Peak Oil News

 

 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Ask Jane
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Follow on Twitter
 Members
 User Panel
 Members List
 PO Team
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
Abiotic oil debunking is a regular thing around here. New members who have not done their homework bring it up as a solution to the worlds problems. Posting a reply uses more energy than will ever be generated by such a thing.

kpeavey

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Links

Net App Training
Aaron
 
CERA: ''Peak Oil'' theory is wrong
Public Policy; Political and Legal NewsPeak Oil Theory – “World Running Out of Oil Soon” – Is Faulty; Could Distort Policy & Energy Debate

Correct Model for Post-2030 Oil Supply is Undulating Plateau

In contrast to a widely discussed theory that world oil production will soon reach a peak and go into sharp decline, a new analysis of the subject by Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA) finds that the remaining global oil resource base is actually 3.74 trillion barrels -- three times as large as the 1.2 trillion barrels estimated by the theory’s proponents -- and that the “peak oil” argument is based on faulty analysis which could, if accepted, distort critical policy and investment decisions and cloud the debate over the energy future.


CAMBRIDGE, Mass., November 14, 2006 – In contrast to a widely discussed theory that world oil production will soon reach a peak and go into sharp decline, a new analysis of the subject by Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA) finds that the remaining global oil resource base is actually 3.74 trillion barrels -- three times as large as the 1.2 trillion barrels estimated by the theory’s proponents -- and that the “peak oil” argument is based on faulty analysis which could, if accepted, distort critical policy and investment decisions and cloud the debate over the energy future.

“The global resource base of conventional and unconventional oils, including historical production of 1.08 trillion barrels and yet-to-be-produced resources, is 4.82 trillion barrels and likely to grow,” CERA Director of Oil Industry Activity Peter M. Jackson writes in Why the Peak Oil Theory Falls Down: Myths, Legends, and the Future of Oil Resources. The CERA projection is based on the firm’s analysis of fields currently in production and those yet-to-be produced or discovered.

“The ‘peak oil’ theory causes confusion and can lead to inappropriate actions and turn attention away from the real issues,” Jackson observes. “Oil is too critical to the global economy to allow fear to replace careful analysis about the very real challenges with delivering liquid fuels to meet the needs of growing economies. This is a very important debate, and as such it deserves a rational and measured discourse.”

“This is the fifth time that the world is said to be running out of oil,” says CERA Chairman Daniel Yergin. “Each time -- whether it was the ‘gasoline famine’ at the end of WWI or the ‘permanent shortage’ of the 1970s -- technology and the opening of new frontier areas has banished the specter of decline. There’s no reason to think that technology is finished this time.”

CERA

Posted on Tuesday, November 14 @ 12:43:21 PST by leanan
 
Related Links
· More about Public Policy; Political and Legal News
· News by leanan


Most read story about Public Policy; Political and Legal News:
ARE We Out of Gas Yet?

 
Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad

 
Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

 
"CERA: ''Peak Oil'' theory is wrong" | Login/Create an Account | 7 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: CERA: ''Peak Oil'' theory is wrong (Score: 1)
by No-Oil on Tuesday, November 14 @ 13:14:08 PST
(User Info ) http://www.cwbr22088.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
And who pray tell paid them for this startling revelation, with no supporting data !?  Obviously couldn't be a a vested interest now, could it ?



Re: CERA: ''Peak Oil'' theory is wrong (Score: 1)
by geistlos on Tuesday, November 14 @ 16:45:27 PST
(User Info )
It's fucking Daniel Yergin again. I'd really love to run into that guy in 10 years. If he's wrong I'd like to punch him in the throat at that time.



Re: CERA: ''Peak Oil'' theory is wrong (Score: 1)
by keehah on Tuesday, November 14 @ 17:44:10 PST
(User Info )
I see CERA backtracking from last years report with a greater dose of denial.   As awareness and knowledge of the issue grows CERA's reports must adapt.  Seems they know the difference between competent shill and laughable shill.



Re: CERA: ''Peak Oil'' theory is wrong (Score: 1)
by Graeme on Tuesday, November 14 @ 19:24:23 PST
(User Info )
It doesn't matter if there is 3.7 trillion or 10 trillion barrels of unconventional oil reserves. This is a red herring. The real problem is that we are turning the Earth into Venus. We have to stop burning fossil fuels within 10 years otherwise we're toast. Why can't policy makers recognise this!



Re: CERA: ''Peak Oil'' theory is wrong (Score: 1)
by waegari on Wednesday, November 15 @ 09:44:33 PST
(User Info )
The red herring is even redder than that. No PO theorist that I know of, denies the abundance of unconventional oil, now, does anyone? Having to resort to those with their lower EROEI and other drawbacks (ecological stress when it comes to oil sands, just to name one) in the not too long run is exactly the problem. We have to repeat this over and over again.