Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

For discussions of events and conditions not necessarily related to Peak Oil.

No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby Carlhole » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 01:36:37

Thanks to NBF for this.

Minerals On Ocean Floor Could Provide Resources For 60 Centuries

It's easy to be a pessimist in a world full of calamities. But for those worried about the continuing availability of natural resources, data from the ocean makes a good case for optimism, says economic geologist Lawrence Cathles.

In a review paper published June 23 online in the journal Mineralium Deposita, Cathles, Cornell professor of earth and atmospheric sciences, writes that while land-based deposits may be a dwindling source of valuable minerals, deposits on the ocean floor could power humanity for centuries.

The minerals, including sulfur, copper, zinc, iron and precious metals, are contained in volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits that form on the ocean floor where tectonic plates pull apart and allow magma (molten rock) to invade the Earth's 3.7-mile- (6 kilometer-) thick crust. The magma heats seawater to 662 degrees Fahrenheit (350 degrees Celsius) and moves it through the ocean crust via convection; and the seawater deposits the minerals where it discharges along the ridge axis.


And the ridge axis is what has pushed the continents apart for millions of years. I guess you could scrape minerals off the bottom at every distance away from the axis. There will have to be robots designed and built for mining the sea floor.
Carlhole
 

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 02:07:11

There is a thing called 'pressure'. http://oilgasglossary.com/pressure-gradient.html
To get reliable usefull gear down there it would have to evolve there, the pressure is so extreme; think of the weight of a few SUV's pressing simultaneously on the palm and back of your hand. That's how different the environment is. Very tricky stuff.Just thinking of how to do anything with hydraulics at such depths is confounding; modern mining relies very heavily on hydraulics.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby Carlhole » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 02:45:26

SeaGypsy wrote:There is a thing called 'pressure'. http://oilgasglossary.com/pressure-gradient.html
To get reliable usefull gear down there it would have to evolve there, the pressure is so extreme; think of the weight of a few SUV's pressing simultaneously on the palm and back of your hand. That's how different the environment is. Very tricky stuff.Just thinking of how to do anything with hydraulics at such depths is confounding; modern mining relies very heavily on hydraulics.


It's just another engineering problem.
Carlhole
 

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 03:09:01


There is also plenty of liquefied NG on Titan, a lot of ready to mine platinides on asteroids and virtually inexhaustible stocks of hydrogen on Sun.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7356
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby Carlhole » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 03:46:28

EnergyUnlimited wrote:

There is also plenty of liquefied NG on Titan, a lot of ready to mine platinides on asteroids and virtually inexhaustible stocks of hydrogen on Sun.


Deleted another ad hom
Carlhole
 

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 04:11:10

This might make sense to me in the intermediate term for relatively rare or expensive things, like rare PM's and rare earths (if rare earths would even be available undersea).

For the common, cheap, base metals the article mentions like copper and zinc -- one would imagine that unless these things got AWFULLY rare above ground, that the cost would be totally prohibitive to mine these on the ocean floor, even if they're abundant there.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby americandream » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 04:24:17

Plus we've ample supplies of bullshit to last us till then end of time.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 04:27:18

Outcast_Searcher wrote:This might make sense to me in the intermediate term for relatively rare or expensive things, like rare PM's and rare earths (if rare earths would even be available undersea).

For the common, cheap, base metals the article mentions like copper and zinc -- one would imagine that unless these things got AWFULLY rare above ground, that the cost would be totally prohibitive to mine these on the ocean floor, even if they're abundant there.

Unfortunately it takes about a tonne of ore to extract 1 gram of precious metal, so the scale of necessary mining would be as large as one needed to produce base metals where concentration of metal in ore is few % and more.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7356
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby Pretorian » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 04:42:12

americandream wrote:Plus we've ample supplies of bullshit to last us till then end of time.


hey do you know that with your spamming here you made Peakoil.com #21 website in your village? Justsaying.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4683
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby americandream » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 05:05:09

Bullshit like I said, and lots of it from the self-appointed.

Pretorian wrote:
americandream wrote:Plus we've ample supplies of bullshit to last us till then end of time.


hey do you know that with your spamming here you made Peakoil.com #21 website in your village? Justsaying.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 06:19:13

It is a simple question which could result in a helpful conversation about the scale and engineering advances necessary to make the process of mining the seafloor profitable (in energy or $). We could talk about the environmental effects of said mining. We could go lots of directions. I could learn something from this thread but in less than one page it has degraded into name calling.

:cry:

Good work folks. Its your website. If you fill it full of manure, don't be surprised if you're mistaken for pigs.

Image

Or you can hate each other all you like and try to demonstrate your points with rational (even polite) argument. It is much more satisfying to make your opponent look like an idiot with some good research and argument but that requires work.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby dolanbaker » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 09:26:04

Getting back on-topic:

I suppose the main issue is whether it's worth going to the trouble of actually getting the minerials. The costs in fuel, engineering resources, materials & labour may just not justify the end result, it may be more beneficial to use an alternative or just do without!
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.:Anonymous
Our whole economy is based on planned obsolescence.
Hungrymoggy "I am now predicting that Europe will NUKE ITSELF sometime in the first week of January"
User avatar
dolanbaker
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3855
Joined: Wed 14 Apr 2010, 10:38:47
Location: Éire

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby efarmer » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 11:10:54

Okay China, that is 8 million metric tons of Mineral McNuggets, and one McNugget Happy Meal with a boy toy. We have a Bernanke and a Trump figurine to chose from so state if you have a preference at the window. You can supersize this order for one yuan or $600 USD, please drive around.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 13:03:45

wisconsin_cur wrote:Good work folks. Its your website. If you fill it full of manure, don't be surprised if you're mistaken for pigs.

Image


We have run out of oil we can afford to burn by JEFF RUBIN
I can’t help but reflect on how far the peak oil movement has come over the last decade
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby RankineCycle » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 13:30:32

It's the same issue as unconventional fossil fuels. I have no doubt that the engineering could be done, but the the high-grade energy/capital investment required to make it possible is another story. It will be a stretch to be able to provide cars to the other 6 billion people on the planet who do not have cars, or a new disposable cell phone to all of the world's people every six months.

Industry will certainly try and the misallocation of resources will continue, as we see in Africa where people live amongst roaring gas flares while they cook their food using dung, or next to multi-gigawatt hydro plants powering gold and diamond mines while they live in shacks lit with candles.
User avatar
RankineCycle
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu 30 Sep 2010, 13:24:10

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby Quinny » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 15:55:40

I think iyou'd probably get a better EROEI from mining waste tips! :wink:
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 16:06:46

Quinny wrote:I think iyou'd probably get a better EROEI from mining waste tips! :wink:

They would go for metals and other minerals, not for energy, by doing that.
However you are essentially right.
To mine ocean floor it would take more construction metal (often in form of expensive, corrosion resistant alloys) than amount of metal which could be lifted up to surface in form of mined ore.
So the project would be a net metal drain, not a source.

Hence it is a senseless undertaking.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7356
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: No need to fight over mineral resources, says geologist

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Fri 08 Oct 2010, 17:31:08

Mineral deposits formed at spreading centers become part of the seafloor as it spreads away from the center.
The seafloor is 0.3 billion km2.
That's a big strip mine if it's spread evenly.

The paper is behind a paywall. $34.00, anyone?
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands


Return to Geopolitics & Global Economics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests