THE Radiation / Radioactive Thread (merged)

[dolanbaker]

Age of cancer victims
A quick scan of this document appears to show no correlation, but if repeated today would the ages change?

[Sir.Henry]

Logically there is no way to counter our baby assuming the correctness of the posted data.

Except maybe for the fact that i am exactly the target. 46 years old, born in may 1965, and no i didn't die recently as far as i know.
I also receive my yearly refunds from my health insurance for 25 years in a row now as i seem to be in a perfect state of health.

Lucky guy? Randomly opposing statistics because i am lost in the hordes of the devastated and dying... - what i have to be?
Not at all. people around my age here are as healthy as i am, say cancer is almost non-existant.

How so? I don't know. But i watched an interesting TV report lately, about animal life near Chernobyl. According to the data gathered there recently, animals are doing fine and are healthy despite the fact of ongoing hefty radiation.
Only newcomers seem to have... let's name it medical issues, but those subside pretty fast.

So there might be - something - those statistics don't catch.

But everyone needs to find this stuff out for themself - and no, i am not a religious guy.

Happy hunting...
...Henry is now 6 months old.

[ColossalContrarian]

You should post a link or something because you're clearly watching something different than everyone else. You can start here ->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COvUwn6yxFc

[babystrangeloop]

Age of cancer victims
A quick scan of this document appears to show no correlation, but if repeated today would the ages change?

How on earth can you say there is no correlation? Are you blind?

The presence of SR-90 in bones can cause bone cancer, cancer of nearby tissues, and leukemia.

Data from a study in 2003?

2003-1964 = 39

Bone cancer diagnosis average age from that table? 39