NEW! Members Only Forums!

Access more articles, news & discussion by becoming a PeakOil.com Member.
Register Today...
It's FREE!


Login



Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins :-)


THE Falkland Islands Thread (merged)

Discussions related to the global politics of energy use and acquisition.

Re: Britain warns Argentina over Falklands "aggression"

Unread postby dolanbaker » Fri 15 Jun 2012, 03:34:04

The islanders claim will be reinforced by a referendum.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18412195
The Falkland Islands will hold a referendum on its "political status" in a bid to end the dispute with Argentina over the archipelago's sovereignty.

The islands' government made the announcement ahead of the anniversary marking 30 years since the end of Argentina's 74-day occupation in 1982.

It said it wanted to send a firm message to Argentina that islanders want to remain British.

The UK prime minister said Britain would support the result of the vote.

The referendum will be organised by the Falkland Islands government and will take place in the first half of next year.

After the last invasion, Argentina set about eliminating all traces of Britishness from the islands, they had plans to import thousands of settlers and "repatriate" islanders to the UK or insist that those that stayed learned Spanish, they succeeded in replacing the currency and forcing motorists onto the wrong side of the road before the Islands were reclaimed.
Ronald Coase, Nobel Economic Sciences, said in 1991 “If we torture the data long enough, it will confess.”
User avatar
dolanbaker
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1562
Joined: Wed 14 Apr 2010, 09:38:47
Location: Éire

Re: Britain warns Argentina over Falklands "aggression"

Unread postby yeahbut » Fri 15 Jun 2012, 05:12:47

Ah yes, the Falklands. Dumbest war ever? I guess the field is too strong to call, but it must be in the top ten, surely. The Argentinian novelist Jorge Louis Borges' quote still summarises it perfectly: "two bald men fighting over a comb" :-D :(
User avatar
yeahbut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue 30 Oct 2007, 02:00:00

Re: Britain warns Argentina over Falklands "aggression"

Unread postby dolanbaker » Fri 15 Jun 2012, 05:58:23

yeahbut wrote:Ah yes, the Falklands. Dumbest war ever? I guess the field is too strong to call, but it must be in the top ten, surely. The Argentinian novelist Jorge Louis Borges' quote still summarises it perfectly: "two bald men fighting over a comb" :-D :(


You might want to think about that if someone decided that a part of your back garden is theirs and fences it off!
Ronald Coase, Nobel Economic Sciences, said in 1991 “If we torture the data long enough, it will confess.”
User avatar
dolanbaker
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1562
Joined: Wed 14 Apr 2010, 09:38:47
Location: Éire

Re: Britain warns Argentina over Falklands "aggression"

Unread postby dissident » Fri 15 Jun 2012, 06:21:36

dolanbaker wrote:
yeahbut wrote:Ah yes, the Falklands. Dumbest war ever? I guess the field is too strong to call, but it must be in the top ten, surely. The Argentinian novelist Jorge Louis Borges' quote still summarises it perfectly: "two bald men fighting over a comb" :-D :(


You might want to think about that if someone decided that a part of your back garden is theirs and fences it off!


That's funny. Like the Malvinas were British since the dawn of time or something. The British grabbed these islands without considering anyone's fences. They tried to grab Argentina too but that was a bit harder so they settled for the islands.
User avatar
dissident
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1872
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 02:00:00

Re: Britain warns Argentina over Falklands "aggression"

Unread postby dolanbaker » Fri 15 Jun 2012, 07:55:23

Follow that logic and you'll find that most of the Americas were illegally occupied!
Ronald Coase, Nobel Economic Sciences, said in 1991 “If we torture the data long enough, it will confess.”
User avatar
dolanbaker
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1562
Joined: Wed 14 Apr 2010, 09:38:47
Location: Éire

Re: Britain warns Argentina over Falklands "aggression"

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Fri 15 Jun 2012, 09:21:37

I can't help but think this is just more of Christina playing to the populist vote and performing a bit of slight of hand to keep the average Argentine's mind off the economic plight they are in. She can't possibly think Argentina would stand a chance against the UK given the results last time (there is a good chapter in a book written about the SAS by one of its former officers that deals with the Falklands/Las Malvinas war and it seems to have been pretty much a cake walk for the UK but did give them a chance to test battle readiness of their Harriers). Its a strange country...the educated professionals realize that the economic policies of the Kirshner gov't will eventually destroy Argentinas economy completely, they look at the Marxist dolt she has placed as her second in command (Kiciloff) and simply shake their collective heads. My sense is they are so tired of a repeat economic performance that they've thrown up their hands in capitulation, realizing that the populist vote always wins. Meanwhile Christina continues to pay $14/MMBTu for LNG and then subsidizes the local gas consumption to about a $1/MMBTU and follows up with a privitization of Repsol portion of YPF suggesting this will solve the countries energy crisis without actually realizing the hundreds of billions of dollars of investment that will be needed, money the gov't doesn't have because they have spent it all subsidizing gas. In the past when the gov't needed money they nationalized the airline, pensions, banks etc. If they drain YPF of the money it churns and don't reinvest then the country will be in an even worse situation. All they need now is an expensive war to really seal their economic fate.

Hopefully this tiff isn't over "oil". The Rockhopper story has been around for a long time. If there was anything there that was economic it would have been developed several years ago. One has to take press releases from oil companies listed on AIM with a grain of salt. In the end they will be fighting over a mass of rocky terrain that has more sheep than people. But I guess the SAS/SBS are always in need of live training.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 02:00:00

Re: Britain warns Argentina over Falklands "aggression"

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 15 Jun 2012, 23:26:22

dissident wrote:That's funny. Like the Malvinas were British since the dawn of time or something. The British grabbed these islands without considering anyone's fences. They tried to grab Argentina too but that was a bit harder so they settled for the islands.


Bottom line is that you've got people who've been living there for generations, it can't be right to force them off their land at the point of a gun and hand it over to Argentines..

We can't re-fight the 1830s, wasn't Argentina still the Spanish Empire anyways.. should the US give up Puerto Rico and Samoa? Who would we give it to, the nearest foreign neighbor that wants it?

France has Guadeloupe and Martinique and they all speak French there, should that be given over to some foreign non French-speaking neighbor? I don't see the reasoning for how Argentina deserves it more than the people who've been living there for generations.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Master
Master
 
Posts: 6253
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Re: Britain warns Argentina over Falklands "aggression"

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 15 Jun 2012, 23:33:36

yeahbut wrote:"two bald men fighting over a comb" :-D :(


:lol:

I still don't get why it's so depopulated. They have fishing, sheep, now oil. I saw a documentary on the Falklands (I like obscure subjects), seemed like they actually have a good amount of land down there, certainly for more than 3,000 people.

But the people they do have, really have lived there for generations, so.. they have a local dialect British accent.. they want nothing to do with the Spanish, that ought to be the end of it.

In comparison, the US territories (tax dollar wise) are also a drain, just as the Falklands are to UK. But it's still sovereign territory. You can't let a foreign army invade and take it over.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Master
Master
 
Posts: 6253
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Re: Britain warns Argentina over Falklands "aggression"

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 15 Jun 2012, 23:45:29

rockdoc123 wrote:My sense is they are so tired of a repeat economic performance that they've thrown up their hands in capitulation, realizing that the populist vote always wins.


Well.. you're forgetting the previous right wing government utterly wrecked the country to point of economic collapse in 2001 (in cahoots with American and Euro banksters).

I don't know what's been going on there since then. Default was a good idea, if they've gone too socialist then that was a mistake all they needed was that default reset and then root out corruption (which can never be done in Latin America, good luck).

Anyhow they won't invade again. Only dictatorships do that. I don't know what they were thinking last time around.. if UK had faltered Uncle Sam would have taken care of it.

It wasn't all a "cakewalk" though, was some tough fighting and men on both sides died hand to hand combat deaths. Don't think you'd call it a cakewalk if you'd been in a foxhole over there, bombs and / or artillery coming in, machine gun fire.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Master
Master
 
Posts: 6253
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Re: Britain warns Argentina over Falklands "aggression"

Unread postby dolanbaker » Sat 16 Jun 2012, 03:37:29

Sixstrings wrote:
yeahbut wrote:"two bald men fighting over a comb" :-D :(


:lol:

I still don't get why it's so depopulated. They have fishing, sheep, now oil. I saw a documentary on the Falklands (I like obscure subjects), seemed like they actually have a good amount of land down there, certainly for more than 3,000 people.
.

For one very simple reason ISOLATION!
It's a remote group of islands far away form where you live and ever further away away from where I live.
Ronald Coase, Nobel Economic Sciences, said in 1991 “If we torture the data long enough, it will confess.”
User avatar
dolanbaker
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1562
Joined: Wed 14 Apr 2010, 09:38:47
Location: Éire

Re: Britain warns Argentina over Falklands "aggression"

Unread postby dolanbaker » Sat 16 Jun 2012, 03:38:31

Sixstrings wrote:
yeahbut wrote:"two bald men fighting over a comb" :-D :(


:lol:

I still don't get why it's so depopulated. They have fishing, sheep, now oil. I saw a documentary on the Falklands (I like obscure subjects), seemed like they actually have a good amount of land down there, certainly for more than 3,000 people.
.

For one very simple reason ISOLATION!
It's a remote group of islands far away from where you live and ever further away away from where I live.
Ronald Coase, Nobel Economic Sciences, said in 1991 “If we torture the data long enough, it will confess.”
User avatar
dolanbaker
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1562
Joined: Wed 14 Apr 2010, 09:38:47
Location: Éire

Re: THE Falkland Islands Thread (merged)

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Sat 16 Jun 2012, 16:06:46

Well.. you're forgetting the previous right wing government utterly wrecked the country to point of economic collapse in 2001 (in cahoots with American and Euro banksters).

no, that is why I said the educated working class are tired of the cycles of booming economy followed by collapse....they seem to go through it every ten years the '01 collapse being the last one. The gov't now is not making any better desicions than were made back in the early 2000's

I don't know what's been going on there since then. Default was a good idea, if they've gone too socialist then that was a mistake all they needed was that default reset and then root out corruption (which can never be done in Latin America, good luck).


Most economists in Argentina would argue that default was the worst possible thing for Argentina...they have never really come back. There economy is booming but it is pretty much a false economy with lots of gov't intervention...no free market here. It is really too bad because it is a beautiful country with lots of natural resources. They can export beef and soya products and the tourism industry could boom if they would let it. They likely have more shale gas than the US but it is doubtful they will access any of it in the next number of years unless they put policies in place to encourage foreign investment
User avatar
rockdoc123
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 02:00:00

Re: Britain warns Argentina over Falklands "aggression"

Unread postby KingM » Sat 16 Jun 2012, 19:28:13

dolanbaker wrote:
Sixstrings wrote:
yeahbut wrote:"two bald men fighting over a comb" :-D :(


:lol:

I still don't get why it's so depopulated. They have fishing, sheep, now oil. I saw a documentary on the Falklands (I like obscure subjects), seemed like they actually have a good amount of land down there, certainly for more than 3,000 people.
.

For one very simple reason ISOLATION!
It's a remote group of islands far away from where you live and ever further away away from where I live.


So is New Zealand. The Falklands are also cold. Not numbingly cold in the winter like places in North America, but it never ever gets warm, either. The record high is only 75/24 F/C.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_islands#Climate
KingM
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue 30 Aug 2005, 02:00:00
Location: Second Vermont Republic

Re: THE Falkland Islands Thread (merged)

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sat 16 Jun 2012, 19:37:46

NZ is huge, you could spend a lifetime exploring NZ and not see every forest, hot springs, glacier, reef and island, mountain top. The northernmost part is sub-tropical, with highs near 90/36 in summer, the arch spreads from this through temperate, marine to the edge of sub antarctic, parallel w/ Falklands, which is comparatively a few bare rocks in the middle of an icy windy ocean.
SeaGypsy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4802
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 03:00:00

Re: THE Falkland Islands Thread (merged)

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Sat 16 Jun 2012, 21:04:47

NZ is huge, you could spend a lifetime exploring NZ and not see every forest, hot springs, glacier,

One of my fond memories of NZ was visiting Franz Joseph glacier in the middle of what seemed to be typical weather there, clouds down to the ground and continuous light rain (reminded me of Scotland). The humorous part of the story was I saw 5 Keas (those huge green parrots that are indigenous) walking down the road to the glacier like so many sailors rolling along. I guess it was even too wet for them to fly. Didn't keep the wee bastards from nibbling on my bicycle tires that night though!
User avatar
rockdoc123
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 02:00:00

Re: THE Falkland Islands Thread (merged)

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sat 16 Jun 2012, 22:52:32

They are flightless, so path of least resistance, then they are there more often than anyone else, territorialism.
SeaGypsy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4802
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 03:00:00

Re: THE Falkland Islands Thread (merged)

Unread postby yeahbut » Sun 17 Jun 2012, 00:26:25

Hi sg, I think that might be kakapo you're thinking of, kea are great fliers altho they do a lot of walking about as well. I loved rockdoc's description of them as rolling along like sailors, that describes perfectly their hilarious rocking gait. They are incredibly cheeky and curious and will peel the rubber off your wind screen wipers and window seals in no time at all if they feel like it.

Farmers used to kill them in the bad old days, in fact the govt actually paid a bounty for their skins at one point because they have been known, very occasionally, to peck at the backs of sheep to get at the fat, which results in a most unpleasant death for the sheep. Wisdom has prevailed for a long time now and they are fully protected- recognition that they have been here for 20 million years, and humans and their livestock for 200...

Kakapo are another matter, they must be among the most bizarre and lovable birds on the planet. They are unique both in being a flightless parrot, and nocturnal. They are very friendly(not a good idea when humans, cats, rats and ferrets turn up!), and have the most ridiculously elaborate and impractial courtship rituals imaginable. In short, they could only possibly have evolved in a crazy, isolated ecosystem with no mammalian predators at all.

For a giggle, check out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T1vfsHYiKY to see a kakapo that was accidently imprinted on humans when it was raised as a chick many years ago. Techniques have since improved, so that this doesn't happen anymore, but as a result of his upbringing Sirrocco the kakapo is not interested in other kakapo at all, only humans, and takes a particularly amorous interest in the unfortunate biologist in this clip :lol:

Well I guess I have derailed threads worse than this before, but surely not by much. Apologies, and back to the pressing matter of some frozen rocks in the south atlantic :P
User avatar
yeahbut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue 30 Oct 2007, 02:00:00

Previous

Return to Geopolitics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests