Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal

PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

It's time to choke off the supply of fossil-death-fuels

Re: It's time to choke off the supply of fossil-death-fuels

Unread postby baha » Wed 25 Apr 2018, 06:57:30

You're both right. I saw the reality that the younger generation was taking my edge in IT. There were hundreds of jobs but thousands of applicants. So I career shifted myself into solar power. Just like KJ is asking. I spent $2500 on training classes before I ever got a job...and then got one in four days.

But I also felt the emptiness that IT had left me with and decided to pursue something that I felt strongly about. The combination of a fast developing field and a 'push my way in attitude' resulted in success :)

I tell my wife all the time...if you can find a job where you enjoy the people and the mission, success is easy :)
A Solar fuel spill is otherwise known as a sunny day!
The energy density of a tank of FF's doesn't matter if it's empty.
User avatar
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu 12 Jul 2007, 02:00:00
Location: North Carolina, USA

Re: It's time to choke off the supply of fossil-death-fuels

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Wed 25 Apr 2018, 12:18:47

KaiserJeep wrote:Niether should you. The purpose of automation is to make goods and services cheaper to all. That way, more people can buy more stuff.

The person who hangs around a dead town with no jobs is a loser.

The person who does not get retrained for another job is a loser.

The person who insists that what he wants to do is a job that no longer exists is a loser.

Here's a clue: They call it work for a reason. They are going to pay you to do something they need done. It might not be what you want to do, or where you want to do it, or in the company of people you want to associate with. You are pretty lucky if you have any of those things.

You take the money and do the job, or quit and please yourself. It's not slavery, you have a choice.

Technological change continues, and always will. Be flexible and willing to learn, or live on the dole, or become homeless, those are the choices.

Everything you say is true.

IMO, however, at least in much of the corporate world, at least in the US, there has been one BIG change re dealing with managing a career since the 90's.

Prior to about the mid-90's many corporations wanted to have and keep good, reliable employees throughout their careers. Thus, they would help them in their careers with guidance, encouragement, and most importantly formal training for better jobs, keeping up with technology, etc.

Much of that went away with MANY old-line companies as the goal of saving money in the short term became number one. So for training, there was little, if any. People were told to take classes on their own dime while on vacation, if they wanted training. Encouragement and guidance? As far as careers, that pretty much went away too.

So you're right -- and the responsibility does rest ultimately with the individual. But it is much more difficult as things are now, at least for the vast majority of US people who were fortunate enough to work for relatively paternalistic corporations before roughly 1995.

Again, the book "White Collar Sweatshop" does a decent job documenting much of the scale and the nature of the way things changed for roughly 80 million white collar workers around that time.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Posts: 5127
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 20:26:42

Re: It's time to choke off the supply of fossil-death-fuels

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Wed 25 Apr 2018, 12:45:55

You are entirely correct. Perks like medical insurance, company picnics, corporate housing, and so forth entered the American job market during WW2 when there was an acute labor shortage. They did not exist prior to that point, and never existed in places where there was never a labor shortage.

My career spanned the late 1970's to 2015 when I retired. Although I saw some of what you describe, there are major exceptions such as Silicon Valley where the starting salary for a new EE for example is likely to be $100,000 or more, and after a few years if you are not making $200,000, you are probably no longer in demand in your specialty.

The dark side of this red hot labor market is housing costs:
The asking price for this burnt shell of a house was $799,000. The actual sale after a bidding war was $900,000+.
Although condemned and uninhabitable, this Fremont home sold for $1.2M.
There are a few other markets where high tech is still driving the economy. Austin Texas and the Greenwhich Connecticut area are mini Silicon Valley tech centers, not so extreme.

As for employee "perks" in this area, I worked for a company that sweetened their regular and generous vacation policy with an extra paid six week "sabbatical" every four years, to encourage employees to reflect upon their career goals and possibly make changes to such. Game rooms, luxurious workout centers, subsidized mass transit, gourmet cafeteria cuisine with professional chefs, personal assistants to fetch your dry cleaning and stand in line at the DMV, etc. are common.

Anything goes, as long as it increases productivity. High Tech profits pay for it all, and jobs are available here.

But the first major expense you face is paying off your college loans, because you are not getting a job here without a degree and talent for hardware or software design. I was fortunate to only owe $16,000 when I got my BSEE degree, I lived the frugal lifestyle paid for by the original GI Bill, at $300/month. Then I used the loan entitlement from the VA to buy my first home. But I "paid" for those benefits with 42 months in uniform, and was so not fond of that lifestyle that I volunteered for isolated service in the Arctic in return for a 6-month reduction in my actice duty time.

I paid for two more college degrees for the wife and kid, while working. The wife is now deeply immersed in the career track mentality of Silicon Valley, she changes the subject when I talk of moving. Then I cheat by reminding her that she can provide a Grandmother's loving childcare while her daughter works to allow them to buy their own home....

I stand to make more than $1M profit on the home I bought for less than $124K in 1986. But the high tech lifestyle is also full of stress. Not to mention, I was moved to new locations three times in my career, which came at a considerable personal cost.

KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
Posts: 4904
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 16:16:32
Location: California's Silly Valley

Re: It's time to choke off the supply of fossil-death-fuels

Unread postby Yonnipun » Wed 25 Apr 2018, 16:35:01

I myself belive that universal basic income is inevitable in the nearest future. There simply will be no job for the average Joe. I also think that without overbreeding control a basic income is a catastrophic failure. Therefore in order to make it work and to stop the overpolulation the basic income should be paid only for them who voluntarily let themselves sterilized.
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat 07 Apr 2018, 03:29:19

Re: It's time to choke off the supply of fossil-death-fuels

Unread postby onlooker » Wed 25 Apr 2018, 16:45:19

Oh my goodness Y, I just wrote something that almost perfectly mirrors what you just state about the economic incentives needed to get people to comply with population controls on the can-collapse-of-global-civ-be-avoided-by-p-a-ehrlich-t67853-140.html#p1394149
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
Posts: 8993
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 12:49:04
Location: NY, USA


Return to Environment, Weather & Climate

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests