NEW! Members Only Forums!

Access more articles, news & discussion by becoming a PeakOil.com Member.
Register Today...
It's FREE!


Login



Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins :-)


LENR, Rossi and the ECAT Thread pt 2 (merged)

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby vision-master » Thu 08 Mar 2012, 11:21:43

User avatar
vision-master
Master
Master
 
Posts: 8870
Joined: Thu 18 May 2006, 02:00:00
Location: Out of this World

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby Captain Thunderbolt » Thu 08 Mar 2012, 12:26:54

OH!...........great Heavens to Auntie Betsy!
NOT another GREEN WIDGET SCAM?????

What is it with you Nexus Magazine addicts?

OOoooooooo0000000H!
We could all have FREE ENERGY except BIG OIL and them nasty Pseudo Sceptics keep on spoiling everything.


(don't bother us with facts, evidence, logic, reason,sanity and Zhit like that. Our opinions are worth just much as your opinions. blah...blah...blah....Professor Plognort said that ZPE hypo-polar pustubles could easily account for the excess COP Coprophillic phenomena. Gamma rays are completely harmless and easily deflagurised by Al-foil Millinery. )

[smilie=5eek.gif]
User avatar
Captain Thunderbolt
permanently banned
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun 26 Feb 2012, 02:58:59

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby vision-master » Thu 08 Mar 2012, 13:08:29

You act like funny man, but the truth is you are a nefarious poster. Again, how many times have you been banned from this 4um?
User avatar
vision-master
Master
Master
 
Posts: 8870
Joined: Thu 18 May 2006, 02:00:00
Location: Out of this World

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby Captain Thunderbolt » Thu 08 Mar 2012, 13:38:14

I cannot imagine why this forum would wish to ban anyone for speaking the incontestable truth.
Opinions are easily altered.
Facts remain unchanged.
:)
User avatar
Captain Thunderbolt
permanently banned
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun 26 Feb 2012, 02:58:59

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby vision-master » Thu 08 Mar 2012, 14:08:31

Yes, the fact is you have been banned before from here.

Why must you continue to derail this thread?

Tell us the facts Blinky....
User avatar
vision-master
Master
Master
 
Posts: 8870
Joined: Thu 18 May 2006, 02:00:00
Location: Out of this World

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby Alcassin » Thu 08 Mar 2012, 19:34:19

Laromi wrote:never give up hope. Here's something else to to challenge the skeptics "Kapanadze_free_energy_100_KWATT_TMZ_demo_Turkey_part3A.flv" courtesy of OverUnity.com. :0


Oh, this is easy.
As long as it is against First Law of Thermodynamics as long it doesn't work. It is. It doesn't work. 8)
It doesn't work since 2004, when the film was done.
Moreover he tries to get electric power from an electric non-conductor - namely ground... Ground O_o Ground!!! Oh yeah, ground is the place where your lighting rod ends. That is unbelievably hilarious :lol: :lol: :lol:

Overunity is a hoax. It is a concept against known laws of physics.
Learn Steorn story.
Buy a physics schoolbook, you may find it helpful.

I'd love to remind you that this topic is about cold fusion, which happens to be a better scam story. At least cold fusionists are not trying to sell "free energy". It cannot be so easily discarded from start, but can be on other grounds than laws of thermodynamics.

NEXT!
Peak oil is only an indication and a premise of limits to growth on a finite planet.
Denial is the most predictable of all human responses.
User avatar
Alcassin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed 20 Jun 2007, 02:00:00
Location: Poland

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 08 Mar 2012, 19:40:13

vision-master wrote:You act like funny man, but the truth is you are a nefarious poster. Again, how many times have you been banned from this 4um?


Asks he who has himself been banned numerous times for complete off topic space cadet stonery, for the umpteenth time on this thread. Boring Vision. You are getting snarly in your old age. I suggest a little trip to Boston to visit our friend Dmitry. Meanwhile Blinky Thunderbum is welcomed for entertainingly bumping Carlhole's hyping Rossi/ Flakycon thread; by a vast majority of the few who keep reading this wonderful thread.
SeaGypsy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4807
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 03:00:00

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 09:21:27

lol - makes me wonder who really is behind this 4um?

Big Oil most likey.......

This place breeds FEAR, exactly what TPTB want. :)

Check out all the banner ads. 8)
User avatar
vision-master
Master
Master
 
Posts: 8870
Joined: Thu 18 May 2006, 02:00:00
Location: Out of this World

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby Laromi » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 10:18:15

Alcassin wrote:
Laromi wrote:never give up hope. Here's something else to to challenge the skeptics "Kapanadze_free_energy_100_KWATT_TMZ_demo_Turkey_part3A.flv" courtesy of OverUnity.com. :0


Oh, this is easy.

As long as it is against First Law of Thermodynamics as long it doesn't work It is. It doesn't work: that was said against many other advances in science, including flight. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Overunity is a hoax. It is a concept against known laws of physics. Well, you said it, no more to be said from me.

Buy a physics schoolbook, you may find it helpful: Perhaps you could suggest a colour that does not clash with your kaleidoscopic id.

I'd love to remind you that this topic is about cold fusion: No it's not, it's a hit on Rossi similar to that awarded to Pons/Flieshman. The main difference in the latter case was that those that decried their work did so publicly and not from a shielded forum. Be adventurous, paint your drivel under your hand in the exposed public arena .

As I say, a lot of folk (shills) using this forum have, in the main, been deriding Rossi not his science. As you should be well aware by now, many creditable members of the scientific community have little or no problem with acceptance of LENR science and this acceptance appears to be quickly growing in universities, Academic/scientific groups, Industry etc. Why don't you publicly name shame and plague the a-foregoing academic parties with your drivel? Oh, you want me to do the footwork for you to remind you who they are? When somewhere along the line that information has already been provided for on this forum albeit under different styles, and over a couple of years. If you have retention difficulties read the whole lot over again yourself :P
Laromi
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat 14 Feb 2009, 23:07:25

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby Laromi » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 10:50:55

[quote="Captain Thunderbolt"]I cannot imagine why this forum would wish to ban anyone for speaking the incontestable truth.

I see by your remarks that you must be a scholar of the arts - such a colourful misunderstanding of the English language - and the sciences - incontestable? My, incontestable; that evokes visions of my primary science master of many years ago wriggling violently in his final resting ground because someone "qualified?" to argue within the realms of science speaks of scientific truths as being incontestable. You are kidding me, aren't you. 8O
Laromi
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat 14 Feb 2009, 23:07:25

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby Laromi » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 11:08:44

Laromi wrote:never give up hope. Here's something else to to challenge the skeptics "Kapanadze_free_energy_100_KWATT_TMZ_demo_Turkey_part3A.flv" courtesy of OverUnity.com. :0


I was of the hope this "off topic" may fill a void for those who have an addictive like rhetoric for railing against over-unity energy devices.
I'm a little disapointed that a few more posters didn't get themselves all in a tizz. :twisted:
Laromi
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat 14 Feb 2009, 23:07:25

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby Captain Thunderbolt » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 14:00:58

Let me give you a few easy examples Laromi
It is an INCONTESTABLE FACT that Rossi is not a scientist.
It is an INCONTESTABLE FACT that Rossi has criminal convictions.
It is an INCONTESTABLE FACT that the Ecat demonstrations were faked.
(a dribble of warm water for furx sake!!)

If you and the rest of the true believers wish to pursue your amusing hobby of nukes for dummies then please go right on ahead.
What fills me with the urge to defecate is when you act as cheerleader for Rossi and Defkalion who are clearly conducting a multi-million dollar scam.

BTW Overunity is also bollocks.
:badgrin:
User avatar
Captain Thunderbolt
permanently banned
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun 26 Feb 2012, 02:58:59

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 14:07:53

It is an INCONTESTABLE FACT that you have been banned from here more than once.
User avatar
vision-master
Master
Master
 
Posts: 8870
Joined: Thu 18 May 2006, 02:00:00
Location: Out of this World

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 18:12:51

Hey Vision, the mods must be in on it to destroy free energy for big oil? :oops:

Otherwise why would they tolerate Blinky? It's as obvious as the nose on your face (between your eyes and your bong).

Rossi wasn't convicted for shoplifting but for environmental destruction and fraud. The worst kind of scammer, a vandal to boot.
SeaGypsy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4807
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 03:00:00

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 19:58:56

Have you been out to sea for to long? lsol
User avatar
vision-master
Master
Master
 
Posts: 8870
Joined: Thu 18 May 2006, 02:00:00
Location: Out of this World

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 20:06:29

Lol! the opposite. 10 days out of the city in 1 year, it's a shocker. Moving house, migrating family, expensive living. Herb here is $300 oz as to $1 gm in Asia. My rent is 10 times what it was. My wife's brother just smashed both his legs in a scooter crash and she has torn off in a huff because we can't afford to pay for his stupid drunkenness.
Looking forward to a new place I've just leased near Melbourne docks, ideal for boatbuilding and international freight business.

Really Vision I would be as happy as anyone to believe the LENR hype, but my frontal lobes keep getting in the way. I just can't get THAT stoned! :razz:
SeaGypsy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4807
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 03:00:00

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby Schadenfreude » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 21:58:21

SeaGypsy wrote:Really Vision I would be as happy as anyone to believe the LENR hype, but my frontal lobes keep getting in the way. I just can't get THAT stoned! :razz:


You don't have to believe anything. It's just a damn energy news story we're following.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1096
Joined: Wed 16 Jan 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 22:06:07

More like the evolution of a black hole.
SeaGypsy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4807
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 03:00:00

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby Laromi » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 22:32:20

Captain Thunderbolt wrote:Let me give you a few easy examples Laromi
It is an INCONTESTABLE FACT that Rossi is not a scientist.
It is an INCONTESTABLE FACT that Rossi has criminal convictions.
It is an INCONTESTABLE FACT that the Ecat demonstrations were faked.
(a dribble of warm water for furx sake!!)

Laromi writes,
You and others still refuse to acknowledge an INCONTESTABLE FACT that LENR, Cold Fusion or an elephant by another name has been proven by many, many times over, to be more than a curious event. So what if the allegations you raise against Rossi as a person or others involved in this (LENR, Cold Fusion) debate are true to what extent do they have any revelance to LENR, Cold Fusion as a scientific demonstration that other potential sources of energy will, as in the past, be exposed in in due course of this debate.

If you have INCONTESTABLE evidence of fraud or some other INCONTESTABLE evidence of wrong doing then present it.

BTW Overunity is also bollocks: even o.o99 to the Nth. Degree is still overunity and perhaps whilst not singularly useful, has however, the potential to be useful rather than some of your baseless remarks and quotations. :badgrin:
Laromi
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat 14 Feb 2009, 23:07:25

Re: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction or LENR

Unread postby Laromi » Fri 09 Mar 2012, 22:57:50

vision-master wrote:SG, pm me with those kind of accusations from now on. No sense in falsely labeling me in a public forum. Have you no manners at all?
Whilst you are on the case, if you read further, those that had the later displeasure of calling Pons and Fleishman out did so without the anonymity of the internet. The "public" (scientific fraternity) knew personally, if you will, the people who made the remarks. Not so as you, or in fact as anyone with a mindset for making feckless noise from somewhere behind a screen of filtered and re-filtered firewalls and proxies. That is what I mean. Read the post. :x And, with a little more effort you may well be on your way to becoming a cynic. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Laromi
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat 14 Feb 2009, 23:07:25

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron