Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

EIA: Most US oil production growth is 40-45° sweet crude

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

EIA: Most US oil production growth is 40-45° sweet crude

Unread postby copious.abundance » Mon 21 Jul 2014, 02:10:17

Just discovered this on the EIA website:

US Oil Production Forecast-Analysis of Crude Types (PDF)
Recent U.S. crude oil production growth has consisted primarily of lighter, sweet crude (a description of crude quality, as measured by API gravity and sulfur content) from tight resource formations. Roughly 96% of the 1.8 million bbl/d growth in production between 2011 and 2013 consisted of sweet grades with API gravity of 40 or above.

EIA analysis of current and forecast crude oil production indicates that U.S. supply of lighter API gravity crude will continue to
outpace that of medium and heavier crudes (Figure 1). More than 60% of EIA’s forecast of production growth for 2014 and 2015 consists of sweet grades with API gravity of 40 or above.

There are certain doomer/peaker types here who have been insisting that most of the growth in US oil production has been of 45+ degree condensate (not that 45 degrees is a clear cutoff for condensate, but I digress). Unfortunately for these particular people, well, they are wrong, as the following charts demonstrate.

Before we look at the total US picture lets look at the "Big Three" of recent US production growth: The Bakken, the Eagleford and the Permian Basin.

From pg. 12 of the document, we have a chart showing the types of oil being produced in the Northern Great Plains, which consists of ND, SD and MT. There is extremely little production in SD, which leaves us with ND and MT, most of which is Bakken production. Here is the distribution of oil types being produced there:

Image

Notice the overwhelming portion of production from this area has been in the 40-45 degree grade (and this is sweet oil, I might add). The 50+ API's - which is clearly in the range considered by these certain people to be condensate - is miniscule. And production of heavier grades has been decreasing as well (I presume that's ND's legacy production).

The 2nd of the "Big Three" is the Eagleford shale in south Texas. On the top half of page 9 they have the following chart:

Image

Now, this one is definitely heavier in the 45+ degree grades. But nonetheless, notice the highest, most "condensate-y" grade of 50+ degrees is declining proportionally in favor of the 40-50 degree categories.

Last of the "Big Three" is the Permian Basin. The graphic is on pg. 10.

Image

Like the Bakken, this contains little condensate. And notice the fastest-growing category is 40-45. I presume the heavier grades is largely legacy production, of which there is still a substantial amount of in the Permian Basin. However, since that is not growing, the balance of production is shifting toward the 40-45 degree grades.

So, of the "Big Three" new US producing regions, two of them have seen their greatest growth in 40-45 degree oil and have relatively little condensate. And even the one which has greater condensate proportions - the Eagleford - still has most of its production in the 40-50 degree range, it just happens that a lot of that is in the 45-50 degree range as well (which is borderline "crude oil" or heavier condensate).

There are other regions described in the document, but I'll skip to the Big Picture on pg. 2:

Image

Notice that the largest-growing grade is 40-45 degrees - from less than 1 million bpd in 2011 to over 1.5 million bpd last year, and projected to over 2 million bpd in 2015.

45-50 degrees is also growing, but it is a much smaller percentage. 50+ is also growing, but it is smaller still.

Thus, as I said, most of the growth in US production has been from 40-45 degree light sweet crude, not "condensate."

Next, I would be more than happy to find, on this forum, the many, many, many pronunciations by doomers over the past several years that ~40 degree light sweet crude is the best grade of oil and that it was (supposedly) on the decline. Really - it would be fun to find all those quotes! Honest! :shock: :lol:
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: EIA: Most US oil production growth is 40-45° sweet crude

Unread postby Pops » Mon 21 Jul 2014, 08:38:51

The problem is what to do with it. The refiners spent tens or hundreds of millions to reconfigure for increasingly sour, heavy oil. Now they must switch back if they think LTO is the next big thing, or simply continue to import heavy oil and let the drillers split and export what they frack for as long as it lasts.

We'll see, but so far I've heard about lots of heater/crackers in the works to enable more exports under the current rules but no news about refinery reconfiguration to process more here. So either the refiners are happy with the share they are getting or don't see a long term benefit to switching back due to fracking.

According to the EIA, approximately 96% of the 1.8 million bbl/d growth in output from 2011 to 2013 consisted of light, sweet crudes with API gravity of 40 or above. And more than 60% of forecast production growth through 2015 will consist of light sweet crudes with API gravity of 40 or above.

Many U.S. refiners are poorly equipped to handle these light sweet grades of crude mainly because they were upgraded over the past decade to process heavier, sour crudes. After all, nobody was expecting a shale revolution 10 years ago and refiners figured they would continue to rely on imports of heavier grades.

Therein lies the main issue -- the growing mismatch between surging light sweet crude production and refining capacity configured to process imported heavy, sour crudes. While some of these refineries do have the flexibility to modify their feedstock to process greater volumes of lighter crudes, doing so would generally reduce their utilization rate and, therefore, profitability.

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2 ... uctio.aspx


I have one word for you ...

Image
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: EIA: Most US oil production growth is 40-45° sweet crude

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Mon 21 Jul 2014, 09:30:21

Pops - I think the "US refineries can't process LTO" has become a bit exaggerated. There are many refiners on the Gulf Coast that can handle LTO. But it is true that other refineries, like those in eastern Canada, can make a much better margin and thus outbid GC refineries for the LTO. But changes in that dynamic are happening. From http://www.nbcnews.com/business/energy/ ... 6C10867716

"Running at their highest levels in six years, U.S. refineries are finding strong demand for diesel fuel, used widely in cars outside of the United States, and other distillates, like jet fuel. "Any companies with refining assets on the Gulf Coast are expanding their export terminals,” said an energy analyst, citing Valero, Shell and Marathon Petroleum. “The profitability is not that clear, but the trend is very clear."

The U.S. is now the largest exporter of refined petroleum products in the world. {I wonder how many here know this? That's the point I keep making about all that silly hand wringing over the US exporting oil. IOW does it make any difference to the American consumer who is competing with foreign consumers for what they buy: refined products...not oil}

The product of choice for export is diesel because the margins are much higher and demand is growing, and U.S. refiners have an advantage over foreign counterparts. Natural gas to fire up refineries is abundant and much cheaper in the U.S., and the expansion of U.S. oil production has made oil more plentiful and cheaper than if refiners had to buy it on the world market.

Gulf Coast product margins: The race is on to add capacity, and mainly for diesel. Diesel demand is growing at twice the rate of gasoline, demand for which has been declining in the U.S. Gasoline demand has been declining and is expected to continue declining, as drivers shift to more fuel-efficient vehicles. Valero, the world's largest independent refiner, completed building two new hydrocrackers, one last year at its refinery in Port Arthur, Texas, and another last month in St. Charles Parish, La. Each cost about $1.5 billion and can process 60,000 barrels of petroleum feed stocks a day. "We're talking about expanding them to make them even larger and we may expand an existing hydrocracker at another existing refinery," said Valero spokesman Bill Day.

{Times...they are a changing. Slowly...but changing}
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: EIA: Most US oil production growth is 40-45° sweet crude

Unread postby Pops » Mon 21 Jul 2014, 11:20:41

ROCKMAN wrote:IOW does it make any difference to the American consumer who is competing with foreign consumers for what they buy: refined products...not oil}

Not at all, which is the point I keep making, LTO isn't helping us out a bit. Unleaded in the US is only a few percent off it's highs. All the feel good peaker-eye-poke threads in the world hasn't changed that and won't until the "glut" satisfies the pent up demand from slow/no growth in production..


Image
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: EIA: Most US oil production growth is 40-45° sweet crude

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Mon 21 Jul 2014, 13:51:53

Pop - Exactly. LTO was never going to help the US consumer simply because we wouldn't have had the boom in LTO if we didn't have high oil price. IOW we can't have low price oil/motor fuel and still have all this new LTO production. It's amazing how some folks here still refuse to acknowledge the dynamics you've pointed put.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: EIA: Most US oil production growth is 40-45° sweet crude

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Mon 21 Jul 2014, 13:51:53

Pop - Exactly. LTO was never going to help the US consumer simply because we wouldn't have had the boom in LTO if we didn't have high oil price. IOW we can't have low price oil/motor fuel and still have all this new LTO production. It's amazing how some folks here still refuse to acknowledge the dynamics you've pointed put.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS


Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 260 guests