Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on July 11, 2018

Bookmark and Share

Speculation About $150 Oil And The (Inevitable) Rise Of Deep Water Companies

Consumption

As this column goes to press, the world oil price is well north of $70 a barrel, a long way from the nadir of $30 a mere 30 months ago. So the oil forecaster’s parlor game is again in full swing. Will we see a return to the $150 barrel, the peak last experienced in early 2008?

We’ve seen this movie before. Peak price speculation invariably follows an earlier period of similar guessing about how low prices will drop. All commodities in the world run in price cycles that feel a lot like “Groundhog Day,” the iconic 1993 movie.

No one knows where the price ceiling will be this time. But one thing we can count on: higher prices stimulate more drilling. America’s oil production and crude exports are setting new records. But for those bullish on what America’s shale producers can yet do (count me in that camp; see my earlier Shale 2.0 paper and Amazon-effect column), even if U.S. shale output doubles, America would only produce 15% of global oil. The source of the remaining 85% is a critical question for the world and for investors.

Over 70% of world oil supply comes from just two sources: about 40% from OPEC, plus about 30% from offshore production. OPEC constitutes a cartel of a dozen cooperating oligarchs desperately trying to prop up prices. The offshore industry is dominated by a dozen highly competitive companies desperately chasing technology to make profits at low prices.

Of course offshore companies, and their investors, enjoy the “windfall” profits during high-price episodes. But you can be sure they are all focused on keeping costs down in anticipation of the next inevitable down cycle. The big story that’s just now becoming clear is in how much technology has lowered offshore oil costs.

As a portent of what’s to come, consider what Drillinginfo’s “2018 Wells To Watch” report reveals: three-fourths of the world’s top 32 oil-fields listed are offshore. And as an indicator of where we are already, consider a handful of representative headlines from this year:

MORE FROM FORBES

Norway’s Oil Discoveries On Track For Best Year Since 2010

  • Norway has proven out far more offshore oil this year than last, and has drilled only half as many exploratory wells. Its latest offshore project is due to come online in 2019 and will be “one the most important industrial projects in Norway in the next 50 years.” We’re talking about Norway here, home to the world’s highest per capital concentration of electric cars.

ExxonMobil unit makes eighth oil discovery offshore Guyana

  • Exxon’s latest discovery brings this particular field offshore Guyana to over a half-billion barrels of oil with first production starting just two years from now. Guyana, with a population of barely 800,000, is South America’s third poorest nation, for now. The first production phase will constitute only 15% of planned output but will generate $700 million in royalty revenues for Guyana’s government.

An Oil Auction Provides Brazil a Needed Boost

  • A familiar list of super-majors including Chevron, Shell, and Exxon, recently put up billions of dollars for rights to drill in Brazil’s deep waters where more than 30 billion barrels of “cheap oil” awaits extraction.

Shell Starts Deepwater Gulf Of Mexico Oil Project Ahead Of Schedule

  • Some 130 miles off the Louisiana coastline, in a tour-de-force of technological acceleration, Shell demonstrated that an offshore project can come in ahead of schedule (less than four years from discovery to production), under budget and produce oil for less than $30 per barrel.

Note that these and most other offshore projects today are not based on hopes for $100 or even $70 oil. According to Ensco [NYSE: ESV], the British-based off-shore drilling contractor, the average break-even cost for offshore projects is now in the $20 to under $40 range. And while few executives would risk promising a future with even lower costs, you can bet that is precisely the goal of every offshore company.

Why are costs coming down? We are (finally) in the beginning days of deploying advanced automation machinery, machine learning, and artificial intelligence in the oil fields, particularly offshore. It’s taken time to get here because it is far harder to create, validate and deploy software in big hardware domains than it is in low-risk consumer applications.

Recent analyses about “digitalization” from both the IEA and Goldman Sachs estimate that if software and automation bring only modest single digit percentage gains in operational efficacy – not efficiency per se, but that too – the aggregate impact unlocks hundreds of billions of dollars of oil production. Future gains that are still hard to quantify will come from deploying next generation low-cost supercomputers, subsea robots (see the NASA spin-out Houston Mechatronics amazing video), off-shore robo-rigs (for example, see a video from Nabors, an oilfield automation leader), as well as technologies like drones and virtual/augmented reality.

The bottom line is easy to predict. Offshore players will continue to drive costs down even further. It won’t come in an overnight burst but in continual incremental gains year-by-year.

All of this activity comes at the right time. Each year, world oil use grows at a rate of 1.5 million additional barrels of demand per day (mmbd) – despite EVs and the Paris Accord. At the same time, the world’s existing oil production naturally) declines at an average of about 4 mmbd. Rising demand and eroding production add up to the need to add at least 5 mmbd of production capacity every year. That’s more than Canada’s total output, or more than a new Permian Basins per year: no small feat.

Against these trends, consider that the oil price collapse in 2014 caused massive cancellations of new production plans equal to some 6 mmbd of output that would have come online over the coming few years. Projects coming on line now were planned and started before the 2014 collapse. In two years, the world will see the effect of these cancellations, specifically a 3-fold drop in new annual production capacity, and over a single year.

Evidence of the pullback from offshore drilling: global offshore rig utilization is still at a four-decade low. It just started rising and can only go up. So too will the fortunes of the relatively small universe of companies that have the capability to produce oil from the world’s deep-water regimes. It’s a skill that requires experience and infrastructure that start-ups just can’t acquire overnight, or even in a decade.

Investment advisors are now charting out preferred lists of companies – many out of favor in recent years – on which to place bets for an impending offshore boom. Anchor the deepwater future will be operators like Exxon [NYSE:XOM], Chevron [NYSE:CVX], Shell, BP, ENI, Statoil, and Anakarko, along with the technology providers such as Schlumberger [NYSE:SLB], Halliburton [NYSE:HAL], Baker Hughes, Transocean, TechnipFM [NYSE:FTI], and earlier noted, Nabors [NYSE:NBR].

And as with all industries in the 21st century, investors look for the critical software suppliers. For oil-focused investors there’s no pure play opportunity in the fact that Microsoft, IBM, HP and even Google Cloud all have oil & gas offerings. On the other hand, there are private companies, closer to pure plays, focused on artificial intelligence for industries, like C3IoT, or like Drillinginfo, which is entirely oil & gas focused. (Both are still private but doubtless have IPOs in the future.) In a sign of the times, venerable Emerson [NYSE:EMR] is remaking itself, last year acquiring a world-class subsurface oil & gas software company for $510 million. (Our oil & gas banker friends at Tudor Pickering Holt & Co. recently covered Emerson.)

Accelerated by software, big offshore companies will be ramping up at the same time as America’s shale fields chase the same bogey adopting similar digital tools. The inevitable dénouement – a repeat of the world becoming, again, over-supplied with oil.

But we’re some years away from that part of the cycle repeating. And it’s possible that the peak price this time could be lower and not last as long as last time. But that’s a tough bet as we are genuinely in terra incognita when it comes to world oil. It’s been over a half-century since technology unlocked so much potential in oil production. And we have yet to learn just how tolerant people will be for continuing to expand subsidies for alternatives to hydrocarbons. If tolerance ends, and economies keep growing, the call on additional oil production could be even higher than forecasts predict.

How high could the price of a barrel go this time before prices collapse as producers over-produce (as they always do) and when markets react (by cutting consumption, as it always does)? Here’s something to think about. Consider the market tolerance in terms of total spending on oil as a share of GDP (use the U.S. GDP as a proxy). In order for oil purchases to constitute the same share of GDP as happened at the 2014 peak, today we’d have to reach $195 per barrel. Ouch.

No one knows whether we’ll hit that price, and if so for how long. But we do know that a lot more oil, even at low prices, can and must be supplied by the offshore producers. So given the obvious – more demand, more money to be made, more jobs created, more exports to alleviate a trade deficit — it remains odd that in the world of offshore oil from green Norway and Guyana, and from Brazil to Italy, the United States is unique in making just 6% of its offshore acreage available for oil development. America doesn’t know the true magnitude of its resources because even exploration is banned. But based on geophysical realities, the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) estimates that some 90 billion barrels resides there; triple the resources of global offshore powerhouse Brazil.

In a rational world it would be good to see America’s offshore region add to the economic and geopolitical benefits that booming onshore production has already yielded. But in the world we have, a lot of great American companies will still be central to the coming offshore boom that the world’s growing economies will desperately need.

Forbes



7 Comments on "Speculation About $150 Oil And The (Inevitable) Rise Of Deep Water Companies"

  1. twocats on Wed, 11th Jul 2018 6:17 pm 

    So much terrible in one article, hard to know where to begin.

    1) $150 oil was the result of capital panic as it fled the light of price discovery in real estate.

    2) this article is pure genius, it understands that prices go up AND DOWN! wow, brilliant.

    3) the tone deafness of the “awash in oil” spiel at the very moment when the entire global economy is hanging in the balance of places like Angola, Libya, and a transformer in Alberta is just mind-crushing.

    and then he/she/it (it is even sentient?) end with the whole “as a % of GDP” retard, sorry, canard. there’s like 50 people total in the US whose income has kept up with GDP like that and could afford to pay twice what they are paying for their energy use.

    can’t wait to eat this guy over an oil-drum fire spit.

  2. Duncan Idaho on Wed, 11th Jul 2018 6:54 pm 

    So much terrible in one article, hard to know where to begin.
    Bingo!

  3. Makati1 on Wed, 11th Jul 2018 7:02 pm 

    Bring on $150 oil! Do I hear $200? LMAO

  4. Roger on Wed, 11th Jul 2018 8:29 pm 

    I concur that the old high, $150/bbl, will be taken out…that’s a no brainier. If Iran closes the strait of Hormuz, it will happen tomorrow…otherwise we’ll continue grinding up. Who knows how high…when will you quit driving?

    The rest of the article is technology hopium…only an ignorant fool would believe the oil industry is behind in software, technology or engineering/scientific expertise.

  5. Harquebus on Wed, 11th Jul 2018 9:11 pm 

    “But one thing we can count on: higher prices stimulate more drilling.”

    Sell expensive oil products to credit fueled consumers? I don’t think so. Would result is less production required I would have thought. High petrol prices will at least slow the economy and more likely, cause another chain reaction of debt defaults. I dunno what happens after that but, it won’t be good.

  6. Cloggie on Thu, 12th Jul 2018 2:49 am 

    The impact of technology is systematically underestimated at this board.

    Peak oil supply is irrelevant, climate is the bottleneck. Pray for high prices to speed up the transition.

  7. Davy on Thu, 12th Jul 2018 5:42 am 

    “The impact of technology is systematically underestimated at this board.”
    I would say this has been the case but I find just as much of an overstatement on the potential of technology. Cornucopian techno-optimist are falling behind on their predictions. Renewables have not captured market shale like many thought. EV’s are still insignificant. What is worse the hardest parts of a transition are ahead when real and expensive changes must be made to the grid and behavior. There may be less affluence because of renewables. Renewables are less power dense and expensive this will surely mean less spent on other needs at a time of growing needs. The cost of renewables is deceptive because the hardware is falling in price and the fuel is free but this disguises all the other higher cost like storage, backup power, and grid changes. The area where there has been gross underestimates is with peaker and the fracking revolution. Peakers were clearly wrong as a group. I don’t think anyone is mourning that because peak oil would likely have been catastrophic. That said climate activist would have liked a mild peak oil decline. Continuing the carbon forcing will not end well.

    “Peak oil supply is irrelevant.”
    Peak oil supply is relevant because there is no guarantee renewables and EV’s will scale up at a price civilization can afford. It is not yet clear there is even the resources to make this transition in time. Unconventionals are economic oil. There are expensive to develop and the final product has less return. If the economy declines so will their economic effectiveness and availability. We can’t count on unconventionals to solve the peak oil supply problem without worry. Conventional oil is depleting and new discoveries are at historic low. That is not irrelevancy in my book. If peak oil demand hits right then we may free up enough supply for a time. If we go into long term economic decline then we may have supply because rising demand will not be there but residual supply will. If renewables and EV’s come on strong likewise supply may be adequate because of technological demand destruction.

    “climate is the bottleneck”
    Climate is a bottleneck but we are not sure when. In the meantime we may have other bottlenecks. Looking forward I am not optimistic. Shorter term because of renewables and unconventional oil I am optimistic. We may extend the normal we are all habituated to but for how long? I see the vicinity of 10 years give or take a few years for some of the problems that are now manageable to become unmanageable. I was once a 3-5 guy so 10-15 years is optimism IMO. During this time we may add another 1BIL people and the climate will have warmed 1.5 degrees. How far can warming go before our industrial agriculture system breaks down? Feeding a 7BIL and rising population needs food production increases. Surely a point will be reached where climate impacts food productivity adversely.

    “Pray for high prices to speed up the transition.”
    Higher prices are not a certain tradeoff for a speeding up in a transition. If the economy were to become robust and higher prices hit then if the technology is available maybe a speed up will occur. If the economy has stagnated and bordering on a recession then higher prices will just make the situation worse with less resources available for transition. Demand may stagnate and this will make fossil fuels possibly cheaper. The price mechanism is a two edge sword. There is a goldilocks range of prices and that is compressing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *