Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forum Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Ask Jane
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Houston Peak Oil
 Follow on Twitter
 Members
 User Panel
 Members List
 PO Team
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Support PeakOil.com
Visit Our Advertisers
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 

Net App Training
Aaron





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:11 am 
Offline
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:00 am
Posts: 1324
Denny wrote:
As somebody else pointed out, that area of boreal forest in Alberta is none too pretty to begin with.


Whether or not the northern boreal forest strikes you or me as pretty has nothing to do with the issues. In its natural state it is a thriving ecosystem and beautiful all on its own, home to a large variety of plants and wildlife. Because of the oil sands activity, at least one of the rivers running through it is turning brown and the air is questionable. Syncrude has reclaimed some of the land, but from what I've read from other sources it will be a very long time until it resembles the original forest. I will look for some links in regards to this.

Aside from the ecological damage, the other issues are the amount of water and natural gas used in the process and the growing level of greenhouse gases produced. Syncrude is meeting government standards, but that isn't saying much as those standards are lacking. Tar sands projects are in the top few industries in Canada for the amounts of greenhouse gas emissions in our atmosphere. The huge area of forest that is gone further complicates matters because the forest isn't able to do what it actually does a very good job of, and that's take care of the excess C02.

The northern forest is not as classically beautiful or as majestic as Jasper National Park or the Kananaskis region, to be sure. But those areas are protected because they produce so much money through tourism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:40 am 
Offline
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 1813
Location: Canada
I think everybody is on the same wavelength that it is imperative to restore the land when finsihed. And, yes, production of synthetic crude uses natural gas and its does emit lots of CO2. But the reality is that there is strong market for fuels right now. It has always been the nature of Canda to exploit its mineral wealth. Some people seem to think of this exploitation is evil. They think we should treat nature not as our servant, but rather sacrosanctly, almost as a deity.

But, I learned in school as a youngster that, according to the bible, God gave dominion over the earth to Adam, which evolved over time to the monarch and in turn she (Queen Victoria) gave the authority over this land to the Parliament of Canada and its provinces with the authority segmented according to the British North America Act. That was the origin of the term "Dominion of Canada".

Thus the earth and the animals are under our control, not the other way around. We must be intelligent about this, practicising conservation appropriately, not like what happened in the nickel belt a century ago, but these riches are for us (at least the people of Alberta) to use.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:08 pm 
Online
Expert
Expert

Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 10083
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Dominion over the land? Holy jesus! What does that have to do with this.

Oil sands are a joke subsidized by relatively inexpensive petroleum. As long as Canada produces light sweet crude and believes in a subsidies this nonsence will continue. The entire project is subsidized by heavy equipment built when petroleum was cheaper than cool-aid. It is subsidized by natural gas and coal electric energy. This entire project is an energy-conversion scheme and not a source of primary energy.

Canada is sacrificing natural gas, clean water, clean air: in fact the planetary ecosystem that supports feeds and protects all humans. For short-term monetary gain. This is the most corrupt subsidy of them all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:37 pm 
Offline
Fission
Fission

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 2506
LOL! Conservation! LOL. Yeah. Its energy for us! The problem there einstein is that we aint even gonna see that energy. Its a ponzi scam. Profits for a very few. Its really just kinda like just a thing to do just for the sake of doing. It will fill a few wealthy peoples pockets. We arent getting hardly any of this energy! How freakin stupid are people! IT IS PONZI! doeas any one have a clue? Imn afraid not. :-(

_________________
"To crush the Cornucopians, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:56 pm 
Online
Expert
Expert

Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 10083
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
holmes wrote:
We humans are nothing more than the shit, grease and cum smeared underwear of a NYC wino. Nothing more.

I'm glad I joined this forum :) That is classic stuff. It takes a while to get into the swing of a new thread. I think I got it now.

A person's gasoline consumption should be monitored. Consumer drives down the street for a bag of natchos and warning picture (devastation of open-pit mine) flashes on the dashboard gameboy. If driver persists hypodermic needle injects person's fat butt with NYC wino solution.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 9:49 pm 
Offline
News Editor
News Editor
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 12:00 am
Posts: 2018
Location: East of Eden
NEOPO wrote:
If an outside force of "goodness" doth exist - please assist us now..

I'm with you there... but if I were that 'outside force,' I'd be shaking my head and saying "Screw you guys" right about now...

_________________
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 10:01 pm 
Offline
News Editor
News Editor
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 12:00 am
Posts: 2018
Location: East of Eden
Denny wrote:
Reforestation during 2003 included the planting of 315,000 tree and shrub seedlings on 240 hectares, bringing to 2,835,000 the total of trees and shrubs planted since 1978. Direct 2003 expenditures on reforestation and other reclamation programs was about $10 million."

I think everybody is on the same wavelength that it is imperative to restore the land when finsihed.

Oh the hubris. Is that all you and they think 'restoration' consists of?

'Restoration' of a destroyed complex system is dicey at best, is usually screwed up completely, and to succeed at all requires an incredibly high level of knowledge, familiarity, patience and delicacy. It certainly won't be accomplished by planting a few weed-trees into decimated and raped soil. Might as well slash the Mona Lisa with a chainsaw, then give a toddler some tape and crayons to 'restore' it.

Actually, never mind. The toddler would do a better job.

_________________
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:12 am 
Offline
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:00 am
Posts: 258
Location: Calgary
This thread was hilarious. Especially about the part about 20 provinces in Canada ruined by oil sands extraction when the operations multiply by 20... lol (hint: there are 10 provinces in Canada).

Pollution is local... 99% of the population in Alberta would not even be affected by tar sands operations if the oil companies DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to repair the damage being done. BUT THEY ARE REQUIRED TO CLEAN UP ANYWAY.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:35 am 
Offline
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 1813
Location: Canada
holmes wrote:
LOL! Conservation! LOL. Yeah. Its energy for us! The problem there einstein is that we aint even gonna see that energy. Its a ponzi scam. Profits for a very few.


The profits are not for a "very few". Most of the companies operating in the oils ands are public companies. You can buy shares in them. The private ones often have an income trust associated to support their capital needs, which pay out some healthy distributions. (Well, at least to 2010, but that is another issue.)

All kinds of pension funds, including yours, assuming you're in the CPP or QPP, are invested in these energy companies.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 9:05 pm 
Offline
Coal
Coal
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 1:00 am
Posts: 1
what some of you don't seem to realize is that it isn't " THEM " doing this. It's US. WE are addicted. If we own a car, heat our homes, and consume large amounts of plastic, it's us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 4:50 pm 
Offline
Fission
Fission

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 2506
Im not addressing companies or corporations. There is NO other option left. Thats apparent. Im bitching at the HUMAN RACE in general. Weve grown way toomuch and have become a nasty bloated parasite. We are winding our way to the last drops now. So now we are in disgusting pathetic mode now. We are cannibals now. Its really fun to watch us consume the last parts of our external bodies. Eventually we will begin to conume actual human bodies becuase their wont be nothing left to consume except humans. Restoration? LOL. That region will never produce anyhting again for us. shes all Dwindling down now. On to the next! The problem is running out of "next". Im saying nothing about corporations! Humans need to reduce breeding. I understand whos driving the death march. The ones that continue to go BAU! Obviously.

_________________
"To crush the Cornucopians, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 7:36 pm 
Offline
Elite
Elite
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 14024
Location: Sedona, Arizona
This is the kind of thread we need on this forum. I find it amazing how quickly we ignore the major environmental problems we are facing with regard to energy expolitation.

_________________
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
Live in Arizona? Check out: http://sustainablearizona.org and read my blog.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Outrageous environmental damage of the tar sands operati
New postPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:39 am 
Offline
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:00 am
Posts: 1324
Here is a recent article by Dan Woynillowicz (Pembina Institute, Alberta). I found it to be an excellent summary of the environmental effects of tar sands production, probably the most thorough I've read to date.

http://www.alternet.org/environment/62325/?page=1

While hiking along the Athabasca River this past weekend in the Hinton and Jasper Park areas, I was again reminded of the issues concerning the river and the northern Alberta forests in general. However, as is noted in this article, some of the effects of oil sands production, especially as they relate to the projected increases in this activity, are global.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dwenergyman and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Atom News Feed   Forums RSS Feed