Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on January 28, 2015

Bookmark and Share

They Really Do Want To Reduce The Population

They Really Do Want To Reduce The Population thumbnail

Most Americans have absolutely no idea, but a very dark philosophy is spreading like wildfire among the global elite.  This philosophy is an obsessive belief that humanity has become a cancer that is destroying the earth.  There are now large numbers of global leaders that are convinced that the exploding population of the world has become like a virus or a plague, and that it must be combated as such.  In fact, it would be very difficult to understate just how obsessed many members of the global elite are with population control.  The United Nations puts out position papers about it, universities have entire courses dedicated to it, radical population control advocates have been appointed to some of the highest political positions in the world, and some of the wealthiest people on the planet get together just to talk about it.  Those who believe in this philosophy are constantly talking about the need for “increased access” to abortion, contraception and other “family planning” services.  But even with all of their efforts, the population of the world is still expanding and those who believe in this population control philosophy are getting nervous.

So just who are these people among the global elite who believe so fervently in population control?  Some of the names you are about to read below might totally shock you.  Many of them are some of the biggest names in the world.  For example, Prince Charles gave a major speech just the other day in which he bemoaned the rapidly expanding world population: “I could have chosen Mumbai, Cairo or Mexico City; wherever you look, the world’s population is increasing fast. It goes up by the equivalent of the entire population of the United Kingdom every year. Which means that this poor planet of ours, which already struggles to sustain 6.8 billion people, will somehow have to support over 9 billion people within 50 years.”

Many among the global elite believe that the growing world population is the number one problem facing the world.  Many of them are absolutely convinced that overpopulation is the primary cause of “climate change”, is ruining our environment, and threatens to turn the entire globe into one gigantic third world slum.

Of course all of that is nonsense, but this is what they actually believe, and the scary thing is that most of them are in positions of power and influence where they can actually do quite a bit to advance their insidious agenda.

The following are 22 shocking population control quotes from the global elite that will make you want to lose your lunch….

#1) The March 2009 U.N. Population Division policy brief….

“What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?”

#2) Microsoft’s Bill Gates….

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

#3) Barack Obama’s top science advisor, John P. Holdren….

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

#4) George W. Bush’s science advisor Paul Ehrlich….

“Each person we add now disproportionately impacts on the environment and life-support systems of the planet.”

#5) U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg….

“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

#6) A United Nations Population Fund report entitled “Facing a Changing World: Women, Population and Climate”….

“No human is genuinely ‘carbon neutral,’ especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation.”

#7) David Rockefeller….

“The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”

#8) Jacques Cousteau….

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.”

#9) CNN Founder Ted Turner….

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

#10) Dave Foreman, Earth First Co-Founder….

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”

#11) Prince Phillip, the Duke of Edinburgh….

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”

#12) David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club….

“Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”

#13) Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger….

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

#14) Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12….

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”

#15) Princeton philosopher Peter Singer….

“So why don’t we make ourselves the last generation on earth? If we would all agree to have ourselves sterilized then no sacrifices would be required — we could party our way into extinction!”

#16) Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs….

“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it….”

#17) Mikhail Gorbachev….

“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”

#18) John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London….

“The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.”

#19) Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka….

“This planet might be able to support perhaps as many as half a billion people who could live a sustainable life in relative comfort. Human populations must be greatly diminished, and as quickly as possible to limit further environmental damage.”

#20) U.S. Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton….

“This year, the United States renewed funding of reproductive healthcare through the United Nations Population Fund, and more funding is on the way.  The U.S. Congress recently appropriated more than $648 million in foreign assistance to family planning and reproductive health programs worldwide. That’s the largest allocation in more than a decade – since we last had a Democratic president, I might add.”

#21) Clinton adviser Nina Fedoroff….

“We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”

#22) The first of the “new 10 commandments” on the Georgia Guidestones….

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.”

endoftheamericandream.com



32 Comments on "They Really Do Want To Reduce The Population"

  1. Plantagenet on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 1:46 pm 

    Good to hear that efforts to reduce global population growth are underway.

  2. Northwest Resident on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 1:52 pm 

    Come on, Michael Snyder. Get it right. It is NOT a very dark philosophy, it is common fact and easily deduced logic. It is NOT spreading like wildfire among the global elite — they’ve known it all along, though maybe they are just now getting around to talking about it in public forums. It IS the number one problem facing the world. And, insidious agenda or not, we are most definitely headed for a major “correction” not just in the stock market, but in the world population count as well. Coming soon to a theatre near you.

  3. Speculawyer on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 1:56 pm 

    Making birth control easily and cheaply available to everyone that wishes to use it is a GREAT thing. I can’t stand these nuts that think otherwise.

    We need to be smarter than yeast.

  4. Northwest Resident on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 2:04 pm 

    A sampling of comments from this article on endoftheamericandream dot com:

    Jesus: We the people need to stop this, if not we are going to die. They are using terrible chemicals in our food, consume, and use. I feel that we should let the planet sustain itself with population growth.

    Diane Godbout: God made this earth to give us all we need and to spare,it’s humans who have messed things up

    Skyzalimit: Urantia or Earth in the galatic catalog of planets is #
    5,342,482,337,666 and with Free energy systems is capable of sustaining the lives of a 100 Billion Humans in complete abundance with zero war.

    Neocovanant: To ALL of those who think population is a concern, HAVE YOU BEEN ANYWHERE OUTSIDE THE CITY YOU LIVE?!? I have only covered about one third of the country so far and have seen countless hundreds of thousands of acres EMPTY!!! Now, to everyone, IF you say you believe in The Bible THEN you would also believe that God doesn’t make mistakes, right? Going further The Bible also states that He knits EVERYONE together in their mothers womb! Therefore, it follows, from a Biblical presupposition, that there is NO overpopulation because there is a PURPOSE for every living being conceived from the beginning of time until the end.

    Now we know why America is in deep, deep shit. With deep thinkers like this doing the voting, well, I guess that explains a lot. ‘Nuff said…

  5. Charlie Bucket on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 2:30 pm 

    I think PO puts these articles on here just to get our goat. The author of this article is exactly why Albert Bartlett quoted ‘The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function.’

  6. ghung on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 2:34 pm 

    Another silly blast from the past (June 10th, 2010). 7.3 billion and counting; about 400 million since this was published? Bill Gates and friends better get going.

  7. ghung on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 2:54 pm 

    For something more current from this stellar source see:

    What Do They Know? Why Are So Many Of The Super Wealthy Preparing Bug Out Locations?
    http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/what-do-they-know-why-are-so-many-of-the-super-wealthy-preparing-bug-out-locations

    One interesting link there from the LA Times:

    More homeless camps are appearing beyond downtown L.A.’s skid row
    http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-homeless-encampments-20150125-story.html

    I guess some folks missed the memo about the improving US economy. In a related note, my brother volunteers at the local food bank and says demand is up while donations have fallen. Must be the high price of beans or something. Probably just a seasonal thing….

  8. PrestonSturges on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 3:23 pm 

    Is there an infinite supply of those sites? I think most of the people on them are paranoid farmers and religious kooks. Notice the obsession with birth control? They are afraid they won’t a chance to complete their scheme of their cult taking over the earth by having 14 children each for the next 7 generations.

  9. markisha on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 3:52 pm 

    number ten my favorite

  10. J-Gav on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 4:52 pm 

    Markisha – We assume you would, of course, be one of the survivors in that scenario …

  11. PrestonSturges on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 5:11 pm 

    Dr. Stranglove:

    General “Buck” Turgidson: Doctor, you mentioned the ratio of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn’t that necessitate the abandonment of the so-called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?

    Dr. Strangelove: Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious… service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.

    Ambassador de Sadesky: I must confess, you have an astonishingly good idea there, Doctor.

  12. penury on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 6:07 pm 

    Just more yeast in the Petri Dish talking about how to use more of the resources for themselves. Wait until they find out that position,power and wealth will not save them. The rot and decay will get us all.

  13. Makati1 on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 6:28 pm 

    Biological warfare has been ongoing for decades. AIDS, vaccines that sterilize, Ebola, GMO foods, Fluoride, etc, ALL contribute to the genocide underway.

    But, it would take the death of about 80,000 people EVERY DAY, just to stay even.

    To cut the population in half at 1,000,000 extra deaths PER DAY would take 10 years. Or it would take 10 Hiroshimas every day … or

  14. Makati1 on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 6:30 pm 

    a World War 2 every month for the same 10 years …. or, well you can do the math. Humans have reached the edge of the petri dish.

  15. Rob on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 6:56 pm 

    SO a world full of old people? How fun. How about we start at the other end first?

  16. MSN Fanboy on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 6:57 pm 

    LOL NR, good comment.

    As for the article:
    “This philosophy is an obsessive belief that humanity has become a cancer that is destroying the earth”

    Change “an obsessive belief” to “a fact”

    If only the Nazis had won ww2 :(over population wouldn’t be an issue.

    Nobody seems to understand the only way for this crazed system to end with some semblance of civilisation is through an autocratic ruthless murderous government who took the hard decisions.

    Instead our ‘enlightened ideals’ such as ‘human rights’ and ‘progress’ will lead us to a second dark age.

    Funny how history works out lol

  17. Davy on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 7:20 pm 

    Damn the bad luck cause that’s what it means to be an earthling. There is really nothing we can do with any vital issue until population is dealt with. Population issues are not dealt with. That is a catch 22. We are living in a time of catch 22’s.

    I would love for someone to do some math on the relationship between oil, food and population. This is important because I see demand and supply destruction in force now. This will delivery us a reduction in energy intensity and lower complexity in a short time. Surely this is going to be the beginning of the end of population growth. If food productivity is lower because of lower oil supply and lower complexity leaves economic activity lower surely we are going to seeing famines and food insecurity. I see no way to avoid this because with food and population less is less. When it comes to food and population you can’t do more with less it is basically a less is less function.

  18. Milret2 on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 7:54 pm 

    As food sources are destroyed or depleted, oceans become anoxic, soils become desert, storms become more violent, CO2 more prevalent, coastal landmasses and islands disappear .. so will people. Problem solved with out “population control”.

  19. GregT on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 8:52 pm 

    Spec said,

    “Making birth control easily and cheaply available to everyone that wishes to use it is a GREAT thing. I can’t stand these nuts that think otherwise.
    We need to be smarter than yeast.”

    Great comment Spec. I absolutely agree with you.

  20. noobtube on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 10:08 pm 

    Self-important deluded American scumbags who are mad that their populations are old and dying while the rest of the world is young and growing.

    Now that is hate.

    I wonder where was all this concern for population when Americans when breeding like cockroaches and murdering the Native populations and enslaving Africans.

    Oh, that’s right.

    It’s only a population problem when it’s the other guy.

  21. GregT on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 10:38 pm 

    noob,

    There is only one source of hatred that often rears it’s ugly face on these forums. That source would be you.

  22. dubya on Wed, 28th Jan 2015 11:47 pm 

    These horrible people want to allow so many people to grow old & die that we would be back to the population we had in 1900!

    Once again I would like assistance from this successful dark cabal in eliminating fish and solar panels also.

  23. peakyeast on Thu, 29th Jan 2015 3:52 am 

    Nobody is smarter than me – perhaps individually, but not as a collective intelligence.

  24. theedrich on Thu, 29th Jan 2015 4:22 am 

    An interesting thing about all of this concern about population is that the “liberals” or “progressives” or “leftists,” are all — despite their quasi-religious rhetoric and vehement denials — actually turning Nazi.  The only exceptions seem to be those who want homo sapiens as a whole wiped from the earth.

  25. Davy on Thu, 29th Jan 2015 6:57 am 

    THEE, I hate the use of Nazi because of its miss use, historical context and emotional name calling. It reminds me of nigger. I see a military dictatorship of one or a group in the making. In a time of existential systematic crisis like we are facing a military dictatorship is the only structure that can make the tough decisions. With that said will they be the right decisions. Past history points to no. Military dictatorships have pretty well failed as bad as enlightened democracies.

    I feel we are in a crisis of democracy. This occurs systematically when the system cycles to a mature brittle point where decay begins from limits and diminishing returns. When population and carrying capacity levels are breached democracy almost always fails. From a point of view higher values democracy is a higher value than military dictatorship in the ideal. The abstract ideal does not put food on the table. When the worst of the descent begins watch as civilian control yields to military and or hybrid dictatorship.

    In reality today there is name only democracy. There is democracy as an afterthought. We have a corruption with a dictatorship of the global plutocrats at an economic level. At the level of the regional and national spoils we have an unholy oligarchy of politicians, financial leaders, and plutocrats in charge. IMA in reverence to the military who everyone knows is there in the background. Democracy is still at the regional or local levels at the fringes with enough show that the sheeples feel their values are still in place. Throw a dog a bone and a rug to sleep on and he is fine.

    It is obvious that there is no human political and social construct that works at the level seen in civilized man. All have failed as civilized man will fail. Man is not meant to have civilization. Civilization does not fit into nature’s ecosystem. Our spiritual rebirth will come from a reduction of population to the point that man can interact and dwell at a level of the Native Americans as an example among many. This was a tribal and community structure with small populations and tight behavioral structures. IMA where people were fulfilled, secure, and had meaning. They were secure as being part of their tribe with meaning in their myth of existence. Every individual had a place and that place was in the tribe.

    As technology fails, complexity falls, the environment destabilizes, and vast stretches of populated earth depopulate man will return in these structures. Technology and complexity are very fragile without growth. Our civilization has extended itself so far away from long term sustainability caused by a hyper level of technological, excess complexity and carrying capacity overshoot that the fall will likely be far. We do not have the skills or the time to relearn the recent pre-modern and industrial man skills. Resources have been depleted and the environment destroyed to allow large scale growth.

    Time frame again comes to mind in this decay. Will it happen over several generations or one? I don’t see our current political and social structures going away until population falls to a point that they are no longer possible. Even then a return to traditional human tribal structures will take generations to reorganize properly. The transition will be a hybrid ugly affair most likely. Chaos is full of stink but all stink settles eventually. This fall is a very real possibility today and appears the only outcome of modern man. In the meantime we will be stuck with either or command control or faux democracy command control. When the pie is shrinking and power corrupts that’s all that is left. Every civilization has eventually followed that path why would we be different.

  26. Lomax on Thu, 29th Jan 2015 7:56 am 

    If we do not take action to lower our population then mother nature will.

    Whatever happens the population will lower, problem through hitting the limit to resources as the environment becomes ever more polluted.

  27. Ralph on Thu, 29th Jan 2015 8:02 am 

    China wants more babies.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/29/chinese-couples-urged-have-more-children

    China is going to hit a world of hurt in a decade or two when the one child policy leaves each working age adult supporting 4 geriatrics.

    Just as climate change and pollution and desertification destroy their land productivity

  28. Kenz300 on Thu, 29th Jan 2015 10:15 am 

    Too many people and too few resources…….

    If you can not provide for yourself you can not provide for a child……

    Family planning services needs to be available to all that want it.

    Snip it….. or wrap it up……..

  29. Phil von Hake on Thu, 29th Jan 2015 1:13 pm 

    I got to hear the late great Albert Bartlett (www.AlBartlett.org) give his world-famous presentation on population growth. While I understand how these quotes put together (and not entirely in-context) might look like some kind of “dark philosophy,” there’s no getting around simple math -> “slowing the rate of increase” in our population is the LEAST we can do to limit Humanity’s damage to Earth. The Earth will inevitably “shake off” a few million people through an epidemic here, a hurricane there, etc. … but We view every problem as being becomes that much worse simply because there are TOO MANY OF US on this little pebble in space!
    PvH

  30. SilentRunning on Thu, 29th Jan 2015 8:27 pm 

    The Dark, Evil philosophy is the one that says that population growth is good and must go on forever. That philosophy can only lead to a global apocalypse of monstrous horror.

    Intelligent, compassionate people realize that a finite planet can only support a finite number of people.

    Anyone who thinks otherwise should be sent to a 1 square mile island, and live there with 10 million people – without any inputs from the outside world. When they start starving to death, they can only leave by signing a statement that stopping population growth is compassionate and sane. If they won’t sign the statement – let them starve to death. Good Riddance.

  31. theedrich on Fri, 30th Jan 2015 3:48 am 

    Davy, I can understand your dislike of politically incorrect terms.  After all, such terminology has been made politically incorrect or otherwise changed radically in meaning by those who control the media and, hence, “morality.”  A relatively mild such contortion can be seen in the metamorphosis of the word “gay.”  Cui bono?  Manipulation of vocabulary is an ancient political device.  Europe and Canada today are tyrannical jokes when it comes to “free” speech.  The invention of “libel” and “anti-hate” laws, and the criminalization of those who use disfavored words, however, are in fact little more than means to maintain control over the masses and keep the current masters in power, i.e., to impose dictatorship.  That is why the Left hates true free speech — speech which is offensive to Big Brother and his multitudinous underlings.  What, indeed, is the difference between the National Socialists of yore and the Natural Socialists of today?  If one is going to reduce a population, which sectors thereof is one going to reduce to achieve the desired level?  Fantasizing about returning to some romantic paradise of supposedly Noble Savages (who, by the way, never existed in North America or anywhere else) avoids the question.  Killing is killing.  It is self-delusion to imagine that the Left is composed of nicey-nice folks while the Right needs to be cast into the outer darkness.  However deluded the Right with its “Pro-Life” stances and Judeo-Christian guns and Bibles may be, it is not the side talking about the urgent need to wipe out 99% of humanity.

    And by the way, it is Nature herself who will impose the Easter Island solution on us.

  32. Davy on Fri, 30th Jan 2015 5:43 am 

    Thee, I have no problem with Nazi or nigger. Political correct people are uptight assholes usually. Our whole society has gone to the extreme of political correct while Rome burns. Get over it (society) and let’s concentrate on the brick wall ahead instead of being political correct pussies.

    I love in Pulp Fiction when Samuel Jackson says:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3RUHGNdPMQ

    I never understood why blacks think it is ok for black people to use the term but whites can’t yet they have plenty of derogatory white terms. BTW one of my best friends is a black Cajun from Louisiana who used to collect money back when I was a finance manager 10 years ago. His voice and vocabulary where forceful and colorful. The best collector I ever used. I bet lots of you despise me now because I used to be an evil finance guy who used a money collector. Some despise me because I am an ex 1%er. So are you being political correct or prejudiced and judgmental?

    Another BTW, I am real and I am not afraid of telling people who I am. Some of you want to stay anonymous and I respect that but I am not afraid to reach out to you guys honestly. The Spooks know everything about me anyhow. What is the use of hiding because it is the people that hide that provides them with the most interest. I am just an old guy on a farm preaching the end of the world as we know it. Not much interest to them besides once the grid destabilizes all that huge digital electromagnetic electrical digital knowledge is just going to poof into the entropic ether. You know they probly are pretty lax on paper backup.

    The world is plain F’d up with everyone looking to join the blame game and few people self-reflect and say “how am I contributing to this mess” How am I using my own guilt and lack of self-worth to accuse other of whatever the flavor of the day is. Many people walk around with a chip on their shoulder because they are a worthless shit and can’t figure out why.

    Back to Nazi Thee, it is not the politically incorrect it is the unsophisticated use of the word and the fact that is used too much with little understanding of history or the politics behind it. It has gotten to the point where many analysis and reports eventually get back to the Nazis and Hitler. It is a worn out term that is frankly boring as an effective descriptive word because of this over use. This does not diminish what happened or what it represents. It is the typical mass use of it by idiots of all colors that annoys me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *