Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forum Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Ask Jane
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Houston Peak Oil
 Follow on Twitter
 Members
 User Panel
 Members List
 PO Team
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Support PeakOil.com
Visit Our Advertisers
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 

Net App Training
Aaron





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Natural Gas
New postPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 1:24 pm 
Offline
Coal
Coal
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:00 am
Posts: 2
Isn't natural gas much easier to pump than oil? It's a gas, so isn't all that's involved is piercing the field and letting it flow? Doesn't that mean that it's a lot easier to pump natural gas and, thus, deplete the field than oil?

Obviously, I know very little any basic primer on the Natural gas pumping mechanics would be great


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural Gas
New postPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 2:06 pm 
Offline
permanently banned
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:00 am
Posts: 818
Russ wrote:
Isn't natural gas much easier to pump than oil? It's a gas, so isn't all that's involved is piercing the field and letting it flow? Doesn't that mean that it's a lot easier to pump natural gas and, thus, deplete the field than oil?

Obviously, I know very little any basic primer on the Natural gas pumping mechanics would be great


Viscosity differences between gas and oil is huge, and all in natural gases favor. Natural gas isn't "pumped", give it a 2psi pressure differential and it'll just move right along.

From that prespective, yes, it does make a gas field easier to deplete than an oil field, plus there aren't quite the "changing recovery factor" arguements which make for lively and interesting reserve changes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural Gas
New postPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:40 pm 
Offline
Coal
Coal
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:00 am
Posts: 2
So how quickly do reserves deplete? Or, how long does North America have?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural Gas
New postPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:17 pm 
Offline
permanently banned
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:00 am
Posts: 818
Russ wrote:
So how quickly do reserves deplete? Or, how long does North America have?


Gas reserves suffer from the same reporting problems that oil reserves do, so all the usual debates can take place. Plus, its easier to produce small gas wells than small oil wells, both from an operational standpoint and an economic one, and small wells is what all wells become at some point in time or another.

My guess is once a big LNG terminal opens near a decent sized hub, north american natural gas problems just translate to world natural gas problems, same as oil, post early 70's. So maybe the question is when does the world run out, and how high will the price have to be to sustain LNG operations world wide.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural Gas
New postPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:44 am 
Offline
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 12:00 am
Posts: 1677
More natural gas controversy
Quote:
Monday, November 2, Arthur Berman wrote in his blog:

Pressure from Petrohawk helps cancel World Oil column

In an act of extraordinary courage, a top Petrohawk executive threatened to cancel his free subscription to World Oil if the magazine continued to publish my column. Today, John Royall, President and CEO for Gulf Publishing, cancelled my November column.

I have accordingly resigned as contributing editor.

Heading Out (Dave Summers) and I have been talking about the issues Arthur Berman raises for quite a while now. Most recently, Dave wrote a post called Shale Gas Estimates Perhaps Optimistic - An Interesting and Worrying Talk at ASPO.

So what are the issues involved?

What Arthur Berman is saying is that natural gas companies that extract shale are mis-estimating how quickly natural gas production will decline in the future--they are assuming gas production will decline more slowly than evidence indicates it will. As a result of their optimistic assumptions about decline rates, they are assuming that shale gas can profitably be extracted for as long as 50 years, when Berman believes the average well life is only about 8 years.

http://www.energybulletin.net/node/50618

_________________
Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall,
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.
All the king's horses,
And all the king's men,
Couldn't put Humpty together again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Natural Gas
New postPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:55 am 
Offline
Fission
Fission
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:00 am
Posts: 2084
eXpat wrote:
Quote:
What Arthur Berman is saying is that natural gas companies that extract shale are mis-estimating how quickly natural gas production will decline in the future--they are assuming gas production will decline more slowly than evidence indicates it will. As a result of their optimistic assumptions about decline rates, they are assuming that shale gas can profitably be extracted for as long as 50 years, when Berman believes the average well life is only about 8 years.

http://www.energybulletin.net/node/50618


Berman's technical abilities have already been commented on.

http://petroleumtruthreport.blogspot.co ... earch.html


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Atom News Feed   Forums RSS Feed