NEW! Members Only Forums!

Access more articles, news & discussion by becoming a PeakOil.com Member.
Register Today...
It's FREE!


QUOTE O’ THE DAY

"It is not possible to continue infinite consumption and infinite population growth on a finite planet.”
-- Michael Ruppert, WSJ, 4/11/09


Login



Peak Oil is You


donate bitcoins ;-) or paypal :-)


Page added on April 26, 2012

Bookmark and Share

Debbie Chachra: peak plastic

Consumption

Dr Debbie Chachra is a materials scientist: an engineering professor at the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering (Deb’s bio at Olin), and a prolific writer.  She also produces one of my favourite tumblrs, Daily Idioms.   Basically, I learn something every time Deb writes anything.  So I asked her to write to you about whatever was on her mind, and she said this:

 

Plasticity has its grand tradition and main stream, which happens to flow by way of du Pont and their famous employee Carothers, known as The Great Synthesist. His classic study of large molecules spanned the decade of the twenties and brought us directly to nylon, which not only is a delight to the fetishist and a convenience to the armed insurgent, but was also, at the time and well within the System, an announcement of Plasticity’s central canon: that chemists were no longer to be at the mercy of Nature. They could decide now what properties they wanted a molecule to have, and then go ahead and build it.
Thomas Pynchon, Gravity’s Rainbow (1973)

I’m a materials scientist by training, and that means that I spend a lot of time thinking about the stuff that makes up our physical environment. How plate glass is an unappreciated marvel, manufactured by floating infinite ribbons of optically-clear glass on canals of molten tin. Or how aluminium went from being a gift for kings to being, literally, disposable with the advent of large-scale electricity generation.

And one of the things I’ve been thinking about recently is peak plastic.

The use of oil for fuel is dominant, and there’s a reason for that. Oil is remarkable—not only does it have an insanely high energy density (energy stored per unit mass), but it also allows for a high energy flux. In about 90 seconds, I can fill the tank of my car—and that’s enough energy to move it at highway speeds for five hours—but my phone, which uses a tiny fraction of the energy, needs to be charged overnight. So we’ll need to replace what oil can do alone in two different ways: new sources of renewable energy, and also better batteries to store it in. And there’s no Moore’s Law for batteries. Getting something that’s even close to the energy density and flux of oil will require new materials chemistry, and researchers are working hard to create better batteries. But this combination of energy density and flux is valuable enough that we’ll likely still extract every drop of oil that we can, to use as fuel.

But if we’re running out of oil, that also means that we’re running out of plastic. Compared to fuel and agriculture, plastic is small potatoes. Even though plastics are made on a massive industrial scale, they still account for less than 10% of the world’s oil consumption. So recycling plastic saves plastic and reduces its impact on the environment, but it certainly isn’t going to save us from the end of oil. Peak oil means peak plastic. And that means that much of the physical world around us will have to change.

Plastic is more than just water bottles and Tupperware. If you’re indoors, look around. There’s a good bet that much of what’s in your field of view is made of plastic. Paint. Carpeting. Upholstery. The finish on a wood floor. Veneer on furniture. And that’s before you go into your kitchen, or bathroom, and never mind a subway car or a hospital (disposable, sterile medical supplies, anyone?). Plastic is so ubiquitous that it’s almost invisible.

In the last century or so, chemists and chemical engineers have done as Pynchon described, and developed thousands of plastics for use in tens of thousands of applications, if not more. That means that we’ll need to find replacements for these oil-based plastics for every one of those uses, probably from previously unconsidered renewable sources. It’ll be a different world.

There’ll likely still be applications that really need petroplastic, so landfills will become goldmines. The characteristic drawback of plastic, its stubborn resistance to degradation (‘this plastic bag will still be around in ten thousand years!’) will become a virtue, as it sits unchanged in anaerobic landfills waiting for us to decide that it’s worth excavating and recycling. And one day we’ll do just that–there’ll come a point when the easy, albeit expensive, way to get a particular combination of properties (formability, degradation resistance, sterilisability) will be to dig up post-consumer plastics and reuse them.

And one day in the future, cool, slick petroplastics will become a repository of warm nostalgia. I like to imagine the Brooklyn-hipsters-of-the-future, on their rooftops, using vodka and bitter almond oil to make artisanal polyethylene.

Warren Ellis



2 Comments on "Debbie Chachra: peak plastic"

  1. DC on Thu, 26th Apr 2012 2:28 pm 

    …I dont want replacements for plastics. I just want them to go away-period! I am well aware, the next to nuclear waste they are the longest lived toxins we produce, plastics will be around to poison us for thousands of years, even if we stoped makeing them this afternoon. Humanity built great and powerful and complex civiliations without plastic salad shooters and tupperwear. Now, we wouldnt know how to.

    All that plastic crap he thinks well be digging up to re-use..Hah! Stuff is nearly as toxic as oil itself once it breaks down into tiny near-invisible ‘nurdles’. If anything, well be hand collecting all the plastic we can so we can dispose of it at centralized locations in a futile effort to keep it form doing anymore damage. ‘Recycling’ something as toxic as plastic is a fools game, IMHO. Once the suburbs are farmland again, unless all the plastic shyt inhabiting N.A. homes is removed and diposed of 1st, it will a toxic harvest for centuries, or even longer. And worst is, unless they retain our scientific knowledge, people of the future will have no idea why they are all so sick…..

  2. BillT on Thu, 26th Apr 2012 3:18 pm 

    Warren assumes that there will still be energy available to recycle the components of used plastic into new forms. Not going to happen. It would take as much energy to remake a plastic case for your lap top as it took to make the one on your lap. Maybe more.

    The only way to use the energy captured in that solid oil is to … burn it for heat to produce steam. And since most plastics contain deadly chemicals that would be released into the air by combustion, that is not likely to happen either.

    Yes, someday, assuming that humanity survives, someone will dig into a big hill and find that it is made of plastic garbage. Can you imagine that they might think of a broken car bumper or packaging peanuts? Or a cracked flat panel with a partially eaten apple engraved on it? There will be so many that they will assume that it was some important part of 21st century life, but they will have no idea what it was for, just like anyone under 30 today would wonder what a glass cylinder with a lot of corroded tiny prongs sticking out of the end was used for.