Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on December 24, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Hormone-Disrupting Chemicals Linked to Fracking Found in Colorado River

Hormone-Disrupting Chemicals Linked to Fracking Found in Colorado River thumbnail

The Colorado River flows through the town of Rifle in Garfield County, Colorado. Photo (taken 1972) by David Hiser,courtesy of U.S. National Archives, Flickr/Creative Commons.
The Colorado River flows through the town of Rifle in Garfield County, Colorado. Photo (taken 1972) by David Hiser, courtesy of U.S. National Archives, Flickr/Creative Commons.

This week, more evidence came in that hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) poses potentially serious risks to drinking water quality and human health.
A team of researchers from the University of Missouri found evidence of hormone-disrupting activity in water located near fracking sites – including samples taken from the Colorado River near a dense drilling region of western Colorado.
The Colorado River is a source of drinking water for more than 30 million people.
The peer-reviewed study was published this week in the journal Endocrinology.
Fracking is the controversial process of blasting water mixed with sand and chemicals deep underground at high pressure so as to fracture rock and release the oil and gas it holds. It has made previously inaccessible fossil fuel reserves economical to tap, and drilling operations have spread rapidly across the country.
The University of Missouri team found that 11 chemicals commonly used in the fracking process are “endocrine disrupters” – compounds that can affect the human hormonal system and have been linked to cancer, birth defects, and infertility.
“More than 700 chemicals are used in the fracking process, and many of them disturb hormone function,” said Dr. Susan Nagel, associate professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and women’s health at the University of Missouri School of Medicine and a co-author of the study, in a news release.
“With fracking on the rise, populations may face greater health risks from increased endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure.”
The research team collected samples from ground water and surface water from sites in Garfield County, Colorado, where fracking fluids had accidentally spilled, as well as from the nearby Colorado River, into which local streams and groundwater drain. They also took samples from other areas of Garfield County where little drilling has taken place, as well as from a county in Missouri where there had been no drilling at all.
They found that the samples from the spill site had moderate-to-high levels of endocrine-disrupting activity, and the Colorado River samples had moderate levels.  The other two samples, taken from areas with little or no drilling activity, showed low levels of endocrine-disrupting activity.
The new findings add urgency to calls for moratoriums on fracking until the risks have been fully assessed and regulations and monitoring put in place to safeguard water supplies and public health.
Due to the so-called “Halliburton loophole,” the oil and gas industry is exempt from important requirements under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, and states have been slow to fill the regulatory gap.
Colorado, in particular, should exercise the utmost caution.
According to a report by Ceres, a Boston-based non-profit organization that educates investors about corporate environmental risks, 92 percent of Colorado’s shale gas and oil wells are located in “extremely high” water stress regions, defined as areas in which cities, industries and farms are already using 80 percent or more of available water.
Adding contamination risks to the high volume of water fracking wells require – typically 4-6 million gallons per well – argues strongly for a precautionary approach to future development and a pause in existing production until the full range of environmental health risks can be assessed.
But Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper has said the state will sue any city that bans fracking within its borders.  Indeed, in July 2012, the state sued the front-range town of Longmont, which had issued such a ban.
A statement about the new findings of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in waters near fracking sites issued by Concerned Health Professionals of New York, and posted here, concludes with this warning:
“These results, which are based on validated cell cultures, demonstrate that public health concerns about fracking are well-founded and extend to our hormone systems. The stakes could not be higher. Exposure to EDCs has been variously linked to breast cancer, infertility, birth defects, and learning disabilities. Scientists have identified no safe threshold of exposure for EDCs, especially for pregnant women, infants, and children.”
And environmental health expert Sandra Steingraber writes in a letter posted at the same site:
“[I]t seems to me, the ethical response on the part of the environmental health community is to reissue a call that many have made already:  hit the pause button via a national moratorium on high volume, horizontal drilling and fracking and commence a comprehensive Health Impact Assessment with full public participation.”


National Geographic Newswatch

6 Comments on "Hormone-Disrupting Chemicals Linked to Fracking Found in Colorado River"

  1. Makati1 on Wed, 25th Dec 2013 12:56 am 

    As I said before: If the public knew what was in those wells, they would hang the drillers from the nearest tree.

  2. dissident on Wed, 25th Dec 2013 3:42 am 

    But, but we were assured by experts like rockdoc that there was no way that these chemicals could leak into the ground water and ultimately into the broader watershed. Allegedly rocks are like pure diamonds and do not allow water to permeate and the borehole casing is totally, divinely leak proof.

    The rife stench of industry apologia.

  3. Dave Thompson on Wed, 25th Dec 2013 7:05 am 

    The stuff we humans are producing and dumping into the biosphere is not good for our Mother Earth.

  4. Bob Inget on Wed, 25th Dec 2013 5:56 pm 

    IN Search of Victims.

    Here’s a list of worst most offensive chemicals;

    Now, can reasonable people make the following assumption? Every one of these chemicals listed were actively ‘disrupting endocrines’ decades before
    the word ‘fracking’ became a household

    How about a second? Could plastics, birth-control pills, several thousand
    chemicals from household cleaning products, medications, ending up in our water supply be proven to be disrupting

    Still here? If you are fighting the good fight against fracking or GMO and lack substantial, provable evidence of victimhood, one time honored tactic is to borrow victims from actual proven
    perpetrators. If you the reader are predisposed to believe anything ‘scientific’ looking that sustains previous bias, you will look no further.

    The very idea that fracking fluids get into rivers would in itself make headline news. Think about it.

    OTOH we have known for generations sewage treatment plants can’t filter antibiotics or hundreds of other
    chemicals we excrete, or use daily.

    Before regulations forbidding such practices, chemical companies dumped
    waste in so called ‘ponds’ which are
    ABOVE ground. Over the years chemical waste has found its way to our water supply.

    All I’m saying: Regulate oil and gas drilling as we (should) do chemical companies.

    Finally, every fresh water river and stream in America is already contaminated by years of coal burning.
    Now, if you are anti-fracking person, see if you can make a connection.

  5. dissident on Wed, 25th Dec 2013 10:59 pm 

    Sophistry. The issue is a NEW emission source and the associated impact it will produce. Clearly, according to some people if there is one molecule of chemical X in the environment, then it’s OK to have 10^10 times more of chemical Y. It’s all bad, therefore it’s all OK. What drivel.

  6. Kenz300 on Thu, 26th Dec 2013 4:55 am 

    The earth is slowly being poisoned……

    Bee colony collapse is the canary in the coal mine for the human race. We need to recognize it.

    We all need clear air to breath, safe water to drink and safe food to eat.

    The polluters need to pay……… and end their pollution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *