... The proximate cause of the sell-off was likely a deal announced between Russia's central bank and Rosneft, a major state-controlled oil company, to help cover the company's debts. Many investors viewed the nearly $11 billion deal as potentially inflationary and, given the favorable terms of the deal and the close ties between Rosneft and the Kremlin, a signal that the central bank may not be immune to political pressures.
... Capital flight: In the first three quarters of the year, net private capital outflows from Russia
totaled $85 billion, compared to net outflows of $54 billion in all of 2012. In December 2014,
Putin announced that one of Russia's sovereign wealth funds, the National Welfare Fund, would
be used to recapitalize Russian banks. ... Although the Russian government had initially been optimistic about its economic growth prospects, in early December 2014, the Bank of Russia forecasted that the economy could contract by 4.5% in 2015.
Issues to Watch
Next steps for the Russian government? How long will Russia's foreign exchange reserves last if it continues to intervene in foreign exchange markets and provide support to selected Russian firms and banks? By most measures, Russia has large foreign exchange reserves, totaling $374 billion at the end of November 2014. However, some analysts question how liquid Russia's foreign exchange reserves actually are. A former finance minister claimed the amount could be as low as $200 billion.
Some analysts have suggested that the Russian central bank could impose capital controls to stop money from leaving the country, but there are questions about the effectiveness and long-term consequences of capital controls.
Contagion to other emerging markets? Russia is a major player in the international economy: it has the world's ninth-largest economy and a population of more than 140 million. There are questions about whether investors will differentiate the economic challenges facing Russia as unique from those facing other emerging economies, such as India, South Africa, and Turkey, or whether the crisis will trigger broad capital flight from emerging markets to "safe havens," like the United States and the EU.
Spillover effects for the United States? Overall U.S. trade and investment ties with Russia are relatively limited, but some major U.S. firms, such as ExxonMobil, General Electric, Ford, and Pepsi, among many others, are active in Russia. An economic crisis or prolonged economic downturn in
Russia could directly impact these firms. It could also create disruptions in the global economy that could impact the U.S. economy more indirectly, particularly as growth in many countries—including Europe, Japan, and China—has slowed. In particular, the economic impact of the crisis on Europe could have implications for the U.S. economy, given tight U.S.-EU economic ties
Thoughts?
1) face saving to keep the obvious failure from being noticed
2) sales pitch to get the baltics to buy some of our newshiny gear and support our arms manufacturers
3) creation of a remote boogyman, far away, but evil..... Putin will do. Xi might do, except he could hurt us economically pretty bad if he wanted to.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Russia's Economy Headed For Even More Trouble
MOSCOW, Dec 26 (Reuters) - Slumping oil prices have put Russia's economy on course for a sharp recession and double-digit inflation next year, government ministers said on Friday, as authorities scaled up a bailout for the first bank to succumb to this month's rouble crisis.
The economy is slowing sharply as Western sanctions over the Ukraine crisis deter foreign investment and spur capital flight, and as a slump in oil prices severely reduces Russia's export revenues and pummels the rouble.
...
"Next year we will, without doubt, have to bring the Reserve Fund into play," he said, referring to one of Russia's two rainy-day funds intended to support the economy at times of crisis.
Crude prices have almost halved from their June peak amid a global glut and a decision by producer group OPEC not to cut output. Saudi Arabia said on Friday it was prepared to withstand a prolonged period of low prices.
"We need to have our budget break even at $70 per barrel by 2017," said Siluanov.
Russia's government imposed informal capital controls this week, including orders to large state-controlled oil and gas exporters Gazprom and Rosneft to sell some of their dollar revenues to shore up the rouble.
Russians have kept a wary eye on the exchange rate since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Hyper-inflation wiped out their savings over several years in the early 1990s and the rouble collapsed again in 1998.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/26/russia-economy-inflation-recession_n_6383064.html
Sixstrings wrote:Agent: you're right, for now, about the ruble -- but it has more it could fall as things deteriorate. This is a plateau and not a bottom.
Overall -- it's hardly good economic news for Russia. Bank bailouts, capital controls, double digit inflation next year, 17% interest rates, crude oil prices half what they used to be and that could go even lower, and they're going to have to tap the rainy day reserve fund:
AgentR11 wrote:I am right. And you don't even seem to understand that it doesn't matter if it falls more or not. What matters is that it floats and is not supported by central bank intervention. Its fine if the ruble is at 50. Its fine if the ruble is at 100. It is *NOT FINE* if the ruble is at 60 and supported by a continuous stream of dollars coming from Russian Central Bank.
It is *JUST* a number. It doesn't matter a hill of beans that the Yen is 120 to the dollar. What matters is that if I take $5 to Japan, I can buy a burger; and if a guy from Japan takes 600 yen to the US, he can buy a burger, very much like the one I bought. That is the sign of a floated currency; we take equivalent value from one place to the other and experience a similar degree of purchasing power.
The exchange rate on a currency is not a horse race; there is no point of victory or utter defeat. The problem with the ruble is that it has never before experienced price discovery;
How many banks have we bailed out? We survived the experience.
Russia has to teach its exporters how to behave in the land of a floating ruble; it'll take some time; but its not a terribly hard trick to master.
Reserves and oil price. I'm pretty sure a long term oil producer like Russia is a aware the price goes up.... and the price goes down.
Your wishcasting of a Russia bankrupting itself is quaint, but simply improbable. If only because you're trying to add up all the stuff Russians say they're gonna build before they actually build it. They'll build only what they can afford. The rest will simply be left undone and tolerated.
Sixstrings wrote:You sound like the "liberoids" from the 90s that Radon talks about.
Sixstrings wrote:AgentR11 wrote:I am right. And you don't even seem to understand that it doesn't matter if it falls more or not. What matters is that it floats and is not supported by central bank intervention. Its fine if the ruble is at 50. Its fine if the ruble is at 100. It is *NOT FINE* if the ruble is at 60 and supported by a continuous stream of dollars coming from Russian Central Bank.
Agreed.
Are you saying 50 is the bottom, though? I'll make a bet with you, for bragging rights -- at some point in the next year there will be one to two more serious bottoms, maybe three, below 50.
It matters to Russians in Moscow going to the market to buy coffee, tea, or Pringles potato chips or any number of other American brands / imported commodities from abroad. There's no tea or sugar grown in Russia.
It's just that their economy is tanking right now and things are going to get worse.
How many banks have we bailed out? We survived the experience.
Big difference -- the US federal reserve prints money.
Russia cannot do that. The Russian ruble is backed by the foreign currencies coming in, trade from gas and oil sales. If they are shoring up the ruble then that's euros they're using to buy those rubles with.
Russia has to teach its exporters how to behave in the land of a floating ruble; it'll take some time; but its not a terribly hard trick to master.
You sound like the "liberoids" from the 90s that Radon talks about. Agent, Russians do not have a lot of patience or love for "learning how to behave in the land of a floating ruble," that's what they're so pissed off about from the 90s.
If they wanted a ruble float and "reforms" and hyperinflation and economic pain, they could have just joined the West rather than fighting it so I don't get the point. Fighting the West has not won them anything.
Reserves and oil price. I'm pretty sure a long term oil producer like Russia is a aware the price goes up.... and the price goes down.
Well they can't just annex a place the size of Belgium and let it rot.
radon1 wrote:Quite the opposite, the liberoids are exactly the ones that have kept rouble artificially "strong". That's why they are liberoids rather than liberals.
Interesting, Russia's trade with the US has been growing over the past several months. According to Putin, imports from the US have grown 23%.
Sixstrings wrote:
Well okay, but everything going on now sounds like what you all went through in the 90s. Hyperinflation looming, currency crisis, a darn bag of coffee or sugar costing so much.
Sounds plausible, probably lots of shady, if not outright fake, contracts to repatriate dollars at any cost.Trade is growing in part because money is fleeing to the safe haven -- the US.
I just wonder how Russians are going to handle such bad inflation, that's coming. It's going to mean coffee and sugar and tea and anything imported rocketing in cost. Doesn't that make anyone nervous over there? I'd sure hate it, inflation is bad enough as it is.
radon1 wrote:Sixstrings wrote:
Well okay, but everything going on now sounds like what you all went through in the 90s. Hyperinflation looming, currency crisis, a darn bag of coffee or sugar costing so much.
Back in 90s prior to 1998 it was the same problem with overvalued rouble, but back then they at least had an excuse in the form of IMF's requirement for "stable" currency as a pre-requisite for IMF's lending.Sounds plausible, probably lots of shady, if not outright fake, contracts to repatriate dollars at any cost.Trade is growing in part because money is fleeing to the safe haven -- the US.I just wonder how Russians are going to handle such bad inflation, that's coming. It's going to mean coffee and sugar and tea and anything imported rocketing in cost. Doesn't that make anyone nervous over there? I'd sure hate it, inflation is bad enough as it is.
There is no tradition of being nervous before the trouble actually arrives. So, no one is particularly nervous about it at the moment. More concern is about banks and deposits, because the banking crisis is already brewing, and may hit hard right after the new year. Putie has just issued a decree for 1trl rouble banking bail-out financed by the budget money. So, the budget is going to bail out various "self-made" effing "effective managers" and other pathetic morons who were borrowing in order to buy sports cars and other "lifestyle" stuff they have never been able to afford. What a joke.
radon1 wrote:There is no tradition of being nervous before the trouble actually arrives.
More concern is about banks and deposits, because the banking crisis is already brewing, and may hit hard right after the new year. Putie has just issued a decree for 1trl rouble banking bail-out financed by the budget money. So, the budget is going to bail out various "self-made" effing "effective managers" and other pathetic morons who were borrowing in order to buy sports cars and other "lifestyle" stuff they have never been able to afford. What a joke.
AgentR11 wrote:I saw the mobile soup kitchen images too; maybe this is a different set, I dunno. The last one claiming to show hungry people in St. Petersburg turned out to be disappointed visitors to a festival that had run out of that nasty boiled buckwheat that is apparently very important.
AgentR11 wrote:I saw the mobile soup kitchen images too; maybe this is a different set, I dunno. The last one claiming to show hungry people in St. Petersburg turned out to be disappointed visitors to a festival that had run out of that nasty boiled buckwheat that is apparently very important.
Return to Geopolitics & Global Economics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests