Bernie Sanders was right that the system is rigged. But he did not go far enough. The problem is not simply that pro-establishment politicians are stealing the vote or organizing the elections in a way that gives them an advantage.
Capitalist democracy is paper thin. The unemployed have a right to vote every two or four years but they do not have a right to a job. Likewise, people who are homeless have a right to vote, but they do not have a right to a home. In America, one out of every two people lives either in or near poverty, according to official statistics. The poor have a right to vote for candidates who are mostly all rich, but they do not have a right to live outside of poverty.
This is the message of the Party for Socialism and Liberation’s presidential candidate Gloria La Riva, as she explained to the Peace and Freedom Party convention in California. La Riva won the PFP nomination over Jill Stein (Green Party), Monica Moorehead (Workers World Party) and other third-party candidates, and her socialist campaign is on the ballot in eight other states as well. She is the only worker, only person of color and only socialist on the California presidential ballot.
Socialism means not only the political rights to participate in elections, but guaranteeing the social rights to have a job, free health care and child care, free education, including at the college level, and the guaranteed right to affordable housing.
All of this—and more—can easily be provided once the vast wealth that has been hoarded by a tiny clique, from slavery to present-day imperialism, is finally liberated and returned to those who created it over generations. That same clique maintains a vice grip over political and economic decision-making: what gets produced, who gets how much, and how technology is used.
Capitalism is like a pyramid. The broad mass of the population constitutes the base of society. The ultra-rich capitalist owners live at the very top. The goal of socialism is to turn the pyramid upside down, so that the broadest part of the population, the majority, the people who survive through their own work, are finally at the top. The pyramid itself would come down.
That is real democracy. Instead of the working class only having the right to vote for someone at the top of the pyramid, it would finally become a collective beneficiary of society’s wealth.
The Trumps, the Clintons, the individual bankers and corporate executives are not at the top of the pyramid because of their great work, intelligence, ingenuity or other personal attributes. They are just the latest individuals who enjoy the privileges, perks and power that belong exclusively to their social class. The system is rigged!
The capitalist bankers torpedoed the economy during what is known as the “Great Recession” of 2007-08. As a consequence, 23 million people lost their jobs, 9.3 million lost their health insurance, more than a million families were forced from their homes.
Not one banker went to jail. In fact, the capitalist politicians in Congress rewarded them with a $670 billion cash bailout. They got to use the money for themselves, no strings attached. In order to bail out capitalist investors, labor contracts were ripped up by the federal government and wages went down even further.
This is the same class of people who 20 years earlier, under the leadership of Bill Clinton, threw millions of poor people off of basic welfare. Clinton’s legislation left food stamps as the only form of aid generally available to able-bodied poor people, and it created new provisions that dramatically reduced that as well in the years since.
Meanwhile, the government, using the so-called free trade agreements, has allowed the capitalists to close factories in towns and cities across the United States and send those jobs elsewhere, where they could pay those workers even lower wages. The Trans-Pacific Partnership takes this scheme to a whole new level.
Impoverished communities in the United States, places that used to be thriving, are now the target of militarized racist policing, surveillance, and mass incarceration.
Between 1776 and 1976, the U.S. prison population grew to a point where a million people were incarcerated. But in the 20 years after 1976, the prison population doubled again so that more than 2 million people are incarcerated. The United States has 5 percent of the world’s population but 25 percent of the world’s prisoners. The prisons are reserved for the working class and poor exclusively.
Society does not have to be this way. Socialists are fighting for real democracy. The poor should not simply have the right to vote for the candidates of the rich. The huge and vast wealth of this country must be made available and accessible to every person regardless of race, religion, creed or gender. That’s real democracy. That’s socialism.
makati1 on Mon, 26th Sep 2016 9:14 pm
Real democracy never existed and never will.
Plantagenet on Mon, 26th Sep 2016 9:51 pm
Democracy has nothing to do with imaginary rights to houses and imaginary rights to jobs.
Cheers!
Harquebus on Mon, 26th Sep 2016 9:54 pm
“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.” — Winston Churchill
makati1 on Mon, 26th Sep 2016 11:07 pm
Harq, great quote!
rockman on Mon, 26th Sep 2016 11:24 pm
Democracy is a nice concept but not very practical. So every law and regulation would have to be voted on by every “voting age” citizen. But 17 yo’s can’t vote? Every govt policy requires a vote by all citizens? And if there’s some international emergency we all need to vote to resolve it? And who determines the details of that vote…two options…20 options? And for an option to pass it needs a majority?
When I hear someone’s ideas for democracy it’s typically not changing the system but changing TPTB who appear to be having the strongest impact on the system to another set of TPTB who want to impact the system as they seem fit.
From what I heared from Bernie wasn’t so much “Power to the people” as it was “Power to the new national leadership”. Which, in theory, might be OK but only if the new wasn’t as corruptable as the old. Given human nature and the natural corrosion brought on by power it’s difficult to see the development of universal good.
theedrich on Tue, 27th Sep 2016 3:37 am
So the answer is Communism. Same old, same old. The screaming meemies on the left never change their demands. In 1927, J.M. Clark, (in the Journal of Political Economy) pointed out that knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns. But the left is not interested in the fact that the increase of knowledge is dependent first of all on the level of human intelligence, not on decrees from Communist dictators.
Instead, the sinistral demand is to import and expand the masses of low IQs and let them proliferate like flies. Yup, yup. Anything else would be “racism.” Let’s all go down in flames together. Hooray for extinction!
forbin on Tue, 27th Sep 2016 5:21 am
meet the new boss , same as the old boss
Forbin
Cloggie on Tue, 27th Sep 2016 5:33 am
The democracy champ in the western world is Switzerland. They have several binding referendums every year on every topic imaginable.
Is Switzerland drowning in chaos because of it? Are the Swiss voting for “everybody rich now” style referendums?
No, the Swiss are very well able to handle their own affairs in a responsible matter. The result is conservative, mildly-rightwing policies.
The Swiss secret is to stay out of international affairs as much as possible. They became member of that proto commie UN club as late as 2002. No EU-membership. Their secret is non-centralization, their secret is subsidiarity (decision making at the lowest possible political level). Switzerland consists of Germans, French and Italians who live completely segregated and political independent. They have almost nothing to do with each other. The result of it all is a society of the highest quality. Small non-European demography of merely 10% gate-crashers (mostly Asian) is helpful as well.
So real democracy can work extremely well.
But in the rest of the West there is no direct democracy, which leads to the hijacking of the system by “special interests”. All the empty suits are bought and paid for and they all sing the “human rights” and “open society” tune of Washington, owned by the Soros types, a system that needs to be exported… a pretext so we can take over anybody who resists to our empire with global reach. An empire where everybody is eekwel and interchangeable. Egalitarian values turn your society into an empty shell in the end. It happened to the USSR, it will happen to the US.
Way out: secession. Give the center the finger. Radical decentralization. Tar and feathers for politicians from Washington or Brussels pretending they are here to help you, but in reality want control over you.
Ralph on Tue, 27th Sep 2016 6:02 am
The Swiss have a comfortable, well organised society with a decent standard of living and wonderful natural environment, low unemployment, excellent social services and little crime for one reason, and one reason only. They are the bankers to every corrupt politician, wardlord, drug lord, mafioso, and despot on the planet. They keep the money safe, no questions asked, ever, and the rates are very reasonable.
Cloggie on Tue, 27th Sep 2016 6:22 am
It is absolutely true that the Swiss banking system is a blot on Switzerland. But the importance of that industry is receding. The infamous banking secrecy has been severely eroded after a lot of justified international pressure. Since 2014, Switzerland exchanges information with foreign tax offices.
Switzerland has always been a free and democratic society, with or without a criminal banking system.
dave thompson on Tue, 27th Sep 2016 7:54 am
There can only be one country like Switzerland. The rest of the world needs to be opened up for unending capitalistic exploitation of endless growth to exhaustion and collapse for Switzerland to exist.
brough on Tue, 27th Sep 2016 9:38 am
Democracy is a utopian dream that many politians aspire to, but never reach. Lets examine the case of David Cameron Ex- prime minister of the UK. He let the people choose if they wished to be in the EU or not and where is he now?. Meanwhile her majesties opposition, the labour party, have decided if they get into power before article 50 is implimented they will stop the Brexit process altogether. So much for socialism being the bastion of democracy. In the coming years, if the UK leaves the EU or not, it will be a real test to see if democracy is real or just a utopian dream. By the way, I do believe that democracy is much stronger in the USA than it is here in the UK.
Apneaman on Tue, 27th Sep 2016 12:59 pm
Signs of the new system already here depending where you at.
Scenes From New England’s Drought: Dry Wells, Dead Fish and Ailing Farms
“Living on Borrowed Water
KINGSTON, N.H. — One day in August, Roxy Moore, 70, went to the faucet to make coffee, and the water trickled to nothing. Her well had gone dry for the first time in the 33 years she had lived here.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/scenes-from-new-englands-drought-dry-wells-dead-fish-and-ailing-farms.html
penury on Tue, 27th Sep 2016 3:18 pm
As Apneaman above says, your new system of government is coming. When dealing with a group of humans as diverse as you have in most nations a true national consensus is extremely hard to develop. (war is always the exception) My experience shows that the same people dominate all organizations and the followers are easy for them to “convince”.
Boat on Wed, 28th Sep 2016 9:16 am
Clog,
Let’s look at the Middle East. If that oil was disrupted much of the entire consuming world would have had huge disruption. It’s hard to have just in time inventory if trucks, planes and rail don’t roll.
Switzerland, Sweden etc depend on the US and it’s Allies to keep life as we know it going.
Take Kansas, they are in the middle of the states. They have great wind, potential solar, oil, nat gas, lightly populated, beef and grain are huge exports. They would be a perfect state to succeed with few problems. What is their potential problem? They are one of the most land locked areas in the world. They totally rely on the rest of the US and it’s Allies for the safe exports of their goods to the world.
All countries/Switzerland and states should be involved in paying the costs to keep trade flowing.
You want trade free and safe? Talk China, Russia, Iran, Syria, N Korea etc. into establishing binding international courts to solve disputes. Oh yea, free your people.
Apneaman on Wed, 28th Sep 2016 3:36 pm
Good luck with the new overshoot systems, killer apes. As the great unraveling continues more humans will be reverting to their base instincts.
Our prehistoric ancestors were as violent as humans today
Research shows we’ve always been aggressive towards each other – as have other primates, suggesting the lethal streak runs deep.
““It is widely acknowledged that evolution has shaped human violence,” the researchers write.”
““Violence can be seen as an adaptive strategy, favouring the perpetrator’s reproductive success in terms of mates, status or resources.”
“The team calculated the percentage of deaths caused by members within the same species, which might include aggression, infanticide or cannibalism; or, among humans, war, homicide or execution.
According to the findings, interpersonal violence represents about 2% of all deaths across the history of humans. This number was close to the estimates for our evolutionary ancestors, which may suggest a certain amount of our tendency to kill each other is built into us from way back when our species first evolved.”
“The researchers suggest that as well as having evolved among a particularly violent group of mammals, our social behaviour and territorial tendencies only serve to increase the propensity for violence towards one another.
“We were, at the dawn of humankind, as violent as expected considering the common mammalian evolutionary history,” the paper claims.”
https://cosmosmagazine.com/society/our-prehistoric-ancestors-were-as-violent-as-modern-humans
Apneaman on Wed, 28th Sep 2016 3:50 pm
Climate change projected to outpace rates of niche change in grasses posing threat to staple foods, say scientists
Experts reveal global warming is typically occuring 5,000 times faster than the estimated speed at which grasses could adapt
“The researchers, led by Dr John Wiens, from the University of Arizona in the US, wrote: “We show that past rates of climatic niche change in grasses are much slower than rates of future projected climate change, suggesting that extinctions might occur in many species and/or local populations.
”This has several troubling implications, for both global biodiversity and human welfare.
“Grasses are an important food source for humans (especially rice, wheat and corn). Evolutionary adaptation seems particularly unlikely for domesticated species … and even local declines may be devastating for some human populations.”
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/climate-change-grasses-outpace-niche-change-threat-staple-foods-scientists-a7334076.html