Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Sponsors
Forex Reviews
User Comments

Training
Managed Accounts
Forex Broker
 
Member Quotes
I'm just saying that you shouldn't test an anti-gravity device by jumping off the top of a building.

BigTex

Suggest Quote

 
PeakSpeak
"PeakSpeak"
"Shadizar"
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
PO Email!
 
More-Powerful Solar Cells
Hydrocarbon AlternativesAn MIT researcher has found a way to significantly improve the efficiently of an important type of silicon solar cells while keeping costs about the same. The technology is being commercialized by a startup in Lexington, MA, called 1366 Technologies, which today announced its first round of funding. Venture capitalists invested $12.8 million in the company.

1366 Technologies claims that it improves the efficiency--a measure of the electricity generated from a given amount of light--of multicrystalline silicon solar cells by 27 percent compared with conventional ones. The company's efficiency and cost claims are based on results from small solar cells (about two centimeters across) made in the lab of Emanuel Sachs, a professor of mechanical engineering at MIT, who is one of the company's founders. 1366 Technologies is building a pilot-scale manufacturing plant that will make full-sized solar cells (about 15 centimeters across). Within a year, the company will decide whether its pilot-plant results justify building a factory for commercial production, Sachs says.

Commercial solar cells made from multicrystalline silicon are normally far less efficient than more expensive ones made from single-crystal silicon, but they're cheaper. The 27 percent improvement will bring multicrystalline cells to efficiencies about the same as single-crystal cells--around 19.5 percent--at the lower costs. So, if the technology successfully scales up, Sachs says, it could significantly bring down the cost of solar electricity. Sachs says that today, solar cells cost about $2.10 per watt generated. When manufactured at a commercial scale, the first cells incorporating his new technology will cost $1.65 per watt. Planned improvements will bring down this cost to about $1.30 a watt, he says. To compete with coal, the cost will need to come down to about $1 a watt, something that Sachs predicts can be achieved by 2012 with further improvements in antireflection coatings and other anticipated advances.

Technology Review

Posted on Thursday, March 27 @ 04:46:37 EDT by waegari
 
Related Links
· More about Hydrocarbon Alternatives
· News by waegari


Most read story about Hydrocarbon Alternatives:
You can close the site now, energy problems are solved.

 
Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad

 
Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

 Send to a Friend Send to a Friend

 
"Login" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: More-Powerful Solar Cells (Score: 1)
by drayor on Thursday, March 27 @ 12:40:06 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
So, tell me how these are any better at surviving the EMP pulses when the nations nook each other over 200 dollar a barrel oil;?
There is no solution, you are wasting your time here.



Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed