Japanese?


![5eek [smilie=5eek.gif]](http://peakoil.com/forums/images/smilies/5eek.gif)



Laromi wrote:never give up hope. Here's something else to to challenge the skeptics "Kapanadze_free_energy_100_KWATT_TMZ_demo_Turkey_part3A.flv" courtesy of OverUnity.com. :0


vision-master wrote:You act like funny man, but the truth is you are a nefarious poster. Again, how many times have you been banned from this 4um?



Alcassin wrote:Laromi wrote:never give up hope. Here's something else to to challenge the skeptics "Kapanadze_free_energy_100_KWATT_TMZ_demo_Turkey_part3A.flv" courtesy of OverUnity.com. :0


Laromi wrote:never give up hope. Here's something else to to challenge the skeptics "Kapanadze_free_energy_100_KWATT_TMZ_demo_Turkey_part3A.flv" courtesy of OverUnity.com. :0







SeaGypsy wrote:Really Vision I would be as happy as anyone to believe the LENR hype, but my frontal lobes keep getting in the way. I just can't get THAT stoned!


Captain Thunderbolt wrote:Let me give you a few easy examples Laromi
It is an INCONTESTABLE FACT that Rossi is not a scientist.
It is an INCONTESTABLE FACT that Rossi has criminal convictions.
It is an INCONTESTABLE FACT that the Ecat demonstrations were faked.
(a dribble of warm water for furx sake!!)
Laromi writes,
You and others still refuse to acknowledge an INCONTESTABLE FACT that LENR, Cold Fusion or an elephant by another name has been proven by many, many times over, to be more than a curious event. So what if the allegations you raise against Rossi as a person or others involved in this (LENR, Cold Fusion) debate are true to what extent do they have any revelance to LENR, Cold Fusion as a scientific demonstration that other potential sources of energy will, as in the past, be exposed in in due course of this debate.
If you have INCONTESTABLE evidence of fraud or some other INCONTESTABLE evidence of wrong doing then present it.
BTW Overunity is also bollocks: even o.o99 to the Nth. Degree is still overunity and perhaps whilst not singularly useful, has however, the potential to be useful rather than some of your baseless remarks and quotations.

Whilst you are on the case, if you read further, those that had the later displeasure of calling Pons and Fleishman out did so without the anonymity of the internet. The "public" (scientific fraternity) knew personally, if you will, the people who made the remarks. Not so as you, or in fact as anyone with a mindset for making feckless noise from somewhere behind a screen of filtered and re-filtered firewalls and proxies. That is what I mean. Read the post.vision-master wrote:SG, pm me with those kind of accusations from now on. No sense in falsely labeling me in a public forum. Have you no manners at all?
And, with a little more effort you may well be on your way to becoming a cynic.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests