Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:13 pm Post subject: How much oil do we REALLY have left?
I've been thinking about this Peak OIl thing. The 'experts', including the oil industry, say we've used about 1 trillion barrels of oil since the dawn of human history. But if you look at their graphs of usage you can see even despite the industrial age and the advent of the car, the world only really started to use oil in quantity since about 1960. And most of that went to the U.S..
Well now, their saying we probably have as much as another 1 trillion barrels of the stuff left in the ground. Sounds impressive. But, aside from the fact that that would mean that we've already hit the peak (and who really knows), we have to look at the graph again and see that for most of the industrial age, we've actually used very little oil. The lion's share has been consumed since about the 60's. That means that we've used most of that 1 trillion barrels of oil in just the last 50 years. And conditions are far different now than they were then.
We had less than a half of the current worlds population in 1960. Population than was estimated to be about 2,981,659 people on earth. Now we have about 6,700,000. So human population has grown by more than twice what it was in the 50's and that rate is increasing exponentially - growing faster and faster because the base keeps expanding. Also few countries at that time could afford to even have a working automobile system. Unlike then, many countries today are quickly modernizing, big countries with hugh populations like India and China. China has about 5 times the U.S. population and India nearly the that many. And they want (and rightly deserve) the same access to oil that we've enjoyed for these last few decades.
So the rate at which the world will use that remaining oil must also grow exponentially. And the more we use, the lower the underground oil table goes, the harder it is to get out of the ground. Probably the last amounts will be near impossible to extract because of varying geological factors. It's not under pressure anymore, and it'll be recessed in underground caves, niches and whathaveyou. So then, barring some extraordinary new find (and like I said, who knows, anything's possible), how far will that next 1 trillion barrels of oil get us?
Joined: May 02, 2005 Posts: 3422 Location: Oh really?
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:45 pm Post subject: Re: How much oil do we REALLY have left?
Concerned1 wrote:
... And the more we use, the lower the underground oil table goes, the harder it is to get out of the ground. .
You are starting to get it, but you need to work on your understanding of oil geology. It's not like a water table. Think of it like this instead:
Imagine the surface of the earth like the skin on a teenagers face. It seeps oil all over the place, except in a few places it gets trapped under a plugged pore, and it builds pressure until its about to pop.
The oil industry has popped all of the big zits on the worlds face, now it must go and dig out the blackheads and do face peels.
Apologies for the gross analogy. It's just too good to ignore, though. _________________ "It's not demand; It's not supply.
It's coming up with credit to buy"
Joined: Jun 03, 2004 Posts: 127 Location: Great Britain
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:48 pm Post subject: Re: How much oil do we REALLY have left?
The last half of our oil will have much less net oil energy than the first half as it will be of poorer quality will require more resources to access, so we've used well over 50% of our net oil energy (while around 50% in volume). Net oil energy is all that's important.
We've probably actually used about 60% of the total oil deposited, so theres's 40% of our oil left, in volume. Taking into account the above, there's probably only 25-30% of our net oil energy left. Taking into account net oil energy per capita, as the population has grown substantially then that is even lower. Suddenly that 50% of oil left at peak is effectively more like 15-20%, with 80-85% gone forever. Declining quality and declining EROEI should accelerate with time.
Basically, the amount of net oil energy for each person on Earth is going to fall off a cliff, we're talking double figures decline rates. Net oil exports also add a whole grim new layer.
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:15 pm Post subject: Re: How much oil do we REALLY have left?
So dermatologists are the oilmen of the face? _________________ Massive Human Dieoff must occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where you live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:23 pm Post subject: Re: How much oil do we REALLY have left?
concened1 wrote:
Population than was estimated to be about 2,981,659 people on earth. Now we have about 6,700,000.
I believe we're in the billions now, not millions, but I think we all know what you meant.
And I think what's left in the ground is not as big an issue as "Energy Returned On Energy Invested" (I think that's right) or EROEI. Are you yet familiar with that? That made a lot of stuff more clear for me.
And the energy contained in oil is so great. There's really nothing to replace it and when you look at what all we do with oil, in what ways we're dependant on it... It's a swirling converging mess.
Joined: Apr 06, 2006 Posts: 3392 Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: Re: How much oil do we REALLY have left?
Quote:
I will make three key points: (1) During George Bush’s first term, the world used about 10% of all crude oil that has ever been consumed; (2) Based on our mathematical modeling, at our current rate of consumption, during the second Bush term the world will use about 10% of all remaining conventional crude oil reserves and (3) Net oil exports are falling much faster than overall world crude oil production is declining.
Hubbert calculated that if the US Lower 48 reserves were increased by 1/3 it would delay peak all of 5 years. Our occasional poster WebHubbleTelescope ran a calculation on a model with an infinite URR - and found that it peaked anyway! _________________ Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
Could you slide your shorts down please?
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:45 pm Post subject: Re: How much oil do we REALLY have left?
Concerned1 wrote:
So then, barring some extraordinary new find (and like I said, who knows, anything's possible), how far will that next 1 trillion barrels of oil get us?
Chevron ad:
“It took us 125 years to use the first trillion barrels of oil. We’ll use the next trillion in 30.” _________________ A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
Live in Arizona? Check out: http://sustainablearizona.org and read my blog.
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:55 am Post subject: Re: How much oil do we REALLY have left?
PraiseDoom wrote:
Hubbert also calculated a nuclear solution to the entire problem, including resource estimates, where they would come from, and their ability to replace all fossil fuel energy for the odd couple thousand years.
Always strikes me as interesting that it is never mentioned to the newbies, or even talked about by the regulars.
I wonder why?
I am glad you bring up this point.
Since no-one important thinks we have the problem, no-one is working on the solution.
After all, if Hubbert was wrong about oil, there is no point paying attention to anything he said about nuclear. Stands to reason.
Joined: Apr 06, 2006 Posts: 3392 Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:57 am Post subject: Re: How much oil do we REALLY have left?
PraiseDoom wrote:
TheDude wrote:
Hubbert calculated that if the US Lower 48 reserves were increased by 1/3 it would delay peak all of 5 years.
Hubbert also calculated a nuclear solution to the entire problem, including resource estimates, where they would come from, and their ability to replace all fossil fuel energy for the odd couple thousand years.
Always strikes me as interesting that it is never mentioned to the newbies, or even talked about by the regulars.
I wonder why?
For one thing he eventually decided our best path would be a massive buildup in solar.
I'm game for more renewables and well-designed nuclear. Just aren't keeping my hopes up. Like the song says: "Life can never be...exactly like you want it to be." _________________ Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
Could you slide your shorts down please?
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:16 am Post subject: Re: How much oil do we REALLY have left?
PraiseDoom wrote:
Twilight wrote:
After all, if Hubbert was wrong about oil, there is no point paying attention to anything he said about nuclear. Stands to reason.
Hubbert came close for US oil only in a single scenario. I haven't seen anyone dispute his uranium and nuclear scenario yet, so I would not assume it is as wrong as his world estimates for oil and gas, or US estimate for gas.
Montequest and his fanboys are all convinced it doesnt matter because earth is a faberge egg that we busted or something and billions of people will die somehow even if we ramp up nuclear. Not that such scenerios are rife with details or timetables or statistical evidence.
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:40 am Post subject: Re: How much oil do we REALLY have left?
Dezakin wrote:
PraiseDoom wrote:
Twilight wrote:
After all, if Hubbert was wrong about oil, there is no point paying attention to anything he said about nuclear. Stands to reason.
Hubbert came close for US oil only in a single scenario. I haven't seen anyone dispute his uranium and nuclear scenario yet, so I would not assume it is as wrong as his world estimates for oil and gas, or US estimate for gas.
Montequest and his fanboys are all convinced it doesnt matter because earth is a faberge egg that we busted or something and billions of people will die somehow even if we ramp up nuclear. Not that such scenerios are rife with details or timetables or statistical evidence.
Hahahaha this is good. you hit the right thing He should really form a doom cult. I also believe that nukes will save the day in short term and in the log term we have fission and after that massive hydrogen on Jupiter.
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:53 am Post subject: Re: How much oil do we REALLY have left?
Ludi wrote:
hiperhiper wrote:
I also believe that nukes will save the day in short term and in the log term we have fission and after that massive hydrogen on Jupiter.
I believe we will have flying Monkey Butlers.
Really after 100 years everything gets far to distorted to predict anything, especially if we develop human level AI. We very well could engineer flying monkey butlers, or tear apart entire stars for fuel. Who can guess at the limits and motivations of gods?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum