Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
NYMEX Crude Oil (Light) ........................121.20 5.64 NYMEX NYH RBOB Gasoline (Globex) ...... 3.0421 .1318

Don’t worry, just a little bump - $70 is just around the corner. Short traders just keep making those margin calls, mortgage the house if you have to. Fortunes await you! PO is for pansies and doomers. At $70 short some more ..... it is going back to $22 .... the world is awash with oil ........ reality has nothing to do with it, its all in those charts!!!!!!!!!!

SELL SELL SELL

shortonoil

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 120, 121, 122, 123  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TonyPrep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Sep 25, 2005
Posts: 1966
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun May 25, 2008 9:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

tin wrote:
I dare you to do a little research and prove anything i have said to be wrong. Polution is a different subject than global warming caused by carbon. pollution is obviously an issue but that is not what the U.N is taking your tax dollars for. I wish you could disprove all that i have said..
Disproving secret global organisations could be difficult and I don't need to. The earth is finite, so it's obvious resources will get scarce, eventually. It's also true that certain pollutants have a warming effect and that the earth only has a limited ability to soak up our waste. So why not pretend that these unpalatable facts will start impinging on your life soon and that you should prepare for that? Seems like a better strategy than worrying about secret organisations or that maybe we haven't yet reached a climate tipping point.

Anyway, as I said, the open discussion forum is better than here. Why did you pick the Michael Lynch discussion to post your theories?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
woodsman
Coal
Coal


Joined: May 21, 2008
Posts: 3
Location: rural oklahoma

PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 11:03 am    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Hi I'm new to this forum....enjoy your posts...I am in the oil/gas well service business....I was thinking of all the fuel required to bring a well to production and I am blown away....I'm sure I has missed many uses of fuel but the ones that come to mind are : seismic trucks,pickups,4 wheelers, helicopers----doziers for roads,location developement, backhoes, trucks to bring in location gravel for rig bases,moving the rigs, trailers, potable toilets, filling mud pit, water , water wells,and water handling pumps cement,down hole chemicals, delivery of diesel for generators, delivery of drill pipe, production tools,casing,b.o.p., flare ,rig welders,,lighting generators , catering,rig relocation, frac tanks, filling of frac tanks, well stimulation,tank batteries, fences,pipeline clearing,digging, laying, ...many of these engines are run 24 /day while at the well locations....Are we using yesterday's production to power today's production? This does not even touch water usage, and pollution..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
pstarr
Expert
Expert


Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 7081
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain

PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 11:42 am    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

woodsman wrote:
Hi I'm new to this forum....enjoy your posts...I am in the oil/gas well service business....I was thinking of all the fuel required to bring a well to production and I am blown away....I'm sure I has missed many uses of fuel but the ones that come to mind are : seismic trucks,pickups,4 wheelers, helicopers----doziers for roads,location developement, backhoes, trucks to bring in location gravel for rig bases,moving the rigs, trailers, potable toilets, filling mud pit, water , water wells,and water handling pumps cement,down hole chemicals, delivery of diesel for generators, delivery of drill pipe, production tools,casing,b.o.p., flare ,rig welders,,lighting generators , catering,rig relocation, frac tanks, filling of frac tanks, well stimulation,tank batteries, fences,pipeline clearing,digging, laying, ...many of these engines are run 24 /day while at the well locations....Are we using yesterday's production to power today's production? This does not even touch water usage, and pollution..
Sounds like you understand the idea of EROEI (Energy Returned on Energy Invested) and the concept of Net Energy.

It obviously requires a lot of petroleum to get petroleum. There have been nearly endless arguments regarding the economic and thermodynamic wisdom of investing in shale oil, tar sands, ultra deep etc. when we perhaps might want to put that effort into weaning ourselves off petroleum.

Welcome. Looking foward to more stories from the oil patch. Smile
_________________
director ree rah rip ram. sunofabitch godamn. hidey didey christ almighty. rah rah crap wav
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ROCKMAN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: May 27, 2008
Posts: 628
Location: TEXAS

PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 12:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Tin,

Thank you so much...I have seen the light and can now put the whole picture together:

It was the Bilderberg group that sank the Titantic. I've discovered the original name of the group was the "Build-a-berg" group but the name was eventually altered by the distortion of speaking though black hoods.

Don't be mad...you have the right to your theories. I don't agee with the general theory any great hidden hand truly controlling all aspects of society but that's just my dumb opinion.

But it was impossible to resist teasing you. Hang on to your beliefs...until you replace them with others. That's what I do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TonyPrep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Sep 25, 2005
Posts: 1966
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Meanwhile, back in Lynch land ...

In response to the news of a big fall in US oil stocks, with the EIA saying that the fall was influenced by delays in unloading tankers, Lynch had this to say:
Quote:
"The bearish demand outlook is starting to weigh on people,'' said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy & Economic Research in Winchester, Massachusetts. "The note about temporary delays means that the crude number is meaningless.''
The report from the EIA was followed by a $4.43 fall in the oil price, though it's since recovered almost a dollar of that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: May 26, 2008
Posts: 498
Location: Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:09 am    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Woodsman, I'm new too, and also work in the oil and gas industry. Welcome!

Pstarr brings up EROEI. Thanks! People often forget that oil is not energy. Energy is --or "was"-- the trillions and trillions of solar energy units used to grow the vegetation eaten by the "dinosaurs" and the dinosaurs that ate dinosaurs, and again, the trillions and trillions of solar energy units used to decompose the dinosaurs into oil. We often measure the energy content of a barrel, often calculate how much energy it takes to extract the barrel available, but we seldomly calculate how energy took to make the oil inside the barrel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert


Joined: Oct 23, 2004
Posts: 5401
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:13 am    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

TonyPrep wrote:
Meanwhile, back in Lynch land ...

In response to the news of a big fall in US oil stocks, with the EIA saying that the fall was influenced by delays in unloading tankers, Lynch had this to say:
Quote:
"The bearish demand outlook is starting to weigh on people,'' said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy & Economic Research in Winchester, Massachusetts. "The note about temporary delays means that the crude number is meaningless.''
The report from the EIA was followed by a $4.43 fall in the oil price, though it's since recovered almost a dollar of that.


Lynch seems to get a free pass in the media, whom don't ever seem to review his track record. In addition, the temporary tanker delay farce has been thoroughly debunked in our US Weekly Inventory thread.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyPrep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Sep 25, 2005
Posts: 1966
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

VMarcHart wrote:
trillions of solar energy units used to decompose the dinosaurs into oil.
Not dinosaurs; plankton, mainly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FreddyH
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Jan 14, 2008
Posts: 321
Location: The Yukon

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

DantesPeak wrote:
Lynch seems to get a free pass in the media, whom don't ever seem to review his track record.


Lynch doesn't need to be correct all the time ... just correct more often than amateurs like yourself...
_________________
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert


Joined: Oct 23, 2004
Posts: 5401
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

FreddyH wrote:
DantesPeak wrote:
Lynch seems to get a free pass in the media, whom don't ever seem to review his track record.


Lynch doesn't need to be correct all the time ... just correct more often than amateurs like yourself...


Moderators: Please remove FreddyH's post.

It is wrong and insulting to me, and other posters here who want to contribute.

Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Troyboy1208
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Apr 26, 2006
Posts: 502
Location: Orlando FL

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Freddy is just jealous because he is not an expert
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyPrep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Sep 25, 2005
Posts: 1966
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

FreddyH wrote:
DantesPeak wrote:
Lynch seems to get a free pass in the media, whom don't ever seem to review his track record.


Lynch doesn't need to be correct all the time ... just correct more often than amateurs like yourself...
And has he been? Anecdotally, he's been worse than a coin toss.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pstarr
Expert
Expert


Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 7081
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

TonyPrep wrote:
FreddyH wrote:
DantesPeak wrote:
Lynch seems to get a free pass in the media, whom don't ever seem to review his track record.


Lynch doesn't need to be correct all the time ... just correct more often than amateurs like yourself...
And has he been? Anecdotally, he's been worse than a coin toss.
Hey. Mad Don't argue with Freddy because he is an expert. It says so on this web site.
_________________
director ree rah rip ram. sunofabitch godamn. hidey didey christ almighty. rah rah crap wav
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyPrep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Sep 25, 2005
Posts: 1966
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 6:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I see this discussion has been un-stickied. Still, I'm sure it'll provide many "I told you so" moments, in the future.

A quote from Lynch (in 1998) came to light in another discussion:
Quote:
Lynch expects the world to have enough oil for the next 300 years

Doomsayers predict new world oil crunch

It explains why it was so hard to get him to give an estimate of when oil will peak and why he often gave the impression that he thinks oil will never peak.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PraiseDoom
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Apr 23, 2007
Posts: 297

PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 6:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

pstarr wrote:
TonyPrep wrote:
FreddyH wrote:
DantesPeak wrote:
Lynch seems to get a free pass in the media, whom don't ever seem to review his track record.


Lynch doesn't need to be correct all the time ... just correct more often than amateurs like yourself...
And has he been? Anecdotally, he's been worse than a coin toss.
Hey. Mad Don't argue with Freddy because he is an expert. It says so on this web site.


So...when one website expert contradicts another websites expert...which website wins?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 120, 121, 122, 123  Next
Page 121 of 123

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed