Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
If "it's bunker time" why the fark do you care about the price of gold? You evolved some enzyme that lets you digest the stuff?

Narz

Suggest Quote

 
aspo08
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Super EU/ Super NAFTA, Hell No, Resurrect British Empire?
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Super EU/ Super NAFTA, Hell No, Resurrect British Empire?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Europe Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert


Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Posts: 5848
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2008 12:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Super EU/ Super NAFTA, Hell No, Resurrect British Empire Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Nickel wrote:
... the Yankees keep telling us the Northwest Passage is an "international" waterway... despite the fact that in many places, it's narrower than the straits between the Hawaiian Islands.


"International" marine transit zones are not defined and the status cannot be denied on the basis of narrowness, unless Canada wants to break the international law treaties it has signed.

--------------------------

UN--INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE SEA:

STRAITS USED FOR INTERNATIONAL NAVIGATION

SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Article 34. Legal status of waters forming straits used for international navigation

1. The regime of passage through straits used for international navigation established in this Part shall not in other respects affect the legal status of the waters forming such straits or the exercise by the States bordering the straits of their sovereignty or jurisdiction over such waters and their air space, bed and subsoil.

2. The sovereignty or jurisdiction of the States bordering the straits is exercised subject to this Part and to other rules of international law.

Article 35. Scope of this Part

Nothing in this Part affects:

(a) any areas of internal waters within a strait, except where the establishment of a straight baseline in accordance with the method set forth in article 7 has the effect of enclosing as internal waters areas which had not previously been considered as such;

(b) the legal status of the waters beyond the territorial seas of States bordering straits as exclusive economic zones or high seas; or

(c) the legal regime in straits in which passage is regulated in whole or in part by long-standing international conventions in force specifically relating to such straits.

Article 36. High seas routes or routes through exclusive economic zones through straits used for international navigation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nickel
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Posts: 1077
Location: The Canada of America

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 9:55 am    Post subject: Re: Super EU/ Super NAFTA, Hell No, Resurrect British Empire Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Plantagenet wrote:
"International" marine transit zones are not defined and the status cannot be denied on the basis of narrowness, unless Canada wants to break the international law treaties it has signed.


Territorial waters, or a territorial sea, as defined by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea[1], is a belt of coastal waters extending at most twelve nautical miles from the baseline (usually the mean low-water mark) of a coastal state.

The Prince of Wales Strait has an average width of ten miles, and is only 6.5 miles wide at its narrowest. Even if any lines are open wider than 24 miles across (which would be entirely inclusive territorially between islands), the following international convention also applies:

Waters landward of the baseline are defined as internal waters, over which the state has complete jurisdiction: not even innocent passage is allowed. Lakes, and rivers are considered internal waters, as are all "archipelagic waters" within the outermost islands of an archipelagic state such as Indonesia or the Philippines.


Or, put another way:


Plantagenet wrote:
Nothing in this Part affects:

(a) any areas of internal waters within a strait, except where the establishment of a straight baseline in accordance with the method set forth in article 7 has the effect of enclosing as internal waters areas which had not previously been considered as such;


Which they have been, at least since 1982; regardless of our territorial claim dating to 1888.


Plantagenet wrote:
(b) the legal status of the waters beyond the territorial seas of States bordering straits as exclusive economic zones or high seas; or


Ours, like many other states, is 200 miles.
_________________
I can has cheezburger?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Europe Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed