Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Globalists Want To Cull 90% Of World’s Population

Re: population control options

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 30 Sep 2007, 20:40:36

How do you intend to implement this coercion? How do you intend to pass legislation in your own country? How do you intend to pass legislation in other countries?


Or is this merely more academic discussion?
Ludi
 

Re: population control options

Unread postby btu2012 » Sun 30 Sep 2007, 22:13:57

Ludi wrote:How do you intend to implement this coercion? How do you intend to pass legislation in your own country? How do you intend to pass legislation in other countries?

Or is this merely more academic discussion?


I believe that such legislation can be passed by the usual legislative bodies, namely parliaments in Europe and Congress in the US, as emergency measures for dealing with the crisis once the crisis starts to hit. You'll likely see massive rationing of fossil fuels and there will be some serious debate about what to do, at that point people need to hear the message that one can deal with this without going to all out war. I think that the war option will not be trivial, since most nations understand that it could mean their annihilation.

This is what happened in most crises in history and in my opinion it will happen again.

If you guys get serious about implementing change, you will have to act through the system by proposing some realistic solutions which could ensure national survival. You will get a fair hearing provided that the message is not outlandish.

I know that it seems impossible given the current political environment, but the political environment will change. The same is true of the political leaders, they will change once the ineptitude of the "business as usual types" becomes apparent.

Btu
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun

Re: population control options

Unread postby Jack » Sun 30 Sep 2007, 22:53:04

btu2012 wrote:I know that it seems impossible given the current political environment, but the political environment will change. The same is true of the political leaders, they will change once the ineptitude of the "business as usual types" becomes apparent.

Btu


Ending business as usual comes in many flavors. Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, and Mao Tse Tung all ended business as usual. Their backers all believed the solutions to be realistic, and that the methods would promote national survival.

When people lose their things - their house, car, toys - and become frightened, they are more likely to embrace extreme methods. That's history.

As for my plans....no, I don't think I'm up to becoming a warlord. I rather doubt we'll see that scenario anytime soon. My plan is to help out the secret police in a more repressive regime. Perhaps I'll even enforce the conservation some desire - while making good use of the contraband seized.

All nice and legal, with the paperwork properly filed, of course. 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: population control options

Unread postby btu2012 » Sun 30 Sep 2007, 23:05:56

Jack wrote:Ending business as usual comes in many flavors. Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, and Mao Tse Tung all ended business as usual. Their backers all believed the solutions to be realistic, and that the methods would promote national survival.


Right, that's something I think we should try to avoid. Each of these people had a communal ideology according to which the individual had to be subsumed to the greater good. A bit like "deep ecology" and some strands of "environmentalism", if you stop to think about it.

Each of these people used violent methods to impose minority beliefs on a majority. Do you see any parallel between say taxation of people who have too many children and the methods of these gentlemen ?

Regarding conservation, it can be achieved through taxation as we are already beginning to see. Guess your future is as a tax collector, not very glamorous, after all. :)

Btu
Last edited by btu2012 on Sun 30 Sep 2007, 23:42:10, edited 1 time in total.
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun

Re: population control options

Unread postby btu2012 » Sun 30 Sep 2007, 23:34:58

HEADER_RACK wrote: I say have as many kids as you can sustain yourself. If you can't sustain any then don't have any. If you have more than what you can support, oh well you will have to pay the piper. Don't make someone else pay to get you out of the fix you put yourself in and don't cry that it's not fair bullsh#t . Life isn't fair


So you would propose eliminating the subsidies for having children, if I understand correctly.

Btu
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun

Re: population control options

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 01 Oct 2007, 13:10:24

btu2012 wrote:I believe that such legislation can be passed by the usual legislative bodies, namely parliaments in Europe and Congress in the US, as emergency measures for dealing with the crisis once the crisis starts to hit.


So your intention is to wait until the crisis to act?


BTW, when I use the word "you" I mean you, btu2012, not "somebody." I'm asking YOU, btu2012, what YOU are intending to do. Or are you just shooting the breeze here?
Ludi
 

Re: population control options

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Mon 01 Oct 2007, 13:14:01

btu2012 wrote:So you would propose eliminating the subsidies for having children, if I understand correctly.

And that is all, what we can realistically hope for...
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7342
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: population control options

Unread postby btu2012 » Mon 01 Oct 2007, 14:48:33

Ludi wrote:
btu2012 wrote:I believe that such legislation can be passed by the usual legislative bodies, namely parliaments in Europe and Congress in the US, as emergency measures for dealing with the crisis once the crisis starts to hit.


So your intention is to wait until the crisis to act?


BTW, when I use the word "you" I mean you, btu2012, not "somebody." I'm asking YOU, btu2012, what YOU are intending to do. Or are you just shooting the breeze here?


Ludi,

The purpose of this thread is to understand what people think. In particular I want to gauge how the community on this board divides between extremists, naive idealists and realists.

May I ask you what *you* plan to do beyond farming for yourself ? Do you really think that this will somehow solve anything ? Or are you just shooting the breeze here ?

Btu
Last edited by btu2012 on Wed 03 Oct 2007, 19:50:25, edited 1 time in total.
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun

Re: population control options

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 01 Oct 2007, 14:58:52

I'm more interested in what people are DOING than what "might " be done. I'm interested in action, more than talking.


What am I doing? Helping to educate people about actions they can take for themselves. Taking action myself.


Regarding this subject - not having children.


I guess, I'm just very frustrated by the endless talking about these problems, especially since they have been studied and discussed for decades. Do you think there will be some new information revealed in this thread? If this thread were about how to motivate people to change, I mean real actions we here on the board could take to help solve problems, I would like it more.
Ludi
 

Re: population control options

Unread postby btu2012 » Mon 01 Oct 2007, 15:30:14

Ludi wrote:
What am I doing? Helping to educate people about actions they can take for themselves. Taking action myself.

I guess, I'm just very frustrated by the endless talking about these problems, especially since they have been studied and discussed for decades. Do you think there will be some new information revealed in this thread? If this thread were about how to motivate people to change, I mean real actions we here on the board could take to help solve problems, I would like it more.


The thread is not about motivating people, people on this board are motivated enough. I started the thread because I need information on people's attitudes.

Indeed the problem has been known for decades, and TPTB (by which I mean the strategic planners) have tried to tell "the people" (which include career politicians) about this a very long time ago. The people rejected the message furiously for the past 30 years, this includes the voters, academia, organized religion and the corporations. Now the situation is changing because the push came to shove. So maybe people will finally be willing to listen.

Remember that "Limits to Growth" was sponsored by the Club or Rome, i.e. the PTB (what Alex Jones and friends call the "globalists"). It's not their fault that nobody wanted to listen. Even nowadays, it's virtual political suicide to talk too clearly about the population problem in UN meetings, even though everyone there knows what the real issues are. This is not the fault of the so-called PTB, but of political parties, religious leaders and elected politicians. They have made it impossible to even mention the truth.

Btu
Last edited by btu2012 on Wed 03 Oct 2007, 19:46:02, edited 2 times in total.
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun

Re: population control options

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 01 Oct 2007, 15:33:50

Ok!
Ludi
 

Re: population control options

Unread postby Alcassin » Tue 02 Oct 2007, 20:34:32

EnergyUnlimited wrote:
btu2012 wrote:So you would propose eliminating the subsidies for having children, if I understand correctly.

And that is all, what we can realistically hope for...


That is all what can be done, the rest is a merely academic discussion with many ideas and unacceptable solutions.

None of the projects presented by gg3 is going to be offered as a plan.
Peak oil is only an indication and a premise of limits to growth on a finite planet.
Denial is the most predictable of all human responses.
User avatar
Alcassin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Wed 20 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Poland

Re: population control options

Unread postby btu2012 » Tue 02 Oct 2007, 21:52:24

Alcassin wrote:
EnergyUnlimited wrote:
btu2012 wrote:So you would propose eliminating the subsidies for having children, if I understand correctly.

And that is all, what we can realistically hope for...


That is all what can be done, the rest is a merely academic discussion with many ideas and unacceptable solutions.

None of the projects presented by gg3 is going to be offered as a plan.


That remains to be seen.

Btu
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun

Re: population control options

Unread postby truecougarblue » Tue 02 Oct 2007, 22:12:14

btu2012 wrote:
By your argument, Nazi Germany should have won WW2.

...Why did Germany loose given that its military machine was qualitatively superior ?

One word: size.


BZZZZZZ, sorry you are incorrect. One word, HITLER. He bungled nearly every important move after takeover of the continent.

There is no doubt that Germany would have at least maintained it's conquests if not completed it's plan had Hitler not pushed ahead on multiple fronts.
Cougar

"Use it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without." - Brigham Young
User avatar
truecougarblue
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed 21 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: population control options

Unread postby Bytesmiths » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 01:39:09

truecougarblue wrote:
btu2012 wrote:By your argument, Nazi Germany should have won WW2.

...Why did Germany loose given that its military machine was qualitatively superior?

One word: size.
BZZZZZZ, sorry you are incorrect. One word, HITLER
I think you're both wrong: it was energy.

Both Japan and Germany failed to secure cheap petroleum sources; the US had more than it could use, at that time.

WWII was essentially the first petroleum war. That's my theory, and I'm stickin' to it! :-)
:::: Jan Steinman, Communication Steward, EcoReality, a forming sustainable community. Be the change! ::::
User avatar
Bytesmiths
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 730
Joined: Wed 27 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Salt Spring Island, Cascadia

Re: population control options

Unread postby truecougarblue » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 10:30:33

If Hitler had stopped at the channel and not gone to war with Stalin then they would have won North Africa and secured the middel east. The americans weren't even in the war at that point and may not have gone to war with Germany despite Japan's attack if Hitler had agin started talking nice after consolidation of the continent.

My 2 cents.
Cougar

"Use it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without." - Brigham Young
User avatar
truecougarblue
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed 21 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: population control options

Unread postby btu2012 » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 12:03:08

Hmm, guys ?...

WW2 is a nice subject and all but maybe we are getting a bit off-topic ?

Btu
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun

Re: population control options

Unread postby Ferretlover » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 12:43:25

Yale Study Shows US Sterilization Movement More Prevalent that Believed at Time of Nazi Germany

population control
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: population control options

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 13:26:40

btu2012 wrote:I started the thread because I need information on people's attitudes.



What do you intend to do with this information, if you don't mind me asking?
Ludi
 

Re: population control options

Unread postby btu2012 » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 19:27:28

Ludi wrote:
btu2012 wrote:I started the thread because I need information on people's attitudes.



What do you intend to do with this information, if you don't mind me asking?


It's top secret, after all I work for the Illuminati :)

Seriously, it's to be used as a gauge of social attitudes.

Btu
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun

PreviousNext

Return to Environment, Weather & Climate

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests

cron