Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 31, 2017

Bookmark and Share

‘Overpopulation’ Fears Are a Hoax. Here’s Why Higher Populations Are Actually a Good Thing.

‘Overpopulation’ Fears Are a Hoax. Here’s Why Higher Populations Are Actually a Good Thing. thumbnail

In 1798, Thomas Malthus wrote “An Essay on the Principle of Population.” He predicted that mankind’s birthrate would outstrip our ability to grow food and would lead to mass starvation.

Malthus’ wrong predictions did not deter Stanford University professor Paul Ehrlich from making a similar prediction.

In his 1968 best-seller, “The Population Bomb,” which has sold more than 2 million copies, Ehrlich warned: “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.”

This hoax resulted in billions of dollars being spent to fight overpopulation.

According to the standard understanding of the term, human overpopulation occurs when the ecological footprint of a human population in a specific geographical location exceeds the carrying capacity of the place occupied by that group.

Let’s look at one aspect of that description—namely, population density.

Let’s put you, the reader, to a test. See whether you can tell which country is richer and which is poorer just by knowing two countries’ population density.

North Korea’s population density is 518 people per square mile, whereas South Korea’s is more than double that, at 1,261 people per square mile.

Hong Kong’s population density is 16,444, whereas Somalia’s is 36.

Congo has 75 people per square mile, whereas Singapore has 18,513.

Looking at the gross domestic products of these countries, one would have to be a lunatic to believe that smaller population density leads to greater riches.

Here are some gross domestic product data expressed in millions of U.S. dollars: North Korea ($17,396), South Korea ($1,411,246), Hong Kong ($320,668), Somalia ($5,707), Congo ($41,615), and Singapore ($296,967).

The overpopulation hoax has led to horrible population control programs. The United Nations Population Fund has helped governments deny women the right to choose the number and spacing of their children.

Overpopulation concerns led China to enact a brutal one-child policy. Forced sterilization is a method of population control in some countries. Nearly a quarter-million Peruvian women were sterilized.

Our government, through the U.N. Population Fund, is involved in “population moderation” programs around the world, including in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia, and Colombia.

The entire premise behind population control is based on the faulty logic that humans are not valuable resources.

The fact of business is that humans are what the late Julian L. Simon called the ultimate resource.

That fact becomes apparent by pondering this question: Why is it that Gen. George Washington did not have cellphones to communicate with his troops and rocket launchers to sink British ships anchored in New York Harbor?

Surely, all of the physical resources—such as aluminum alloys, copper, iron ore, and chemical propellants—necessary to build cellphones and rocket launchers were around during Washington’s time. In fact, they were around at the time of the caveman.

There is only one answer for why cellphones, rocket launchers, and millions of other things are around today but were not around yesteryear.

The growth in human knowledge, human ingenuity, job specialization, and trade led to industrialization, which, coupled with personal liberty and private property rights, made it possible.

Human beings are valuable resources, and the more we have of them the better.

The greatest threat to mankind’s prosperity is government, not population growth. For example, Zimbabwe was agriculturally rich but, with government interference, was reduced to the brink of mass starvation.

Any country faced with massive government interference can be brought to starvation. Blaming poverty on overpopulation not only lets governments off the hook but also encourages the enactment of harmful, inhumane policies.

Today’s poverty has little to do with overpopulation. The most commonly held characteristics of non-poor countries are greater personal liberty, private property rights, the rule of law, and an economic system closer to capitalism than to communism.

That’s the recipe for prosperity.

dailysignal.com



61 Comments on "‘Overpopulation’ Fears Are a Hoax. Here’s Why Higher Populations Are Actually a Good Thing."

  1. makati1 on Thu, 1st Jun 2017 8:03 pm 

    Derhund, Davy has no real facts/stats to back up his shit. The U$ has nothing positive going for it today. All negative. It’s difficult to claim the $$ Titanic is not sinking when the waves are splashing over the deck and getting higher.

  2. ALCIADA-MOLE on Thu, 1st Jun 2017 8:05 pm 

    mak glad to see you again bro. i was almost prophetic when i talked about you earlier. that is considering what went on in manila today

  3. Davy on Thu, 1st Jun 2017 8:10 pm 

    makati, can you say something with substance. You remind me of Mr. Kenz with the same old worn out clichés. BTW, did you see the smoke and hear the gunfire of the ISIS attacks there in everything is under control Manila?

  4. makati1 on Thu, 1st Jun 2017 8:13 pm 

    AL, the event in Manila is just a normal robbery attempt, not terrorists. Manila is safer than Philly or Chicago or any large city in the U$. I could give you refs to the stats but it is not necessary. You already know I am correct.

  5. Davy on Thu, 1st Jun 2017 8:18 pm 

    “AL, the event in Manila is just a normal robbery attempt, not terrorists. Manila is safer than Philly or Chicago or any large city in the US.

    Wow, someone is off the wagon laying in the dirt. You are losing it makati.

  6. makati1 on Thu, 1st Jun 2017 8:40 pm 

    Davy, you already lost it. That was from several sources here and also Yahoo on line this AM. Didn’t you take your meds today? Maybe they need to be strengthened? LMAO

  7. Davy on Thu, 1st Jun 2017 8:53 pm 

    Makati, you don’t really think Manila is so safe do you? A mega region of cities 20Mil in size with many poor people densely packed to together. You think all that is safe. I am not saying American cities are all that safe but I will say it depends on where you go. You just want to give a blanket “all is safe” for Manila. That’s what I am talking about makati.

  8. makati1 on Thu, 1st Jun 2017 9:07 pm 

    Davy, your exaggeration does NOT prove your assertion. NYC is larger in size and numbers. Want the stats on murders/robberies/rapes there? They are far worse. You are talking thru your ass as usual.

    One week in NYC:

    http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/downloads/pdf/crime_statistics/cs-en-us-city.pdf

    Not very safe is it? LMAO

  9. Davy on Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 3:58 am 

    “Davy, your exaggeration does NOT prove your assertion. NYC is larger in size and numbers. Want the stats on murders/robberies/rapes there? They are far worse. You are talking thru your ass as usual.”

    Makati, your P’s is 3rd world and much of what happens there is not reported. The police are involved with rackets and extrajudicial killings it’s just not reported. You are a fool to think your Manila is a paradise. Did I practice makatism in my above comment of hazing and praising? I am not saying a US city is better. What I am saying is your paradise is a fantasy and Manila is a dangerous city also.

    I get tired of reading about Manila. There are other places in the world. You want to be special and make your place a topic of the conversation on this board. This is what a typical narcissist does.

  10. makati1 on Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 4:54 am 

    Simple Davy, don’t read my comments. You live in the most dangerous, immoral, rabid, insane country in the world but will never see or admit it. So, why argue with someone who knows the real America and points it out to you every time you try to deny it? Exceptionalist obsession?

  11. Jurgens on Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 6:43 pm 

    His facts on Hong Kong and Singapore are right on. But African cities do not necessarily support his claims.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *