StormBringer wrote:80 Deg. in 13 days would be eventful to say the least...........Any speculation on what might be the result of such a rapid switch??????
Yeah, possible 300 mph winds for one.
Moderator: Tanada
StormBringer wrote:80 Deg. in 13 days would be eventful to say the least...........Any speculation on what might be the result of such a rapid switch??????

alokin wrote:That would be huge nearly right angle and what the equator is now would be the north pole. That would mean the equator becomes cold and the poles hot..? Just my unscientific speculation.


alokin wrote:That would be huge nearly right angle and what the equator is now would be the north pole. That would mean the equator becomes cold and the poles hot..? Just my unscientific speculation.


RdSnt wrote:In the end we don't know for sure what is creating the magnetic field.



Not a problem.StormBringer wrote:So what is everyone's opinion of the effects of a sudden change?????? Anyone.......?????


Auroras, sometimes called the northern and southern (polar) lights or aurorae (singular: aurora), are natural light displays in the sky, usually observed at night, particularly in the polar regions. They typically occur in the ionosphere. They are also referred to as polar auroras. In northern latitudes, the effect is known as the aurora borealis, named after the Roman goddess of dawn, Aurora, and the Greek name for north wind, Boreas by Pierre Gassendi in 1621.[1] The aurora borealis is also called the northern polar lights, as it is only visible in the sky from the Northern Hemisphere, the chance of visibility increasing with proximity to the North Magnetic Pole, which is currently in the arctic islands of northern Canada. Aurorae seen near the magnetic pole may be high overhead, but from further away, they illuminate the northern horizon as a greenish glow or sometimes a faint red, as if the sun was rising from an unusual direction. The aurora borealis most often occurs from September to October and from March to April. The northern lights have had a number of names throughout history. The Cree people call this phenomenon the "Dance of the Spirits." Aurorae can be spotted throughout the world. It is most visible closer to the poles due to the longer periods of darkness and the magnetic field.

Ludi wrote:Or something...RdSnt wrote:In the end we don't know for sure what is creating the magnetic field.
"At the heart of our planet lies a solid iron ball, about as hot as the surface of the sun. Researchers call it "the inner core." It's really a world within a world. The inner core is 70% as wide as the moon. It spins at its own rate, as much as 0.2o of longitude per year faster than the Earth above it, and it has its own ocean: a very deep layer of liquid iron known as "the outer core." --snip-- link

Roy wrote:would the Northern Lights be over Tahiti then?


Ludi wrote:Yes. "And, as a bonus, Tahiti could be a great place to see the Northern Lights. " see linkRoy wrote:would the Northern Lights be over Tahiti then?


Recent research
Recent work by scientists and geologists Adam Maloof of Princeton University and Galen Halverson of Paul Sabatier University in Toulouse, France, indicates that Earth indeed rebalanced itself around 800 million years ago during the Precambrian time period.[8] They tested this idea by studying magnetic minerals in sedimentary rocks in a Norwegian archipelago. Using these minerals, Maloof and Halverson found that the north pole shifted more than 50 degrees — about the current distance between Alaska and the equator — in less than 20 million years. This reasoning is supported by a record of changes in sea level and ocean chemistry in the Norwegian sediments that could be explained by true polar wander, the team reports in the September–October 2006 issue of the Geological Society of America Bulletin.[9]



efarmer wrote:"Taste the sizzling fury of fajita skillet death you marauding zombie goon!"



wisconsin_cur wrote:Seems to me that the dislocation (if such a thing happened with pole shifts) would leave evidence in the fossil record with mass extinctions.Is there such a correlation?
efarmer wrote:"Taste the sizzling fury of fajita skillet death you marauding zombie goon!"

wisconsin_cur wrote:Seems to me that the dislocation (if such a thing happened with pole shifts) would leave evidence in the fossil record with mass extinctions. Is there such a correlation?



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests