NEW! Members Only Forums!

Access more articles, news & discussion by becoming a PeakOil.com Member.
Register Today...
It's FREE!


Login



Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins :-)


Reverse Engineer's Explanation of Markets and Investing

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of hydrocarbon depletion.

Re: Banksters taking US to the Cleaners

Unread postby jupiters_release » Mon 24 Nov 2008, 08:00:23

ReverseEngineer wrote:and there will be a battle coming down here at the top of the food chain such as has not been seen since the days of the collapse of the Roman Empire.


The top of the food chain has more than you can currently conceive of.

You really should find the time to learn the history of banking:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... ters&hl=en
jupiters_release
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 998
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 02:00:00

Re: Banksters taking US to the Cleaners

Unread postby frankthetank » Mon 24 Nov 2008, 09:13:01

The avg American can't afford this. If you do the math, its a lot of money per person (every man/woman/child). The ONLY way i can see these guys getting their money is to get it out of pension funds. I don't think they understand you can't take money from people that don't have any.
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Master
Master
 
Posts: 6112
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Solutions to Global Monetary System Meltdown

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Tue 25 Nov 2008, 02:52:49

I am bumping this thread back up because of some discussions going on in other threads regarding the outcomes of deflation, inflation or monetary collapse, as the case may be here in the coming 3 month-4 year time period. The purpose here is to step out of my typical Sooper Doomer spin to analyze some possibilities that are not quite so spectacularly horrific as marauding Zombies, debt prisoners eating Cockroaches and an economy based on Prostitution. Thank you EU for contributing those last two entertaining scenarios to the Peak Oil zeitgeist. LOL.

Anyhow, when asked by some who aren't so familiar with deflationary and inflationary outcomes as to what to expect here in the US over the coming months/years, our Pundits here often respond with "think Argentina" or "think Iceland". Although its certainly conceivable we suffer a similar downspin, right now I don't think its likely to play out in quite the same way or in the same time frame mainly. I'll try to explain my current thinking on this, feel free to shoot holes in it if you like. It puts me at odds with some of my closest analytical matches here, Cid Yama and ShortonOil, so I'll be interested especially to see how they dissect this scenario and analysis.

The US differs from Iceland and Argentina in several fundamental ways. First off is size and natural resources. The US is much larger than either of those two countries, with the definite ability to feed itself even in the scenario of complete monetary collapse. There is sufficient oil coming out of just our own remaining GOM rigs and the North Slope to if push came to shove could be directed solely at the food production and distribution industry for at least a couple of year. Meanwhile, as the rest of the world slides into econmic chaos as great as our own, we can still negotiate for direct trades of food surplus for oil, particularly from the Saudis who basically are in our pocket and have been for years. The Saudis are going to starve, and fast if they cannot trade their oil with a major food producer. Neither Argentina or Iceland fits that description.

Second, the dollar is and remains for as long as it lasts the World's Reserve Currency. Neither Iceland or Argentina's currency fits that description either. Because of this aspect of the Dollar, when the dollar tanks, so in domino fashion will all the rest of the fiat currencies. There is a big difference between when you are a small player in the game and are pushed out of the game and when the entire game collapses. In the second case, everyone is highly motivated to get a new game started; in the first case, the losers are left to basically twist in the wind.

Finally of course there is the difference of the Military Card, which neither Argentina or Iceland held at all. The US holds the Military card in SPADES, the only other countries that approach this are Russia and China, and they are in the same sewer we are in. It does not behoove any of the 3 majors to go up against each other, but they CAN "divy up" the rest of the world for a time here, in terms of Piracy of the resources of countries in their spheres of influence, which could be negotiated politically. I could easily see Putin, Obama and Wen Jiabow sitting down at a table and Russia being given Iran if he can take it, China being given Nigeria if they can take it, US being given Brazil and Venezuela if we can take them, etc. Fighting against each other is a No Win scenario for all 3 major powers, divying up the weaker nations is not so necessarily no win, though it certainly would not be pretty.

To bring this around to the reason I dropped this in the Solutions thread, one soluton I see coming out of this now is a 3 way breakup to 3 separate currencies, centered around the 3 major powers. The Yuan would form one currency for the Asian world and whatever they get in the divy up around the world. Depending on which way the Europeans go, with Russia (better choice for the europeans IMHO), the Russians would take on the Euro as their currency. If the Europeans Ally with the Americans, the Americans take on the Euro. If they don't, sadly one would have to expect the Amero to come out of this. If the Ruskies don't end up with the Euro, they will have to reinvent the new Ruble.

Time frame would be important here in how fast this could be set up to avoid complete collapse on a social level and devolution to social anarchy. I could see short term as a bridging mechanism Couponing for food being instituted in the US, and also local State issued currencies, or perhaps even Regional Currencies based on the breakdown I gave in the Regions thread.

While certainly there are the typical motivations toward World War here, there is also MAD, there is also the motivating factor of stabilizing your internal economy before you even try to mobilize for a World War. It will be extraordinarily difficult, perhaps even impossible for any of the 3 majors to mobilize up a war machine as long as their economies are in this kind of chaos. It took time for Nazi Germany to move from the disorder of the Weimar Republic to getting its war machine in place to decimate Europe. That also only happenned because Bankers like Prescott Bush funded that machine. The banking system is currently in chaos, and right now there is no way they can get their act together to fund a military machine, heck they cannot even keep themselves floating at the moment. The Ubermeisters themselves need a Reboot before they can try this tactic.

Conclusion here, its not necessarily true that a collapse of the Dollar will mean an immediate descent into a Zombie Wasteland. there are possible mediation schemes, and the resources of the US remain in place despite the failure of the economic system. It would of course take great Leadership to negotiate our way out of the mess without it devolving into a Thermonuclear exchange which inevitably wipes humanity off the face of the Earth. One can only HOPE that Obama has such Leadership skills in him, because he is the one we have put up at the top here, for better of for worse. He can turn out to be a puppet and a nincompoop, that is possible. If he has it in him to step up to the Plate here though, he could be the greatest President of all time.

Only time will tell how it plays out, but IMHO all hope is not lost YET. Its not Bunker Time YET. It ain't OVER til the Fat Lady Sings.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Rogers and Soros: Solvent or Insolvent?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Tue 16 Dec 2008, 04:51:42

With the collapse of Bernie Maddoff's Hedge Fund, I am reading some curious material from other sources and getting what I think are some curious signals from a few of the Big Players, notably in this case Jim Rogers and George Soros. Rogers on the one hand tells us *most* big banks are insolvent.

http://www.reuters.com/article/Investme ... CO20081211

At the SAME time, Rogers pats himself on the back as being ahead of the game here and escaping to non-dollar denominated assets:

Now a specialist in commodities, Rogers said he has used the recent rally in the U.S. dollar as an opportunity to exit dollar-denominated assets.


Now, with the collapse of Bernie's Hedge Fund (and many others which have suspended redemptions) Rogers seems to be promoting himself as a GENIUS who is escaping this cataclysmby running with his money to non-dollar denominated assets, which in this article appears to be Chinese Infrastructure.

Rogers said is investing in growth areas in China and Taiwan, in such areas as water treatment and agriculture, and recently bought positions in energy and agriculture indexes.


It appears to me that Rogers is trying to create a Bubble of his own, with many of the mega-rich seeking to find safe havens for their wealth he is promoting Chinese Infrastructure as the place to put your money. In subtext, what he is saying is "IF you can get any money out of your Hedge Fund, invest it with ME and I will save your ass by investing in Sewage Treatment Plants in China."

Now I am sorry, but do you really think processing Chinese SHTI is really a great place to put your money as a Safe Haven? LOL. The Chinese are going down the toilet themselves very fast, so really what would a lot of Investment there amount to? ANOTHER Ponzi Scheme!

I am betting Dollars to Doughnuts Rogers and Soros are insolvent, and cannot make redemptions on their Hedge Funds EITHER. They are trying to get Suckers to invest with them so they can keep paying out returns, but of course just how much return could you really expect from a Chinese Shti Plant anyhow? LOL.

Anybody here agree with this assesment? Or do you folks really think that Rogers and Soros are above it all and are going to make a bundle here on Chinese Shti Plants? If you agree with me that Rogers and Soros are in fact BROKE, just how long do you think it will be before it can't be hidden from their investors anymore? Will the mega rich STOP trying to redeem their funds because Rogers says he is a genius who is investing in Chinese Shti Plants?

How is this one going to play out? Soros of course does own part of the Fed, so maybe he can get enough bailout money printed to stay solvent through the whole thing? What is your opinion? Inquiring minds want to know.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Re: Rogers and Soros: Solvent or Insolvent?

Unread postby RdSnt » Tue 16 Dec 2008, 09:29:31

The argument is almost irrelevant at this level Reverse, neither of these guys is going to die poor, nor for that matter, have any worries about their general comfort level.
Their currency is pride and reputation, it's simply not about the money.

Consider Buffet and his supposed "bold" investments recently. His entire corporation and his own wealth could suddenly collapse, yet he will not want for food or shelter. The only thing that will be damaged is the magical glow that has been built around him.

We have been living in a corrupt fantasy world for 30 years, replete with untouchable magicians and demi-gods. No matter how vigorously our noses are rubbed into the fact that the elite are simply thieves (Madoff, et el ) we will hold desperately onto that fantasy.
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Rogers and Soros: Solvent or Insolvent?

Unread postby mark » Tue 16 Dec 2008, 10:35:30

Don't know about Soros, but Rodgers has long been a world wide investor. Remember Investment Biker? That was in the nineties. Then with a custom built mercedes, he did it again and wrote Adventure Capitalist. Each time with a hot blond. He knows markets, people and is willing to commit his capital to his ideas. While most of these investment people are all talk, he acts. Don't think he's broke and wish him well.
Who is John Galt?
mark
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed 01 Sep 2004, 02:00:00
Location: chicago

Re: Rogers and Soros: Solvent or Insolvent?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Tue 16 Dec 2008, 19:28:59

RdSnt wrote:The argument is almost irrelevant at this level Reverse, neither of these guys is going to die poor, nor for that matter, have any worries about their general comfort level.
Their currency is pride and reputation, it's simply not about the money.


You know, I'll bet Marie Antoinette felt exactly the same way about a week before her head went rolling across the town square. I'LL bet Nicholas and Alexandra Romanoff felt exactly the same way a couple of days before they got filled full of lead in a damp and cold Ruskie basement.

Sory, I don't buy the idea that these folks are going to be trading on the currency of their Pride and Reputation much longer. George Bush's reputation is so good people are throwing shoes at him. You really think if/when Soros & Rogers Hedge Fund goes Belly Up there won't be a Legion of formerly rich folks looking for retribution?

Sorry, you cannot impoverish an entire country, nary the entire WORLD,INCLUDING many of the formerly wealthy and trade too long on Pride and Reputation. Nor can you Bail out every Pigman in the country either.

I dispute your conclusion therefore. Heads will roll here, I have no doubt.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Re: Rogers and Soros: Solvent or Insolvent?

Unread postby RdSnt » Tue 16 Dec 2008, 22:28:51

Much as I would love to see that retribution and wish it would be so, there are simply too many countries that have, or are currently, collapsed, for good evidence that the elite get away.
Russia of the 90's,
Current Zimbabwe
Iraq
North Korea
, etc.

In the US (just picking the obvious target ), there may be violence and panic (I'm certainly expecting it ), but it will be self-destruction. Murders in the streets, destruction of buildings, looting, etc. Sure a few rich people may be targets, but the vast majority of the elite will be untouched.
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Rogers and Soros: Solvent or Insolvent?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Tue 16 Dec 2008, 23:19:11

RdSnt wrote:Much as I would love to see that retribution and wish it would be so, there are simply too many countries that have, or are currently, collapsed, for good evidence that the elite get away.
Russia of the 90's,
Current Zimbabwe
Iraq
North Korea
, etc.


Those were local collapses in a world where the monetary system still functioned across boundaries for the purposes of bribery and so forth. This is a different type of collapse, much more like the collapse of the Roman Empire. It won't be the poor folk killing the rich, it will be the rich folks stabbing EACH OTHER in the back.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Re: Rogers and Soros: Solvent or Insolvent?

Unread postby joewp » Wed 17 Dec 2008, 11:52:07

ReverseEngineer wrote:It won't be the poor folk killing the rich, it will be the rich folks stabbing EACH OTHER in the back.

Reverse Engineer


Now that would be popcorn worthy! [smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1836
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 02:00:00
Location: Out in the streets of a runaway american dream

Re: Reverse Engineer's Explanation of Markets and Investing

Unread postby davep » Mon 07 May 2012, 11:51:40

I'm bumping this thread for anyone who used to be interested in Reverse Engineer's posts. He now posts at the Doomstead Dinerhttp://www.doomsteaddiner.org/forum/index.php the name of which some of you may remember from his time here.

He appears to be far less aggressive in his approach than he used to be. I for one would like him to bring his take on things back here...
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 3324
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 02:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Reverse Engineer's Explanation of Markets and Investing

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 07 May 2012, 12:59:52

davep wrote: I for one would like him to bring his take on things back here...


That would be great.

Re-reading his posts from 2008 its clear now he was way ahead of most people in understanding the role of banks in the financial collapse and the anger people would come to feel against banks. A lot of the stuff he was saying in 2008 wound up being the basis of what the Occupy Wall Street People were saying three years later in 2011.

The global economy is premised on expansion, where what we face is contraction
---Colin Campbell (2012)
Unfortunately, the Fed can't print oil
---Ben Bernanke (2011)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 12659
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 02:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Reverse Engineer's Explanation of Markets and Investing

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Mon 07 May 2012, 15:49:02

RE left partly because his detractors kept accusing him of unseemly conduct with his pupils. There were other issues, mainly about crossing the line when it comes to what could be construed as calling for treason or terrorism. I liked RE's presence here and would like to see a return. Yet I can't see him sticking around to be called names.
SeaGypsy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4838
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 03:00:00

Re: Reverse Engineer's Explanation of Markets and Investing

Unread postby Revi » Mon 07 May 2012, 20:39:00

I think we'll have a little while to get ready for what's coming, then we'll find that our salaries (if we have any) won't keep up with inflation. We are going to have to make a lot of our livelihood. That might mean trading in our spare time or cutting wood. The main idea is that we won't be given enough to purchase what we need. Whether it's inflation or deflation the result will be the same. There won't be enough for every middle class person to live the lifestyle they are accustomed to. They will have to learn to live like most of the world does now. Cars won't be just for fun. Just like in the 30's, every time you go to town you will bring along a trunk full of stuff to trade. You'll head back to your homestead with a bunch of stuff that will last you. A bag of flour and a bunch of DVD's will have to last until the next time you have something to trade. It will be high tech/low tech. You might use a cell phone or computer to plan out where you drop eggs off for example.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Master
Master
 
Posts: 5632
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 02:00:00
Location: Maine

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests