rerere wrote:I did not know this but stoves that have soapstone sides will radiate heat better.
look into soapstone.
I highly recommend this option as well...soapstone is a wonder.


Grimnir wrote:I am planning on installing a small Regency woodstove at the bottom of the stairs in an unfinished area of the basement. Since the floor and walls are concrete I don't have to worry about setting them on fire, and I figure they'll act as thermal mass as well. I'm in the northern US and the house is about 1200 square feet. Does anyone want to warn me against doing this before I go ahead and put a deposit down?



They have been using the system for a number of years, and it works well for them. They are 100% off grid with PVs and use their excess power to heat water and run refrigeration, after charging their electric recumbent trikes.


Grimnir wrote:I am planning on installing a small Regency woodstove at the bottom of the stairs in an unfinished area of the basement. Since the floor and walls are concrete .....

Consensi wrote:Grimnir wrote:I am planning on installing a small Regency woodstove at the bottom of the stairs in an unfinished area of the basement. Since the floor and walls are concrete .....
I recommend doing a little research on the principles of a Rocket Stove. Can't say enough about them. I am reading through this thread in amazement at how much money people are spending on something they could build basically for just a couple hundred dollars. I checked WisJim's link and saw the workings of the Rocket Stove adapted to an expensive conventional wood burning stove.
If I were going to build a wood burning stove in my basement (I don't have a basement), I would lay down an 8" bed of cob and place the stove on top then surround the stove with more cob on both sides and the back. The cob works just as well as soapstone does by absorbing lots of heat then slowly releasing it for hours after the fire burns out. But cob is basically free of cost.
Another nice thing about Rocket Stoves is that they burn more efficiently, cleanly, and you would use about half of the wood a conventional wood stoves burns to get the same BTU's of heat.
Before spending upwards of a thousand dollars I strongly recommend you look into the rocket stove.








davep wrote:Well, I installed my chimney last weekend and according to my wife it consumes wood even faster than the old inefficient insert.
I guess this is either because the chimney is pulling the air up too fast or that the air entry regulator is buggered.
Any ideas?


uNkNowN ElEmEnt wrote:I got my stove in etc and I don't think its drawing enough air. There are times (maybe on a windless day) when it will die out if you close the door (which its always supposed to be closed as its catalytic).

uNkNowN ElEmEnt wrote:I got my stove in etc and I don't think its drawing enough air. There are times (maybe on a windless day) when it will die out if you close the door (which its always supposed to be closed as its catalytic).
I talked to the guy who installed it about putting in an outside air intake and he says I don't need it. but its getting frustrating babying the thing for hours so it doesn't go out.
there is an air intake on the back. its a 3" round hole and the plate in the hole has a couple slits in it... what would happen if I took the plate off and enlarged these slits a bit?
Everyone told me that in a mobile home we'd be so hot we'd have to open the windows but we are finding the opposite to be true. Its freaking cold and I'm putting a heater in the other end bedroom to keep it liveable at times.


Plarin wrote:I'm curious, where are you guys finding this wood? Do you have huge backyards, can you get a lot more out of a single tree than I'm imagining, or are you planning on having access to public land after TSHTF?

frankthetank wrote:I'd put in an air intake. I wouldn't listen to that guy. I did one for my pellet stove when i had it installed and it worked great. When i get my woodstove in i'll do another one. There simple to do and the hole isn't that big... You might want to ask over on Hearth forums.
http://www.hearth.com/econtent/index.ph ... ategory/1/

davep wrote:Well, I installed my chimney last weekend and according to my wife it consumes wood even faster than the old inefficient insert.
I guess this is either because the chimney is pulling the air up too fast or that the air entry regulator is buggered.
Any ideas?


frankthetank wrote:Yup. There was a long discussion on it over on that other site maybe last year. The air has to come from somewhere for combustion.
Also REMEMBER TO HAVE A CO DETECTOR. Small price to pay for not waking up dead. I swear every year around here someone/some family dies because of CO poisoning.

Return to Planning For The Future
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests