













Expatriot wrote:Regarding Lasik, the "flap" issues are rare, but if you don't like the idea of having the flap cut and reattached and the risk associated with that, there's a procedure that you can get that actually sculpts the outside of your cornea - same net effect - change refraction through cornea - but no flap, no chance of flap side effects and no flap weakness - that is, flaps that heal are not a strong as normal cornea. Some say it's like a tupperware bowl - strong bond on outside, inside of flap prone to re-tear if mechanical injury occurs.
Knew a guy who had the contouring done - said it was brutal for a couple days, then perfect vision thereafter.

graham wrote:Basically I have really bad shortsightedness. My focal distance is now around a foot (from having 20/20 vision up until 18). At the moment I wear soft contacts as I really HATE glasses. My eyesight in them is terrible as they rob me of depth perception.


anador wrote:All we have now are secretaries that punch a code into a machine loaded with industrial milled blanks.... really sad.


Keith_McClary wrote:graham wrote:Basically I have really bad shortsightedness. My focal distance is now around a foot (from having 20/20 vision up until 18). At the moment I wear soft contacts as I really HATE glasses. My eyesight in them is terrible as they rob me of depth perception.
Mine's about 4 and 6 inches. My hobby is spotting high flying birds for a migratory raptor count.
I don't understand your statement about depth perception. Of course we have much better binocular depth perception at close distances.
I recently bought $10 prescription glasses online. They were shipped from Pakistan. EyeglassRetailerReviews.com has good info. Do we have a thread on online shopping?

Yeah, strong perscriptions can be like that. I've found that thinner closer fitting lenses help, but only so much. Contacts are better.graham wrote:My eyesight in them is terrible as they rob me of depth perception.
Usually people say what Gramme said because contact lenses don't help with astigmatism as well as eyeglasses due to the lenses being soft. Feeling like their eyes are "working harder" is a common complaint.Expatriot wrote:With regard to your eyes "working hard" with contacts on, this makes no sense for distance vision, for sure, and probably makes not much sense for short vision. All contacts do is bend the light coming in to your cornea slightly. If anything, contacts should make it easier for your eyes, because your iris isn't straining to try to bend your lens to focus on the retina.
Regarding Lasik, many people who are myopic or with strong astigmatisms are poor candidates. Though there are new more expensive procedures that involve inserting a lens into the eye. So if Gramme can't get lasik, then he might be able to get something like an Implantable Contact Lens.Expatriot wrote:Regarding Lasik, the "flap" issues are rare, but if you don't like the idea of having the flap cut and reattached and the risk associated with that, there's a procedure that you can get that actually sculpts the outside of your cornea - same net effect - change refraction through cornea - but no flap, no chance of flap side effects and no flap weakness - that is, flaps that heal are not a strong as normal cornea. Some say it's like a tupperware bowl - strong bond on outside, inside of flap prone to re-tear if mechanical injury occurs.
This thread isn't so bad. I think as gramee mentioned, a lot of what you are calling "bad info" is simply due to language differences.Expatriot wrote:Like I said - lots of bad info in this thread. Read, read, learn, ask lots of questions. I did a bunch of research before getting mine done.



nocar wrote:The advantage of being near-sighed is that the normal aging forcing you to have reading glasses will not affect you - you can still read (and sew and pick out bones in your fish for example) without glasses.




Return to Planning For The Future
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 7 guests