dissident wrote:Since the thread has been derailed into the topic of who goes around boasting. Well, it's quite thick and rich listening to bitching about Russian boasting. If anything, it is the USA that thinks it is the center of universe in terms of human intelligence.
Here's the truth about it: Americans and Russians are both, "cowboys." Blowhards. Braggarts. Sentimental, and a sense of honor, and moral right and wrong. Russians and Americans are both different, from Europeans.
It's no accident the two sides had a cold war for half a century. They're too much alike.
And then of course, there are big differences too. Historically, America has an evangelism bent. This comes from the Puritans. America evangelizes -- with religion (in the past more than today, religion is on the wane everywhere), but then that same evangelistic gene we have rolled right on over into democracy and the American way, and today for liberals it is human rights and climate change action, etc.
Russians aren't evangelists, except when they were spreading communism, and they do have a religious aspect to them as well -- they were leaders of othordoxy for a while, they got that from the Byzantines. Russians don't evangalize though in the way America does, it's more like Russians just like to have a Russian Empire.
Russia -- is historically and culturally, an outsider. And the USA has always been an outsider, as well. First rising up to great power status in the days of Teddy Roosevelt, and he sailed the "Great White Fleet" around the world to announce America is a power now.
The things Putin does now, and that Russia does, it's a lot like that early 20th century America. And the politics in Russia are more rough and tumble, more corruption, very much like we had back then. Russia is "making itself great again" and doing what we did around 1910.
As for "center of the universe" -- Russia is pot calling kettle black on that, no? Russia wants to be a center of a universe, as well. In the cold war, the world was split between the two. American-led alliance, and Russian-led.
Nowdays.. what's the trouble about? For what reason?
Communism vs. capitalism was a real thing to have opposition about. Diametrically opposed ideologies, incompatible.
So what, exactly, is the new division? I don't see a reason for it. Ok so we'll have tensions in the future, over the arctic. What's the point of that? Russia needn't rattle sabres to get resources access, it could do that and be a winner and be on top from WITHIN the western system. So why oppose it, it's not even efficient or the most profitable. There's no good reason for Russia to be the "outsider," anymore. There's no leninism to defend and advance, anymore.
Why doesn't Russia just ADOPT ameicanism? It's honestly just "westernism" and democracy, that's all it is. Russia shouldn't keep trying to reinvent the wheel. Like Putin's "directed democracy" idea. You CAN'T reinvent the wheel. What we have in the US, our constitutional system and liberties and capitalism and democratic institutions, it's the best system possible.
It's the culmination of thousands of years of western civ, from the Greek republic city states to the Roman Republic and empire, to the renaissance, and then the age of reason combined with English values of commerce and hard work.
Russia can't invent something different, and it be better, there is no better than this.
Russia could just adopt westernism and make it its own. Like South Korea did. Like Japan did.
A real constitution, with real division of powers, needn't be "American." It's just law and a blueprint. It can apply anywhere, but you need the entire system to it.
For example: in Russia, the duma changed the law to remove presidential term limits so Putin could run again. In the US, that can't be done, that would require a consitutional amendment which is very difficult to pass, needing 3/4 of all state legislatures to approve.
We have a good system in the US. It can work anywhere, Russia could be a place of liberty and free thought and total freedom --
and the economy would boom along with that freedom. With the most freedom, comes the most innovation. That's not propaganda it's just a fact, the more repression there is then the less innovation a place has. People have to be free, in order to create.
Russia could peacefully develop itself and become a big rich Canada. It could have been a leader in the West, not opposing it. It could lead the world and contribute in cultural things.
Personally, I'd rather see more good Russian movies and novels and art, and other contributions to civilization, rather than just tough guy "Empire" stuff. But yeah, I've read all the articles explaining things.. Russians felt defeated at the end of the cold war.. they don't know what it is "to be great again," but they miss that part of the USSR, just the nationalism of being a "Great Power" -- whether it made any economic or practical sense, or not.