Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on March 28, 2015

Bookmark and Share

UN Agency Lobbies African and Asian Nations to Have Fewer Children


Even while many countries are grappling with fertility decline, aging populations, and even loss of population, population control advocates intend to use an upcoming UN conference to make fertility reduction a UN priority for the foreseeable future.

A UN commission will meet in April to discuss the implications of “population dynamics” for the new global development agenda that will be launched by world leaders this September.

In the past, the Commission on Population and Development (CSD) promoted contraception in high-fertility regions of Africa and Southeast Asia. This year’s draft resolution seems to repeat that approach.

It notes the “potential development benefits of fertility decline,” citing the possibility of a much-touted “demographic dividend” from lower birth rates. It calls for investments in sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights in multiple paragraphs, and warns of bulging youth populations.

Meanwhile, the document ignores the growing crisis of aging populations in countries with sub-replacement fertility, and overlooks the emerging challenges faced by countries that are growing old before they ever got a chance to develop.

United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), which wields disproportionate influence with its $1 billion budget, actively lobbies governments ahead of the commission each year.

On a recent trip to Japan, the head of UNFPA was asked what he thought about the most aged nation in the world.

“I think it’s important what Japan has done and achieved not be seen as negative,” Dr. Babatunde Osotimehin said.

“It should be seen as positive in terms of how the right investments were made and how democratization and good governance have allowed people to get where they are.”

Osotimehin referred to Japan as a “laboratory” to assess strategies for managing an aging population. But the stakes are higher than simple experimentation. Poor countries where social services are already strained or almost nonexistent are especially concerned that they will not be able to reverse the effects of decades of rapid fertility decline.

According to Kaja Jurczynska of Population Action International, an aging society is a “human success story” where improved health care reduces preventable deaths and increases life expectancy.

This optimism ignores another force driving up the average age, namely, reduced fertility, which has long been the focus of UN population policy.

The draft resolution urges governments to address aging, but does not discuss the dangers of rapidly aging societies, such as insufficient caregivers for childless elderly, shrinking workforces, and national security concerns.


Given the potential harms and uneven benefits of fertility reduction, an important question is whether declining birthrates can be reversed as fertility plummets below replacement level.

At a 2011 UNFPA-sponsored forum in Thailand, Japanese professor Noriko Tsuya warned officials that “once population decline starts, you can’t just stop it that easily.” UNFPA’s representative Najib Assifi expressed concern that Thailand’s rapid economic development could be undercut by its precipitously declining birthrate: “Who will run the factories in the future?”

As conference preparations commence, attention is focused on Africa, where fertility remains high.

Last week UNFPA hosted a retreat for African delegates working on development issues to persuade them to support UNFPA’s contraception-centered approach to population policies.

One delegate laughed off the efforts to get Africans on board with a population control agenda. “They think we will listen to Dr. Osotimehin because he is one of us,” he said. Osotimehin is Nigerian, and a father of five.

life news

6 Comments on "UN Agency Lobbies African and Asian Nations to Have Fewer Children"

  1. kervennic on Sat, 28th Mar 2015 9:56 am 

    Boko haram will take care of the Nigerian surplus.

  2. Davy on Sat, 28th Mar 2015 10:00 am 

    I will acknowledge maturity and respect from these global academics, NGO’S, and Think Stinks when they start asking countries how they are going to mitigate and adjust to the large excess deaths over births that is coming to everyone’s neighborhood in just a few years. Then and only then will I say finally we have real men and women with backbones facing reality. Then and only then will I read these articles without sarcasm and contempt.

  3. Kenz300 on Sat, 28th Mar 2015 10:01 am 

    Endless population growth is not sustainable.

    Around the world we can find a food crisis, a water crisis, a declining fish stocks crisis, a Climate Change crisis, an unemployment crisis and an OVER POPULATION crisis.


    Wrap it up……. get it snipped……

    Birth Control Permanent Methods: Learn About Effectiveness

  4. Bob Owens on Sat, 28th Mar 2015 11:42 am 

    Even under the best of outcomes this UN work will not even move the population needle. Humans have, and always will, continue to reproduce as much as they can up to natural resource limits. We see this today but blindly believe this work can make a difference. It can’t.

  5. Makati1 on Sun, 29th Mar 2015 8:45 am 

    We are increasing our numbers by some 80,000,000 per year. That means the death rate would have to increase by 220,000 per day or an extra 10,000 every hour just to stay even. To get back to one billion would take about 18 years at 1,000,000 extra deaths PER DAY and ZERO Births. A whole generation to get to a sustainable level.

    What is the chance? 1:1,000,000,000?

  6. Davy on Sun, 29th Mar 2015 9:27 am 

    Mak, now that you admit the real population dynamics how is a region called Asia going to be OK with 60% of the global population in an area smaller than Russia that imports the energy and food it needs? Inquiring minds want to know. Because it is either magic or denial.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *