Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on April 25, 2013

Bookmark and Share

No lonely planet


Malthusians can breathe a sigh of relief: If current trends hold, human beings won’t fulfill doomsday predictions by making like rabbits after all. Thanks to the success of incessant fear-mongering, the world’s population is expected to peak soon and then begin a long slide downward. That’s fewer of us “defacing” the planet.

A research team from the Autonomous University of Madrid and CEU-San Pablo University in Spain predicts the global population will begin to decline by the middle of the 21st century. Their study, published in the scientific journal “Simulation,” used computer models to project population based on current fertility and death rates. It predicts that global population will reach its high-water mark around the middle of the century, then decline. By 2100, there will be only about 6.2 billion of us, about the same number as in 2000.

Only yesterday, on Oct. 31, 2011 (Halloween, as a matter of fact), the United Nations announced the birth of the 7 billionth baby — not in celebration, but in alarm. The U.N. called it the “Day of 7 Billion,” and sounded “a call to action to world leaders to meet the challenges that a growing population poses.” The U.N. Population Fund marked the occasion with a report that included a graph projecting a steep increase in the rate of human growth, and asked the scary question: “Will my grandchildren live in a world of 10 billion?”

The U.N. has spent decades and billions of dollars to bend the rate of childbirth downward, particularly in Third World nations, where large families are often considered essential to work the fields and hence survival. The new population study confirms the global body’s success in persuading humans that less is more. “Overpopulation was a specter in the 1960s and ‘70s, but historically the U.N.’s low fertility-variant forecasts have been fulfilled,” writes Felix F. Munoz, researcher and co-author of the project.

Behind population-control schemes lurk the pessimistic belief that one human being is a consumer; a billion is an environmental disaster. Thomas Malthus, an 18th-century Anglican clergyman, taught that population growth would eventually reach a tipping point and that famine and disease would kill numbers that threatened sustainability: “The increase of population is necessarily limited by the means of subsistence.”

Malthus could not have predicted the miracles of the 21st century. Stephen Hawking, a famous theoretical physicist, has lived his 71 years with Lou Gehrig’s disease, which has left him a quadriplegic. Modern medicine has redefined “the means of subsistence,” allowing Mr. Hawking to project influence from his motorized wheelchair. He is living proof that efforts to limit human growth are foolhardy when a universe of God-given potential lives to be tapped within each person.

An empty world would represent failure for the human race, not success. Better to face the future with courage than be taken in by the doomsayers. Human ingenuity is the ultimate resource.

The Washington Times

4 Comments on "No lonely planet"

  1. J-Gav on Thu, 25th Apr 2013 3:08 pm 

    Read another article along these lines recently. Some people just don’t get the fact that you can’t eat ideas and that ingenuity does not power transportation or create or create energy/electricity from nothing. All ideas and ingenuity can do is tweak existing resource use and thus maybe put off the day of reckoning a little bit longer.

    By the way, the world’s population will go down, and probably well before 2050, but not for the reasons the author of this article believes.

  2. BillT on Thu, 25th Apr 2013 3:15 pm 

    This is another piece of S— article. The UN has done zero to cut population growth anywhere. Certainly not in 3rd world countries. I notice that they omit the number that they expect to be the high point. Who gives a crap what the population will be in 2100. No one alove today will be arond to see it. It will be a totally different world of higher temperatures, rising seas, terrible storms and pockets of life, maybe.

  3. GregT on Thu, 25th Apr 2013 3:40 pm 

    Since this article was written (Nov 1 2011 ), the earth’s population has increased by 120 million people. That may not seem like much compared to 7 billion, but for those of us in Canada, that would be more than 3 times the population of our entire country. In one and a half years.

  4. Kenz300 on Fri, 26th Apr 2013 8:01 pm 

    Every problem is made harder to solve with the worlds ever growing population.

    Around the world we have a food crisis, a water crisis, a Climate Change Crisis, a financial crisis, a jobs crisis and an over population crisis,

    Worst Environmental Problem? Overpopulation, Experts Say

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *