Moderator: Tanada



peripato wrote:Of course the question remains, where is all that Saudi spare capacity, that the IEA has to step into the breach?
I guess desperate times call for desperate measures. The global elite must be quacking in their boots...



evilgenius wrote:Sounds like a bridge to an extra ten or fifteen cents a gallon off at the pump to me. You righties can call that a bribe if you want to. I call it putting stimulus into the economy in a much more direct fashion than the crippled banking system can at the present time.



seahorse3 wrote:This ill conceived attack on Libya caused the world to lose that 2mpd of much needed production, raised oil prices, and now forces the West to tap our oil reserves. The problem is, Libyan crude will be offline for at least a year, so this release of 60mbpd at 2mbpd is only 30 days of oil. What then Sherlock?





ColossalContrarian wrote:The timing of the SPR release is mind boggling, there isn't a shortage but instead a glut and now when the SPR is really needed it will already be used up. Goldman Sachs can still keep the price high too, so this entire charade is impotent!
The unintended consequences are even worse because there's no need for everyone to ramp up supply since demand is so low!


wrote:Drill Baby Drill.


LL: Is the opening of the SPR ill-timed?
KB: The timing is a bit surprising. If the Libyan disruption was a proper supply crisis, why wait until refiners have been running for five months without high-quality crude before responding to it?
There may also be more going on than meets the eye.
In a deleveraging world where bailout dollars are running out, selling petroleum to lower prices may have been viewed as a back-door, consumer-side stimulus that could also capitalize further government spending. And, if current economic conditions have made price interventions acceptable, political factors, including the run-up the 2012 national election could them increasingly so.
...
For decisions like this one, late-breaking data can tip the balance.
Inputs that could have tipped the balance might have been (1) the June 8 OPEC impasse; and (2) a high (>80%) share of rising speculative calendar spreads in crude.


Total oil stocks in IEA member countries amount to over 4.1 billion barrels, and nearly 1.6 billion barrels of this are public stocks held exclusively for emergency purposes.
Refining capacity across Europe & Eurasia declined by 1.0% in 2010, which might lead one to conclude that there is more involved here than greedy U.S. oil companies. In fact, global refining capacity increased by 0.8% as refining operations shifted to areas with lower labor costs and more direct access to crude oil. Refining capacity in Africa, China, Iraq, and India respectively grew by 8.9%, 12.%, 6.8%, and 3.6%. I expect the loss of U.S. refining jobs to continue such that crude oil imports are slowly replaced by finished product imports.


Bill Hicks wrote:ColossalContrarian wrote:The timing of the SPR release is mind boggling, there isn't a shortage but instead a glut and now when the SPR is really needed it will already be used up. Goldman Sachs can still keep the price high too, so this entire charade is impotent!
The unintended consequences are even worse because there's no need for everyone to ramp up supply since demand is so low!
There's hardly a "glut" with Brent currently in triple digits.
Seahorse is right, this move is to try to save Europe from the debacle of the Libyan campaign. What they plan to do when the 60 days are up and Libyan production is still shut down is anyone's guess.

evilgenius wrote:Sounds like a bridge to an extra ten or fifteen cents a gallon off at the pump to me. You righties can call that a bribe if you want to. I call it putting stimulus into the economy in a much more direct fashion than the crippled banking system can at the present time.


Hughj wrote:I'm going to have a drink! It's 5 oclock somewhere!
Hugh


Users browsing this forum: energy investor and 17 guests