role in the equation.


huffingtonpost

Sustainability Mythbusters Part VI: There’s No Consumer Demand for Sustainability

Selectively search the Internet and it’s usually easy to find the research one needs to back up a stance. That used to be the case when talk turned to whether or not there’s demand from consumers for more sustainability in the companies they deal with.

The tide seems to be turning toward consumers who prefer, if not outright demand, more sustainable products and services. And even if some research shows that people may still be on the fence about whether or not they’d pay more for sustainability, it’s becoming clear that more people are choosing sustainability.

This shift has come, in part, from that fact that consumers view sustainable products as better for their health and the environment. According to the 2013 Tork Sustainability Study conducted by Harris Interactive, 78 percent of consumers say they buy green products and services, up from 69 percent a year prior. Of those in the 2013 survey, 20 percent cite health reasons – an increase of 8 percent over 2012 – and 47 percent say they do so because of the products’ effects on the environment.

Consumers also see the implications of sustainability in terms of its costs. Given sustainable options at similar costs, consumers by and large will go with the more sustainable product or service. They may not lean that way, however, if the cost difference is too significant.

But there is more to the price than what is on the tag as many products often don’t include externalized costs. In this day and age of accessible information, consumers have become more aware about where the products they purchase come from. They’re more cognizant of transportation costs – something that hits their own wallets in the form of high gas prices.

Similarly, when it comes to sustainability and cost, the less expensive price tag doesn’t always reveal the true – and less sustainable costs – of cheap labor. When comparing similar products, a cheaper product may not simply reflect a lesser quality of materials or craftsmanship, but it may have been produced with ultimately higher costs to the environment and the communities in which it was produced.

People today care about these impacts more than ever. Just as consumers are pushing for greater sustainability, so too are holding companies bearing greater accountability for producing tangible results from their corporate social responsibility programs, according to research conducted by the marketing firm Cone Communications.


environmentalleader
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Sustainability pt. 2 (merged)

Unread postby dohboi » Thu 24 Apr 2014, 13:47:13

User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Environment, Weather & Climate

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron