Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on October 20, 2014
We Need Ebola To Kill Off 90% Of World Population
Is all of this just a coincidence?
Back in 2006, award winning Univ. of Texas evolutionary ecologist, Dr Eric R. Pianka, publicly stated that the use of an airborne Ebola was necessary to kill off 90 percent of the world’s population, that war and famine wasn’t sufficient to get the job done.
Pianka is one of those guys who feels that humans are a virus that plagues the Earth – that we are vastly overpopulated and most of us should die.
Pianka was investigated afterwards for “advocating biological terrorism.”
But he’s not alone in this sick mentality…
In 2007, one year after Pianka’s speech, the CDC started the process to obtain a patent on Ebola, which they achieved in 2009.
Enter Bill Gates…who also owns patents on Ebola and Ebola related vaccines. Gates also publicly stated that one way to reduce the world population is through the use of vaccines.
Yes, Gates is another ‘population reduction’ sicko. See the video below.
Of course, Barack Obama has done everything he can to bring Ebola to the US as part of his plan to bring this country down and under control.
One gets the feeling that all of this is is orchestrated. What do you think?
28 Comments on "We Need Ebola To Kill Off 90% Of World Population"
Charlie Bucket on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 7:50 am
Really? I thought for sure I was going to see Prison Planet in little blue letters at the end of this “article”.
ghung on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 8:23 am
If we can have a ‘National Kazoo Day’ (Jan. 28), surely we can have a National Suicide Day; one day of the year that suicide is legal. Beats the crap out of International Dog Biscuit Appreciation Day (Feb. 23).
forbin on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 9:06 am
“One gets the feeling that all of this is is orchestrated. What do you think?”
Yes I think articles like this one are being “orchestrated”
By the side who funds ” truth and action”
Forbin
Northwest Resident on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 9:42 am
How evil and despicable can Obama possibly be? The devil couldn’t possibly be any worse. That dirty, rotten, conniving, murderous, psychopathic POTUS is without any doubt, proven by hard facts and scientifically accurate analysis, doing “everything he can to bring Ebola to the US.” It is so obvious to all truly intelligent and thinking humans, based upon evaluation of all the facts, that Obama has long plotted to bring Ebola to the US, and now he has done it! The evilness of it all is so dastardly apparent, and as we all know, this is just one aspect of Obama’s plan to bring this country down and under control. EVERYTHING that goes wrong in America is Obama’s fault and part of his ruthless plan to take over America, to drive all good, honest, white Obama-hating redneck dumbasses into an early grave, to confiscate their guns and ammo, to neuter them and hang their white nuts in the White House Oval Office. All of this is obvious and cannot be disputed. Plant, do we finally have agreement?
GregT on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 9:56 am
NWR,
How could Obama possibly be responsible for anything? I thought he spent all of his time golfing?
Northwest Resident on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 10:00 am
GregT — That’s because you’re applying logic and rational thought. In order to fully understand how truly evil and stupid Obama is, you must first throw away all pretense of logic and rational thought, you must dig deep and connect with the primordial hatred and psychopathic id that lurks within all of us — well, SOME of us.
noobtube on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 10:11 am
They are still running this Ebola scam so the United States can invade Ghana, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Nigeria?
Why?
To get the natural resources, of course. It is always under the guise of “helping” the poor, sick Africans (who are always poor and sick according to Americans). I wonder why they don’t spread Democracy and freedom and liberty in Africa? That must just be for the Arabs.
The Liberians and Nigerians realize the Americans (masquerading under the name Red Cross) are infecting the people with diseases and calling it Ebola.
Then, these Americans run to the United States and scream about disease in Africa. And, of course, the American degenerates believe anything on the TeeVee that is negative about Africa.
Before it was Boko Hararm.
Before it was 300 girls.
Before it was insurgents in Mali.
Before it was rebels in Nigeria.
Every time something doesn’t work, as a cover to invade Africa, the Americans invent some new nonsense.
I wonder why (consider how Americans are always screaming about overpopulation) they never use famine, in Africa, anymore?
http://www.spiritscienceandmetaphysics.com/ebo-lie-man-living-in-ghana-confirms-ebola-is-a-hoax/
Plantagenet on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 10:21 am
Noob is fantasizing about the US invading Africa, and NWT is fantasizing about Obama cutting off people’s “nuts” and hanging them up in the White House.
This must the “loony” topic of the day.
noobtube on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 10:46 am
Fantasy, eh?
Americans themselves made a whole damn movie about Americans invading Africa, called Blackhack Down.
All Americans ever do in Africa (or the Middle East) is fuck it up.
How willfully ignorant, selectively incompetent, and deliberately dishonest can someone be?
Just a small sampling…
http://www.africom.mil/newsroom/article/6220/fact-sheet-history-of-us-military-involvement-in-a
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayhallen/2014/05/21/its-time-to-rescue-the-nigerian-girls/
Plantagenet on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 10:55 am
You are having a fantasy, Noob. Your beliefs have nothing to do with reality.
For instance, the move “Blackhawk Down” is not about America invading Africa. You may think it does, but that is just a symptom of your delusional world view.
Perk Earl on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 11:00 am
Pianka was investigated afterwards for “advocating biological terrorism.”
He was ‘investigated’? Code for ‘intimidated’ into saying no more publicly.
noobtube on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 11:17 am
When the Americans send in the United States military to murder Africans, I think the rest of the world will call that an American invasion of Africa.
But, you are probably one-of-those that say there was no Vietnam War and that the United States is bombing in the middle East to spread freedom, Democracy, and liberty.
A typical American degenerate… the world has a reward waiting, when the time comes.
Plantagenet on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 11:46 am
NooB: Your latest fantasy that there was no VietNam War is utterly nutso.
I hate to tell you this, but everything you know is wrong.
turningpoint on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 1:07 pm
I believe the world has an overpopulation problem but nuts like Pianka do not help matters.
noobtube on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 2:35 pm
Yeah, Americans are always screaming about OVER-population and of course, too many people never includes Americans.
Hmmm…. I wonder if Americans know what the phrase “self-serving” means?
Bob Owens on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 3:02 pm
As a rational human being, I would like us to keep our population under control. That is not going to happen by us. Nature will have to do the job for us (and it just may be Ebola). Or starvation, or nuclear war, or some other horror. Why are humans so Technologically brilliant and so Socially stupid? The question of a lifetime.
noobtube on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 3:34 pm
And, who gets to “CONTROL” the world’s population?
I suppose Americans are supposed to “CONTROL” world population because “exceptionalism” entitles them (sort of the way Americans had “CONTROL” of slaves and native populations).
That is why Americans are going around the world infecting other people with diseases and calling them AIDS, or Ebola, or West Nile virus, or Avian Bird flu, or SARS, or Anthrax, Legionnaires, or whatever to “CONTROL” the world’s population.
Americans want to do to the rest of the world, what they did in the Western Hemisphere… mass murder, genocide, and disease.
peakyeast on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 6:37 pm
@Noobtube:
Its always great fun to read your ramblings. 🙂
Just to help you a little:
Also remember that the US went to Mogadishu only for the briefest of moments – after which they ran crying home to mommy because a few dead soldiers were displayed in various states of FUBAR.
Btw. Im not anti-american – to me it seems almost all governments today represent their local psychotic greedy mafia chiefs and none represent the people or even any kind of sanity.
Im not anti-government either, but I believe it should be a government that is not there to rip off everyone for the sake of a few defective people.
Davy on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 7:00 pm
Peakie, again like I told Stercus, you guys are cowards. What dumb ass country are you from so we can pick it apart.
Nony on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 8:05 pm
Nutty.
Mike999 on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 8:31 pm
HOAX.
This has already been debunked, the guy didn’t say that.
Secondly, You can Stop World Population NOW, by simply educating young girls, which delays their reproductive cycle and Nobody has to die.
Don’t get your “news” from right wing nuts.
Mike999 on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 8:35 pm
Pianka appeared on NBC-affiliate KXAN Austin[21] and on two cable talk-shows “to try and clear his name”. He posted a statement on his University of Texas website that said in part:[22]
I have two grandchildren and I want them to inherit a stable Earth. But I fear for them. Humans have overpopulated the Earth and in the process have created an ideal nutritional substrate on which bacteria and viruses (microbes) will grow and prosper. We are behaving like bacteria growing on an agar plate,[23] flourishing until natural limits are reached or until another microbe colonizes and takes over, using them as their resource. In addition to our extremely high population density, we are social and mobile, exactly the conditions that favor growth and spread of pathogenic (disease-causing) microbes. I believe it is only a matter of time until microbes once again assert control over our population, since we are unwilling to control it ourselves. This idea has been espoused by ecologists for at least four decades and is nothing new. People just don’t want to hear it.
I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us. Simply stopping the destruction of rainforests would help mediate some current planetary ills, including the release of previously unknown pathogens. The ancient Chinese curse “may you live in interesting times” comes to mind — we are living in one of the most interesting times humans have ever experienced. For example, consider the manifold effects of global warming. We need to make a transition to a sustainable world. If we don’t, nature is going to do it for us in ways of her own choosing. By definition, these ways will not be ours and they won’t be much fun. Think about that.
As a consequence of the controversy, Pianka and members of the Texas Academy of Science have received death threats.[24][25] According to Pianka, his daughters are now worried about his and their safety, and his life has been “turned upside-down by ‘right-wing fools’.”[26]
Makati1 on Mon, 20th Oct 2014 8:50 pm
Eliminating 4% of the world population would release 25+% of the world’s resources for the other 96%. Guess who the 4% country is? Hint: It starts with U.S. and ends with A..
Kenz300 on Tue, 21st Oct 2014 1:22 am
Right wing RepubliCONS……………
Davy on Tue, 21st Oct 2014 6:43 am
Who among us does not wish for less population? Here on this board there are few because we, as academics, realize what overshoot and breached carrying capacity is. Over population is a subject that is part of the subject of natural laws of physics and biology. It is economist that live in an economic abstraction divorced from laws and reality that advocate large and growing populations as a productive asset. Economists can use their pseudo-science to argue that our current population is fine and we must have population growth to grow the economy. There is the religious leaders who call upon the faithful to follow scripture and doctrine. God says so. So be it. The guy in question made a mistake of being an expert and recommending the truth in a straight forward scientific way. Today the cold hard truth must be sanitized for soccer moms and preachers or the authorities will act. You know the general public cannot and does not want to handle some truths. The TPTB understand this as disruptive.
The anti-American above mentioning the benefits of eliminating the US for world population health should know a better course of action would be eliminating Asia. This would halve the population first of all. Asia being a population cancer. Secondly it would prevent a people 10 times the US population who are quickly reaching the point of US consumptive levels to be out of the equations. That folks is a better value than the removal of the US from humanity. In fact let us go another route and eliminate anyone over 70. That would solve lots of costly end of life issues.
Mike999 on Tue, 21st Oct 2014 7:34 am
We all would like to see population growth finally stall, and even decline to some sustainable amount.
But, then the right wing Senile Nuts come out and suddenly any talk of a sensible solution becomes: a EUGENICS FREAKOUT!
America has the WORST Education System in the world: Dumbass RADIO.
JuanP on Tue, 21st Oct 2014 11:32 am
If 90% died from Ebola, the survivors would have to have been preselected to have any chance of surviving long term. Otherwise, those nuclear reactors, radioactive waste pools, and abandoned nuclear boms would doom them, too, in time.
PrestonSturges on Tue, 21st Oct 2014 6:20 pm
Biowarfare agents are notoriously inefficient and tough to weaponize. But if smallpox showed up, it would be pretty awful for the young Americans who have never had a small pox vaccination. We’d be left with a lot more immigrants who have great big smallpox inoculation scars because they were getting inoculated for some years after we quit in the US!