Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 8

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby pstarr » Fri 10 Nov 2017, 14:24:34

"Which is why I only see "autonomous" vehicles as being viable in the near future for known repetitive routes. "

Yes and why Google developed and loaded into each robocar, 2000 miles of detailed 3D road maps. (I believe it was around Mountain View test area). The map must include every intersection, stop sign, traffic light and obstacle. Any change to the geography (whether through malfunction, road work, accident or other municipal changes) would have to be downloaded to every vehicle IN REAL TIME. All the time.
November 2016
pstarr
NeoMaster
NeoMaster
 
Posts: 27067
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby pstarr » Fri 10 Nov 2017, 14:51:10

GHung wrote:I BRAKE FOR EVERYTHING!.

Image
AI . . . we brake EVERYTHING lol
November 2016
pstarr
NeoMaster
NeoMaster
 
Posts: 27067
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Fri 10 Nov 2017, 15:23:45

pstarr wrote:"Which is why I only see "autonomous" vehicles as being viable in the near future for known repetitive routes. "

Yes and why Google developed and loaded into each robocar, 2000 miles of detailed 3D road maps. (I believe it was around Mountain View test area). The map must include every intersection, stop sign, traffic light and obstacle. Any change to the geography (whether through malfunction, road work, accident or other municipal changes) would have to be downloaded to every vehicle IN REAL TIME. All the time.

Fleets of AI/EVs will all be in constant contact with a central mega computer and will share information about everything from traffic signal settings to pot holes to perhaps even pedestrians walking with their nose in their phone and their head up their A$$. After said pedestrian passes a couple of AI vehicles they will have plotted his course and speed and following vehicles will be looking for him. For that matter as facial recognition improves a fleet of AI vehicles could be constantly on the lookout for a list of known trouble makers and report back all sightings to big brother.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 8859
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby pstarr » Fri 10 Nov 2017, 15:28:58

Big Brother is a meany, but his Little Brother (kid's into slow-pitch softball) is such a dear. Wouldn't let anything happen to his mommy's Tesla.
November 2016
pstarr
NeoMaster
NeoMaster
 
Posts: 27067
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Fri 10 Nov 2017, 15:58:32

pstarr wrote:Big Brother is a meany, but his Little Brother (kid's into slow-pitch softball) is such a dear. Wouldn't let anything happen to his mommy's Tesla.

I hope you are just kidding and have read or at least know of Orwell's classic 1984. If not you might lose your job at the Minitrue (Ministry of truth in old speak) and find yourself in room 101. 8O
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 8859
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 10 Nov 2017, 21:49:16

pstarr wrote:
asg70 wrote:
pstarr wrote:I know you know them :) They are your friends. Good friends! Happy Friends [smilie=5umbrella.gif]


Got a point or do you just want to be flagged?

How about this: no hands-free autonomous vehicle ever drove from San Francisco to Los Angeles. That makes your little friend a liar. Is that better for you? Is it better that I out and out call Adam a liar. Or am I allowed to have a little fun with him? Is that your f#cking call?


How about you...like...read...something on the topic before discovering that just as with oily topics, you don't know squat. This one is from 2 years ago. I spoke to the gentleman I referenced in April of 2016.

Now learn something, maybe you'll grow a new neuron or something and won't be such a shining example of an ignorant patsy.

https://www.wired.com/2015/01/rode-500- ... re-boring/
Peak oil in 2020: And here is why: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2b3ttqYDwF0
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4300
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 16:10:26

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 10 Nov 2017, 21:54:35

pstarr wrote:I read and understand it, unlike the EV posers (none actually own an EV).


3 years old and still going strong.

Image

I'd offer to let you drive it, but it requires enough intellectual horsepower to push a button, turn that big wheelie thing, and use go and stop pedals. Plus I'd have to get the wife's permission, and she doesn't let many fully functional adults drive it, so you are REALLY far outta luck in that regard.
Peak oil in 2020: And here is why: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2b3ttqYDwF0
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4300
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 16:10:26

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 10 Nov 2017, 21:56:59

Plantagenet wrote:Self Driving shuttle crashes in Las Vegas

self-driving-shuttle-crashes-in-las-vegas-hours-after-launch

The AI driving the shuttle probably got distracted by some pretty girls on the sidewalk.


Read the article. The human driver of the other vehicle was at fault. Score: Computers 1, Humans 0
Peak oil in 2020: And here is why: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2b3ttqYDwF0
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4300
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 16:10:26

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 10 Nov 2017, 22:01:58

Revi wrote: We have owned a small electric vehicle for over 12 years now, and use it almost every day in the snow free months. It uses a tiny fraction of the energy of a regular car, and can get you around about a 15 mile radius. Image


The wife has been using a full sized electric to get around for 3 years or so now, and it uses a tiny fraction of the energy of a regular car, and can get you around a 20 mile radius. At 70mph on the interstate or 10mph around town. With ice cold A/C, or heat, and better yet if it gets rammed by a vehicle other than another small lightweight EV, its got 4000# of airbags, steel crumple zones, antilock brakes and traction control and heck fire it is so good you can drive it around in the winter months and 110F heat and everything!! Yours looks like it sacrifices quite a bit of safety there Revi. How many airbags you got on that thing?

Image
Peak oil in 2020: And here is why: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2b3ttqYDwF0
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4300
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 16:10:26

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 10 Nov 2017, 22:04:13

GHung wrote:BTW: My first major was 'CS-Expert Systems", now generally referred to as "AI".


Are you any good at it? Awhile ago you claimed to be unemployed and poor in Appalachia?
Peak oil in 2020: And here is why: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2b3ttqYDwF0
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4300
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 16:10:26

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby asg70 » Sat 11 Nov 2017, 15:41:12

pstarr wrote:No computer hardware or program known today that can pick out a face in a crowd


That's the difference between engineers and doomer luddites like you. Engineers roll up their sleeves and SOLVE PROBLEMS. Doomers assume all problems are HOPELESS. That's why we have the computers of today rather than them still being hand-built vacuum tube monstrosities. I mean, if doomers were in control since the start I wonder whether we'd even have invented the abacus! "This math, it's just too hard. Let's stick with eenie meenie on our fingers."

Image
“If and when the oil price skewers for 6 months or more substantially above the MAP, then I will concede the Etp is inherently flawed"
--Onlooker, 1/1/2018
asg70
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1787
Joined: Sun 05 Feb 2017, 13:17:28

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby GHung » Sat 11 Nov 2017, 16:11:36

AdamB wrote:
GHung wrote:BTW: My first major was 'CS-Expert Systems", now generally referred to as "AI".


Are you any good at it? Awhile ago you claimed to be unemployed and poor in Appalachia?


I'll only say that you and I have very, very different values, Adamn. And I was good at a lot of things. Still am. I know that accumulation of 'wealth' is a priority for most folks, but I walk a different path. And I'm not really unemployed, and never said that (I notice you read in a lot of things people never said). I just don't work for the man. Your government likely considers me "not employed and not looking for work". I call it flying under the radar.

One of us strives for some humility in their life and character, and that ain't you.
Blessed are the Meek, for they shall inherit nothing but their Souls. - Anonymous Ghung Person
User avatar
GHung
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2222
Joined: Tue 08 Sep 2009, 15:06:11
Location: Moksha, Nearvana

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Sat 11 Nov 2017, 21:58:22

GHung wrote:
AdamB wrote:
GHung wrote:BTW: My first major was 'CS-Expert Systems", now generally referred to as "AI".


Are you any good at it? Awhile ago you claimed to be unemployed and poor in Appalachia?


I'll only say that you and I have very, very different values, Adamn. And I was good at a lot of things. Still am. I know that accumulation of 'wealth' is a priority for most folks, but I walk a different path. And I'm not really unemployed, and never said that (I notice you read in a lot of things people never said). I just don't work for the man. Your government likely considers me "not employed and not looking for work". I call it flying under the radar.

One of us strives for some humility in their life and character, and that ain't you.

So apparently you're not reporting your income for tax purposes by "flying under the radar"?

Don't read the NYT -- their readers, via various comments on editorials would be VERY, VERY angry at you, as they are, currently blaming evil tax cheaters for the fact that taxes aren't magically curing all the US's problems.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 5263
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 20:26:42

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby GHung » Sat 11 Nov 2017, 22:20:49

Outcast_Searcher wrote:
GHung wrote:
AdamB wrote:
GHung wrote:BTW: My first major was 'CS-Expert Systems", now generally referred to as "AI".


Are you any good at it? Awhile ago you claimed to be unemployed and poor in Appalachia?


I'll only say that you and I have very, very different values, Adamn. And I was good at a lot of things. Still am. I know that accumulation of 'wealth' is a priority for most folks, but I walk a different path. And I'm not really unemployed, and never said that (I notice you read in a lot of things people never said). I just don't work for the man. Your government likely considers me "not employed and not looking for work". I call it flying under the radar.

One of us strives for some humility in their life and character, and that ain't you.

So apparently you're not reporting your income for tax purposes by "flying under the radar"?

Don't read the NYT -- their readers, via various comments on editorials would be VERY, VERY angry at you, as they are, currently blaming evil tax cheaters for the fact that taxes aren't magically curing all the US's problems.


Wrong. I just try to avoid things that increase the velocity of money and create tax liability.
Blessed are the Meek, for they shall inherit nothing but their Souls. - Anonymous Ghung Person
User avatar
GHung
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2222
Joined: Tue 08 Sep 2009, 15:06:11
Location: Moksha, Nearvana

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby AdamB » Sun 12 Nov 2017, 18:23:31

GHung wrote:
AdamB wrote:
GHung wrote:BTW: My first major was 'CS-Expert Systems", now generally referred to as "AI".


Are you any good at it? Awhile ago you claimed to be unemployed and poor in Appalachia?


I'll only say that you and I have very, very different values, Adamn.


Well, unlike some other things you have pointed at me, that is reasonably accurate.

GHung wrote: And I was good at a lot of things. Still am. I know that accumulation of 'wealth' is a priority for most folks, but I walk a different path.


I don't know anyone who has made a priority of acquiring wealth. You must hang out with a different class of folks in Appalachia than I was raised with. The folks I know are happy to eat, have a roof over their heads, most would like a good and steady job but most don't have one, just happy to get by might describe their way of thinking. My thinking was different of course, but it had nothing to do with wealth either. Getting out would describe it best I suppose.

GHung wrote: And I'm not really unemployed, and never said that (I notice you read in a lot of things people never said).


You said you were unemployed in 2008. You didn't seem to indicate in that post if you had remedied that situation or not. Good to hear that even with peak oil and pstarr claiming at various times that it was a depression, you were able to work your way out of it as did apparently many others, the unemployment rate being what it is today.

GHung wrote: I just don't work for the man. Your government likely considers me "not employed and not looking for work". I call it flying under the radar.


Nothing wrong with a cash and off the books type work. Until the government bans cash anyway. And it isn't my government any more than it is yours, more like it is the government we all live under, whether you like it or not.

GHung wrote:One of us strives for some humility in their life and character, and that ain't you.


You wouldn't know any more about the humility in my life than you do what I strive for or what my core values are, or how I grew up in conditions that aren't the same as the ones I live in today. You never asked, otherwise I would have explained some of them, instead you just assumed based on my enthusiasm for the EV solution to peak oil for most folks. And that enthusiasm is economic in nature, nothing more, the same guiding principles that most folks use, be they poor in Appalachia, or not.
Peak oil in 2020: And here is why: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2b3ttqYDwF0
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4300
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 16:10:26

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Mon 13 Nov 2017, 00:20:15

AdamB wrote:
I don't know anyone who has made a priority of acquiring wealth.

I know a lot of people who have made a priority of acquiring enough wealth to leave poverty behind them and never again fear having to do without. Some do get carried away with it and amass why more then they will ever need to the point of spending too much time making money and too little time with their families enjoying the happiness they can now afford.
Somehow I have managed to avoid such problems. :oops:
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 8859
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Growth in Electric Vehicles Won’t Dent Oil Demand Much

Unread postby AdamB » Tue 14 Nov 2017, 19:07:31



Amid an anticipated increase in electric vehicles during the next 20 years, the world's appetite for oil is still expected to wane just a bit, as demand for transportation including petrochemicals continues, the International Energy Agency said Tuesday. An estimated 50 million vehicles will be in operation by 2025 and 300 million by 2040, versus about 2 million currently, the IEA said. But that's expected to reduce global demand by just 2.5 million barrels a day, or roughly 2 percent, by then. The U.S. will be a major player in global oil and gas markets for years as the shale industry boom transforms into the largest supply increase ever, the agency said in its annual World Energy Outlook. The cycle will change the U.S. into a net exporter of fossil fuels, with growth in U.S. oil production hitting that accomplished by Saudi


Growth in Electric Vehicles Won’t Dent Oil Demand Much
Peak oil in 2020: And here is why: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2b3ttqYDwF0
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4300
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 16:10:26

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby kublikhan » Sun 17 Dec 2017, 17:11:55

The U.S. Postal Service has launched full-scale testing of a series of prototype delivery vans from which it plans to select its next mail truck. The order will be huge for the companies involved. The USPS will choose models from the prototypes to replace up to 180,000 mail trucks over the course of seven years, an estimated $6.3 billion of business. The post office's current fleet is aging. Of the 215,000 mail trucks in operation, 140,000 are at least two decades old. “Real-world” testing of the prototypes began last month. The postal service said the winner of the vehicle contract will be announced in early– 2018.

Five contenders are participating in the competition, which the USPS has named the Next Generation Delivery Vehicle, or NGDV, program. They include two team entries: VT Hackney/Workhorse Group and Karsan/Morgan Olson. The three additional companies are AM General, Oshkosh and Mahindra. Given the Trump administration's arguably protectionist rhetoric and preference for U.S. manufacturers, it's likely the agency might opt for a full American design, said Jeffrey Osborne, a Cowen & Co. automotive analyst. That would favor three of the contenders, AM General, Oshkosh and the Hackney entry, which is an electric vehicle that shares many components with the Workhorse W-15 electric pickup truck.

If the USPS selects an electric vehicle, it will become the largest electric vehicle fleet in the world, Osborne said. “It would be a pretty pronounced step, in terms of showing that electric vehicles are ready to hit prime time.”

The Contenders:
1. AM General - A recent prototype of the AM General mail truck was spotted using an internal combustion engine with start-stop technology for improved fuel efficiency.

2. Karsan/Morgan Olson - Karsan Otomotive has designed and built more than 277,000 gas and electric cars. For the next-generation mail truck, Karsan will provide the hybrid technology and Morgan Olson will manufacture the body.

3. Mahindra: - The truck uses a 2.5-liter engine from General Motors and may be available with a mild hybrid powertrain option.

4. Oshkosh - Oshkosh has a long history of contracts with the federal government. Since 2009, its defense arm has delivered more than 35,700 medium tactical trucks and trailers to the U.S. Army.

5. VT Hackney/Workhorse - The Workhorse chassis is already being used by FedEx Ground, USPS and DHL. Workhorse has a relationship with fleet management company Ryder System Inc., which placed an order for 2,500 of its W-15 electric pickup trucks. UPS also ordered more than 300 of its Range-Extended E-Gen Model step trucks. The Workhorse-VT Hackney all-electric prototype was seen delivering mail in Leesburg, Va. It has a small BMW gasoline engine that acts as a generator to extend the range of the truck.

What’s next
Postmaster General Megan Brennan told the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in a hearing on Feb. 7 that the agency may use a “bridge strategy” as it has in the past, which means incrementally replacing up to 12,000 vehicles at a time.

As the agency looks for its next truck, it's already thinking ahead. The USPS is also working with the University of Michigan on an autonomous mail delivery truck, which it hopes to introduce to select rural routes across the country by 2025.
The Trucks Competing to Be the Next USPS Delivery Vehicle, Third Prototype Spotted
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4152
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Illinois

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Sun 17 Dec 2017, 17:47:27

kublikhan wrote:
The U.S. Postal Service has launched full-scale testing of a series of prototype delivery vans from which it plans to select its next mail truck. The order will be huge for the companies involved. The USPS will choose models from the prototypes to replace up to 180,000 mail trucks over the course of seven years, an estimated $6.3 billion of business. The post office's current fleet is aging. Of the 215,000 mail trucks in operation, 140,000 are at least two decades old. “Real-world” testing of the prototypes began last month. The postal service said the winner of the vehicle contract will be announced in early– 2018.

Five contenders are participating in the competition, which the USPS has named the Next Generation Delivery Vehicle, or NGDV, program. They include two team entries: VT Hackney/Workhorse Group and Karsan/Morgan Olson. The three additional companies are AM General, Oshkosh and Mahindra. Given the Trump administration's arguably protectionist rhetoric and preference for U.S. manufacturers, it's likely the agency might opt for a full American design, said Jeffrey Osborne, a Cowen & Co. automotive analyst. That would favor three of the contenders, AM General, Oshkosh and the Hackney entry, which is an electric vehicle that shares many components with the Workhorse W-15 electric pickup truck.

If the USPS selects an electric vehicle, it will become the largest electric vehicle fleet in the world, Osborne said. “It would be a pretty pronounced step, in terms of showing that electric vehicles are ready to hit prime time.”

The Contenders:
1. AM General - A recent prototype of the AM General mail truck was spotted using an internal combustion engine with start-stop technology for improved fuel efficiency.

2. Karsan/Morgan Olson - Karsan Otomotive has designed and built more than 277,000 gas and electric cars. For the next-generation mail truck, Karsan will provide the hybrid technology and Morgan Olson will manufacture the body.

3. Mahindra: - The truck uses a 2.5-liter engine from General Motors and may be available with a mild hybrid powertrain option.

4. Oshkosh - Oshkosh has a long history of contracts with the federal government. Since 2009, its defense arm has delivered more than 35,700 medium tactical trucks and trailers to the U.S. Army.

5. VT Hackney/Workhorse - The Workhorse chassis is already being used by FedEx Ground, USPS and DHL. Workhorse has a relationship with fleet management company Ryder System Inc., which placed an order for 2,500 of its W-15 electric pickup trucks. UPS also ordered more than 300 of its Range-Extended E-Gen Model step trucks. The Workhorse-VT Hackney all-electric prototype was seen delivering mail in Leesburg, Va. It has a small BMW gasoline engine that acts as a generator to extend the range of the truck.

What’s next
Postmaster General Megan Brennan told the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in a hearing on Feb. 7 that the agency may use a “bridge strategy” as it has in the past, which means incrementally replacing up to 12,000 vehicles at a time.

As the agency looks for its next truck, it's already thinking ahead. The USPS is also working with the University of Michigan on an autonomous mail delivery truck, which it hopes to introduce to select rural routes across the country by 2025.
The Trucks Competing to Be the Next USPS Delivery Vehicle, Third Prototype Spotted

Having 140,000 vehicles past their expiration date shows very poor fleet management has been practiced. They will probably have to buy closer to 30,000 new ones a year to keep all routes serviced. Can you imagine the amount of money being wasted each year keeping those worn out trucks on the road.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 8859
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Re: THE Electric Vehicle (EV) Thread pt 7

Unread postby kublikhan » Sun 17 Dec 2017, 18:01:26

vtsnowedin wrote:Having 140,000 vehicles past their expiration date shows very poor fleet management has been practiced. They will probably have to buy closer to 30,000 new ones a year to keep all routes serviced. Can you imagine the amount of money being wasted each year keeping those worn out trucks on the road.
These are not ordinary vehicles. They were specifically designed long lasting vehicles(LLVs). They were designed to operate for up to 30 years.

The Grumman LLV was specifically designed for the United States Postal Service with Grumman winning the contract for production. The main design points of the vehicle in contract competition were serviceability, handling in confined areas, and overall economical operation. As its name suggests, the Grumman LLV is easily capable of a long life. The original design lifespan of the Grumman LLV specified by the U.S. Postal Service was 24 years, but in 2009 this was extended to thirty years.

Because the United States Postal Service owns over 100,000 Grumman LLVs, of which the oldest are reaching the end of their lifespan, the USPS has been looking into replacing or retrofitting the LLVs. On September 22, 2016, the United States Postal Service awarded the NGDV Prototype Contract to six selected suppliers: AM General, Karsan, Mahindra, Oshkosh, Utilimaster, and VT Hackney. Half of the prototypes will feature hybrid and new technologies, including alternative fuel capabilities. The prototypes will represent a variety of vehicle sizes and drive configurations, in addition to advanced powertrains and a range of hybrid technologies.
Grumman LLV
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4152
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Illinois

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests