Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Daniel_Plainview » Fri 04 Feb 2011, 21:32:55

pstarr wrote:
Daniel_Plainview wrote:So are you arguing that PO hasn't happened yet, but when it does, it will lead to systemic collapse; or are you arguing that PO has already happened, and we're now in the midst of a systemic collapse?

the latter. I was willing to consider a possible US economic rebound to be a new stasis, a somewhat stable stair step on the bumpy decline. Now consider any temporary respite here (or in Germany) to be an exemption. The rest of world, Chinidia included, are sinking slowly as we speak.


OK, so a systemic collapse takes several years to play out, and it can involve temporary reprieves (respites / recoveries) as the global economy falls inexorably into a vortex of economic despair. This seems quite plausible, my only qualm being that the concept of a "systemic collapse" seems to envision a sudden toppling of the house-of-cards rather than a gradual unwinding.
User avatar
Daniel_Plainview
Prognosticator
Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Tue 06 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: 7035 Hollis ... Near the Observatory ... Just down the way, tucked back in the small woods

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Xenophobe » Fri 04 Feb 2011, 21:46:27

Daniel_Plainview wrote:There never has been a uniform theory as to precisely how peak oil's consequences will play out.


True. However, a review of most pre-2005 Doomer documents at dieoff.org reveals that the word "shortages" and "rationing" appears in nearly all of them.

People, prior to the financial shenanigans of home owners, equated peak oil with oil type problems. Once peak oil was called in 2005...and nothing much happened...the revisionist history began.

Daniel_Plainview wrote: The most widely held view is that PO will lead to successive ratchetings of a "severe recession" followed by a "weak recovery" followed by a "severe recession" followed by a "weak recovery."


I disagree that this was the most widely help view prior to peak oil in 2005. This is a common view now, AFTER it became obvious that peak oil might not even be ABOUT a peak, but a plateau, lasting an indeterminate amount of time. Of course, it all becomes even more complicated, and will prove my theory right (again) if something even worse happens like....another peak....

http://earlywarn.blogspot.com/2010/12/p ... crude.html
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 04 Feb 2011, 21:47:51

Canada, with less than 10% of our population, added almost TWICE the jobs we did.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-04/canada-adds-69-200-jobs-in-january-while-jobless-rate-increased-to-7-8-.html
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Daniel_Plainview » Fri 04 Feb 2011, 21:54:13

Xenophobe wrote:
Daniel_Plainview wrote:There never has been a uniform theory as to precisely how peak oil's consequences will play out.


True. However, a review of most pre-2005 Doomer documents at dieoff.org reveals that the word "shortages" and "rationing" appears in nearly all of them.



People who adopted the "shortages/rationing" paradigm obviously failed to adequately factor-in demand destruction. The concept of "demand destruction" has been the single most import PO concept since 2008.
User avatar
Daniel_Plainview
Prognosticator
Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Tue 06 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: 7035 Hollis ... Near the Observatory ... Just down the way, tucked back in the small woods

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Xenophobe » Fri 04 Feb 2011, 22:19:41

Daniel_Plainview wrote:People who adopted the "shortages/rationing" paradigm obviously failed to adequately factor-in demand destruction.


I would agree. One of the important things we have learned from the peak of 2005 is that demand destruction is much more powerful than natural field declines. Of course, if your agenda is to scare people, you don't even mention a HINT of demand destruction.


For example, did you know that Matt Savinar doesn't even use the phrase "demand destruction" in his 2004 classic, "The Oil Age Is Over"? Doesn't use the word mortgage either. Like I said, revisionist history is primarily what you find on peaker websites because it is very difficult to make a slow crash point PRIOR to peak oil happening.

Everyone wanted peak oil for an apoclypic trigger and all they got was a recession related to housing....I'd be cheesed as well if I had been foolish enough to get even the industry causing the problems wrong.

Daniel Plainview wrote: The concept of "demand destruction" has been the single most import PO concept since 2008.


Of course. Like I said, it's a revisionist history thing. People waited until 3 years post peak, and then went banana's all over whatever they could find. And this demand destruction was one of the face savings revisions.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 04 Feb 2011, 22:41:04

Xenophobe wrote:Everyone wanted peak oil for an apoclypic trigger and all they got was a recession related to housing....


The effects of Peak Oil aren't over yet.

In fact, they've hardly gotten started. :roll:
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26616
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Daniel_Plainview » Fri 04 Feb 2011, 22:41:31

Xenophobe wrote:For example, did you know that Matt Savinar doesn't even use the phrase "demand destruction" in his 2004 classic, "The Oil Age Is Over"?


In retrospect, one of the great lapses of people like Matt Savinar and Matt Simmons is their failure to adequately account for "demand destruction."

The concept of "peak oil" is much more than a mere geological concept; instead, PO embodies and comprises human behavior, psychology, micro economics, macro economics, finance, politics, law, geology, physics, chemistry, biology, sociology, environmental sciences, public policy, and even religion/philosophy. To pretend that there is one monolithic rubric that espouses a majority view of "peak oil" is to do a disservice to the interdisciplinary nature of the concept of PO.
User avatar
Daniel_Plainview
Prognosticator
Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Tue 06 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: 7035 Hollis ... Near the Observatory ... Just down the way, tucked back in the small woods

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Xenophobe » Fri 04 Feb 2011, 22:56:59

Plantagenet wrote:
Xenophobe wrote:Everyone wanted peak oil for an apoclypic trigger and all they got was a recession related to housing....


The effects of Peak Oil aren't over yet.

In fact, they've hardly gotten started. :roll:


Isn't that the entire point? Energy analysts like Lundberg were imagining that peak oil effects would be near catastrophic within a matter of days. Deffeyes actually said that the 2000-2009 time period would be the real killer for peak oil, if we cleared 2010 we would be much better off. We cleared that hurdle just fine.

Simmons back in 2003 was claiming that the solution was to PRAY...and that was a 2006 time frame event.

Are you aware of any pre-peak oil effect which said "peak oil will cause a recession, the cause of which will appear to be a real estate, lending and credit crisis bubble. Oh yeah, and the real price of crude will be about what it was in...oh....in 1864"?
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Xenophobe » Fri 04 Feb 2011, 23:10:45

Daniel_Plainview wrote:
Xenophobe wrote:For example, did you know that Matt Savinar doesn't even use the phrase "demand destruction" in his 2004 classic, "The Oil Age Is Over"?


In retrospect, one of the great lapses of people like Matt Savinar and Matt Simmons is their failure to adequately account for "demand destruction."


It would be just as easy to say, "one of the great lapses....is their failure to predict the future any better than anyone else." Makes just as much sense.

Colin Campbell claimed it would lead to a PERMANENT (his word, not mine) doubling and tripling of prices. We haven't even managed to sustain the real crude price in 1864, undoubtedly caused by the Reb's and their resource war against the Burning Springs oilfield in West Virginia.

Daniel Plainview wrote:The concept of "peak oil" is much more than a mere geological concept; instead, PO embodies and comprises human behavior, psychology, micro economics, macro economics, finance, politics, law, geology, physics, chemistry, biology, sociology, environmental sciences, public policy, and even religion/philosophy.


You just described most of the reasons for why EVERYTHING on the planet happens. Little bit wide of a net to be explanatory in nature, don't you think? Certainly I don't recall Hubbert explaining in any detail how sociology would cause more or less oilfields to be found, or even account for the conventional/unconventional bookkeeping trick invented by others to conceal how poorly the idea worked in the first place.

Daniel Plainview wrote: To pretend that there is one monolithic rubric that espouses a majority view of "peak oil" is to do a disservice to the interdisciplinary nature of the concept of PO.


I believe that this "interdisciplinary nature" of PO is one of those revisionist concepts as well. For example, are you aware of a single reference or claim, created prior to the most recent peak in 2005, which argues that peak oil can be effected, either negatively or positively, by the application of the science of the sociology? I would argue that most debates against peak oil argue that sociology doesn't matter in the least, that people are people, won't change, and will all die because of it.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby copious.abundance » Sat 05 Feb 2011, 00:22:35

This will be revised upward
One set of figures not subject to revision is the Treasury Department’s data on receipts from income taxes. And those numbers are giving a more positive signal, said Carl Riccadonna, a senior economist at Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. in New York.

The amount of money deducted from paychecks was up 5.2 percent at the start of this month from February 2010, according to Riccadonna’s calculations. That exceeds the Labor Department’s measure of weekly earnings, which showed a 2.5 percent year-over-year increase in January.

“That tells me the trend in payroll revisions is going to be higher,” Riccadonna said.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Serial_Worrier » Sat 05 Feb 2011, 05:45:00

Blah blah big business is greedy, so what? What purpose do soup kitchens serve anyways? Oh you want a neo-WPA program? To build what?
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1548
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 05 Feb 2011, 11:23:38

Serial_Worrier wrote:Oh you want a neo-WPA program? To build what?


These would be a good start.
mos6507
 

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 05 Feb 2011, 11:25:35

Daniel_Plainview wrote:People who adopted the "shortages/rationing" paradigm obviously failed to adequately factor-in demand destruction. The concept of "demand destruction" has been the single most import PO concept since 2008.


Excellently stated.

Heinberg and others have attempted to retroactively claim they always supported a stairstep collapse model with oil prices tanking (due to demand destruction) and recovering, but I don't really buy it. I think everyone felt that prices would only go up.
mos6507
 

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Xenophobe » Sat 05 Feb 2011, 11:56:25

mos6507 wrote:
Daniel_Plainview wrote:People who adopted the "shortages/rationing" paradigm obviously failed to adequately factor-in demand destruction. The concept of "demand destruction" has been the single most import PO concept since 2008.


Excellently stated.

Heinberg and others have attempted to retroactively claim they always supported a stairstep collapse model with oil prices tanking (due to demand destruction) and recovering, but I don't really buy it. I think everyone felt that prices would only go up.


Of course they did. The earliest reference I can find to a see-saw economic cycle related to peak oil is Ruppert, somewhere in 2005/2006 I believe. Of course, he also wins the prize for claiming all consequences to peak oil in a shotgun manner, apparently adopting the peak oiler approach of always claiming its coming...waiting...claiming it again...and continuing ad infinitum in the hopes of being right sometime or another.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby vision-master » Sat 05 Feb 2011, 12:04:03

Not only has this already happened, also the Apocalypse has begun.

Unaware sheeple like X are still hanging onto the old patriarchaly ways of the past.....
vision-master
 

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Xenophobe » Sat 05 Feb 2011, 13:42:13

vision-master wrote:Not only has this already happened, also the Apocalypse has begun.

Unaware sheeple like X are still hanging onto the old patriarchaly ways of the past.....


Of course the Apocalypse has begun, just ask David Koresch or any of the other religious nutbags who, since the writing of the Bible, have been claiming it. They see apocalypse under their bed pillows. So Vision sees it while he reads Chariots of the Gods...big deal. His grandkids will be seeing it 40 years from now.

How about those earthquakes opening up a portal to another universe, how did that turn out? Those webbots sure got it going on, don't they Vision?
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby joewp » Sat 05 Feb 2011, 13:56:39

Xenophobe wrote:
Fishman wrote:Lets step back from any politics. Isn't this what we should expect from post peak oil? Oil prices up, government throwing paper at the problem. No solutions? Got preps?


Peak oil was supposed to start with shortages. Rationing. Obviously, when demand runs into no stagnant or falling supply, bad things are supposed to happen, and it all was going to start with the fuel.

The heavy duty relationship to all things financial is primarily a revisionist game by those disappointed with how peak oil in 2005 actually went.


It started with shortages. Many places in the world can't afford oil and its products for their basic needs. What do you think these riots all over the world are about? Just because you're snug as a bug in your particular situation doesn't mean there's a lot of misery out there.

I fixed your strawm... er statement above because nobody ever said there would be no supply.

And in case you didn't know it, there's been rationing all along. Rationing by price. It's called "the market". The people who don't have enough debt-backed paper "money" are rationed out of their needed supply. This "demand destruction" thing always bothered me too. I can tell you I still have demand for eating out every night, but the prices are too high, I have to cook in. And there's people all over the world with empty stomachs because they don't have enough to buy food. I would think their demand is still there, wouldn't you?

Just for your edification, the Hirsch Report said in 2005 "A shortfall of oil supplies caused by world conventional oil production peaking will
sharply increase oil prices and oil price volatility." Like from $30 to $140 back to $30 and up to $90 all in 5 or 6 years? Yep, that fits.

So I don't see what you're on about. Seems to be it's going as predicted by many.
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Xenophobe » Sat 05 Feb 2011, 14:32:04

joewp wrote:It started with shortages. Many places in the world can't afford oil and its products for their basic needs.


Expensive and shortage are two different things. I can go down to the local gasoline store and acquire a tanker truck of it. Using a credit card no less. Its cost does not prevent me from collecting as much as I wish.

joewp wrote:What do you think these riots all over the world are about? Just because you're snug as a bug in your particular situation doesn't mean there's a lot of misery out there.


Such misery existed pre-peak oil. Therefore it is ridiculous to pretend that peak oil in 2005 is the cause.

joewp wrote:And in case you didn't know it, there's been rationing all along. Rationing by price. It's called "the market".


Fine. Certainly peak oil has not changed this scheme in the least either. Not for more than a century I might add.

joewp wrote:Just for your edification, the Hirsch Report said in 2005 "A shortfall of oil supplies caused by world conventional oil production peaking will
sharply increase oil prices and oil price volatility." Like from $30 to $140 back to $30 and up to $90 all in 5 or 6 years? Yep, that fits.


The Hirsch report said many things. I can say "price volatility" at any point from 1859 to present and produce a chart showing exactly that. For example, real crude price volatility from 1861 to 1867 was nearly identical to 1979 through 1986. Same could be said of 2002 through 2009. We had price volatility before you were born, you want to argue that Hirsch is right just because he recycled something from other times of crisis, some of which were related to prior peak oils (1979) and some of which weren't? (1863)


joewp wrote:So I don't see what you're on about. Seems to be it's going as predicted by many.


Really? Walmart trucks stopped running in your neck of the woods? Seen any tractors parked in the fields, abandoned for lack of fuel? How about that nuke war stuff, spotted any EMP explosions recently? Revisionist history is the motto of the day, because lets face it, PRE peak oil the scenarios were all so much cooler. What's left? Blaming a recession on peak oil, and gasoline prices lower than they were in the 70's when we had a REAL energy crisis?
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08

Re: Employment Report: IT SUCKS

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 05 Feb 2011, 14:42:04

Xenophobe wrote:
Such misery existed pre-peak oil. Therefore it is ridiculous to pretend that peak oil in 2005 is the cause.


If you are going to require the invention of entirely new kinds of misery before you accept that peak oil occurred in 2005, then there in no convincing you.

Peak oil will involve mainly traditional, well-established forms of misery...some of these miseries have even been around for thousands of years.

Image
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26616
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests