Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:21 am Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
There is hope. The gun abolition trend in the U.S. reversed after seventy years. Common sense editorials asserting a right to self defense will sow the seeds in the public mind. It takes time. It starts with a letter to the editor.
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:44 am Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
Miltary cartridges and cartridges most popular and common are the way to go.
30-06
270 win
243 win
7mm rem mag ...4 most rifle popular cartridges by US sales in order
7.62X 39 russian AK 47 round
308 win aka 7.62 NATO 30 cal round
12 ga shotgun
9mm luger aka parabelum aka 9x19mm
45 acp aka auto
38 spec. can be shot in 357 mag but not visa versa
22LR rimfire
223 rem aka 5.56 NATO standard M-16/AR-15 round
stay away from the latest NEW chamberings, there are a bunch of them.stick with the time proven chamberings with the most ammo available.
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:55 am Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
Jotapay wrote:
I would buy a SigSauer, HK, CZ or Glock semi-auto; or a Ruger or Smith and Wesson revolver. These are very well-made pistols with excellent machining. They are the only brands I would trust with my life.
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:10 am Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
Carlo wrote:
Jotapay wrote:
I would buy a SigSauer, HK, CZ or Glock semi-auto; or a Ruger or Smith and Wesson revolver. These are very well-made pistols with excellent machining. They are the only brands I would trust with my life.
I strongly second your wise words, Jotapay.
I would add Colt, Browning, and Taurus (revolver) to that list. _________________ A man should never wear a hat that has more character than he does.
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:39 pm Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
there are lotsof great guns out there. Ruger revolvers are like Glock handguns, nearly indistructable. Ruger revolver actions are truly modern,super simple.Drop one in the sand. They can be field strip with the rim of a spent revolver casing and the action unit washed in a stream and reassempled. Try that with a Smith and Wesson. Colt, S& W and Taurus actions are more complicated, fragile and are basically unchanged for a century. Browning Hi-power aka p-35. Walther,Beretta, Zastava, Tangfolio,many,many 1911 clones.
I would be more concerned with obtaining the most common chamberings.
I'll take a lesser brand in 9mm than a Sig chambered in 357 Sig for example.
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:50 pm Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
Definitely agree that common rounds make sense.
I do own and carry a pistol with an odd chambering - - -
I have the ammo stocked. In 10 years it may be worthless without ammo, so it's a bit of a luxury. I got it because it suited my need for concealment, firepower, and size/weight. Nothing else had the stats I wanted, so I went with it. Of course I have another in a common chambering just in case . . . _________________ Massive Human Dieoff must occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where you live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:26 am Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
You know, a .22 long rifle hollow point will stop a human cold. And you could have 50 blocks of bullets so cheap with 500 bullets each.
I have a 357 S&W too. Shot lots of animals with .22 tho and ppl not near as tough. Shot a wounded deer one time to put it down and it dropped like a rock. Shot placement of course is everything.
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 134 Location: Upstate New York
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:33 am Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
joelcolorado wrote:
You know, a .22 long rifle hollow point will stop a human cold. And you could have 50 blocks of bullets so cheap with 500 bullets each.
I have a 357 S&W too. Shot lots of animals with .22 tho and ppl not near as tough. Shot a wounded deer one time to put it down and it dropped like a rock. Shot placement of course is everything.
True but that fuzzy little deer is not shooting back or coming at you with a knife. Stopping power is a personal preference. Can a .22 stop someone.. Yes. Can a .45 stop someone from coming at you when you only hit them in the leg.. maybe but a helluva a lot better than a .22. Sometimes you don't have time to place the "perfect" shot while under fire/stress.
Joined: Sep 14, 2004 Posts: 6178 Location: Rural Virginia
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:52 pm Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
Hooray! I just successfully stripped down and cleaned my Taurus PT-92 AF pistol. I've owned this pistol for about a year, but haven't fired it much (maybe 200 rounds) because I wasn't sure if I was going to keep it, because I wasn't sure how to disassemble it, because the manual's illustrations and instructions regarding this process are almost incomprehensible. I was scared I wouldn't be able to put it back together again. Isn't that ridiculous?
I'm no gun expert at all, but it seems to me there's no point owning a gun you can't strip down.
So this evening I got up the gumption and and figured it out (very carefully, repeating the actions over and over in a stepwise fashion), cleaned it, and got back together. Everything "clicked." Whatta feeling.
The funny thing is it's not difficult at all.
Now I know it's a keeper. Next step: Buy small-of-back holster for this model sold by Galco Gunleather (thanks to Spe_Cop and Expat for the great suggestion for holster type).
I hope you gun experts think a Taurus pistol is worth spending $100 on a holster for it. I know it's not a top-of-the-line handgun, but I like the way this model fits my hand, and it does what it's supposed to when I pull the trigger. So far, anyway. _________________ "Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---Me and my brother
Joined: Feb 09, 2006 Posts: 392 Location: Venezuela
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:28 pm Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
Heineken wrote:
Hooray! I just successfully stripped down and cleaned my Taurus PT-92 AF pistol. I've owned this pistol for about a year, but haven't fired it much (maybe 200 rounds) because I wasn't sure if I was going to keep it, because I wasn't sure how to disassemble it, because the manual's illustrations and instructions regarding this process are almost incomprehensible. I was scared I wouldn't be able to put it back together again. Isn't that ridiculous?
I'm no gun expert at all, but it seems to me there's no point owning a gun you can't strip down.
So this evening I got up the gumption and and figured it out (very carefully, repeating the actions over and over in a stepwise fashion), cleaned it, and got back together. Everything "clicked." Whatta feeling.
The funny thing is it's not difficult at all.
Now I know it's a keeper. Next step: Buy small-of-back holster for this model sold by Galco Gunleather (thanks to Spe_Cop and Expat for the great suggestion for holster type).
I hope you gun experts think a Taurus pistol is worth spending $100 on a holster for it. I know it's not a top-of-the-line handgun, but I like the way this model fits my hand, and it does what it's supposed to when I pull the trigger. So far, anyway.
Taurus makes some damed fine products. I've never been disatisfied with anything with their label.
Joined: Sep 14, 2004 Posts: 6178 Location: Rural Virginia
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:40 pm Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
Wow, that's quite an endorsement, Cudabachi. Thanks!
I don't know whether I'll buy another gun. Along with the Taurus, I have a 25-year-old Winchester 30-30 94 AE rifle in excellent working condition. Some have criticized the action of this rifle as "delicate" (and not as robust as, say, that of the comparable Marlin rifle), but I've never had any problem with it (not that I've shot it a huge amount).
I've always wanted a S&W revolver, so if I buy another gun it might be one of those. Or maybe a better rifle with a scope.
Well, I just ordered the holster. $100+ out the window. From now on when I'm out working on my two country places, I walk armed. _________________ "Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---Me and my brother
Joined: Feb 09, 2006 Posts: 392 Location: Venezuela
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:07 pm Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
Heineken wrote:
Wow, that's quite an endorsement, Cudabachi. Thanks!
I don't know whether I'll buy another gun. Along with the Taurus, I have a 25-year-old Winchester 30-30 94 AE rifle in excellent working condition. Some have criticized the action of this rifle as "delicate" (and not as robust as, say, that of the comparable Marlin rifle), but I've never had any problem with it (not that I've shot it a huge amount).
I've always wanted a S&W revolver, so if I buy another gun it might be one of those. Or maybe a better rifle with a scope.
Well, I just ordered the holster. $100+ out the window. From now on when I'm out working on my two country places, I walk armed.
Well, as you might guess, here in Venezuela, I walk armed all the time. I'm permitted to carry a Baretta 9mm and a .38 caliber Taurus revolver.
I've bought a couple of Taurus semi-autos but haven't yet gotten the permits for them. It's a costly and time-consuming procedure so I'll probably wait another year or so on them.
Joined: Jun 30, 2005 Posts: 669 Location: northern California
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:19 pm Post subject: Re: [Shelter] Defense (THE gun thread)
Heineken wrote:
I don't know whether I'll buy another gun. Along with the Taurus...
I've always wanted a S&W revolver, so if I buy another gun it might be one of those.
Heineken, why bother?
"In 1968, the company was ready to venture into the U.S. market. This was accomplished by employing the services of a succession of U.S. distributors over the next several years. Their efforts met with only marginal success.
In the meantime, Smith & Wesson had been purchased by a conglomerate named Bangor Punta. In 1970, Bangor Punta also purchased 54% of Taurus. Thus, the two companies became "sisters". Smith & Wesson never owned Taurus. They were both independent companies. However, during the next seven years, a great deal of technology and methodology was passed between the two. What may come as a surprise to some is that more of what was "right" in Porto Alegre was sent to Springfield than was sent from Springfield to south of the equator."
http://www.taurususa.com/company/history.cfm _________________ "I believe that a wise Vermonter lives more by lack of expense rather than from income."--some Dartmouth professor from across the river
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum