Just a couple of comments about the Kunstler article:
I happen to live in Missouri as well.
Quote:
<T>hey wrapped their big bales of hay in white plastic to ferment the hay. The plastic (petroleum) they use is unbelievable. The waste unimaginable.
The plastic amounts to a couple of large (yard waste?) size garbage bags. It's a minor waste of petroleum, in my opinion. Does one need to generate silage in a plastic bag? No, but evidently the old-fashioned way of making silage is unacceptable to the writer as well. Read on, below.
Quote:
Our neighbor purchases cattle that come through the ring in poor shape, or cattle needing a few more pounds of weight. The farmers selling those cattle take a loss. Our neighbor buys them cheaper, and speculates that he can put enough weight on the cattle to turn them over in a few months and make a profit. I guess you could call it cattle speculation.
Buying less-than-perfect cattle is actually a great way to "recycle". I think the small farmer is actually better off doing this than the factory farmer. I know plenty of people who do this and produce much better beef than the factory feedlots.
Quote:
The fermenting big bales create a gigantic horrible stench as they ferment.
and
Quote:
We began to notice a new stench as we drove by the operation. This new odor put the smell of fermenting rotting hay to shame.
and
Quote:
Now they are building a pit silo. A pit silo is kind of like a berm house, or what they call an earth contact house. Only instead of filling the house with people, they will fill it with wood shavings and chicken shit, or alfalfa hay.
From our point of view this seems so unsustainable. Also, in light of our recent cutbacks and efforts at conservation, it makes it seem like we are not making much of a difference. I am just guessing, but I would say that for every farmer cutting down like we are, there are 50 who are doing bagged silage and feeding chicken shit to cattle
Making silage is a time-tested method of preserving excellent cattle fodder. To suggest making silage is "a new stench" leads me to wonder whether the writer is actually a farmer or has any real farming experience. Now, to defend him, I think that feeding a combination of (apparently) composted chicken manure and wood shavings is completely unacceptable. Silage, on the other hand, is an excellent and commendable foodstuff for cattle.
Quote:
Lynn and I have both slowed down to 60 mpg <sic>on the highway. (yes, we stay in the slow lane). People whiz around us like their backsides are on fire.
I drive about 50 on the interstate or expressway, and try to maintain 40 in town, where possible. Driving 60 mph is wasting fuel, in my opinion. Most vehicles, including Mr. Farmer's, are much more fuel efficient around 45 mph. Slow down, Mr. Farmer, if you're serious about saving energy.
Quote:
Our young Governor, Matt Blunt (Roy Blunt's son)recently made national news when he slashed Missouri's Medicare program. Working at the food bank I have witnessed people being removed from wheelchairs and oxygen tanks, etc. The money from Medicare was in a general revenue fund. The money was suppossedly never slotted for Medicare. The money should have gone to the highway dept.
The truth is that this is completely untrue. No money was taken from Medicare funds (general revenue, GR) and given to the highway department (MoDOT). In fact, because of gas tax revenue, MoDOT has plenty of money. The budget was cut on the GR side because the damn government was spending money it did not have.
Quote:
Oddly enough MODOT is in the process of installing mile markers across the entire state on Hwy 70. This makes no sense in light of the fact that we already have mile markers every single mile across the entire state, from St. Louis to Kansas City. This was not good enough for MODOT. They are now installing a mile marker every single tenth of a mile. What a waste.
Absolutely true, except for where the money originated, which was not so-called "Medicare funds". I don't completely understand the need for tenth-mile markers either, except for improved response time for the Highway Patrol. They won't have to search for the accident, or whatever, as long if the location is between two tenth mile markers. I know, believe me if you can, it's harder than one thinks to track down an accident on the interstate.
Quote:
Also, they recently installed cable separating the two sides of HWy. 70. The cables do not stop larger vehicles, only sedans. They are a perfect height for an SUV to roll over. The cables are already falling apart.
True, cables are being installed. It is untrue that the cables are a perfect height for SUV's to roll over; anything less than a 15 foot high, five foot thick wall is not going to prevent all median cross-overs. The safety advantages have been documented, and I'm personally glad to see them installed. It's completely untrue that the cables are falling apart.
Quote:
A few years ago they installed plastic snow markers on the side of the Hwy. Those are almost all gone now.
"Snow markers" were installed. Many are still around. They were an experiment I think, and probably very inexpensive to install, judging by the longevity. The markers amounted to a piece of cheap plastic about 3 feet tall with a reflective surface at the top. They did make it easier to see the edge of the road surface (actually, the shoulder) in inclement weather. I drive all over the state, and I personally thought they were an improvement on the "fog lines".
To each his own, but this article (letter) was definitely slanted. I question whether it was written by an actual farmer.