Dr SWEDE wrote::?: FUSION With all respect - do your homework better, your calculations only describes the lack of knowledge.
I do not consider chemical reactions to be "calculations".
So, if you are a serious criticizer of the Abiogenic Hydrocarbon chemical process, than get the full report and come back with a matured calculation that belongs to the reality instead of what you already have presented here.
So could you present us with details of chemical process (as found in the publication which you are referring to) which is supposedly delivering Methane (CH4) solely from Calcium carbonate (CaCO3), Iron oxide(s) (Fe3O4, FeO, Fe2O3) and Water (H2O)?
You may post here for discussion purpose relevant part (one dealing with chemistry) of article from Nature Geoscience, (presumably you have access to it).
I would like to find out more details about chemical process responsible of transferring hydrogen from water to form methane and also to learn where oxygen is going as per proposed process.
You seem to advocate chemical impossibility on quite unsophisticated level here.
You probably misunderstood article or some details of it.
Why do you think that the “ Deep Carbon Observatory” was started in US 2008 and why
Do you think that they now are seeking science experience from Russia and their continuing
Research since the 1960,s within the Abiotic Hydrocarbon field ?
1. Out of curiosity (to learn more about carbon cycle).
2. To provide additional forum for academics, so they can argue about particular subjects.
3. To provide jobs and secure public grants for particular academic institutions.