Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forum Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Ask Jane
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Houston Peak Oil
 Follow on Twitter
 Members
 User Panel
 Members List
 PO Team
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Support PeakOil.com
Visit Our Advertisers
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 

Net App Training
Aaron





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 170 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Electric car maker poised to shock auto industry
New postPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:01 pm 
Offline
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:00 am
Posts: 326
Location: Delft, Netherlands
TheAntiDoomer wrote:
Game Changing Battery Technology: Is It Here Now?


No doubt the promise of this EEstor battery technology is grandiose! Reviewing the claims in the above articles, I believe it is definitely a step in the direction we need to go. This topic should be on the radar of all peakoil enthousiasts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Video: MIT working on rapid recharging for electric vehicles
New postPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:34 pm 
Offline
Knight of the Realm
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 3977
TheAntiDoomer wrote:
Carlhole, I have a eestor thread over here if you are interested:

http://peakoil.com/open/electric-car-ma ... 1-150.html


Subject: Video: MIT working on rapid recharging for electric vehicles

TheAntiDoomer wrote:
Carlhole, I have a eestor thread over here if you are interested:

http://peakoil.com/open/electric-car-ma ... 1-150.html


Thanks. I was just re-reading the article from allcarselectric.com and read the Wiki entry on EEstor. Looks pretty fascinating to me.

_________________
"...the WTC dust contains people. That's probably true. It's also the forensic evidence that speaks to us. We have to listen what it has to say"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Video: MIT working on rapid recharging for electric vehicles
New postPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:39 pm 
Offline
Fusion
Fusion
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:00 am
Posts: 3823
Location: Cornucopia
Already posted this 3 months ago:
http://peakoil.com/energy-technology/ne ... 51805.html

_________________
PO. Peak Optimism - when installed natural gas is more than sufficient to maintain installed natural gas. Plus some oil, hydropower, solar, wind, coal and nuclear thrown in for good measure!

Fun new game for peak oilers to play! It's called Follow the Prospects!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electric car maker poised to shock auto industry
New postPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:52 am 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:00 am
Posts: 575
Unlimited energy on the cheap - just a dream?

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10587618
Quote:
Transcripts and audio files of a leaked phone conversation between the secretive CEO of Texas-based eeStore, Dick Weir, and an as yet undisclosed source have been doing the rounds online for the last 24 hours creating a stir amongst technologists and environmentalists around the world.

_________________
Do I make you Corny? :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electric car maker poised to shock auto industry
New postPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:31 am 
Offline
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:00 am
Posts: 1168
EnergyUnlimited wrote:
emailking wrote:
I don't see why any of that makes it unsustainable. The energy doesn't have to come from fossil fuels. It can come from existing solar panels.

Energy to produce steel have to come from fossil fuels.
That is because:
Fe3O4 + 4CO ---> 3Fe + 4CO2
CO is made by partial oxidation of coke and synproportionation of CO2 with coke.

We do not have alternative industrial process which could be applied in such large scale.

And solar panels are producing electricity, not coke.

For aluminum production sacrificial carbon anodes are used.
For every 54 grams of Al 36 grams of these anodes must be consumed.
Alternative process relying on reduction by sodium or potassium of aluminum chloride would make aluminum about as expensive as titanium is.
Quote:
Maybe not in the next 30 years. But over hundreds I don't see why this couldn't be done.

If so, you are likely to achieve steady state situation involving relatively few solar plants within several decades and there will be no prospect of further growth.
Quote:
EnergyUnlimited wrote:
Are you aware that Mittal-Arcelor, largest steel manufacturer on the world, recently announced increase of price of their products by 60%?


No but I don't see why that matters.

It shows, that we are already loosing game.
Raw materials to build renewable infrastructure will prove much more expensive than we think now.


+1 :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electric car maker poised to shock auto industry
New postPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:34 am 
Offline
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:00 am
Posts: 1168
TheAntiDoomer wrote:
WOW, JUST WOW, to the following news! The world of energy as we see it is about to change for the better my friends, a new energy dawn is approaching. We may want to start a doomer suicide watch support group to be ready for the aftermath of this announcement:."
[/quote]

or perhaps a cornucopian suicide watch group. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electric car maker poised to shock auto industry
New postPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:38 am 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:00 am
Posts: 575
JJ wrote:
TheAntiDoomer wrote:
WOW, JUST WOW, to the following news! The world of energy as we see it is about to change for the better my friends, a new energy dawn is approaching. We may want to start a doomer suicide watch support group to be ready for the aftermath of this announcement:."


or perhaps a cornucopian suicide watch group. :)[/quote]

????????????

_________________
Do I make you Corny? :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electric car maker poised to shock auto industry
New postPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:27 am 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 12:00 am
Posts: 925
Quote:
It shows, that we are already loosing game.
Raw materials to build renewable infrastructure will prove much more expensive than we think now.




Where have I heard that before? Oh yes, Paul Erhlich said exactly the same thing in the 70's and 80's, until Simon proved him wrong

Here is why he was wrong:

Quote:
* The price of tin went down because of an increased use of aluminium, a much more abundant, useful and inexpensive material.
* Better mining technologies allowed for the discovery of vast nickel lodes, which ended the near monopoly that was enjoyed on the market.
* Tungsten fell due to the rise of the use of ceramics in cookware.
* The price of chromium fell due to better smelting techniques.
* The price of copper began to fall due to the invention of fiber optic cable (which is derived from sand), which serves a number of the functions once reserved only for copper wire.


Pwnage!

_________________
Y2K is real. Y2K is going to rock our world.
-Kunstler

Don't respond, I'll just ignore it.
-MonteQuest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electric car maker poised to shock auto industry
New postPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:53 am 
Online
Expert
Expert

Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 10083
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
outcast wrote:
Quote:
It shows, that we are already loosing game.
Raw materials to build renewable infrastructure will prove much more expensive than we think now.




Where have I heard that before? Oh yes, Paul Erhlich said exactly the same thing in the 70's and 80's, until Simon proved him wrong

Here is why he was wrong:

Quote:
* The price of tin went down because of an increased use of aluminium, a much more abundant, useful and inexpensive material.
* Better mining technologies allowed for the discovery of vast nickel lodes, which ended the near monopoly that was enjoyed on the market.
* Tungsten fell due to the rise of the use of ceramics in cookware.
* The price of chromium fell due to better smelting techniques.
* The price of copper began to fall due to the invention of fiber optic cable (which is derived from sand), which serves a number of the functions once reserved only for copper wire.


Pwnage!
You didn't read the last of the article. Simon lost his last wager
wiki wrote:
In 1996, Simon bet $1000 with David South that the inflation-adjusted price of timber would decrease in the following 5 years. Simon paid out early on the bet in 1997 (before his death in 1998) based on his expectation that prices would remain above 1996 levels (which they did).[2]
and then quit . . . by dying. :)

Even without this cowardly act Simon would have lost any last bet because, contrary to magical economic thinking, the forces of the market are trumped by reality (a finite planet earth) every time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Video: MIT working on rapid recharging for electric vehicles
New postPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:13 pm 
Offline
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude

Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 6:26 pm
Posts: 122
kublikhan wrote:


And therein lies part of the problem. You care about price, safety, etc. If you want a nice midsized electric sedan with modern safety features, reasonable comfort, and a 200 mile range, that is going to be very expensive. The EV1 cost around $80,000 and had less than 100 miles of range. The Tesla Roadster was even more at $100,000. To bring that price down to more reasonable levels, you might have to accept drastically shorter range, say 20-40 miles. Keep in mind that is slow driving with the ac/heat off. Chop that range further down if you want luxuries like heating, cooling, or highway speeds. All of a sudden, a quick recharge starts sound like it would be a bit more handy wouldn't you say?



from the original quoted article wrote:

The headline ambition of this project is a full recharge within 10 minutes, which would eliminate somewhere between four and ten hours of waiting. Speedwise, the Electric Vehicle Team is aiming for a 100 mph top speed from a 250-horsepower / 187 kilowatt AC induction motor, and a not unheard of 200-mile cruising range.



I'm basing my comments on the quoted article's stated goals of the team.
(I realize today's technology is a far cry from that). If you're saying that's complete science fiction for the forseeable future, then fine. If not, I could certainly live with a smaller car and half the horsepower AND half the range if I could have safety, reliability, and a reasonable cost (and climate control, if possible). Not sure if most of America would like that until gasoline bacame truly unafforable tho...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electric car maker poised to shock auto industry
New postPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:15 pm 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 12:00 am
Posts: 925
Quote:
Energy to produce steel have to come from fossil fuels.
That is because:
Fe3O4 + 4CO ---> 3Fe + 4CO2
CO is made by partial oxidation of coke and synproportionation of CO2 with coke.

We do not have alternative industrial process which could be applied in such large scale.



Not anbymore


Oxygen furnaces have ONLY been around since the 50's, and most steel producers in western countries now use this method, instead of the traditional coke reliant open hearth furnace.


Quote:
You didn't read the last of the article. Simon lost his last wager


Because there is a difference between metals and trees. Metals are everywhere and we have huge amounts of it, trees are much more limited.

Quote:
the forces of the market are trumped by reality (a finite planet earth) every time.



Then perhaps you would care to explain why he lost his first bet?

_________________
Y2K is real. Y2K is going to rock our world.
-Kunstler

Don't respond, I'll just ignore it.
-MonteQuest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: THE Electric Car Thread (merged)
New postPosted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:17 pm 
Offline
Fusion
Fusion
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:00 am
Posts: 3823
Location: Cornucopia
Back on topic . . .

>>> LINK <<<
Quote:
Nissan Adds Its Leaf to the Pile of Next-Gen Electric Cars
Mon Aug 3, 2009 5:14pm EDT
By James Murray

Japanese auto giant Nissan yesterday declared itself the winner in the unofficial race to develop a mass-market electric vehicle. It did so by unveiling a new battery-powered car called the Nissan Leaf, which the firm said will be in showrooms in Japan, the U.S. and Europe by the end of next year.

The car manufacturer said that unlike existing two-seater electric vehicles, the medium-sized hatchback would seat five adults, with a top speed of about 90mph and a range of more than 100 miles between recharges. It added that according to its own research, the range would be sufficient to cover 70 percent of journeys taken by motorists worldwide.

Nissan said the Leaf's lithium-ion battery would recharge fully in eight hours using a conventional power socket, allowing for overnight refueling, while "fast-charging" power units could charge the battery to 80 percent capacity within just 30 minutes.

[...]

Not 100% electric, but . . .
>>> LINK <<<
Quote:
GM to launch Buick plug-in SUV in 2011
Thu Aug 6, 2009 12:32pm EDT

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich., Aug 6 (Reuters) - General Motors Co [GM.UL] unveiled plans to launch a plug-in SUV for its Buick brand in 2011, its latest move away from gas-guzzling vehicles in response to higher fuel-economy standards.

The new five-passenger Buick crossover is expected to be the first commercially available plug-in hybrid sport-utility vehicle by a major automaker, and would follow GM's heavily touted Chevrolet Volt plug-in car into the market.

The Chevy Volt, slated for showrooms in late 2010, and other electric vehicles including the Buick plug-in are key to GM's effort to reinvent itself and win back consumer trust after the automaker emerged from bankruptcy in July.

GM Vice Chairman Tom Stephens, announcing plans for the Buick hybrid at an industry conference in Traverse City, Michigan, on Thursday, said the company's "robust" balance sheet following its bankruptcy restructuring gives it flexibility to focus on product development.

[...]

_________________
PO. Peak Optimism - when installed natural gas is more than sufficient to maintain installed natural gas. Plus some oil, hydropower, solar, wind, coal and nuclear thrown in for good measure!

Fun new game for peak oilers to play! It's called Follow the Prospects!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Volt mileage: 230 mpg is nonsense
New postPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 7:32 am 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:00 am
Posts: 533
Location: Holland, Belgica Foederata (Republic of the Seven United Netherlands)
Quote:
For the first 40 miles, no gas is used and during the last 10 miles, 0.2 gallons are used. That's the equivalent of 250 miles per gallon.

CNN

What a nonsense. Following that logic my diesel car has unlimmitted mileage because it doesn't use any gas at all. Electricity is energy too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Volt mileage: 230 mpg is nonsense
New postPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 7:57 am 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:00 am
Posts: 575
Gerben wrote:
Quote:
For the first 40 miles, no gas is used and during the last 10 miles, 0.2 gallons are used. That's the equivalent of 250 miles per gallon.

CNN

What a nonsense. Following that logic my diesel car has unlimmitted mileage because it doesn't use any gas at all. Electricity is energy too.


Gerben, the HUGE difference being that the Electrcity can come from domestic and renewable energy sources, whereas 70% of that diesel is imported.

_________________
Do I make you Corny? :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: THE Electric Car Thread (merged)
New postPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:40 am 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:00 am
Posts: 734
Location: Las Vegas
Now that the auto makers are finally taking alternative auto's more seriously I suspect in about 10 years fossil fuel will be taking a back seat for a change, this might also keep fuel prices low, $5-$6 a gal gas might destroy there own market now, I am waiting for a air powered truck to hit the market, I think air powered is one of the best ways to go, no batteries, less weight and less maintenance and should cost less. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 170 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Atom News Feed   Forums RSS Feed