Login



Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 20, 2012

Bookmark and Share

The end of fish

The end of fish thumbnail

Want to see how severely we humans are scouring the oceans for fish? Check out this striking map from the World Wildlife Fund’s 2012 “Living Planet Report.” The red areas are the most intensively fished (and, in many cases, overfished) parts of the ocean — and they’ve expanded dramatically since 1950:


To measure how intensively these areas are fished, Swartz et al., (2010) used the fish landed in each country to calculate the primary production rate (PPR) of each region of the ocean. PPR is a value that describes the total amount of food a fish needs to grow within a certain region. (WWF)

Between 1950 and 2006, the WWF report notes, the world’s annual fishing haul more than quadrupled, from 19 million tons to 87 million tons. New technology — from deep-sea trawling to long-lining — has helped the fishing industry harvest areas that were once inaccessible. But the growth of intensive fishing also means that larger and larger swaths of the ocean are in danger of being depleted.

Daniel Pauly, a professor of fisheries at the University of British Columbia, has dubbed this situation “The End of Fish.” He points out that in the past 50 years, the populations of many large commercial fish such as bluefin tuna and cod have utterly collapsed, in some cases shrinking more than 90 percent (see the chart to the right).


(WWF, Living Planet Report 2012) Indeed, there’s some evidence that we’ve already hit “peak fish.” World fish production seems to have reached its zenith back in the 1980s, when the global catch was higher than it is today. And, according to one recent study in the journal Science, commercial fish stocks are on pace for total “collapse” by 2048 — meaning that they’ll produce less than 10 percent of their peak catch. On the other hand, many of those fish-depleted areas will be overrun by jellyfish, which is good news for anyone who enjoys a good blob sandwich.

The full WWF report (PDF), meanwhile, is chock full of brightly colored graphs charting the decline of wildlife across the globe. All told, global vertebrate populations have declined by some 30 percent since 1970. But that number masks a lot of variation. Wildlife actually appears to be recovering in the temperate areas, while it’s utterly collapsing in the tropics. (It seems there have been some modest conservation successes in the wealthier temperate regions — the European otter is staging an impressive comeback, for instance.)

The big thing the WWF paper emphasizes, however, is that human consumption patterns are currently unsustainable. We’re essentially consuming the equivalent of one and a half Earths each year. This is possible because we borrow from the future, as is the case with fish — one day the world’s fish population may collapse, but there’s plenty for us now. WWF doesn’t quite call it a Ponzi scheme, but that’s the first metaphor that comes to mind.

So is there any way to stop this slide? After all, it’s not like people can just stop eating fish altogether. Pauly, surprisingly, is fairly optimistic. He argues that strict government quotas on catches can help stop the slide. “There is no need for an end to fish,” he writes, “or to fishing for that matter.” (He’s not sold on aquaculture, or fish farming, since it often requires huge harvests of smaller fish to feed the big carnivorous ones in farms.)

The hitch is that when governments have tried to institute such quotas in the past — as they’ve recently attempted with Atlantic bluefin tuna — the rules tend to get, uh, watered down under intense lobbying. Or else shadowy black sushi markets emerge to flout the rules. But no one said it was easy, halting the end of fish.

Washington Post



7 Comments on "The end of fish"

  1. dsula on Sun, 20th May 2012 8:31 pm 

    The sooner we run out of food, the better for the planet.

  2. Shaved Monkey on Sun, 20th May 2012 9:11 pm 

    Too many humans not enough fish one has has to be stopped from growing the other needs to be allowed to grow.

  3. BillT on Mon, 21st May 2012 12:29 am 

    Just tell everyone that the fish are contaminated with radiation from Fukushima (which is probably true) and the consumption would drop dramatically.

  4. ken nohe on Mon, 21st May 2012 1:41 am 

    As for Vietnamese villages, we shall eat the fishes to save them from a more grueling death from radiations, heavy metal, acidification and ocean warming in this order. And by the way, some jellyfish are actually quite good!

  5. Welch on Mon, 21st May 2012 2:11 am 

    We’re destroying our life support system. This isn’t really news. But surprising to see in the WSJ.

  6. diemos on Mon, 21st May 2012 2:28 pm 

    Soylent Corporation Oceanographic Survey of 2011-2012

  7. Kenz300 on Mon, 21st May 2012 3:29 pm 

    Quote — ” there’s some evidence that we’ve already hit “peak fish.” World fish production seems to have reached its zenith back in the 1980s, when the global catch was higher than it is today.”
    ————–

    Too many people and too few resources.

    We have a fish stocks crisis, a food crisis, a water crisis, a financial crisis , a jobs crisis and an OVER POPULATION crisis. Every problem is made harder to solve with the worlds ever growing population. Access to family planning services needs to be available to all that want it.